Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 67
Filter
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(7): e2120295, 2021 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34236416

ABSTRACT

Importance: The COVID-19 pandemic is the greatest global test of health leadership of our generation. There is an urgent need to provide guidance for leaders at all levels during the unprecedented preresolution recovery stage. Objective: To create an evidence- and expertise-informed framework of leadership imperatives to serve as a resource to guide health and public health leaders during the postemergency stage of the pandemic. Evidence Review: A literature search in PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase revealed 10 910 articles published between 2000 and 2021 that included the terms leadership and variations of emergency, crisis, disaster, pandemic, COVID-19, or public health. Using the Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence reporting guideline for consensus statement development, this assessment adopted a 6-round modified Delphi approach involving 32 expert coauthors from 17 countries who participated in creating and validating a framework outlining essential leadership imperatives. Findings: The 10 imperatives in the framework are: (1) acknowledge staff and celebrate successes; (2) provide support for staff well-being; (3) develop a clear understanding of the current local and global context, along with informed projections; (4) prepare for future emergencies (personnel, resources, protocols, contingency plans, coalitions, and training); (5) reassess priorities explicitly and regularly and provide purpose, meaning, and direction; (6) maximize team, organizational, and system performance and discuss enhancements; (7) manage the backlog of paused services and consider improvements while avoiding burnout and moral distress; (8) sustain learning, innovations, and collaborations, and imagine future possibilities; (9) provide regular communication and engender trust; and (10) in consultation with public health and fellow leaders, provide safety information and recommendations to government, other organizations, staff, and the community to improve equitable and integrated care and emergency preparedness systemwide. Conclusions and Relevance: Leaders who most effectively implement these imperatives are ideally positioned to address urgent needs and inequalities in health systems and to cocreate with their organizations a future that best serves stakeholders and communities.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Health Personnel , Leadership , Pandemics , Consensus , Disaster Planning , Health Personnel/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Personnel/organization & administration , Humans , Models, Organizational , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Healthc Q ; 23(4): 60-64, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33475494

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patient and family experience are integral to the care that we provide. In the pediatric hospital setting, multiple family members are directly involved in patient care. We identified the need for greater caregiver name recognition at The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to improve communication between healthcare providers and families via the optimization of caregiver identification badges. METHODS: We used a qualitative, narrative study design to explore perceptions surrounding caregiver identification badges via unstructured interviews. RESULTS: We identified key hospital and family stakeholders. Unstructured interviews supported the theory that badge optimization could improve communication and patient care. Our initiative, however, was abruptly interrupted by the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSION: Communication with patients and families is crucial across medical disciplines. The optimization of caregiver identification badges to facilitate the use of preferred names and pronouns will ultimately lead to the more effective and safer delivery of high-quality care.


Subject(s)
Caregivers , Communication , Professional-Family Relations , Caregivers/psychology , Hospitals , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Stakeholder Participation
3.
Healthc Q ; 23(SP): 4-7, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32333742

ABSTRACT

Physicians as a group have a highly variable love/hate relationship with digital technology: there is no doubt that digital technology has the potential to dramatically improve the care that we provide to our patients; however, it also has the potential to negatively disrupt how we work and interact with one another and may even cause harm, albeit rarely (Wachter 2015). One suspects that this trade-off is similar to what has been experienced by society as a whole as we have undergone the digital revolution over the past two decades. For example, although digital platforms have allowed us to stream more music than could ever be purchased by one individual, it comes at the cost of sound quality. Social media has allowed billions of people to connect across cultures but has opened up a whole new world of cyberbullying and "fake news."


Subject(s)
Electronic Health Records , Physicians , Communication , Hospitals, Community , Humans , Ontario
4.
Am J Infect Control ; 47(8): 1022-1024, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30795839

ABSTRACT

Active pulmonary tuberculosis testing with 3 expectorated sputa can increase isolation days and expenditures compared with 1 induced sputum. Six-month retrospective and prospective chart reviews were conducted, and a screening algorithm was phased into 2 hospital sites. With induced sputum testing, isolation decreased from 7 to 4 days (interquartile range, 4-3, P = .0135), and there was a cost savings of $7,275 per case, with no added harm.


