Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Gesundheitswesen ; 78(7): 460-6, 2016 Jul.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26990610

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Epidemiology is the basic science of Public Health and has to provide high-quality scientific evidence for disease prevention and health care. Sex/Gender, as social and biological structure categories of population, play a central role in the analysis of epidemiological data. Whether and how epidemiologists incorporate sex/gender aspects in their research, their attitudes, needs and requirements they have in this context have hardly been investigated. These questions were addressed in a survey of epidemiologists in Germany. METHODS: With the support of the respective scientific societies, an online survey was conducted of German epidemiologists, and the data subjected to descriptive analysis. RESULTS: Approximately 64% of the 276 participants (response rate 25%) were female and 75% worked in the academic field. 70% reported having had experience in sex/gender-sensitive research and 83% expressed future interest in this topic. Issues mentioned as important were interaction of gender aspects and other factors of social inequality as well as the inclusion of sex and gender in all phases of the research process. Women and younger participants reported more experience and more needs concerning sex/gender sensitive research. To facilitate further incorporation of sex/gender-sensitive research in epidemiology, special workshops/tutorials at the respective scientific societies' annual meetings and online information materials were rated as important. CONCLUSION: Due to the low response rate, a positive selection of participants cannot be ruled out. The results show that, while a large group of epidemiologists had experience and interest in gender-sensitive research, there are some with less interest. Possible starting points for the strengthening of sex/gender-sensitivity research include further training and involvement of scientific societies in the process.


Subject(s)
Eligibility Determination/statistics & numerical data , Epidemiologic Research Design , Epidemiologists/statistics & numerical data , Gender Identity , Health Services Research/statistics & numerical data , Sexism/statistics & numerical data , Attitude of Health Personnel , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Patient Selection , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Gesundheitswesen ; 77 Suppl 1: S47-8, 2015 Sep.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26406533

ABSTRACT

In an online survey, in which 18 experts participated, recommendations for research and practice to improve access to target groups were discussed. The recommendations were developed within the context of the KNP project. For the implementation of the recommendations, not only is an increased cooperation between science and practice particularly important, but also materials and training as well as standardization of methods. Furthermore, financial resources, especially for conducting evaluation studies are needed.


Subject(s)
Expert Testimony , Health Promotion/standards , Health Services Accessibility/standards , Patient Participation/methods , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Germany , Quality Improvement/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25077462

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It is considered general knowledge among physicians and epidemiologists that biological and social aspects associated with being male or female have a strong influence on health and disease. Integrating these aspects into research is necessary to counteract the problems--including ethical problems--resulting from a different evidence basis for men and women. From January 2011 to June 2014 the Federal Ministry of Education and Research supported the network "Sex-/Gender-Sensitive Research in Epidemiology, Neuroscience and Genetics/Cancer Research" with three subprojects, which aimed to promote gender-sensitive research practices. The concepts and results are presented in this article. METHODS: The subproject gathered data (literature analyses, questionnaires) and offered programs for young scientists. Experiences and results were collected and generalized, for instance, in the form of definitions of terms. RESULTS: 50 young scientists have taken part in the training program, identifying associations and barriers in sex-/gender-sensitive research. Among others, a working definition for "sex-/gender-sensitive research" was developed, as well as definitions for the terms "sex-specific" (for biological characteristics that are specific to men or women) and "sex-/gender-dependent" or "sex-/gender-associated" (for biological and social factors, for which the extent of occurrence differs between the sexes). PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT: The concepts realized by the network are well suited to stimulate further development and discussions. The definition of terms is an important base for a productive and high-yielding interdisciplinary collaboration.


Subject(s)
Epidemiologic Research Design , Epidemiology/organization & administration , Genetics/organization & administration , Health Services Research/organization & administration , Medical Oncology/organization & administration , Neurosciences/organization & administration , Sexism/statistics & numerical data , Female , Gender Identity , Humans , Male , Men's Health/statistics & numerical data , Program Evaluation , Sex Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Women's Health/statistics & numerical data
4.
Int J Prison Health ; 5(1): 39-44, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25758928

ABSTRACT

Injection drug use (IDU) and IDU-related infectious diseases such as hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections are highly prevalent among prisoners worldwide. However, little is known about the prevalence of IDUs, HCV/HIV and the availability of respective treatment options in German prisons. Data provided by prison physicians of 31 prisons, representing 14,537 inmates, were included in this analysis. The proportion of IDUs among all prisoners was 21.9%. Substitution treatment was available in three out of four prisons (74.2%). Overall, 1137 substitution treatments were provided annually with a wide range of treatment aims. The prevalence rate was 14.3% for HCV and 1.2% for HIV. Around 5.5% of all HCV-infected prisoners were in antiviral treatment annually, 86.5% of all HIV-positive inmates in antiretroviral HIV-treatment. Generally, substitution treatment, and HCV and HIV testing and treatment are available. However, due to abstinence-orientated treatment aims, substitution treatment is rarely available as maintenance treatment, and HCV/HIV-treatment is mainly provided for patients with an existing treatment before imprisonment. The inconsistent data quality necessitates changes in prison-related policy to improve surveillance and to generate aggregated data in German prisons. The selection process in this analysis might lead to overestimating the provision of substitution and antiviral HCV-treatment.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Hepatitis C/drug therapy , Opiate Substitution Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Prisons/statistics & numerical data , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/drug therapy , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Cross-Sectional Studies , Germany/epidemiology , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Humans , Prevalence , Prisoners , Risk Factors , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL