ABSTRACT
Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is a genetic disease characterized by replacement of ventricular myocardium with fibrofatty tissue, predisposing the patient to ventricular arrhythmias and/or sudden cardiac death. Most cases of ACM are associated with pathogenic variants in genes that encode desmosomal proteins, an important cell-to-cell adhesion complex present in both the heart and skin tissue. Although ACM was first described as a disease predominantly of the right ventricle, it is now acknowledged that it can also primarily involve the left ventricle or both ventricles. The original right-dominant phenotype is traditionally diagnosed using the 2010 task force criteria, a multifactorial algorithm divided into major and minor criteria consisting of structural criteria based on two-dimensional echocardiographic, cardiac MRI, or right ventricular angiographic findings; tissue characterization based on endomyocardial biopsy results; repolarization and depolarization abnormalities based on electrocardiographic findings; arrhythmic features; and family history. Shortfalls in the task force criteria due to the modern understanding of the disease have led to development of the Padua criteria, which include updated criteria for diagnosis of the right-dominant phenotype and new criteria for diagnosis of the left-predominant and biventricular phenotypes. In addition to incorporating cardiac MRI findings of ventricular dilatation, systolic dysfunction, and regional wall motion abnormalities, the new Padua criteria emphasize late gadolinium enhancement at cardiac MRI as a key feature in diagnosis and imaging-based tissue characterization. Conditions to consider in the differential diagnosis of the right-dominant phenotype include various other causes of right ventricular dilatation such as left-to-right shunts and variants of normal right ventricular anatomy that can be misinterpreted as abnormalities. The left-dominant phenotype can mimic myocarditis at imaging and clinical examination. Additional considerations for the differential diagnosis of ACM, particularly for the left-dominant phenotype, include sarcoidosis and dilated cardiomyopathy. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.
Subject(s)
Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia , Cardiomyopathies , Humans , Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia/diagnostic imaging , Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia/genetics , Contrast Media , Gadolinium , Cardiomyopathies/diagnostic imaging , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnostic imaging , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/geneticsABSTRACT
Pediatric heart disease is a large and diverse field with an overall prevalence estimated at 6 to 13 per 1,000 live births. This document discusses appropriateness of advanced imaging for a broad range of variants. Diseases covered include tetralogy of Fallot, transposition of great arteries, congenital or acquired pediatric coronary artery abnormality, single ventricle, aortopathy, anomalous pulmonary venous return, aortopathy and aortic coarctation, with indications for advanced imaging spanning the entire natural history of the disease in children and adults, including initial diagnosis, treatment planning, treatment monitoring, and early detection of complications. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Heart Diseases , Adult , Child , Humans , Diagnosis, Differential , Diagnostic Imaging/methods , Societies, Medical , United StatesABSTRACT
This document discusses preprocedural planning for transcatheter aortic valve replacement, evaluating the imaging modalities used in initial imaging for preprocedure planning under two variants 1) Preintervention planning for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: assessment of aortic root; and 2) Preintervention planning for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: assessment of supravalvular aorta and vascular access. US echocardiography transesophageal, MRI heart function and morphology without and with IV contrast, MRI heart function and morphology without IV contrast and CT heart function and morphology with IV contrast are usually appropriate for assessment of aortic root. CTA chest with IV contrast, CTA abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast, CTA chest abdomen pelvis with IV contrast are usually appropriate for assessment of supravalvular aorta and vascular access. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Subject(s)
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Societies, Medical , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , United StatesABSTRACT
Computed Tomography (CT) imaging is routinely used for imaging of the lungs. Deep learning can effectively automate complex and laborious tasks in medical imaging. In this work, a deep learning technique is utilized to assess lobar fissure completeness (also known as fissure integrity) from pulmonary CT images. The human lungs are divided into five separate lobes, divided by the lobar fissures. Fissure integrity assessment is important to endobronchial valve treatment screening. Fissure integrity is known to be a biomarker of collateral ventilation between lobes impacting the efficacy of valves designed to block airflow to diseased lung regions. Fissure integrity is also likely to impact lobar sliding which has recently been shown to affect lung biomechanics. Further widescale study of fissure integrity's impact on disease susceptibility and progression requires rapid, reproducible, and noninvasive fissure integrity assessment. In this paper we describe IntegrityNet, an attention U-Net based automatic fissure integrity analysis tool. IntegrityNet is able to predict fissure integrity with an accuracy of 95.8%, 96.1%, and 89.8% for left oblique, right oblique, and right horizontal fissures, compared to manual analysis on a dataset of 82 subjects. We also show that our method is robust to COPD severity and reproducible across subject scans acquired at different time points.
