Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment (Engl Ed) ; 15(4): 251-258, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36513401

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to assess the relationship between social functioning and clinical symptoms in people with schizophrenia, analyzing the influence of both global social functioning and the specific aspects of social functioning, assertiveness and communication skills in the explanation of type of symptoms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional descriptive study composed of 125 people diagnosed with schizophrenia was performed. Patients were assessed with the Communication Skills Questionnaire (CSQ), the Gambrill and Richey Assertiveness Inventory (GR), the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF) and the Global Assessment of Social Functioning Scale (SOFAS), Social Functioning Scale (SFS), Life Skills Profile (LSP) scale and the Clinical Global Impression scale for Schizophrenia (CGI-S). RESULTS: SOFAS, LSP and GR are related to each of the subscales and total scores of symptoms (p<0.05-0.001). The multiple regressions show that SOFAS and GR explained 59% of the total symptoms. SOFAS and GR, accounting for 65% of the variance, explain positive symptoms. GR and SOFAS explained 34% of the variance of negative symptoms. SOFAS, CSQ and LSP, accounting for 20% of the variance, explain depressive symptoms. SOFAS explained 46% of the variance of cognitive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest the usefulness of social functioning assessment in the explanation of clinical symptoms in people with schizophrenia. Moreover, our results point out that not only negative and cognitive symptoms, but also positive and depressive symptoms, should be taken into account in the rehabilitation process in order to improve patient adaptation in the community.


Subject(s)
Schizophrenia , Humans , Schizophrenia/diagnosis , Social Interaction , Cross-Sectional Studies , Multivariate Analysis
2.
Rev. psiquiatr. salud ment. (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 15(4): 251-258, oct.-dic. 2022. tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-213119

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The aim of the present study was to assess the relationship between social functioning and clinical symptoms in people with schizophrenia, analyzing the influence of both global social functioning and the specific aspects of social functioning, assertiveness and communication skills in the explanation of type of symptoms. Material and methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study composed of 125 people diagnosed with schizophrenia was performed. Patients were assessed with the Communication Skills Questionnaire (CSQ), the Gambrill and Richey Assertiveness Inventory (GR), the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF) and the Global Assessment of Social Functioning Scale (SOFAS), Social Functioning Scale (SFS), Life Skills Profile (LSP) scale and the Clinical Global Impression scale for Schizophrenia (CGI-S). Results: SOFAS, LSP and GR are related to each of the subscales and total scores of symptoms (p<0.05–0.001). The multiple regressions show that SOFAS and GR explained 59% of the total symptoms. SOFAS and GR, accounting for 65% of the variance, explain positive symptoms. GR and SOFAS explained 34% of the variance of negative symptoms. SOFAS, CSQ and LSP, accounting for 20% of the variance, explain depressive symptoms. SOFAS explained 46% of the variance of cognitive symptoms. Conclusions: Our findings suggest the usefulness of social functioning assessment in the explanation of clinical symptoms in people with schizophrenia. Moreover, our results point out that not only negative and cognitive symptoms, but also positive and depressive symptoms, should be taken into account in the rehabilitation process in order to improve patient adaptation in the community. (AU)