Subject(s)
Bacteriological Techniques/methods , Bacteriological Techniques/standards , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolation & purification , Sputum/microbiology , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/diagnosis , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/microbiology , Aged , Bacteriological Techniques/economics , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies
5.
Can Assoc Radiol J ; 70(1): 96-103, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30691569

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: In suspected spondylodiscitis and vertebral osteomyelitis, computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsies are often performed to determine a causative organism and guide antimicrobial therapy. The aim of this study is to determine the diagnostic culture yield of CT-guided biopsies performed in cases of suspected spinal infections. METHODS: A literature search of PubMed and MEDLINE up to April 2017 was performed for keywords "CT guided vertebral biopsy infection," "CT-guided spine biopsy infection," "CT guided spine biopsy yield," and "CT guided vertebral biopsy yield." Inclusion criteria primarily consisted of studies exclusively using CT-guided biopsies in cases of suspected infectious lesions only. After study selection, published articles were analysed to determine diagnostic culture yield. Descriptive statistics were applied. RESULTS: 220 search results were screened; 11 met our inclusion criteria and were reviewed. In total, 647 biopsies of suspected infectious spinal lesions were performed. Positive cultures were obtained in 241 cases. Upon excluding one paper's skewed results, the net pooled results culture yield was 33%. Several cultures grew multiple organisms, leading to a total of 244 species identified. Most common isolated organisms include Staphylococcus aureus (n = 83), coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (n = 45), and Mycobacteria (n = 38). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic culture yield of CT-guided biopsies in cases of suspected spinal infection is 33%. In the majority of cases, a causative organism is not identified. This suggests that improvements can be made in biopsy technique and specimen transfer to optimize culture yield and increase the clinical value of the procedure.


Subject(s)
Discitis/diagnostic imaging , Osteomyelitis/diagnostic imaging , Radiography, Interventional/methods , Spine/diagnostic imaging , Spine/pathology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Discitis/pathology , Humans , Image-Guided Biopsy , Osteomyelitis/pathology , Reproducibility of Results
6.
Healthc Pap ; 17(1): 8-23, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29278219

ABSTRACT

Front-line ownership (FLO) is a complexity science-based approach to leading change initiatives that is built upon a foundation of Positive Deviance and the use of Liberating Structures to engage others. In this paper, we outline the use of FLO in four successful patient safety or quality improvement projects in four countries. While the underlying principles guiding the use of FLO were the same for each of these projects, project goals, the types of roles involved and how the projects evolved, spread and were sustained, varied considerably between settings. Allowing for local variability while following consistent overarching simple rules is central to the FLO approach and we believe the key reason why it has met with success. While many parts of healthcare delivery require increased standardization, approaches that allow teams to develop implementation strategies based on their unique local situations, will likely meet with greater success than those that attempt to standardize implementation in addition to practice.


Subject(s)
Health Personnel/psychology , Organizational Innovation , Ownership , Patient Safety , Quality Improvement/standards , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Hand Hygiene , Health Personnel/standards , Humans , Infection Control/standards , Ireland , New York , New Zealand , Organizational Case Studies , Safety Management/standards
7.
Healthc Pap ; 17(1): 57-61, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29278226

ABSTRACT

It is a pleasure to respond to the commentaries and we thank the authors for the thought, time and effort they so obviously put into their writing. We are excited that documenting our experience has resulted in such a wide range of opinion.


Subject(s)
Ownership , Quality Improvement , Quality of Health Care , Writing
9.
PLoS One ; 12(1): e0163586, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28129360

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Four cluster randomized controlled trials (cRCTs) conducted in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) have reported reductions in patient risk through increased healthcare worker (HCW) influenza vaccination. This evidence has led to expansive policies of enforcement that include all staff of acute care hospitals and other healthcare settings beyond LTCFs. We critique and quantify the cRCT evidence for indirect patient benefit underpinning policies of mandatory HCW influenza vaccination. METHODS: Plausibility of the four cRCT findings attributing indirect patient benefits to HCW influenza vaccination was assessed by comparing percentage reductions in patient risk reported by the cRCTs to predicted values. Plausibly predicted values were derived according to the basic mathematical principle of dilution, taking into account HCW influenza vaccine coverage and the specificity of patient outcomes for influenza. Accordingly, predicted values were calculated as a function of relevant compound probabilities including vaccine efficacy (ranging 40-60% in HCWs and favourably assuming the same indirect protection conferred through them to patients) × change in proportionate HCW influenza vaccine coverage (as reported by each cRCT) × percentage of a given patient outcome (e.g. influenza-like illness (ILI) or all-cause mortality) plausibly due to influenza virus. The number needed to vaccinate (NNV) for HCWs to indirectly prevent patient death was recalibrated based on real patient data of hospital-acquired influenza, with adjustment for potential under-detection (5.2-fold), and using favourable assumptions of HCW-attributable risk (ranging 60-80%). RESULTS: In attributing patient benefit to increased HCW influenza vaccine coverage, each cRCT was found to violate the basic mathematical principle of dilution by reporting greater percentage reductions with less influenza-specific patient outcomes (i.e., all-cause mortality > ILI > laboratory-confirmed influenza) and/or patient mortality reductions exceeding even favourably-derived predicted values by at least 6- to 15-fold. If extrapolated to all LTCF and hospital staff in the United States, the prior cRCT-claimed NNV of 8 would implausibly mean >200,000 and >675,000 patient deaths, respectively, could be prevented annually by HCW influenza vaccination, inconceivably exceeding total US population mortality estimates due to seasonal influenza each year, or during the 1918 pandemic, respectively. More realistic recalibration based on actual patient data instead shows that at least 6000 to 32,000 hospital workers would need to be vaccinated before a single patient death could potentially be averted. CONCLUSIONS: The four cRCTs underpinning policies of enforced HCW influenza vaccination attribute implausibly large reductions in patient risk to HCW vaccination, casting serious doubts on their validity. The impression that unvaccinated HCWs place their patients at great influenza peril is exaggerated. Instead, the HCW-attributable risk and vaccine-preventable fraction both remain unknown and the NNV to achieve patient benefit still requires better understanding. Although current scientific data are inadequate to support the ethical implementation of enforced HCW influenza vaccination, they do not refute approaches to support voluntary vaccination or other more broadly protective practices, such as staying home or masking when acutely ill.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/epidemiology , Health Personnel , Influenza Vaccines/therapeutic use , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Cross Infection/virology , Humans , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/virology , Long-Term Care , Mortality , Orthomyxoviridae/pathogenicity , Pandemics , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Vaccination/methods
10.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 38(1): 24-30, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27804901

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE To assess clinically relevant outcomes after complete cessation of control measures for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). DESIGN Quasi-experimental ecological study over 3.5 years. METHODS All VRE screening and isolation practices at 4 large academic hospitals in Ontario, Canada, were stopped on July 1, 2012. In total, 618 anonymized abstracted charts of patients with VRE-positive clinical isolates identified between July 1, 2010, and December 31, 2013, were reviewed to determine whether the case was a true VRE infection, a VRE colonization or contaminant, or a true VRE bacteremia. All deaths within 30 days of the last VRE infection were also reviewed to determine whether the death was fully or partially attributable to VRE. All-cause mortality was evaluated over the study period. Generalized estimating equation methods were used to cluster outcome rates within hospitals, and negative binomial models were created for each outcome. RESULTS The incidence rate ratio (IRR) for VRE infections was 0.59 and the associated P value was .34. For VRE bacteremias, the IRR was 0.54 and P=.38; for all-cause mortality the IRR was 0.70 and P=.66; and for VRE attributable death, the IRR was 0.35 and P=.49. VRE control measures were not significantly associated with any of the outcomes. Rates of all outcomes appeared to increase during the 18-month period after cessation of VRE control measures, but none reached statistical significance. CONCLUSION Clinically significant VRE outcomes remain rare. Cessation of all control measures for VRE had no significant attributable adverse clinical impact. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;1-7.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/mortality , Cross Infection/mortality , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/mortality , Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci/isolation & purification , Aged , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Female , Hospitals , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Ontario/epidemiology , Vancomycin Resistance
11.
J Gen Intern Med ; 32(3): 262-268, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27752880