Subject(s)
Labor, Obstetric , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Humans , Pregnancy , Female , Biomechanical Phenomena , Pleural Cavity , Lung/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
Pulmonary embolism (PE) remains a common and important clinical condition that cannot be accurately diagnosed on the basis of signs, symptoms, and history alone. The diagnosis of PE has been facilitated by technical advancements and multidetector CT pulmonary angiography, which is the major diagnostic modality currently used. Ventilation and perfusion scans remain largely accurate and useful in certain settings. MR angiography can be useful in some clinical scenarios and lower-extremity ultrasound can substitute by demonstrating deep vein thrombosis; however, if negative, further studies to exclude PE are indicated. In all cases, correlation with the clinical status, particularly with risk factors, improves not only the accuracy of diagnostic imaging but also overall utilization. Other diagnostic tests have limited roles. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer-reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances in which peer-reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Subject(s)
Pulmonary Embolism , Societies, Medical , Humans , Evidence-Based Medicine , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging , Lower Extremity , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Dyspnea is the symptom of perceived breathing discomfort and is commonly encountered in a variety of clinical settings. Cardiac etiologies of dyspnea are an important consideration; among these, valvular heart disease (Variant 1), arrhythmia (Variant 2), and pericardial disease (Variant 3) are reviewed in this document. Imaging plays an important role in the clinical assessment of these suspected abnormalities, with usually appropriate procedures including resting transthoracic echocardiography in all three variants, radiography for Variants 1 and 3, MRI heart function and morphology in Variants 2 and 3, and CT heart function and morphology with intravenous contrast for Variant 3. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Subject(s)
Heart Diseases , Societies, Medical , Dyspnea/diagnostic imaging , Dyspnea/etiology , Heart Diseases/complications , Humans , Ischemia , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/adverse effects , United StatesABSTRACT
Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) evaluation of chest pain patients in an emergency department (ED) is considered appropriate. While a "negative" CCTA interpretation supports direct patient discharge from an ED, labor-intensive analyses are required, with accuracy in jeopardy from distractions. We describe the development of an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm and workflow for assisting qualified interpreting physicians in CCTA screening for total absence of coronary atherosclerosis. The two-phase approach consisted of (1) phase 1-development and preliminary testing of an algorithm for vessel-centerline extraction classification in a balanced study population (n = 500 with 50% disease prevalence) derived by retrospective random case selection, and (2) phase 2-simulated clinical Trialing of developed algorithm on a per-case (entire coronary artery tree) basis in a more "real-world" study population (n = 100 with 28% disease prevalence) from an ED chest pain series. This allowed pre-deployment evaluation of the AI-based CCTA screening application which provides vessel-by-vessel graphic display of algorithm inference results integrated into a clinically capable viewer. Algorithm performance evaluation used area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC); confusion matrices reflected ground truth vs AI determinations. The vessel-based algorithm demonstrated strong performance with AUC-ROC = 0.96. In both phase 1 and phase 2, independent of disease prevalence differences, negative predictive values at the case level were very high at 95%. The rate of completion of the algorithm workflow process (96% with inference results in 55-80 s) in phase 2 depended on adequate image quality. There is potential for this AI application to assist in CCTA interpretation to help extricate atherosclerosis from chest pain presentations.
Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Artificial Intelligence , Chest Pain/diagnostic imaging , Computed Tomography Angiography , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Nonischemic cardiomyopathies encompass a broad spectrum of myocardial disorders with mechanical or electrical dysfunction without evidence of ischemia. There are five broad variants of nonischemic cardiomyopathies; hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (Variant 1), restrictive or infiltrative cardiomyopathy (Variant 2), dilated or unclassified cardiomyopathy (Variant 3), arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (Variant 4), and inflammatory cardiomyopathy (Variant 5). For variants 1, 3, and 4, resting transthoracic echocardiography, MRI heart function and morphology without and with contrast, and MRI heart function and morphology without contrast are the usually appropriate imaging modalities. For variants 2 and 5, resting transthoracic echocardiography and MRI heart function and morphology without and with contrast are the usually appropriate imaging modalities. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Subject(s)
Cardiomyopathies , Heart Diseases , Myocardial Ischemia , Cardiomyopathies/diagnostic imaging , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Societies, Medical , United StatesABSTRACT
Chest pain is a frequent cause for emergency department visits and inpatient evaluation, with particular concern for acute coronary syndrome as an etiology, since cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in the United States. Although history-based, electrocardiographic, and laboratory evaluations have shown promise in identifying coronary artery disease, early accurate diagnosis is paramount and there is an important role for imaging examinations to determine the presence and extent of anatomic coronary abnormality and ischemic physiology, to guide management with regard to optimal medical therapy or revascularization, and ultimately to thereby improve patient outcomes. A summary of the various methods for initial imaging evaluation of suspected acute coronary syndrome is outlined in this document. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Chest Pain/diagnostic imaging , Chest Pain/etiology , Diagnostic Imaging , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Societies, Medical , United StatesABSTRACT
Lung transplantation is an established therapeutic option for patients with irreversible end-stage pulmonary disease limiting life expectancy and quality of life. Common indications for lung transplantation include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, cystic fibrosis, pulmonary arterial hypertension, and alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. Complications of lung transplantation can be broadly divided etiologically into surgical, infectious, immunologic, or neoplastic. Moreover, specific complications often occur within a certain time interval following surgery, which can be broadly classified as early (<6 wk), intermediate (6 wk to 6 mo), and late (>6 mo). Thus, each group of complications can further be categorized on the basis of the time continuum from transplantation. Imaging, primarily by high-resolution computed tomography, plays a critical role in early diagnosis of complications after lung transplantation. Early recognition of complications by the radiologist, and initiation of therapy, contributes to improved morbidity and mortality. However, accurate diagnosis is only feasible if one has a thorough understanding of the major etiologic categories of complications and how they relate to the time course since transplantation. We review imaging manifestations of lung transplant complications via a framework that includes the following major etiologic categories: surgical; infectious; immunologic; and neoplastic; and the following time frames: surgery to 6 weeks; 6 weeks to 6 months; and beyond 6 months. We propose this approach as a logical, evidence-based algorithm to construct a narrow, optimal differential diagnosis of lung transplantation complications.
Subject(s)
Lung Transplantation , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , HumansABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate magnetic resonance angiography sequences during the contrast steady-state (SS-MRA) using inversion recovery (IR) with fast low-angle shot (IR-FLASH) or steady-state free precession (IR-SSFP) read-outs, following the injection of a blood-pool contrast agent, and compare them to first-pass MR angiography (FP-MRA) in adults with congenital heart disease (CHD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three adult patients with CHD who underwent both SS-MRA and FP-MRA using a 1.5-T scanner were retrospectively identified. Signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios were obtained at eight locations within the aorta and pulmonary vessels.. Image quality and the presence of artifacts were subjectively assessed by two radiologists. The presence of pathology was noted and given a confidence score. RESULTS: There was no difference in vessel dimensions among the sequences. IR-SSFP showed better image quality and fewer artifacts than IR-FLASH and FP-MRA. Confidence scores were significantly higher for SS-MRA compared to FP-MRA. Seven cases (30.4%) had findings detected at SS-MRA that were not detected at FP-MRA, and 2 cases (8.7%) had findings detected by IR-SSFP only. CONCLUSION: SS-MRA of the thoracic vasculature using a blood pool contrast agent offers superior image quality and reveals more abnormalities compared to standard FP-MRA in adults with CHD, and it is best achieved with an IR-SSFP sequence. These sequences could lead to increased detection rates of abnormalities and provide a simpler protocol image acquisition.
