Evolution and outcomes of aortic dilations in giant cell arteritis.

OBJECTIVES: To identify factors associated with the progression of giant cell arteritis (GCA)-related or associated aortic dilations. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 47 GCA patients with aortic dilation were longitudinally analyzed. Each patient underwent ≥2 imaging scans of the aorta during the follow-up. Three progression statuses of aortic dilations were distinguished: fast-progressive (FP) defined by a progression of the aortic diameter ≥5 mm/year or ≥1 cm/2 years, slow progressive (SP) by a progression of the aortic diameter >1 mm during the follow-up, and not progressive (NP) when aortic diameter remained stable. RESULTS: Among the 47 patients with aortic dilation, the thoracic section was involved in 87 % of patients. Within a total follow-up of 89 [6-272] months, we identified 13 (28 %) patients with FP dilations, and 16 (34 %) and 18 (38 %) patients with SP and NP dilations, respectively. No differences regarding baseline characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors or treatments were observed among the 3 groups. However, FP patients more frequently showed atheromatous disease (p = 0.04), with a more frequent use of statins (p = 0.04) and antiplatelet agents (p = 0.02). Among the 27 (57 %) patients with aortitis, aortic dilation developed on an inflammatory segment in 23 (85 %). Among the FP patients who underwent aortic surgery with available histology (n = 3), all presented active vasculitis. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that aortic inflammation, as well as atheromatous disease, might participate in the fast progression of aortic dilation in GCA.

Frequency and characteristics of severe relapse in giant cell arteritis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the frequency and characteristics of severe relapse in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) in a real-life setting. METHODS: In a monocentric database of 530 patients, we retrospectively analysed patients who experienced at least one relapse and distinguished severe from nonsevere relapses. Severe relapse was defined by the occurrence of an ischaemic event (ophthalmologic, neurologic, digestive, limb ischaemia), the occurrence of an aortic complication (i.e. new or worsening of aortic dilation, aortic dissection), or new or worsening of vascular stenosis. RESULTS: From the cohort of 530 patients, 242 (45.7%) patients experienced relapse at least once, including 13 (2.5% of the cohort) who experienced severe relapse. Among the 464 recorded relapses, 14 (3% of all relapses) were severe. Severe relapse corresponded to the following vascular events: a peripheral limb ischaemia in 6 patients, a visual event in 3 patients (including 2 acute anterior ischaemic anterior neuropathies), an aortic complication in 3 patients, a mesenteric ischaemia in one patient and an ischaemic stroke in one patient.When compared with the 229 patients who experienced nonsevere relapses, severe relapse patients were younger at diagnosis (p= 0.02), more frequently showed limb claudication at baseline (p< 0.0001) and fewer GCA-related cranial signs (p< 0.0001). At diagnosis, more large-vessel vasculitis on imaging (82% vs 36%, p= 0.002) were observed in patients with severe relapse. The death rate did not differ between patients with severe and nonsevere relapses. CONCLUSION: In a real-life setting, relapse affects nearly half of GCA patients, but severe relapse is rare.

Evolution of the Therapeutic Management of Giant Cell Arteritis: Analysis of Real-Life Practices over Two Timeframes (2014-2017 and 2018-2020).

Objectives: To determine how therapeutic strategies for giant cell arteritis (GCA), especially glucocorticoid (GC) management, evolved between 2014 and 2020. Patients and Methods: Consecutive GCA patients followed for at least 24 months in a single tertiary center were enrolled and separated into two groups: those diagnosed from 2014 to 2017 and those diagnosed from 2018 to 2020. GC doses (mg/kg/day) were analyzed at onset, at Month 3 (M3) and, if continued, at M6, M12, M18 and M24. Physicians' practices were also individually analyzed. Results: Among the 180 patients included, 96 (53%) were diagnosed in 2014-2017 and 84 (47%) in 2018-2020. All patients received GC at diagnosis without a difference in the initial dose between the two groups (p = 0.07). At M3, the daily dose was lower in patients treated after 2017 (p = 0.002). In patients who still received GC at M6 (p = 0.0008), M12 (p = 0.01) and M24 (p = 0.02), the daily GC dose was still lower in patients treated after 2017. The proportion of patients who definitively discontinued GC use before M18 (42% versus 21%, p = 0.003) was higher in those treated after 2017. The rates of immunosuppressant use were not different between the two time periods (31% versus 38%, p = 0.34), but tocilizumab replaced methotrexate. Significant differences were observed among practitioners regarding the GC doses at M6 (p = 0.04) and M12 (p = 0.04), the total GC duration (p = 0.02) and the ability to stop GC before M18 (p = 0.007). Conclusions: This real-life study showed a global change in GC management over time for GCA patients, with important variability among physicians' practices.