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Isolation precautions have negative effects on patient safety, psychological well-being, and healthcare worker contact. However, it is not known whether isolation precautions affect certain hospital-related outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of isolation precautions on hospital-related outcomes and cost of care. DESIGN: Retrospective, propensity-score matched cohort study of inpatients admitted to general internal medicine (GIM) services at three academic hospitals in Toronto, Ontario, Canada between January 2010 and December 2012. PARTICIPANTS: Adult (≥18 years of age) patients on isolation precautions for respiratory illnesses and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) were matched to controls based on propensity scores derived from nine covariates: age, sex, Resource Intensity Weight, number of hospital readmissions within 90 days, total length of stay for hospital admissions within 90 days, site of admission, month of isolation, year of isolation, and Case Mix Group. MAIN MEASURES: Thirty-day readmission rates and emergency department visits, hospital length of stay, expected length of stay, adverse events, in-hospital mortality, patient complaints, and cost of care in Canadian doll ars (CAD). KEY RESULTS: A total of 17,649 non-isolated patients were admitted to the participating hospitals during the study period. We identified 1506 patients isolated for respiratory illnesses and 745 patients isolated for MRSA. Compared to non-isolated individuals, those on isolation precautions for respiratory illnesses stayed 17 % longer (95 % CI: 9 %, 25 %), stayed 9 % longer than expected (95 % CI: 3 %, 15 %), and had 23 % higher cost of care (95 % CI: 14 %, 32 %). Patients isolated for MRSA had similar outcomes, but they also had a 4.4 % higher (95 % CI: 1.4 %, 7.3 %) rate of readmission to hospital within 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: Isolation precautions are associated with adverse effects which may result in poorer hospital outcomes. Balancing the benefits for the many with the harms to the few will be a future challenge.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Patient Isolation/economics , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Academic Medical Centers , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Length of Stay/economics , Male , Patient Isolation/statistics & numerical data , Patient Readmission/economics , Propensity Score , Respiratory Tract Infections/economics , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Staphylococcal Infections/economics , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology
12.
CMAJ ; 187(16): E473-E481, 2015 Nov 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26416993

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: All Canadian immigrants undergo screening for tuberculosis (TB) before immigration, and selected immigrants must undergo postimmigration surveillance for the disease. We sought to quantify the domestic health impact of screening for TB in all new immigrants and to identify mechanisms to enhance effectiveness and efficiency of this screening. METHODS: We linked preimmigration medical examination records from 944,375 immigrants who settled in Ontario between 2002 and 2011 to active TB reporting data in Ontario between 2002 and 2011. Using a retrospective cohort study design, we measured birth country-specific rates of active TB detected through preimmigration screening and postimmigration surveillance. We then quantified the proportion of active TB cases among residents of Ontario born abroad that were detected through postimmigration surveillance. Using Cox regression, we identified independent predictors of active TB postimmigration. RESULTS: Immigrants from 6 countries accounted for 87.3% of active TB cases detected through preimmigration screening, and 10 countries accounted for 80.4% of cases detected through postimmigration surveillance. Immigrants from countries with a TB (all-sites) incidence rate of less than 30 cases per 100 000 persons resulted in pre- and postimmigration detection of 2.4 and 0.9 cases per 100 000 immigrants, respectively. Postimmigration surveillance detected 2.6% of active TB cases in Ontario residents born abroad, and TB was detected a median of 18 days earlier in those undergoing surveillance than in those who were not referred to surveillance or who did not comply. Predictors of active TB postimmigration included radiographic markers of old TB, birth country, immigration category, location of application for residency, immune status and age. INTERPRETATION: Universal screening for TB in new immigrants has a modest impact on the domestic burden of active TB and is highly inefficient. Focusing preimmigration screening in countries with high incidence rates and revising criteria for postimmigration surveillance could increase the effectiveness and efficiency of screening.


Subject(s)
Emigrants and Immigrants/statistics & numerical data , Mass Screening/methods , Public Health Surveillance/methods , Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Ontario/epidemiology , Program Evaluation , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Tuberculosis/epidemiology , Tuberculosis/prevention & control , Young Adult
13.
Reg Anesth Pain Med ; 40(1): 82-4, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25469758

ABSTRACT

The use of ultrasound guidance has revolutionized regional anesthesia practice. Ultrasound equipment disinfection techniques vary between institutions. To date, there are no large data set publications or evidence-based guidelines that describe risk-reduction techniques for infectious complications related to the use of ultrasound guidance for peripheral nerve blockade. We retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of 7476 patients who received ultrasound-guided single-injection peripheral nerve blockade from October 2003 to August 2013 using our institution's low-level disinfection technique in combination with a sterile transparent film barrier dressing to cover the ultrasound transducer. No indications of block-related infection were found. We conclude that using a practical and efficient low-level disinfection technique and sterile barrier dressing results in an extremely low rate of block-related infection following ultrasound-guided single-injection peripheral nerve blockade.


