Regulation of onco and tumor suppressor MiRNAs by mTORC1 inhibitor PRP-1 in human chondrosarcoma.

Metastatic chondrosarcoma of mesenchymal origin is the second most common bone malignancy and does not respond either to chemotherapy or radiation; therefore, the search for new therapies is relevant and urgent. This study aimed to reveal the comparative analysis of miRNAs and their targets in human JJ012 chondrosarcoma cell line between control and experimental samples, treated with mTORC1 inhibitor, cytostatic antiproliferative proline-rich polypeptide (PRP-1). Examination of tumor-specific microRNA expression profiles has revealed widespread deregulation of these molecules in diverse cancers. It was reported that microRNAs can function as novel biomarkers for disease diagnostics and therapy, as well as a novel class of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. mTORC 1 inhibitor PRP-1 caused significant upregulation of tumor suppressors, such as miR20a, miR125b, and miR192; and downregulation of onco miRNAs, miR509-3p, miR589, miR490-3p, miR 550 in human chondrosarcoma JJ012 cell line.

Cytostatic effect of novel mTOR inhibitor, PRP-1 (galarmin) in MDA 231 (ER-) breast carcinoma cell line. PRP-1 inhibits mesenchymal tumors.

Activation of the PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway is implicated both in the establishment of tumors and as well as a target for therapy in many types of solid malignancy, its blockade represents an opportunity to improve outcomes in patients with tumors that are associated with poor prognosis. Our experimental data indicates that proline-rich polypeptide-1 (PRP-1, galarmin) is immunomodulator cytokine, produced by hypothalamic neurosecretory cells and exerts its antiproliferative effect on the tumor cells of mesenchymal origin via inhibiting mTOR kinase activity and repressing cell cycle progression. The goal of these investigations was to elucidate the antiproliferative action of PRP-1 on the breast carcinoma cell line MDA 231 (ER-) and to compare PRP-1 action previously reported on other mesenchymal tumors. These experiments confirmed maximum inhibition of cell growth at 0.5 and 1 µg/ml PRP-1 (71% and 63%, respectively) and inhibition at 10 µg/ml of 44%. There was no inhibitory effect observed on luminal T47-D (ER+) cells. Videomicroscopy results demonstrated dividing cells in the cytokine-treated MDA 231 (ER-), suggesting that the cells were not in the state of dormancy. The flow cytometry experiments confirmed that PRP-1-treated cells were accumulated in S phase. No apoptosis, caspase activation, or senescence was detected after treatment with this cytokine. Experiments with mTOR with PRP-1 (10 µg/ml) indicated statistically significant 40% inhibition of mTOR kinase activity in immunoprecipitates of the MDA 231 (ER-) cell line. PRP-1 is a novel mTOR inhibitor with strong antiproliferative action in mesenchymal tumors mostly resistant to radiation and chemotherapy.

Utility of quantitative computerized pain drawings in a sample of spinal stenosis patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of quantitative computerized pain drawings (CPDs) in a sample of spine patients before and after surgery. DESIGN: Analysis of changes in quantified CPDs, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Short Form-36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36), and numerical ratings of pain intensity before and after surgery. SETTING: Private clinic in large metropolitan area. Patients. Forty-six patients with spinal stenosis. Interventions. Surgery for the relief of pain due to spinal stenosis. OUTCOME MEASURES: A total points (TP) score was calculated from the CPD that reflected the total number of pixels filled by the patient, and the percentage of total pain area indicated as aching, stabbing, numbness, pins and needles, burning, and other, were each calculated separately. CPD scores, ODI score, Physical Components Summary (PCS) and Mental Components Summary scores of the SF-36, and pain intensity ratings (0-10 scale) were all recorded before and after surgical intervention. Results. After surgery, patients showed significant improvements in the extent of shaded pain area of the CPD, pain intensity ratings, ODI, and SF-36 PCS scores (paired t-test, P < or = 0.01). Changes in TP scores calculated from the CPDs were significantly correlated (P < or = 0.05) with changes in ODI scores (r = 0.34) and pain intensity ratings (r = 0.37). Changes in the percentage of total pain area covered by specific qualities of pain were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Results from the present study provide initial support for the use of automated quantified data collected from CPDs to evaluate treatment interventions and to serve the clinician as a record of changes in spatial location, radiation or extent of pain, and the sensory quality of pain when evaluating individual patient needs.