Introducción: El objetivo del presente estudio fue evaluar la relación entre el funcionamiento social y los síntomas en las personas esquizofrénicas, analizando la influencia del funcionamiento social global y los aspectos específicos del funcionamiento social, la asertividad y las competencias de comunicación en la explicación del tipo de síntomas. Material y métodos: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo transversal integrado por 125 personas con diagnóstico de esquizofrenia. Se evaluó a los pacientes utilizando Communication Skills Questionnaire (CSQ), Gambrill and Richey Assertiveness Inventory (GR), Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF) y Global Assessment of Social Functioning Scale (SOFAS), Social Functioning Scale (SFS), Life Skills Profile (LSP) scale y Clinical Global Impression scale for Schizophrenia (CGI-S). Resultados: SOFAS, LSP y GR están relacionadas con cada una de las sub-escalas y puntuaciones totales de los síntomas (p<0,05-0,001). Las regresiones múltiples muestran que SOFAS y GR justifican el 59% de los síntomas totales. SOFAS y GR, que representan el 65% de la varianza, explican los síntomas positivos. GR y SOFAS justificaron el 34% de la varianza de síntomas negativos. SOFAS, CSQ y LSP, que representaron el 20% de la varianza, justificaron los síntomas depresivos. SOFAS justificó el 46% de la varianza de los síntomas cognitivos. Conclusiones: Nuestros hallazgos sugieren la utilidad de la evaluación del funcionamiento social para explicar los síntomas clínicos de las personas esquizofrénicas. Además, nuestros resultados apuntan que, no solo deberían considerarse en el proceso de rehabilitación los síntomas negativos y cognitivos, sino también los síntomas positivos y depresivos, a fin de mejorar la adaptación del paciente dentro de la comunidad. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Schizophrenia/diagnosis , Schizophrenia/rehabilitation , Interpersonal Relations , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Cross-Sectional Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Communication
3.
Health Soc Care Community ; 30(6): e5819-e5830, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36073979

ABSTRACT

Profile of Community Recovery Services users has changed over the years and has become more diverse. To explore the evolution of treatment needs, this study aimed to identify users' needs, from the point of view of different agents implicated in the recovery process. We explored the consistency between the agents using the focus group technique. We defined four groups (n = 58): service users, family members, professionals, and referring professionals. We pre-identified topics related to recovery, such as illness-related losses, imaginary of CRS, expectations, activities, and life goals. All agents recognised losses related to the mental illness, the need for carrying activities out of the Community Recovery Services, and for including families in the recovery process. The groups differed in some areas, such as the identification of activities that should be encouraged, or the importance of promoting vital expectations. Our findings suggest that it is important to identify the needs of different agents involved in the recovery process. There is consistency in the service users' needs, but there are some differences that need to be considered. Interventions should be personalised, covering functional, cognitive, and relational losses related to the mental illness.


Subject(s)
Community Mental Health Services , Mental Disorders , Mental Health Services , Humans , Mental Health , Spain , Mental Disorders/therapy , Health Personnel
4.
J Pers Med ; 11(3)2021 Mar 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33802926

ABSTRACT

The objective of the study was to test the usability of 'Feeling Master' as a psychotherapeutic interactive gaming tool with LEGO cartoon faces showing the five basic emotions, for the assessment of emotional recognition in people with schizophrenia in comparison with healthy controls, and the relationship between face affect recognition (FER), attributional style, and theory of mind (ToM), which is the ability to understand the potential mental states and intentions of others. Nineteen individuals with schizophrenia (SZ) and 17 healthy control (HC) subjects completed the 'Feeling Master' that includes five basic emotions. To assess social cognition, the group with schizophrenia was evaluated with the Personal and Situational Attribution Questionnaire (IPSAQ) for the assessment of attributional style and the Hinting Task (ToM). Patients with SZ showed significant impairments in emotion recognition and their response time appeared to be slower than the HC in the recognition of each emotion. Taking into account the impairment in the recognition of each emotion, we only found a trend toward significance in error rates on fear recognition. The correlations between correct response on the 'Feeling Master' and the hinting task appeared to be significant in the correlation of surprise and theory of mind. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that the 'Feeling Master' could be useful for the evaluation of FER in people with schizophrenia. These results sustain the notion that impairments in emotion recognition are more prevalent in people with schizophrenia and that these are related with impairment in ToM.