Efficacy and tolerance of methotrexate in a real-life monocentric cohort of patients with giant cell arteritis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the indications, efficiency and tolerance profiles of methotrexate (MTX) in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) in a real-life setting. METHODS: From a monocentric database of >500 GCA patients, we retrospectively selected 49 patients who received MTX between 2010 and 2020. Cumulative glucocorticoid (GC) doses, the number of relapses and GC-related adverse events were recorded before, during and after MTX. We separately analyzed the 3 main indications of MTX, i.e., disease relapse, GC-sparing strategy, and GCA presentation. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 84 [10-255] months, 25 (51%) and 18/41 (44%) patients relapsed during MTX treatment and after its discontinuation, respectively. Among the 40 patients who relapsed before MTX, 26 (65%) experienced a new relapse after MTX introduction. Once MTX was introduced, 24 (49%) patients were able to discontinue GC after 20.5 [7-64] months. No significant difference in cumulative GC doses were noted before and after MTX introduction with a total GC dose of 14.7 [1.05-69.4] grams. At the last follow-up, MTX was discontinued in 41 patients, including 13 (32%) due to clinicobiological remission, 12 (30%) due to treatment failure and 15 (36%) due to side effects. CONCLUSION: Our real-life study showed a modest beneficial effect of MTX on relapse in patients with GCA. However, we did not observe any GC-sparing effect in this study. Other studies are needed to assess the GC-sparing effect in patients in whom GC management is adapted from recent recommendations.

Preventive effect of beta-blockers in the development of aortic dilation in giant cell arteritis-related aortitis.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze whether beta-blockers (BBs), in addition to conventional care, can decrease the risk of aortic dilation in giant-cell arteritis (GCA)-related aortitis. METHODS: We conducted in a single medical center retrospective study including 65 consecutive patients with GCA-related aortitis who all underwent aortic morphology control during follow-up. The impact of previous cardiovascular (CV) risk factors and/or events on BB prescription and on the risk for new aortic dilation was analyzed using a weighted (8-point maximum) score between 0 (i.e., 0/8 CV risk factors and events) and 1 (i.e., 8/8). RESULTS: Among the 65 patients with GCA-related aortitis, 15 (23%) were taking BBs before GCA diagnosis and continued them thereafter. The vascular score was significantly higher in patients who received BBs (0.25 [0.125-0.625] vs. 0.125 [0-0.625] in patients without BBs, p < 0.0001). The median follow-up was 91 [25-163] months in GCA patients taking BBs and 61 [14-248] months in patients not taking BBs (p = 0.13). None of the patients taking BBs developed a new aortic dilation, whereas 15 (15/50; 30%) patients not taking BBs did (p = 0.01), as detected at a median time of 38 [6-120] months after the first imaging. Rates of other CV events during follow-up did not differ between the groups (p = 1). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to suggest that BBs in addition to conventional care in patients with GCA-related aortitis may help to prevent the risk of aortic dilation during follow-up. Larger-sized studies are required to confirm these results.

Impact of Glucocorticoid Cumulative Doses in a Real-Life Cohort of Patients Affected by Giant Cell Arteritis.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the impact of cumulative glucocorticoid (GC) doses on related adverse events (AEs) in giant cell arteritis (GCA) in a real-life setting. METHODS: The medical charts of the last 139 consecutive GCA patients followed in a tertiary centre were retrospectively analysed. The cumulative GC doses were calculated, and the main GC-related AEs were collected during the follow-up. RESULTS: After a median follow-up duration of 35.6 (2-111) months, the median cumulative GC dose in the 139 patients was 9184 (1770-24,640) mg, and 131 patients (94%) presented at least one GC-related AE. Infections (63%) were the most frequently reported GC-related AE, followed by metabolic events (63%), including weight gain in 51% of them. Cardiovascular and neuropsychiatric events occurred in 51% and 47% of patients, respectively. Osteoporotic fractures, muscular involvement, digestive events, geriatric deterioration, skin fragility, ophthalmologic complications and hypokalaemia were reported in <35% of patients. Cardiovascular events (p = 0.01), osteoporotic fractures (p = 0.004), cataract occurrence (p = 0.03), weight gain (p = 0.04) and infections (p = 0.01) were significantly associated with GC cumulative doses > 9 g. Longer GC durations were associated with cataract occurrence (p = 0.01), weight gain (p = 0.03) and all-grade infections (p = 0.048), especially herpes zoster occurrence (p = 0.003). Neuropsychiatric and metabolic events appeared within the first months after GC introduction, whereas herpes zoster recurred, and most cardiovascular AEs emerged after 1 year. Geriatric events, especially osteoporotic fractures, occurred 2 years after GC introduction. CONCLUSION: This study highlights how frequent GC-related AEs are and the impact of prolonged GC and cumulative doses.

Tolerance of glucocorticoids in giant cell arteritis: a study of patient-reported adverse events.

