Sunvozertinib for patients in China with platinum-pretreated locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer and EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation (WU-KONG6): single-arm, open-label, multicentre, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Sunvozertinib is an oral, irreversible, and selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has a favourable safety profile and encouraging antitumour activity, as shown in phase 1 studies of patients with heavily pretreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation (exon20ins). We aimed to assess the antitumour efficacy of sunvozertinib in patients with platinum-pretreated locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with EGFR exon20ins. METHODS: WU-KONG6 is a single-group, open-label, multicentre phase 2 trial of sunvozertinib monotherapy, conducted across 37 medical centres in China. We enrolled adult patients with pathologically or cytologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC whose tumour tissue carried an EGFR exon20ins mutation. All patients had received at least one line of previous systemic therapy, with at least one line containing platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), as assessed by the independent review committee. The ORR was defined as the percentage of patients who achieved complete or partial response, confirmed by two separate assessments with at least 4-week time interval, until disease progression or initiation of any new anti-cancer therapy. Enrolled patients received sunvozertinib 300 mg once daily until meeting discontinuation criteria per the protocol. Patients who received at least one dose of treatment and were evaluable for efficacy analysis were included in the primary analysis, and all patients who received at least one dose of treatment were included in the safety analysis. This study is registered with ChinaDrugTrials.org, CTR20211009, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05712902, and efficacy and safety follow-up are ongoing. FINDINGS: Between July 19, 2021, and May 6, 2022, 104 patients were enrolled. At data cutoff (Oct 17, 2022), the last enrolled patient had been followed up for about 6 months. Among 97 patients evaluable for efficacy analysis, 59 (61%) patients achieved tumour response, with a confirmed ORR of 61% (95% CI 50-71). All tumour responses were partial responses. Tumour responses were observed irrespective of age, sex, smoking history, EGFR exon20ins subtypes, brain metastasis at baseline, previous lines of therapy, and history of onco-immunotherapy. In total, 19 death events occurred over a median follow-up period of 7·6 months (IQR 6·1-9·4). Sunvozertinib was well tolerated at 300 mg once daily. The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events were blood creatine phosphokinase increased (18 [17%] of 104), diarrhoea (eight [8%]), and anaemia (six [6%]). The most common serious treatment-related adverse events were interstitial lung disease (five [5%] of 104), anaemia (three [3%]), vomiting (two [2%]), nausea (two [2%]) and pneumonia (two [2%]). INTERPRETATION: In this phase 2 study, sunvozertinib demonstrated antitumour efficacy in patients with platinum-based chemotherapy pretreated NSCLC with EGFR exon20ins, with a manageable safety profile. A multinational randomised, phase 3 study of sunvozertinib versus platinum-doublet chemotherapy in EGFR exon20ins NSCLC is ongoing (NCT05668988). FUNDING: Dizal Pharmaceutical.

Osimertinib versus comparator first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors as first-line treatment in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: a Chinese, multicenter, real-world cohort study.

Background: In the phase 3 FLAURA trial, osimertinib was compared with first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) as a first-line treatment for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Osimertinib showed longer progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and a similar safety profile. However, more studies demonstrating the effectiveness and safety of osimertinib as a first-line strategy are needed in real-world populations. Methods: We enrolled 1,556 patients with EGFR-mutated stage IIIc-IV NSCLC from the CAPTRA-Lung database. All patients received either osimertinib (n=202) or a first-generation EGFR-TKI (n=1,354) as their initial treatment. To adjust for differences in baseline characteristics between two groups, 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. Propensity scores included gender, age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score, smoking history, family history of tumor, pathology, EGFR mutations, and central nervous system (CNS) metastases. The standardized mean differences (SMD) before and after PSM were calculated to examine the balance of covariate distributions between two groups. Results: After PSM, 202 patients receiving osimertinib and 404 patients receiving first-generation EGFR-TKIs were finally identified. SMD of each matched variable is less than 0.10. The median PFS was 19.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 14.3-24.4] in the osimertinib arm and 10.9 months (95% CI: 9.3-12.5) in the comparator arm [hazard ratio (HR) for progression, 0.47; 95% CI: 0.38-0.59; P<0.001). The median OS was 40.5 months (95% CI: 27.1-54.0) vs. 34.3 months (95% CI: 30.6-38.0) in two groups, respectively (HR for death, 0.76; 95% CI: 0.58-1.00; P=0.045). The incidence of grade 3 adverse events (AEs) between the two groups was 1% and 4.2%, respectively. No grade 4 AEs and treatment-related deaths were reported in both groups. Conclusions: In real-world settings, osimertinib demonstrates longer PFS and OS, with a similar safety profile to that of comparator EGFR-TKIs when used as a first-line strategy in NSCLC patients.

