Can the Workplace Limitations Questionnaire Capture Short-term Productivity Losses in Acute Distal Radius Fractures Treated With Operative Fixation Versus Cast Immobilization in the Working Population?

Background: Distal radius fractures (DRFs) contribute substantially to overall morbidity in the elderly population. We believe that accurately capturing total productivity losses is vital to understanding the true economic impact of these injuries in working patients. Methods: We conducted a prospective nonrandomized cohort study and enrolled working patients with DRF treated with either casting or operative fixation. We administered the Workplace Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ, Tufts Medical Center) at the first visit following injury and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months after definitive treatment. The WLQ measures the degree to which employed individuals are experiencing limitations on-the-job due to their health problems and estimates health-related productivity loss. We also calculated the monetary value of work time lost at market value in US dollars. The treatment groups were analyzed for statistical similarity using Student t tests. Results: A total of 30 patients met our study's inclusion criteria. The WLQ index score trended downward in both groups across all time points and was lower in the operative cohort compared with the nonoperative cohort at 6 weeks (1.4% vs 12.9% productivity loss, P = .17). The monetary value of work time lost trended downward across all time points and was lower in the operative cohort compared with the nonoperative cohort ($200.21 vs $2846.90, P = .12). Conclusions: In this pilot study, we successfully applied the WLQ to working patients treated for DRF. The WLQ is effective in capturing short-term productivity losses following DRF and may suggest a decreased at-work burden among patients treated with operative fixation compared with casting.

To Bundle or Not to Bundle? The Financial Impact of Pathologic Hip Disease on Hip Arthroplasty Episodes of Care.

BACKGROUND: The Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement model aims to support more efficient care for patients. We examined the impact of patient and surgical characteristics, post-acute care, and clinical outcomes on episode of care (EOC) costs in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty for all diagnoses. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from a large database of patients undergoing hip arthroplasty for oncologic and nononcologic diagnoses between 2014 and 2017. We compared EOC costs and outcomes between the 2 groups using Student's t-tests. We estimated the association between an oncologic-associated procedure and EOC costs from a multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: There were 2122 total patients included: 1993 in the nononcologic group and 129 in the oncologic group. The length of stay was significantly greater in the oncologic group (7.2 vs 4.2 days, P = .00). In the post-acute period, a greater proportion of oncologic patients was readmitted (29% vs 14%, P = .05) and discharged to skilled nursing (93% vs 51%, P = .00). Index hospitalization costs (mean difference [MD] $1561, P = .05), skilled nursing costs (MD $5932, P = .001), and total EOC costs (MD $20,012, P = .00) were all greater in the oncologic group. Along with increasing age and fracture diagnosis, an oncologic diagnosis is independently associated with greater EOC costs from a multivariate analysis (ß = 16,163 ± 2258, P = .00, r2 = 29%). CONCLUSION: Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement should incorporate risk adjustment for oncologic disease because hip arthroplasty for an oncologic diagnosis is associated with worse outcomes and greater costs than in the general population.

Systematic Review of Thigh Symptoms after Lateral Transpsoas Interbody Fusion for Adult Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease.

BACKGROUND: Lateral transpsoas interbody fusion (LTIF) is a minimally invasive technique for achieving lumbar spinal fusion. While it has many advantages over open techniques it carries with it a distinct set of risks, most commonly post-operative ipsilateral thigh pain, weakness and sensory disturbances. It is vital for both the surgeon and patient to understand the risks for and outcomes of injury associated with this procedure. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the incidence, risks, and long-term clinical outcomes of post-operative thigh symptoms in patients treated with LTIF. METHODS: We conducted a search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Collaboration Library, using keywords and MeSH terms, for English-language literature published through September 2014, as well as reference lists from key articles. Studies were then manually filtered to retrieve articles that met inclusion criteria. We were interested in studies that reported postoperative lower extremity symptoms after LTIF, such as pain, weakness and changes in sensation. The strength of evidence was determined based on precepts outlined by the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group (GRADE). RESULTS: A total of 392 articles were initially retrieved, with 24 ultimately meeting criteria for inclusion. The incidence of any post-operative thigh symptom varied, ranging as high as 60.7%, with 9.3% of patients experiencing a motor deficit related to direct nerve injury. Several studies reported cases of persistent symptoms at 6 months follow up. Additionally, inclusion of the L4-5 disc space and a longer duration of surgery were both identified as risks for developing postoperative thigh symptoms. CONCLUSION: The risk of postoperative thigh symptoms after LTIF is high. Thigh pain, paresthesias and weakness were the most commonly reported symptoms. While most patients' symptoms resolved by 6 months follow up, several studies reported patients with symptoms persistent as far as 12 months removed from surgery. Surgery at the L4-5 disc space and longer surgical duration place the patient at greater risk for developing postoperative and long-term thigh symptoms.