5.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32694016

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to assess the relationship between social functioning and clinical symptoms in people with schizophrenia, analyzing the influence of both global social functioning and the specific aspects of social functioning, assertiveness and communication skills in the explanation of type of symptoms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional descriptive study composed of 125 people diagnosed with schizophrenia was performed. Patients were assessed with the Communication Skills Questionnaire (CSQ), the Gambrill and Richey Assertiveness Inventory (GR), the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF) and the Global Assessment of Social Functioning Scale (SOFAS), Social Functioning Scale (SFS), Life Skills Profile (LSP) scale and the Clinical Global Impression scale for Schizophrenia (CGI-S). RESULTS: SOFAS, LSP and GR are related to each of the subscales and total scores of symptoms (p<0.05-0.001). The multiple regressions show that SOFAS and GR explained 59% of the total symptoms. SOFAS and GR, accounting for 65% of the variance, explain positive symptoms. GR and SOFAS explained 34% of the variance of negative symptoms. SOFAS, CSQ and LSP, accounting for 20% of the variance, explain depressive symptoms. SOFAS explained 46% of the variance of cognitive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest the usefulness of social functioning assessment in the explanation of clinical symptoms in people with schizophrenia. Moreover, our results point out that not only negative and cognitive symptoms, but also positive and depressive symptoms, should be taken into account in the rehabilitation process in order to improve patient adaptation in the community.

6.
Compr Psychiatry ; 87: 120-122, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30340017

ABSTRACT

Women with schizophrenia have shown better social and clinical functioning than men in several previous studies. The aim of this study was to assess gender differences in social functioning of people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia who are in psychosocial rehabilitation treatment in Catalonia, using several different one-dimensional and multidimensional measures of clinical and social functioning. Gender differences were found only in several daily life activities, in which women showed better functioning: independence-competence (p = 0.006) and independence-performance (p = 0.017). No other differences between genders were observed. Our results clearly suggest that women with schizophrenia undergoing the rehabilitation process could benefit as do men from psychosocial intervention in order to improve social skills and functioning.


Subject(s)
Psychiatric Rehabilitation/statistics & numerical data , Schizophrenia/rehabilitation , Schizophrenic Psychology , Sex Factors , Social Adjustment , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
7.
Rev. psiquiatr. salud ment ; 9(3): 150-157, jul.-sept. 2016. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-153962

ABSTRACT

Introducción. El estigma hacia las personas con una enfermedad mental es muy elevado. En España no existen instrumentos actuales para evaluar este constructo. El objetivo del presente estudio es validar la versión española del cuestionario Community Attitudes towards Mental Illness en una población de adolescentes, estudiando la consistencia interna del instrumento, así como la estabilidad temporal. Este último análisis se realizará también por género. Material y métodos. Se llevó a cabo una traducción y retrotraducción del Community Attitudes towards Mental Illness. Se evaluaron con este instrumento un total de 150 alumnos de Enseñanza Secundaria Obligatoria, de entre 14 y 18 años, en 2 momentos. Se analizó la consistencia interna del instrumento mediante el α de Cronbach, y la fiabilidad test-retest con el coeficiente de correlación intraclase. Se realizaron análisis estratificados por género. Resultados. El α de Cronbach fue de 0,861 para la primera evaluación y de 0,909 para la segunda evaluación. Los valores del coeficiente de correlación intraclase oscilan entre 0,775-0,339 en el análisis de ítem por ítem, y entre 0,88-0,81 en las subescalas. En la segmentación por género encontramos que las puntuaciones en el coeficiente de correlación intraclase en el grupo de chicas está entre 0,797-0,863 y en los chicos entre 0,889-0,774. Conclusiones. En conclusión podemos afirmar que el Community Attitudes towards Mental Illness es un instrumento fiable para la evaluación del estigma social. A pesar de resultar fiable de la misma manera para chicos y para chicas, se han encontrado algunas diferencias en el análisis por género (AU)


