Living with epilepsy during COVID-19 pandemic restrictions: A longitudinal perspective.

The purpose of our study was to explore how people with epilepsy fared during two of the most stringent 4-month society-wide COVID-19-related pandemic restrictions in Ireland, in 2020 and one year later in 2021. This was in the context of their seizure control, lifestyle factors, and access to epilepsy-related healthcare services. A 14-part questionnaire was administered to adults with epilepsy during virtual specialist epilepsy clinics in a University Hospital in Dublin, Ireland at the end of the two lockdowns. People with epilepsy were questioned on their epilepsy control, lifestyle factors, and quality of epilepsy-related medical care, compared to pre-COVID times. The study sample consisted of two separate cohorts of those diagnosed with epilepsy (100 (51.8%) in 2020, and 93 (48.2%) in 2021, with similar baseline characteristics. There was no significant change in seizure control or lifestyle factors from 2020 to 2021, except for deterioration in anti-seizure medication (ASM) adherence in 2021 compared to 2020 (p = 0.028). There was no correlation between ASM adherence and other lifestyle factors. Over the two years, poor seizure control was significantly associated with poor sleep (p < 0.001) and average seizure frequency in a month (p = 0.007). We concluded that there was no significant difference between seizure control or lifestyle factors between the two most stringent lockdowns in Ireland, in 2020 and 2021. Furthermore, people with epilepsy reported that throughout the lockdowns access to services was well maintained, and they felt well supported by their services. Contrary to the popular opinion that COVID lockdowns greatly affected patients with chronic diseases, we found that those with epilepsy attending our service remained largely stable, optimistic, and healthy during this time.

Spontaneous neonatal subdural haemorrhage: always non-accidental injury?

In any neonate or infant presenting with an acute onset of encephalopathy, and/or retinal haemorrhages with no history of major trauma and imaging showing subdural haemorrhage (SDH), the diagnostic priority is to exclude a non-accidental injury (NAI), given the association of these clinical features with the shaken baby syndrome. However, other causes of SDH may present in a similar manner in neonates and infants, in particular vascular lesions such as aneurysms. A four week old neonate presenting with seizures and retinal haemorrhages, was diagnosed with an acute subdural haemorrhage (ASDH) on imaging with significant midline shift needing surgical evacuation. As there was some blood extending into the left sylvian fissure, further imaging was considered before surgical intervention. This showed a distally located middle cerebral artery aneurysm, which was successfully treated and the neonate made a remarkable recovery. We present a case of a neonate presenting with spontaneous acute subdural haematoma in the absence of classical diffuse subarachnoid haemorrhage, intracerebral haemorrhage or intraventricular haemorrhage, secondary to a ruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysm. The distribution of aneurysms in the neonatal age group is different to adults, with middle cerebral artery aneurysms and more distally located peripheral aneurysms being more common. Vigilance should be borne to exclude the aforementioned as causes for this presentation especially prior to undertaking surgical intervention.