ABSTRACT
Our study aimed to identify clusters of hospitalized older COVID-19 patients according to their main comorbidities and routine laboratory parameters to evaluate their association with in-hospital mortality. We performed an observational study on 485 hospitalized older COVID-19 adults (aged 80+ years). Patients were aggregated in clusters by a K-medians cluster analysis. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Medical history and laboratory parameters were collected on admission. Frailty, defined by the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), referred to the two weeks before hospitalization and was used as a covariate. The median age was 87 (83-91) years, with a female prevalence (59.2%). Three different clusters were identified: cluster 1 (337), cluster 2 (118), and cluster 3 (30). In-hospital mortality was 28.5%, increasing from cluster 1 to cluster 3: cluster 1 = 21.1%, cluster 2 = 40.7%, and cluster 3 = 63.3% (p < 0.001). The risk for in-hospital mortality was higher in clusters 2 [HR 1.96 (95% CI: 1.28-3.01)] and 3 [HR 2.87 (95% CI: 1.62-5.07)] compared to cluster 1, even after adjusting for age, sex, and frailty. Patients in cluster 3 were older and had a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation, higher admission NT-proBNP and C-reactive protein levels, higher prevalence of concurrent bacterial infections, and lower estimated glomerular filtration rates. The addition of CFS significantly improved the predictive ability of the clusters for in-hospital mortality. Our cluster analysis on older COVID-19 patients provides a characterization of those subjects at higher risk for in-hospital mortality, highlighting the role played by cardio-renal impairment, higher inflammation markers, and frailty, often simultaneously present in the same patient.
ABSTRACT
Background: Older adults are at higher risk of morbidity and mortality for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors (RASi) were found to have a neutral or protective effect against mortality in COVID-19 adult patients. Aims: We investigated whether this association was confirmed also in COVID-19 older patients. Methods: This is a prospective observational study on 337 hospitalized older adults (aged 80 years and older). We classified the study population according to usage of RASi before and during hospitalization. A propensity score analysis was also performed to confirm the findings. Results: The mean age was 87.4 ± 6.1 years. Patients taking RASi at home were 147 (43.6%). During hospitalization, 38 patients (11.3% of the entire study population) discontinued RASi, while 57 patients (16.9% of the entire study population) started RASi. In-hospital mortality was 43.9%. Patients taking RASi during hospitalization (patients who maintained their home RASi therapy + patients who started RASi during hospitalization) had a significantly lower in-hospital mortality than untreated patients [HR 0.48 (95% CI: 0.34-0.67)], even after adjustment for required respiratory support, functional status, albumin, inflammation, and cardiac biomarkers. The analysis of the groups derived from the "propensity score matching" (58 patients in each group) confirmed these results [HR 0.46 (95% CI: 0.23-0.91)]. Discussion: Despite the high risk of death in older COVID-19 patients, RASi therapy during hospitalization was associated with a clinically relevant lower in-hospital mortality, likely due to the benefit of RAS modulation on the cardiopulmonary system during the acute phase of the disease. Conclusion: Our findings confirm the protective role of RASi even in COVID-19 patients aged 80 years and older.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the prevalence and predictors of ambulatory blood pressure (BP) control in patients taking a triple antihypertensive therapy (renin-angiotensin system inhibitor + calcium channel blocker + thiazide/thiazide-like diuretic, in either free or fixed-dose combinations) containing an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). METHODS: We performed an observational cross-sectional study on 520 consecutive patients with essential hypertension taking a stable triple therapy in whom 24-h ambulatory BP was evaluated. Both number of pills and antihypertensive treatment intensity (ATI), as possible pharmacological predictors of ambulatory BP control, were taken into account. RESULTS: A total of 189 (36.3%) patients were taking triple therapy with ACEi and 331 (63.7%) patients were taking triple therapy with ARB. Mean age was 62.7 ± 12.2 years. Patients on triple therapy with ACEi had a significantly lower ATI and took fewer antihypertensive pills than patients on triple therapy with ARB (22.2% of patients took a single-pill triple fixed-dose combination). Patients taking triple therapy with ACEi had higher prevalence of both 24-h (54.8% vs 44.0%; p = 0.019) and daytime BP control (61.8% vs 49.2%; p = 0.006) than patients taking triple therapy with ARB, even after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, smoking habit, type 2 diabetes mellitus, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and ATI [OR 1.5 (95% CI 1.1-2.2) and OR 1.6 (95% CI 1.1-2.4), respectively]. However, these independent associations with ambulatory BP control were lost when the number of antihypertensive pills was included in the model. CONCLUSION: The higher prevalence of ambulatory BP control found in patients taking a triple therapy with ACEi was affected by the lower number of antihypertensive pills taken, which was also the key predictor of ambulatory BP control in our study. This confirms the importance of fixed-dose combinations in the management of essential hypertension.
