High-Resolution Nerve Ultrasound to Assess Nerve Echogenicity, Fascicular Count, and Cross-Sectional Area Using Semiautomated Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Little is known about echogenicity and fascicular structure observed in high-resolution nerve ultrasound (HRUS) in both healthy subjects and patients with peripheral nerve disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of echogenicity, fascicle count, and fascicle size analysis, to create standard values and compare these parameters to patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). METHODS: Median, ulnar, radial, tibial, and fibular nerve of 79 healthy subjects and patients were scanned by one examiner using HRUS. Image analysis regarding echogenicity, fascicle count, and fascicle cross-sectional area (CSA) was performed by two independent raters semiautomatically using ImageJ. Pearson correlation coefficient r reflected interrater reliability (IR), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) determined intrarater reliability (IAR). Results of healthy subjects were compared to 20 patients with CIDP by analysis of variance. RESULTS: IR was very good for echogenicity (r = .9) and good for fascicle count and size of the largest fascicle (r = .64/.56). IAR was very good for all three parameters (ICC = .9/.83/.74). Healthy subjects had a wide range of values. CIDP patients were in range of healthy subjects. Clinically progressive CIDP patients (defined as an increase in Overall Disability Sum Score by ≥1 point) had a lower fraction of black than healthy controls and stable CIDP patients (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Semiautomated evaluation of echogenicity, fascicle count, and fascicle CSA is reliable. Cutoff values to differentiate between healthy persons and CIDP do not exist. Echogenicity is useful for detecting clinically progressive CIDP patients and should be used in clinical context or intraindividual course.

Nerve echogenicity and intranerve CSA variability in high-resolution nerve ultrasound (HRUS) in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP).

OBJECTIVE: HRUS is increasingly being used in the diagnosis and evaluation of autoimmune neuropathies such as CIDP. Recently, studies focused not only on changes of nerves size, but also the fascicular structure and the echogenicity changes in CIDP. However, little is known about the alterations of echogenicity in the long-term course in CIDP. The aim of this study was to evaluate echogenicity in CIDP patients in a long-term follow-up period and to analyze the benefit of the evaluation of echogenicity compared to nerve size. METHODS: 20 patients fulfilling the definite diagnostic criteria of CIDP received clinical examination, nerve conduction studies and HRUS every 6 months over a median follow-up time of 34 months. Patients were divided into clinically stable/regressive disease course or progressive disease course according to the development of the inflammatory neuropathy cause and treatment overall disability sum score. Echogenicity of peripheral nerves was measured semi-automated and quantitative. Echogenicity was divided into three classes by fraction of black: hypoechogenic, mixed hypo-/hyperechogenic, hyperechogenic. RESULTS: Patients with hyperechogenic arm nerves more frequently show clinical worsening, whereas patients with hypoechogenic arm nerves remain stable or even improved over time. In the long-term course of the disease, echogenicity mostly did not change, and if changes occured echogenicity did not correspond to ODSS changes. CONCLUSION: Echogenicity of the arm nerves in CIDP may be used as a prognostic marker, but not as a follow-up tool for evaluating clinical changes. Further studies in a larger cohort are needed to confirm these results.