Subject(s)
Autonomic Nerve Block/trends , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Hospitals, University/trends , Peripheral Nerves , Ultrasonography, Interventional/trends , Adult , Aged , Autonomic Nerve Block/adverse effects , Cross Infection/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ontario/epidemiology , Peripheral Nerves/microbiology , Retrospective Studies , Ultrasonography, Interventional/adverse effects
14.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 35(11): 1336-41, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25333427

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Healthcare worker hand hygiene is known to prevent healthcare-associated infections, but there are few data on patient hand hygiene despite the fact that nosocomial pathogens may be acquired by patients via their own unclean hands. The purpose of this study was to measure patient hand hygiene behavior in the hospital after visiting a bathroom, before eating, and on entering and leaving their rooms. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Acute care teaching hospital in Canada. PATIENTS: Convenience sample of 279 adult patients admitted to 3 multiorgan transplant units between July 2012 and March 2013. METHODS: Patient use of alcohol-based hand rub and soap dispensers was measured using an ultrasound-based real-time location system during visits to bathrooms, mealtimes, kitchen visits, and on entering and leaving their rooms. RESULTS: Overall, patients performed hand hygiene during 29.7% of bathroom visits, 39.1% of mealtimes, 3.3% of kitchen visits, 2.9% of room entries, and 6.7% of room exits. CONCLUSIONS: Patients appear to perform hand hygiene infrequently, which may contribute to transmission of pathogens from the hospital environment via indirect contact or fecal-oral routes.


Subject(s)
Computer Systems , Hand Hygiene/statistics & numerical data , Health Behavior , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Epidemiological Monitoring , Female , Hand Sanitizers , Humans , Male , Meals , Middle Aged , Organ Transplantation , Sex Factors , Soaps , Toilet Facilities
15.
BMJ Qual Saf ; 23(12): 974-80, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25002555

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Hawthorne effect, or behaviour change due to awareness of being observed, is assumed to inflate hand hygiene compliance rates as measured by direct observation but there are limited data to support this. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the presence of hand hygiene auditors was associated with an increase in hand hygiene events as measured by a real-time location system (RTLS). METHODS: The RTLS recorded all uses of alcohol-based hand rub and soap for 8 months in two units in an academic acute care hospital. The RTLS also tracked the movement of hospital hand hygiene auditors. Rates of hand hygiene events per dispenser per hour as measured by the RTLS were compared for dispensers within sight of auditors and those not exposed to auditors. RESULTS: The hand hygiene event rate in dispensers visible to auditors (3.75/dispenser/h) was significantly higher than in dispensers not visible to the auditors at the same time (1.48; p=0.001) and in the same dispensers during the week prior (1.07; p<0.001). The rate increased significantly when auditors were present compared with 1-5 min prior to the auditors' arrival (1.50; p=0.009). There were no significant changes inside patient rooms. CONCLUSIONS: Hand hygiene event rates were approximately threefold higher in hallways within eyesight of an auditor compared with when no auditor was visible and the increase occurred after the auditors' arrival. This is consistent with the existence of a Hawthorne effect localised to areas where the auditor is visible and calls into question the accuracy of publicly reported hospital hand hygiene compliance rates.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/prevention & control , Electrical Equipment and Supplies , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Hand Hygiene/standards , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Infection Control/standards , Hospitals, University/standards , Humans , Observation , Retrospective Studies , Wireless Technology
16.
Am J Infect Control ; 42(6): 671-3, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24837117

ABSTRACT

The vast majority of infection prevention and control (IPAC) experience and practice guidance relates to the inpatient setting. We have taken a pragmatic approach to applying IPAC guidance in our ambulatory setting, and here we identify and describe the 4 key areas where we modified our IPAC program and adapted current guidelines to fit with our setting.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care Facilities , Infection Control/methods , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Carrier State/diagnosis , Carrier State/microbiology , Disinfection , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Hand Hygiene , Household Work , Humans , Infection Control/standards , Patient Isolation
17.
Am J Infect Control ; 42(4): 439-42, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24679574