Introduction. The stigma against people with mental illness is very high. In Spain there are currently no tools to assess this construct. The aim of this study was to validate the Spanish version of the Community Attitudes towards Mental Illness questionnaire in an adolescent population, and determining its internal consistency and temporal stability. Another analysis by gender will be also performed. Material and methods. A translation and back-translation of the Community Attitudes towards Mental Illness was performed. A total of 150 students of between 14 and 18 years-old were evaluated with this tool in two stages. Internal consistency was tested using Cronbach α; and intraclass correlation coefficient was used for test-retest reliability. Gender-stratified analyses were also performed. Results. The Cronbach α was 0.861 for the first evaluation and 0.909 for the second evaluation. The values of the intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.775 to 0.339 in the item by item analysis, and between 0.88 and 0.81 in the subscales. In the segmentation by gender, it was found that girls scored between 0.797 and 0.863 in the intraclass correlation coefficient, and boys scored between 0.889 and 0.774. Conclusions. In conclusion, the Community Attitudes towards Mental Illness is a reliable tool for the assessment of social stigma. Although reliable results have been found for boys and girls, our results found some gender differences in the analysis (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Young Adult , Mental Status Schedule/statistics & numerical data , Mental Status Schedule/standards , Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale , Mental Health/standards , Mental Health/trends , Social Stigma , Surveys and Questionnaires , Reproducibility of Results , 28599
8.
World J Psychiatry ; 6(2): 239-47, 2016 Jun 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27354967

ABSTRACT

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention for reducing social stigma towards mental illness in adolescents. The effect of gender and knowledge of someone with mental illness was measured. METHODS: Two hundred and eighty secondary school students were evaluated using the Community Attitudes towards Mental Illness (CAMI) questionnaire. The schools were randomized and some received the intervention and others acted as the control group. The programme consisted of providing information via a documentary film and of contact with healthcare staff in order to reduce the social stigma within the school environment. RESULTS: The intervention was effective in reducing the CAMI authoritarianism and social restrictiveness subscales. The intervention showed significant changes in girls in terms of authoritarianism and social restrictiveness, while boys only showed significant changes in authoritarianism. Following the intervention, a significant reduction was found in authoritarianism and social restrictiveness in those who knew someone with mental illness, and only in authoritarianism in those who did not know anyone with mental illness. CONCLUSION: The intervention was effective to reduce social stigma towards people with mental illness, especially in the area of authoritarianism. Some differences were found depending on gender and whether or not the subjects knew someone with mental illness.

9.
Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment ; 9(3): 150-7, 2016.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25882535

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The stigma against people with mental illness is very high. In Spain there are currently no tools to assess this construct. The aim of this study was to validate the Spanish version of the Community Attitudes towards Mental Illness questionnaire in an adolescent population, and determining its internal consistency and temporal stability. Another analysis by gender will be also performed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A translation and back-translation of the Community Attitudes towards Mental Illness was performed. A total of 150 students of between 14 and 18 years-old were evaluated with this tool in two stages. Internal consistency was tested using Cronbach α; and intraclass correlation coefficient was used for test-retest reliability. Gender-stratified analyses were also performed. RESULTS: The Cronbach α was 0.861 for the first evaluation and 0.909 for the second evaluation. The values of the intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.775 to 0.339 in the item by item analysis, and between 0.88 and 0.81 in the subscales. In the segmentation by gender, it was found that girls scored between 0.797 and 0.863 in the intraclass correlation coefficient, and boys scored between 0.889 and 0.774. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the Community Attitudes towards Mental Illness is a reliable tool for the assessment of social stigma. Although reliable results have been found for boys and girls, our results found some gender differences in the analysis.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Mental Disorders , Psychological Tests , Social Stigma , Adolescent , Female , Humans , Male , Psychology, Adolescent , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Sex Factors , Spain , Translations
10.
Compr Psychiatry ; 62: 93-9, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26343472

ABSTRACT

Self-stigma specifically in people with schizophrenia has been little studied. The aims of the present study were to validate a new instrument for the assessment of self-stigma (SSQ) and to assess the relationship between self-stigma and social functioning in people with schizophrenia. A sample of 76 people with schizophrenia was assessed at two moments in time with the SSQ, the PDD (stigma), two scales of social functioning (LSP, SFS), and a scale of general functioning (GAF). The results indicated that SSQ presented good psychometric properties, with Cronbach's alpha ranging between 0.75 and 0.901. The stability of the instrument was between 0.836 and 0.402. Three factors were found in the factor analysis (social discrimination, perceived capabilities, concealment of the disease), explaining 62.66% of the total variance. A relationship was found between self-stigma and social functioning in people with schizophrenia, especially in relation to social contact. In conclusion, the SSQ seems to be a valid and reliable questionnaire for the assessment of self-stigma in people with schizophrenia, and interventions should be designed to cope with self-stigma in order to improve the social functioning of people who suffer schizophrenia.


Subject(s)
Schizophrenic Psychology , Social Adjustment , Social Stigma , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adaptation, Psychological , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Perception , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Social Discrimination , Young Adult
11.
Psychiatry Res ; 220(1-2): 646-53, 2014 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25091232

ABSTRACT

This present study describes the validation of the Communication Skills Questionnaire (CSQ) in people with schizophrenia. A total of 125 clinically stable people in rehabilitation treatment who were diagnosed with schizophrenia were included. For convergent and discriminant validity the following tests were administered; the Gambrill and Richie (GR) Assertiveness Inventory, the Social Functioning Scale (SFS), Life Skills Profile (LSP), Clinical Global Impression scale for schizophrenia (CGI-S) and the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale. Internal consistency of the CSQ had a Cronbach׳s alpha of 0.96. Test-retest reliability showed coefficients between 0.60 and 0.70. Convergent validity showed significant relations at p<0.0001 for all instruments assessed. None of the subscales used for assessing discriminant validity showed a significant correlation with the CSQ except for the CGI-S depression subscale. The instrument shows good psychometric properties and demonstrates that it is a useful instrument for evaluating communication skills in people with schizophrenia.


Subject(s)
Communication , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/statistics & numerical data , Schizophrenia/rehabilitation , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results
12.
An. psicol ; 30(2): 431-437, mayo 2014. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-121781

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Validar la versión española del Cuestionario de Asertividad de Gambrill y Richey en personas con esquizofrenia. Método: La muestra está compuesta por 125 personas con esquizofrenia en tratamiento en uno de los centros de rehabilitación psicosocial que participan en el estudio. Los instrumentos utilizados para valorar la validez discriminante y convergente son: el cuestionario de habilidades de comunicación(CSQ); la Escala de Funcionamiento Social(EFS); el Perfil de Habilidades de la Vida Cotidiana(LSP);la Escala de Impresión Clínica Global (ICG) y la Escala de Funcionamiento Global(GAF). Resultados: La consistencia interna del instrumento muestra un alfa de Cronbach de .935 en la escala total. Los coeficientes de correlación intraclase para valorar la consistencia temporal del instrumento oscilan entre .21 y .78. El instrumento muestra validez convergente con la escala CSQ y con las subescalas de comunicación y aislamiento social (p < .001-.05). Con el resto de subescalas de funcionamiento social muestra validez divergente. Con la CGI muestra validez divergente con la probabilidad de respuesta, sin embargo encontramos que hay validez convergente entre las subescalas de CGI y la subescala de grado de malestar del instrumento (p < .012-.042). Conclusiones: El instrumento muestra unas buenas características psicométricas y parece útil para la valoración de las habilidades sociales en una muestra de personas con esquizofrenia


Objective: To validate the Spanish version of the questionnaire Gambrill and Richey Assertiveness for people with schizophrenia. Method: he sample comprised a total of 125 people with schizophrenia on treatment in one of the psychosocial rehabilitation centers participating in the study. The instruments used to assess convergent and discriminant validity are the Communication Skills Questionnaire (CSQ); the Social Functioning Scale(SFS); the Life Skills Profile(LSP); the Clinical Global Impression Scale(CGI) and the Global Functioning Scale (GAF). Results: Internal consistency of the instrument shows a Cronbach alpha of .935 in the full scale. The intraclass correlation coefficients to assess the instrument's internal consistency ranged between .21 and .78. The instrument shows a convergent validity with CSQ scale and the subscales of communication and social isolation (p < .001-.05). With the rest of social functioning sub-scales shows divergent validity. With the CGI shows divergent validity with the probability of response, and convergent validity between the subscales of CGI and the degree of distress subscale of the instrument (p < .012-.042). Conclusions: The instrument shows good psychometric characteristics and appears useful for assessing social skills in a sample of people with schizophrenia