Subject(s)
Contrast Media/administration & dosage , Gadolinium/administration & dosage , Heart Defects, Congenital/diagnosis , Image Enhancement/methods , Magnetic Resonance Angiography/methods , Organometallic Compounds/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Aorta/abnormalities , Aortic Diseases/diagnosis , Aortic Valve/abnormalities , Artifacts , Dilatation, Pathologic/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Pulmonary Artery/abnormalities , Retrospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to determine the lowest multidetector-row computed tomographic radiation dose parameters for the detection of pneumothorax after thoracic intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anthropomorphic chest phantom containing pneumothoraces was imaged with different tube voltages (80, 100, and 120 kV[p]) and tube currents (10, 20, 40, 75, and 110 mAs). The images were reconstructed with both filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms. Two blinded radiologists scored images independently for the presence or absence of pneumothorax. Effective dose, image noise, contrast-to-noise ratio, and signal-to-noise ratio were recorded. RESULTS: At radiation dose below 0.48 mSv, sensitivity for the detection of pneumothorax decreased in both reconstruction algorithms (80% for FBP vs 83% for IR; P > 0.05). Interobserver agreement was good (k = 0.78). The IR data sets showed lower image noise as well as higher signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio when compared with FBP on all acquisition parameters (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Very low computed tomographic dose parameters may be suitable for confident detection of small pneumothoraces after intervention.
Subject(s)
Algorithms , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Multidetector Computed Tomography/methods , Pneumothorax/diagnostic imaging , Radiation Dosage , Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , Humans , Male , Multidetector Computed Tomography/instrumentation , Observer Variation , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , Signal-To-Noise RatioABSTRACT
The tarsometatarsal, or Lisfranc, joint complex provides stability to the midfoot and forefoot through intricate osseous relationships between the distal tarsal bones and metatarsal bases and their connections with stabilizing ligamentous support structures. Lisfranc joint injuries are relatively uncommon, and their imaging findings can be subtle. These injuries have typically been divided into high-impact fracture-displacements, which are often seen after motor vehicle collisions, and low-impact midfoot sprains, which are more commonly seen in athletes. The injury mechanism often influences the imaging findings, and classification systems based primarily on imaging features have been developed to help diagnose and treat these injuries. Patients may have significant regional swelling and pain that prevent thorough physical examination or may have other more critical injuries at initial posttrauma evaluation. These factors may cause diagnostic delays and lead to subsequent morbidities, such as midfoot instability, deformity, and debilitating osteoarthritis. Missed Lisfranc ligament injuries are among the most common causes of litigation against radiologists and emergency department physicians. Radiologists must understand the pathophysiology of these injuries and the patterns of imaging findings seen at conventional radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging to improve injury detection and obtain additional information for referring physicians that may affect the selection of the injury classification system, treatment, and prognosis.