Targeting transient receptor potential canonical 1 reduces non­small cell lung cancer chemoresistance and stemness via inhibition of PI3K/AKT signaling.

TRPC1 enhances cell proliferation and migration in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, its effect on NSCLC chemoresistance and stemness remains to be determined. The aim of the current study was to investigate the effect of TRPC1 on NSCLC chemoresistance and stemness and to determine the underlying mechanism of action. Cisplatin-resistant A549 (A549/CDDP) and H460 (H460/CDDP) cells were first established and were then transfected with negative control small interfering (si)RNA (si-NC) or TRPC1 siRNA (si-TRPC1). Cells were then treated with 740 Y-P, a PI3K/Akt agonist. Subsequently, the sensitivity of A549/CDDP and H460/CDDP cells to CDDP was evaluated. Furthermore, the expression levels of CD133 and CD44, and sphere formation ability were also determined. The results showed that the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of CDDP was significantly higher in A549/CDDP cells compared with A549 cells and in H460/CDDP cells compared with H460 cells. TRPC1 silencing decreased the IC50 value of CDDP compared with the si-NC group in A549/CDDP (11.78 vs. 21.58 µM; P<0.01) and H460/CDDP (23.76 vs. 43.11 µM; P<0.05) cells. Additionally, TRPC1 knockdown in both cell lines decreased the number of spheres formed compared with the si-NC group. Furthermore, compared with the si-NC group, A549/CDDP cells transfected with si-TRPC1 exhibited decreased levels of both CD133 (P<0.01) and CD44 (P<0.05). However, only CD133 (P<0.05) was downregulated in TRPC1-depleted H460/CDDP cells compared with the si-NC group. In addition, TRPC1 knockdown repressed PI3K/AKT signaling compared with the si-NC group in both A549/CDDP and H460/CDDP cells (all P<0.05). Finally, cell treatment with 740 Y-P reversed the effect of TRPC1 knockdown on PI3K/AKT signaling, chemoresistance, and cancer stemness in A549/CDDP and H460/CDDP cells (all P<0.05). In conclusion, the results of the current study suggested that targeting TRPC1 could attenuate cancer stemness and chemoresistance via suppression of PI3K/AKT signaling in NSCLC.

Comparison of EGFR mutations detected by LNA-ARMS PCR in plasma ctDNA samples and matched tissue sample in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Screening for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations is the key to select suitable patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for EGFR-TKI therapy in clinical practice. Nevertheless, tumor tissue that needed for mutation analysis is frequently unavailable, especially for patients with recurrence after operation. Therefore, detection of EGFR from circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients with NSCLC is a sensitive and convenient method to direct patient sequential treatment strategy. METHODS: One hundred and seventy-nine NSCLC patients with both tumor tissue samples and paired plasma samples were recruited. EGFR mutations were detected in 68 tumor tissue samples and 179 plasma samples using Anlongen Locked Nucleic Acid-Amplification Refractory Mutation System (LNA-ARMS) EGFR Mutation Detection Kit. The remaining 111 tumor tissue samples were detected with the use of multiplex PCR-Based NGS sequence. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive prediction value (PPV) and negative prediction value (NPV) of LAN-ARMS PCR. The objective response rate (ORR) of patients received TKIs therapy was calculated. RESULTS: Of the 179 patients, EGFR mutations were detected in 77 of the 179 tumor tissue samples, with a positive rate of 43.01% (77/179). In addition, EGFR mutations were detected in 42 of the 179 plasma samples. The sensitivity and specificity of LAN-ARMS in detecting EGFR mutations were 57.18% and 98.04% respectively compared to tissue results. The PPV was 95.24%, and NPV was 72.99%. Of the 179 pair of samples, EGFR mutations were inconsistent in 39 pairs of tissue and plasma. The overall agreement of EGFR mutation detection was 78.21% (140/179). The ORR was higher in patients with both tissue and plasma EGFR mutations compared with that in patients with only tissue EGFR mutations (73.33% vs. 68.29%), but the difference was not significant. It was suggested that tissue detection combined with plasma detection could improve the mutation rate. CONCLUSION: In plasma samples, Anlongen LAN-ARMS EGFR Mutation Detection Kit had a high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of EGFR mutations. Anlongen LAN-ARMS EGFR Mutation Detection Kit had the advantages of easy-to-operate and high sensitivity in clinical application.

Value and significance of brain radiation therapy during first-line EGFR-TKI treatment in lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR sensitive mutation and synchronous brain metastasis: Appropriate timing and technique.