Subject(s)
Humans , Schizophrenia , Neuropsychological Tests , Assertiveness , Activities of Daily Living/psychology , Communication , Executive Function , Social Adjustment
13.
World J Psychiatry ; 3(2): 18-24, 2013 Jun 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24175182

ABSTRACT

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness in reducing social stigma of an intervention and to assess the influence of gender and knowledge. METHODS: The program consisted in providing information and contact with users of mental health in order to reduce social stigma in the school environment. A total of 62 secondary school students (age 14-16 years) were evaluated with the Opinions on Mental Illness (OMI) questionnaire before and after the intervention. The subscales of the OMI were: authoritarianism, interpersonal etiology, benevolence, restrictiveness and negativism. The analysis was performed over the total sample, separating by gender and knowledge of someone with a mental disorder. t-test for repeated measures was used in the statistical analysis. RESULTS: All the OMI subscales showed a significant change after the intervention (P < 0.001), except for benevolence. Women presented significant changes in the subscales of authoritarianism and restrictiveness, while men presented changes in negativism and interpersonal etiology rather than restrictiveness (P < 0.001-0.003). Students that knew someone with a mental disorder presented significant changes in authoritarianism, interpersonal etiology, and negativism (P < 0.001-0.003) and students that do not know anyone with a mental disorder improved in restrictiveness and authoritarianism (P < 0.001-0.001). In all the subscales of the instrument the students improved their perception of mental disorders, reducing their levels of stigma. CONCLUSION: The intervention designed to reduce social stigma was effective, especially in the area of authoritarianism. The whole sample showed improved attitudes towards mental illness, although the areas were different depending on gender and knowledge.

14.
Rev. Asoc. Esp. Neuropsiquiatr ; 31(111): 477-489, jul.-sept. 2011. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-89738

ABSTRACT

Introducción y objetivos: Pocos son los estudios que evaluan la autopercepción del estigma social en las personas que padecen esquizofrenia. El objetivo del presente estudio consiste en analizar la percepción sobre la esquizofrenia que tienen las personas que la padecen. Material y métodos: Se realizaron dos sesiones en cuatro grupos focales de personas con esquizofrenia que estaban siendo atendidas en servicios de rehabilitación psicosocial del Parc Sanitari de Sant Joan de Déu. A partir de un guión establecido se valoraron un total de 11 áreas abordadas en los grupos. Resultados: Las áreas de peligrosidad, culpa, pérdida de roles sociales y miedo al rechazo fueron aquellas que más mencionaron y más preocupaban a las personas que participaron en los grupos focales. Conclusión: Intervenciones para reducir el estigma social en la comunidad y en los propios usuarios/as deberían ser tenidas en cuenta, especialmente en estas área (AU)


Introduction and Objetives: Few studies evaluated the perception of social stigma in people with schizophrenia. The aim of this study was to analyze the perception of people who suffers schizophrenia. Material and methods: Two sessions in four focus groups of people with schizophrenia who were being treated in psychosocial rehabilitation services Sanitari Parc de Sant Joan de Déu were done. A total of 11 areas (guided by a screenplay) were assessed in the groups. Results: The areas of danger, guilt, lost of social roles and fear of rejection were those most concerned and most mencioned by the people who took part in focus groups. Conclusion: Interventions to reduce social stigma in the community and in the self- users should be taken into account, especially in these areas (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Self Concept , Social Stigma , Schizophrenic Psychology , Social Support , Sick Role/physiology , Body Image , Mental Health Services/trends , Mental Health Services , Psychosocial Impact
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...