Survival Differences in High-Risk Prostate Cancer by Age.

PURPOSE: Age is an established determining factor in survival in low-risk prostate cancer (PC), being this evidence weaker in high-risk tumors. Our aim is to evaluate the survival of patients with high-risk PC treated with curative intent and to identify differences across ages at diagnosis. METHODS: We did a retrospective analysis of patients with high-risk PC treated with surgery (RP) or radiotherapy (RDT) excluding N+ patients. We divided patients by age groups: < 60, 60-70, and > 70 years. We performed a comparative survival analysis. A multivariate analysis adjusted for clinically relevant variables and initial treatment received was performed. RESULTS: Of a total of 2383 patients, 378 met the selection criteria with a median follow-up of 8.9 years: 38 (10.1%) < 60 years, 175 (46.3%) between 60-70 years, and 165 (43.6%) >70 years. Initial treatment with surgery was predominant in the younger group (RP:63.2%, RDT:36.8%), and with radiotherapy in the older group (RP:17%, RDT:83%) (p = 0.001). In the survival analysis, significant differences were observed in overall survival, with better results for the younger group. However, these results were reversed in biochemical recurrence-free survival, with patients < 60 years presenting a higher rate of biochemical recurrence at 10 years. In the multivariate analysis, age behaved as an independent risk variable only for overall survival, with a HR of 2.8 in the group >70 years (95%CI: 1.22-6.5; p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: In our series, age appeared to be an independent prognostic factor for overall survival, with no differences in the rest of the survival rates.

Influence of androgen deprivation therapy on the severity of COVID-19 in prostate cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The TMPRSS2 protein has been involved in severe acute respiratory syndrome caused by coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The production is regulated by the androgen receptor (AR). It is speculated that androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) may protect patients affected by prostate cancer (PC) from SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients treated for COVID-19 in our institution who had a previous diagnosis of PC. We analyzed the influence of exposure of ADT on the presence of severe course of COVID-19. RESULTS: A total of 2280 patients were treated in our center for COVID-19 with a worse course of disease in males (higher rates of hospitalization, intense care unit [ICU] admission, and death). Out of 1349 subjects registered in our PC database, 156 were on ADT and 1193 were not. Out of those, 61 (4.52%) PC patients suffered from COVID-19, 11 (18.0%) belonged to the ADT group, and 50 (82.0%) to the non-ADT group. Regarding the influence of ADT on the course of the disease, statistically significant differences were found neither in the death rate (27.3% vs. 34%; p = 0.481), nor in the presence of severe COVID-19: need for intubation or ICU admission (0% vs. 6.3%; p = 0.561) and need for corticoid treatment, interferon beta, or tocilizumab (60% vs. 34.7%; p = 0.128). Multivariate analysis adjusted for clinically relevant comorbidities did not find that ADT was a protective factor for worse clinical evolution (risk ratio [RR] 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-1.83; p = 0.77) or death (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.26-1.74; p = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that COVID-19 is more severe in men. However, the use of ADT in patients with PC was not shown to prevent the risk of severe COVID-19.