ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Patients with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) may need prolonged mechanical ventilation (MV) and a long stay in the Intensive Care Unit. An intermediate respiratory care unit (IRCU) can shorten that stay, optimizing hospital resources. The aim of our work has been to evaluate the activity of such a unit in our hospital. METHODS: This is a descriptive retrospective study based on the data of patients with SCI and respiratory failure discharged from our IRCU between 1 July 2010 and 28 February 2013. RESULTS: We have analysed data from 146 patients with SCI, adding up to 228 admissions (68 first admissions and 160 readmissions due to complications or scheduled review visits). Sixty-three out of the 68 newly admitted patients survived their first admission (92.6%). Length of hospitalization was 195.6±110.4 days, 22 were admitted to monitor their respiratory status and 46 were on MV on admission. Of these, 26 (38.2%) were admitted to attempt weaning from the respirator and 20 (29.4%) to enter a programme of permanent respiratory support. Weaning was successful in 23 out of 26 patients (88.4%), the process taking 47.2±49.3 days. Forty of them (58.8%) were discharged to their home. CONCLUSIONS: An IRCU can manage a substantial number of severe SCI patients who need MV, and an important number of them can be weaned from the respirator. It may also achieve a good success rate in the integration of MV-dependent patients within family and society.
Subject(s)
Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Respiration, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , Respiratory Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Spinal Cord Injuries/complications , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Respiratory Insufficiency/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Presentamos el caso de un paciente con lesión medular cervical de larga evolución que sufre una crisis hipertensiva de consecuencia fatal secundariamente a un cuadro de disreflexia autonómica. Aunque este trastorno vegetativo es frecuente en este tipo de pacientes, y su tratamiento es sencillo y está bien establecido, es escasamente conocido fuera de los ambientes que tratan pacientes con lesiones medulares. Su desconocimiento puede retrasar la instauración del tratamiento y dejar secuelas severas. El cuadro puede ser tan grave como el que presentamos, a pesar de ser diagnosticado y manejado precozmente
We report the case of a male patient with a cervical spinal cord injury who suffered a hypertensive episode secondary to autonomic dysreflexia with fatal outcome. Although this vegetative disorder is common in these patients and its treatment is simple and well established, it is not widely known outside setting in which patients with bone marrow injuries are treated. Lack of knowledge about it may delay the initiation of treatment and result in severe sequelae. This disease can be as severe as the one we present despite being diagnosed and managed Early
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Autonomic Dysreflexia/complications , Cerebral Hemorrhage/etiology , Hypertension/physiopathology , Spinal Cord Injuries/complications , HIV Infections/complicationsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Phrenic nerve pacing is a method of respiratory support that can replace mechanical ventilation in high-level cervical spinal cord injury patients with diaphragmatic paralysis. Our objective was to evaluate survival and long-term quality of life in patients with external respiratory support by PNP vs volumetric respirator in patients with severe respiratory insufficiency due to a high-level spinal cord injury. DESIGN: This is a retrospective review study of a prospectively collected database for evaluate the survival and a questionnaire for quality of life has been collected face-to-face or by telephone at present. PATIENTS: Cervical SCI patients with permanent respiratory support (PNP or MV). METHODS: Long-term evaluation of a cohort of PNP-supported patients. We performed a comparison between these patients and volumetric respirator-supported patients. For survival analysis, we used the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model. The health-related quality of life was assessed with SF-36 questionnaire, a general HRQL evaluation. RESULTS: One hundred twenty six patients on permanent respiratory support were evaluated during the study period. Of these, 38 were on PNP and 88 were mechanically ventilated. Paced patients were younger and had a longer survival, but in a multivariate analysis adjusted for age using a multiple logistic correlation we found that length of survival was greater for PNP patients. In terms of HRQL, the PNP-supported patients showed better results in terms of social functioning. CONCLUSIONS: PNP is a stable and effective method of long-term respiratory support in this type of patients (SCI patients dependent on external respiratory support). In these patients it improves the length of survival and some social issues by quality of life when compared with patients under MV.
Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/injuries , Electric Stimulation Therapy , Phrenic Nerve/physiology , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Spinal Cord Injuries/therapy , Adult , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Regression Analysis , Respiratory Insufficiency/etiology , Respiratory Insufficiency/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Socioeconomic Factors , Spinal Cord Injuries/complications , Spinal Cord Injuries/mortality , Surveys and Questionnaires , Survival Analysis , Young AdultABSTRACT
We present our series of patients with chronic ventilatory failure treated with electrophrenic respiration: 13 males and nine females with a mean age of 12 +/- 11.5 years. The etiology was, 13 tetraplegia, five sequelae of surgical treatment of intracranial lesions, and four central alveolar hypoventilation. The mean duration of the conditioning period were 3-4 months. Eighteen patients (81.8%) achieved permanent, diaphragmatically-paced breathing with bilateral stimulation and in four (18.2%) patients, pacing was only during sleep. Five patients died (22.7%): two during the hospital stay and three at home; two deaths had unknown cause and three were due respectively to, lack of at-home care, recurrence of an epidermoid tumor, and sequelae of accidental disconnection of the mechanical ventilation before beginning the conditioning period. Two cases were considered failures: One patient had transitory neurapraxia lasting 80 days, and the other had an ischemic spinal cord syndrome with progressive deterioration of the left-side response to stimulation. One patient had right phrenic nerve entrapment by scar tissue and four suffered infections. The follow-up periods since pacemaker implantation are currently: 1, 11 years; 4, 10 years, and 17, less than 5 years. The results of our experience demonstrate that complete stable ventilation can be achieved using diaphragmatic pacing and that it improves the prognosis and life quality of patients with severe chronic respiratory failure.