BACKGROUND: For lung adenocarcinoma patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) sensitive mutation and synchronous brain metastasis (syn-BM), when and how to apply radiotherapy (RT) during first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment remains debatable. METHODS: From a real-world multicenter database, EGFR-mutant patients with syn-BM diagnosed between 2010-2020 and treated with first-line TKIs were enrolled and divided into upfront TKI + RT and upfront TKI groups. Median intracranial progression-free survival (mIC-PFS), median overall survival (mOS), and their risk factors were estimated. RESULTS: There were 60 and 186 patients in the upfront TKI + RT group and upfront TKI group, respectively. Their mIC-PFS were 28.9 months (m) and 17.5 m (p = 0.023), and mOS were 42.7 m and 40.1 m (p = 0.51). Upfront brain RT improved mIC-PFS in patients ≤60-year-old (p = 0.035), with symptomatic BM (p = 0.002), and treated with first-generation TKIs (p = 0.012). There was no significant difference in mOS in any subgroup. Upfront brain stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) showed a trend of better mIC-PFS and mOS. mIC-PFS was independently correlated with symptomatic BM (HR = 1.54, p = 0.030), EGFR L858R mutation (HR = 1.57, p = 0.019), and upfront brain RT (HR = 0.47, p = 0.001). mOS was independently correlated with being female (HR = 0.54, p = 0.007), ECOG 3-4 (HR = 10.47, p < 0.001), BM number>3 (HR = 2.19, p = 0.002), and third-generation TKI (HR = 0.54, p = 0.044) or antiangiogenic drugs (HR = 0.11, p = 0.005) as first/second-line therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Upfront brain RT based on first-line EGFR-TKI might improve IC-PFS but not OS in EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients, indicating potential survival benefit from brain SRS and early application of drugs with higher intracranial activity.

Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) are still debated in the treatment of patients with cancer, and the optimal duration of therapy remains uncertain. Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) were searched to retrieve studies on the efficacy and safety of DOACs versus LMWH in treating patients with cancer from January 1980 to October 2018. The primary efficacy and safety endpoints were recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding. Our study included two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nine observational studies, together comprising 4509 patients with cancer. The pooled estimates indicated that DOACs led to a modest reduction recurrent VTE in the RCTs [RR: 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.42-0.96, P = 0.03] and in the observational studies (RR: 0.74, 95% CI, 0.58-0.93, P = 0.011), without increasing the risk of major bleeding for observational studies (P = 0.805), but increased for RCTs (P = 0.017). The same trends were observed in the rivaroxaban subgroup. Moreover, subgroup analyses according to the treatment duration indicated that DOACs significantly reduced the incidence of recurrent VTE (P = 0.006 at 6 months; P < 0.001 at 12 months) without significant differences in major bleeding compared with LMWH at 6 or 12 months. Patients with cancer who received DOACs exhibited a significant reduction in recurrent VTE with no increased risk of major bleeding compared with LMWH. DOACs may be an alternative choice for long-term anticoagulant therapy in patients with cancer.

Diagnostic values of vascular endothelial growth factor and epidermal growth factor receptor for benign and malignant hydrothorax.

BACKGROUND: Hydrothorax, as one of the common complications of malignant tumors, still cannot be sensitively detected in clinical practice, thus requiring a sensitive, specific method for diagnosis. The aim of this study was to analyze the correlation between levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in patients with benign and malignant hydrothorax. METHODS: The contents of VEGF in the pleural effusion and serum of the patients with malignant pleural effusion (n = 35) and benign pleural effusion (n = 30) were detected by double antibody sandwich enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. The gene copy number level of EGFR in pleural effusion was detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The points with the highest sensitivity and specificity were selected as the critical values to calculate the diagnostic value of the VEGF in pleural effusion and serum, and EGFR gene copy number in pleural effusion. RESULTS: The contents of VEGF in pleural effusion and serum of patients with malignant hydrothorax were (384.91 ± 120.18), and (129.62 ± 46.35) ng/L, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of the patients with benign hydrothorax (207.97 ± 64.04), (63.49 ± 24.58) ng/L (P < 0.01). The sensitivity and specificity of detecting VEGF in pleural effusion were 80.0% and 96.7% (the boundary value was 297.06 ng/L), respectively for diagnosing benign and malignant hydrothorax. The sensitivity and specificity of serum were 74.3% and 96.7%, respectively (the boundary value was 99.21 ng/L) for diagnosing benign and malignant hydrothorax. The diagnostic efficiencies of EGFR and VEGF in hydrothorax were similar. There was a significant correlation between EGFR and VEGF in hydrothorax (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: VEGF and EGFR play important roles in the formation of pleural effusion. VEGF differed significantly in benign and malignant pleural effusions, which contributed to differential diagnosis results of benign and malignant pleural effusions. It is feasible to detect the gene copy number of the pleural effusion cell mass EGFR by FISH technique. Joint detection can improve the diagnostic sensitivity.