Subject(s)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Metatarsal Bones/diagnostic imaging , Metatarsal Bones/injuries , Tarsal Joints/diagnostic imaging , Tarsal Joints/injuries , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , HumansABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the influence of atherosclerotic plaques on femoral haemodynamics assessed by two-dimensional (2D) phase-contrast (PC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with three-directional velocity encoding. METHODS: During 1 year, patients with peripheral artery disease and an ankle brachial index <1.00 were enrolled. After institutional review board approval and written informed consent, 44 patients (age, 70 ± 12 years) underwent common femoral artery MRI. Patients with contra-indications for MRI were excluded. Sequences included 2D time-of-flight, proton-density, T1-weighted and T2-weighted MRI. Electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated 2D PC-MRI with 3D velocity encoding was acquired. A radiologist classified images in five categories. Blood flow, velocity and wall shear stress (WSS) along the vessel circumference were quantified from the PC-MRI data. RESULTS: The acquired images were of good quality for interpretation. There were no image quality problems related to poor ECG-gating or slice positioning. Velocities, oscillatory shear stress and total flow were similar between patients with normal arteries and wall thickening/plaque. Patients with plaques demonstrated regionally increased peak systolic WSS and enhanced WSS eccentricity. CONCLUSIONS: Combined multi-contrast morphological imaging of the peripheral arterial wall with PC-MRI with three-directional velocity encoding is a feasible technique. Further study is needed to determine whether flow is an appropriate marker for altered endothelial cell function, vascular remodelling and plaque progression. KEY POINTS: ⢠Femoral plaques are associated with altered dynamics of peripheral blood flow. ⢠Multi-contrast MRI can investigate the presence and type of atherosclerotic plaques. ⢠Three-dimensional velocity-encoding phase-contrast MRI can investigate flow and wall shear stress. ⢠Atherosclerotic peripheral arteries demonstrate increased systolic velocities and wall shear stress.
Subject(s)
Femoral Artery/physiopathology , Peripheral Arterial Disease/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Femoral Artery/pathology , Hemodynamics , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Observational Studies as Topic , Peripheral Arterial Disease/pathology , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Stress, Mechanical , SystoleABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluates a semi-automated method for Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm (TAA) measurement using ECG-gated Dual Source CT Angiogram (DSCTA). METHODS: This retrospective HIPAA compliant study was approved by our IRB. Transaxial maximum diameters of outer wall to outer wall were studied in fifty patients at seven anatomic locations of the thoracic aorta: annulus, sinus, sinotubular junction (STJ), mid ascending aorta (MAA) at the level of right pulmonary artery, proximal aortic arch (PROX) immediately proximal to innominate artery, distal aortic arch (DIST) immediately distal to left subclavian artery, and descending aorta (DESC) at the level of diaphragm. Measurements were performed using a manual method and semi-automated software. All readers repeated their measurements. Inter-method, intra-observer and inter-observer agreements were evaluated according to intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plot. The number of cases with manual contouring or center line adjustment for the semi-automated method and also the post-processing time for each method were recorded. RESULTS: The mean difference between semi-automated and manual methods was less than 1.3mm at all seven points. Strong inter-method, inter-observer and intra-observer agreement was recorded at all levels (ICC ≥ 0.9). The maximum rate of manual adjustment of center line and contour was at the level of annulus. The average time for manual post-processing of the aorta was 19 ± 0.3 min, while it took 8.26 ± 2.1 min to do the measurements with the semi-automated tool (Vitrea version 6.0.0.1 software). The center line was edited manually at all levels, with most corrections at the level of annulus (60%), while the contour was adjusted at all levels with highest and lowest number of corrections at the levels of annulus and DESC (75% and 0.07% of the cases), respectively. CONCLUSION: Compared to the commonly used manual method, semi-automated measurement of vessel dimensions is feasible in the thoracic aorta with the advantage of reduced post-processing time.
Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/diagnostic imaging , Aortography/methods , Cardiac-Gated Imaging Techniques/methods , Pattern Recognition, Automated/methods , Radiography, Dual-Energy Scanned Projection/methods , Software , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Algorithms , Aorta, Thoracic , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , User-Computer InterfaceABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate two nonenhanced MRA methods: quiescent-interval single-shot (QISS) and Native SPACE (NATIVE = Non-contrast Angiography of the Arteries and Veins; SPACE = Sampling Perfection with Application Optimized Contrast by using different flip angle Evolution), using contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CEMRA) as a reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients (14 male; mean, 69.3 years old) referred for lower extremity MRA were recruited in a HIPAA-compliant prospective study. QISS and Native SPACE of the lower extremities were performed at 1.5 Tesla with a hybrid dual-injection contrast-enhanced MRA as reference. Image quality and stenosis severity were assessed in segments by two blinded radiologists. Methods were compared with logistic regression for correlated data for diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: Of 496 arterial segments, 24 were considered nondiagnostic on the Native SPACE images. There were no QISS or CEMRA imaging segments considered to be nondiagnostic. Image quality was significantly higher for QISS than for Native SPACE. QISS stenosis sensitivity (84.9%) was not significantly different from Native SPACE (87.3%). QISS had better specificity (95.6%) than Native SPACE (87.0%), P = 0.0041. In comparison with QISS, Native SPACE proved less robust for imaging of the abdominal and pelvic segments. CONCLUSION: Native SPACE and QISS were sensitive for hemodynamically significant stenosis in this pilot study. QISS NEMRA demonstrated superior specificity and image quality, and was more robust in the abdominal and pelvic regions.
Subject(s)
Arterial Occlusive Diseases/pathology , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Ischemia/pathology , Leg/blood supply , Magnetic Resonance Angiography/methods , Peripheral Arterial Disease/pathology , Aged , Contrast Media , Female , Humans , Image Enhancement/methods , Leg/pathology , Male , Pilot Projects , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
Although standard magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) has many advantages in the evaluation of peripheral artery disease, it has poorer spatial resolution compared with computed tomographic angiography and digital subtraction angiography. The MRA blood pool contrast agents have an extended half-life. By allowing longer imaging times, MRA enables the acquisition of high-resolution images as well as providing simultaneous visualization of both arteries and veins. Two cases of popliteal artery aneurysm are presented, in which MRA with a blood pool contrast agent provided critical clues to the correct diagnosis: a traumatic pseudoaneurysm of the popliteal artery caused by a femoral osteochondroma and a large fusiform popliteal aneurysm compressing the adjacent popliteal vein, causing venous congestion and leg pain.
Subject(s)
Aneurysm/diagnosis , Contrast Media , Gadolinium , Magnetic Resonance Angiography , Organometallic Compounds , Popliteal Artery/pathology , Adolescent , Aneurysm/etiology , Aneurysm/pathology , Aneurysm/surgery , Aneurysm, False/diagnosis , Aneurysm, False/pathology , Aneurysm, False/surgery , Femoral Neoplasms/complications , Femoral Neoplasms/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osteochondroma/complications , Osteochondroma/diagnosis , Popliteal Artery/surgery , Predictive Value of Tests , Vascular Surgical ProceduresABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To depict treatment response to chemoradiotherapy by comparing tumor growth rate between treated and untreated patients and to compare depicted response with objective response according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 guideline. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant, retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board. Volume doubling time (DT) of histologically confirmed locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma was calculated in 16 patients treated with chemoradiotherapy and 10 untreated patients by incorporating interscan interval (Δt) and tumor volume at baseline (V0) and follow-up (V1) obtained by semiautomated segmentation into the following equation: DT = Δt · log 2/log (V1/V0). Reciprocal of doubling time (RDT), which is the linear representation of tumor growth rate, was calculated by use of the following equation: RDT = 365/DT. The lowest RDT value of 2.42 in untreated patients was considered as the cutoff value for depiction of treatment response. Depicted response rate was defined as the proportion of patients with an RDT value of less than 2.42. Depicted response was compared with objective response according to the RECIST 1.1 guideline. The significance level was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in mean RDT between treated (range, -7.12 to 3.27; mean, -1.27; median, -1.30) and untreated (range, 2.42 to 10.74; mean, 5.33; median, 4.26) patients (p < 0.05). Reciprocal of doubling time was less than 2.42 in 14 treated patients, which corresponded to a depicted response rate of 87.50% as opposed to the objective response rate of 18.75% according to the RECIST 1.1 guideline (p < 0.05) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 response rate of 62.50% (p > 0.05). Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 response was concordant with RDT and RECIST response in 12 patients (75.00%) (κ, 0.38) and 9 patients (56.25%) (κ, 0.24), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant difference between depicted response according to RDT and objective response according to RECIST. Reciprocal of doubling time might serve as a valuable biomarker for evaluation of treatment response when depiction of small changes in tumor size is concerned.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/radiotherapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Tumor Burden , Aged , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Bevacizumab , CA-19-9 Antigen/blood , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology , Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Tumor Burden/drug effects , Tumor Burden/physiology , Tumor Burden/radiation effects , GemcitabineABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to construct a model for estimation of splenic volume from standardized one-dimensional diameters of the spleen and to compare that model with the ellipsoid model for estimation of splenic volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, segmentation software was used for semiautomated quantification of splenic volume by counting CT voxels in 193 consecutively registered patients. For standardization of one-dimensional measurements, the software was used to measure transaxial diameter in the slice with the largest splenic cross-sectional area. By incorporation of splenic volume and the product of width, thickness, and length into the linear regression equation, a model for estimation of splenic volume was constructed, and its performance was externally assessed. Splenic volume also was calculated with the formula for a prolate ellipsoid. The ellipsoid volume and best-fit volumes were compared with segmented splenic volume by use of Bland-Altman plot and Lin concordance correlation. A value of p < 0.05 denoted statistical significance. RESULTS: Splenic width was the best one-dimensional predictor of splenic volume (r = 0.84, p < 0.05). The linear regression fitted model for estimation of splenic volume (V(R)) in the initial 100 patients was V(R) = (0.36 × W × T × L) + 28, where W is width, T is thickness, and L is length (R(2) = 0.91, p < 0.05) and was externally validated by estimation of splenic volume in the other 93 patients. Compared with that observed with use of the ellipsoid formula, mean bias decreased from 22.57% to 0.93%, and the Lin coefficient increased from 0.81 to 0.96 with application of the best-fit model for calculation of splenic volume. CONCLUSION: The best-fit model V(R) = (0.36 × W × T × L) + 28 is more optimized than the ellipsoid formula and is associated with less bias for estimation of splenic volume.
Subject(s)
Models, Biological , Spleen/anatomy & histology , Spleen/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/standards , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Organ Size , Retrospective Studies , Software , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In experimentation with rats submitted to enteral and parenteral infusions for medium to long periods it is necessary to use swivels. With the objective of developing a new biocompatible, safe, efficient, and low cost swivel, the medical and engineering teams of the University of São Paulo joined forces. MATERIAL AND METHODS: After defining the characteristics and criteria for the mechanical design, the new swivel was developed and bench tested for flow, rotation and sealing. Later it was evaluated on rats, after catheterization of jugular vein and stomach (by gastrostomy) for infusion of different solutions at certain concentrations and infusion rates (mean 6.73 days of infusion). RESULTS: The new swivel consisted of two sections of common plastic syringes for injection, together with the rubber seals, a plunger, and a hypodermic needle. The syringe with a slightly smaller diameter rotates inside the larger diameter syringe interconnected with a needle sealed by their respective rubber rings. The bench and animal tests did not reveal any functional defects. There were no blockages or leaks in the swivel and it was reused three times without losing its mechanical properties, after being hygienized and sterilized with ethylene oxide. The cost of producing this swivel is estimated to be no more than $3 US. CONCLUSION: The cooperation between the departments of medical research and mechanical engineering enabled the development of a swivel that is simple and inexpensive to make, yet fully meets the needs of parenteral and enteral infusion in rats. The authors present detailed instructions for the construction of this new swivel.