OBJECTIVE: To assess patients' self-reported glucocorticoid (GC)-related adverse events (AEs) in a GCA population. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to the 100 patients most recently diagnosed with GCA in a tertiary centre. This questionnaire included open- and close-ended questions on the disease and GC effects. Eight primary AE areas were analysed: cardiovascular, metabolic, muscle, cognitive and psychologic, bone, cutaneous and hairiness, infective and visual complications. Including derivative subitems from preceding areas, a total of 18 GC-related AEs were analysed separately and according to GC duration. RESULTS: Ninety patients were analysed and 89 (99%) reported at least one GC-related AE [median 6 (range 1-11)]. Cognitive and psychological changes, primarily insomnia (72%), affected 90% of patients. Cutaneous changes and muscle loss affected 70% of patients, with frequent impairment of physical autonomy (P = 0.007) associated with this event. Metabolic issues, especially weight gain (40%) and diabetes mellitus (20%), affected 49% of patients. Conversely, vision troubles and bone fractures were mentioned by 42% and 9% of patients, respectively, and more frequently in patients who received GCs for >18 months (P = 0.01 and P = 0.007, respectively). Cardiovascular changes and infections affected 30% and 26% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: This real-life study of GC tolerance assessed using a self-evaluation provides pragmatic and updated data reminding us that GC tolerance remains more noteworthy than ever. This study suggests carefully monitoring GC-related AEs during follow-up and encourages GC-sparing strategies in some patients.

Impact of Giant Cell Arteritis and Its Treatment on the Patient's Quality of Life: A Single-Center Self-Assessment Study.

Little is known about the impact of giant cell arteritis (GCA) and its treatment on patient-reported physical, mental, and psychic quality of life (QoL). In this monocentric study, a questionnaire was sent to the 100 last patients diagnosed with GCA and followed-up in a single tertiary center. Their physical, mental and psychic status were self-assessed via close-ended questions, the 12-item short form survey (SF-12) and the 15-item geriatric depression scale (GDS). We aimed to identify parameters that were significantly associated with moderate-to-severe disability in both physical and mental domains. Ninety patients were analyzable. Moderate to severe physical disability was found in 41 (46%) patients. In multivariate analysis, walking difficulties (OR, 95% CI 8.42 [2.98-26.82], p <0.0001), muscle mass and strength reduction (OR, 95% CI 4.38 [1.37-16.31], p = 0.01) and age >80 (OR, 95% CI 4.21 [1.44-13.61], p = 0.008) were independent findings associated with moderate to severe physical disability. Moderate to severe mental disability was found in 30 (33%) patients. In multivariate analysis, depressive mood (OR, 95% CI 11.05 [3.78-37.11], p < 0.0001), felt adverse events attributable to glucocorticoids (OR, 95% CI 10.54 [1.65-213.1], p = 0.01) and use of immune-suppressants (OR, 95% CI 3.50 [1.14-11.87], p = 0.03) were independent findings associated with moderate to severe mental disability. There was a statistically significant negative correlation between GDS and the physical and/or mental disability scores (GDS and PCS-12: r = -0.33, p = 0.0013; GDS and MCS-12: r = -0.36, p = 0.0005). In conclusion, this study identified via a self-assessment of patients with GCA some medical and modifiable findings that significantly affect their physical and mental quality of life. A better knowledge of these factors may help improve the care of GCA patients.

Real-life analysis of the causes of death in patients consecutively followed for giant cell arteritis in a French centre of expertise.

OBJECTIVES: To describe, in a real-life setting, the direct causes of death in a cohort of consecutive patients with GCA. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the deaths that occurred in a cohort of 470 consecutive GCA patients from a centre of expertise between January 2000 and December 2019. Among the 120 patients who died, we retrieved data from the medical files of 101 patients. RESULTS: Cardiovascular events were the dominant cause of death (n = 41, 41%) followed by infections (n = 22, 22%), geriatric situations (i.e. falls or senile deterioration; n = 17, 17%) and cancers (n = 15, 15%). Patients in each of these four groups were compared with the other deceased patients pooled together. Patients who died from cardiovascular events were more frequently male (46 vs 27%; P = 0.04) with a past history of coronary artery disease (29 vs 8%; P = 0.006). Patients who died from infections mostly had ongoing glucocorticoid treatment (82 vs 53%; P = 0.02) with higher cumulative doses (13 994 vs 9150 mg; P = 0.03). Patients who died from geriatric causes more frequently had osteoporosis (56 vs 17%; P = 0.0009) and had mostly discontinued glucocorticoid treatment (76 vs 33%; P = 0.001). The predictive factors of death in multivariate analysis were a history of coronary disease [hazard ratio (HR) 2.39; 95% CI 1.27, 4.21; P = 0.008], strokes at GCA diagnosis (HR 2.54; 95% CI 1.05, 5.24; P = 0.04), any infection during follow-up (HR 1.93; 95% CI 1.24, 2.98; P = 0.004) and fever at GCA diagnosis (HR 1.99; 95% CI 1.16, 3.28; P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Our study provides real-life insight on the cause-specific mortality in GCA patients.