ABSTRACT

A survey pilot asked patients to observe the hand hygiene compliance of their health care providers. Patients returned 75.1% of the survey cards distributed, and the overall hand hygiene compliance was 96.8%. Survey results and patient commentary were used to motivate hand hygiene compliance. The patient-as-observer approach appeared to be a viable alternative for hand hygiene auditing in an ambulatory care setting because it educated, engaged, and empowered patients to play a more active role in their own health care.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/standards , Guideline Adherence/standards , Hand Hygiene/standards , Patient Participation/methods , Ambulatory Care/methods , Hand Hygiene/methods , Humans
18.
Microb Ecol ; 68(1): 121-31, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24577741

ABSTRACT

Despite an increased awareness of biofilm formation by pathogens and the role of biofilms in human infections, the potential role of environmental biofilms as an intermediate stage in the host-to-host cycle is poorly described. To initiate infection, pathogens in biofilms on inanimate environmental surfaces must detach from the biofilm and be transmitted to a susceptible individual in numbers large enough to constitute an infectious dose. Additionally, while detachment has been recognized as a discrete event in the biofilm lifestyle, it has not been studied to the same extent as biofilm development or biofilm physiology. Successful integration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PA01 expressing green fluorescent protein (PA01GFP), employed here as a surrogate pathogen, into multispecies biofilm communities isolated and enriched from sink drains in public washrooms and a hospital intensive care unit is described. Confocal laser scanning microscopy indicated that PA01GFP cells were most frequently located in the deeper layers of the biofilm, near the attachment surface, when introduced into continuous flow cells before or at the same time as the multispecies drain communities. A more random integration pattern was observed when PA01GFP was introduced into established multispecies biofilms. Significant numbers of single PA01GFP cells were continuously released from the biofilms to the bulk liquid environment, regardless of the order of introduction into the flow cell. Challenging the multispecies biofilms containing PA01GFP with sub-lethal concentrations of an antibiotic, chelating agent and shear forces that typically prevail at distances away from the point of treatment showed that environmental biofilms provide a suitable habitat where pathogens are maintained and protected, and from where they are continuously released.


Subject(s)
Biofilms , Intensive Care Units , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/growth & development , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacterial Load , Biofilms/drug effects , Genes, Reporter , Green Fluorescent Proteins/genetics , Microscopy, Confocal , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Toilet Facilities , Water Microbiology , Water Supply
19.
Chem Res Toxicol ; 27(4): 683-9, 2014 Apr 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24564876

ABSTRACT

Isoniazid (INH) remains a mainstay for the treatment of tuberculosis despite the fact that it can cause liver failure. The mechanism of INH-induced liver injury remains controversial. It had been proposed that the mechanism involves metabolic idiosyncrasy based on the observations that liver injury is not usually associated with fever, rash, or prompt increase in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) upon rechallenge. In the present study, we found that patients who were treated with INH because of a positive tuberculosis (TB) skin test and developed a small increase in ALT had an increase in Th17 cells as well as T cells that produce interleukin (IL)-10, which suggests stimulation of an adaptive immune response. Th17 cells are considered inflammatory and could be involved in causing the liver injury. IL-10 is considered anti-inflammatory and could be the reason that more serious liver injury did not occur. These changes were not observed in patients who did not have an increase in ALT. These are the first data to show a change in the T cell profile in patients with mild INH-induced liver injury; however, it is difficult to determine whether these changes were the cause or the result of the liver injury. Nevertheless, together with other studies, the data suggest that INH-induced liver injury is immune-mediated, with mild injury resulting in immune tolerance.


Subject(s)
Antitubercular Agents/adverse effects , Interleukin-10/biosynthesis , Isoniazid/adverse effects , Liver/drug effects , Th17 Cells/metabolism , Adult , Female , Flow Cytometry , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
20.
Syst Rev ; 2: 101, 2013 Nov 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24219817

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Healthcare worker hand hygiene is thought to be one of the most important strategies to prevent healthcare-associated infections, but compliance is generally poor. Hand hygiene improvement interventions must include audits of compliance (almost always with feedback), which are most often done by direct observation - a method that is expensive, subjective, and prone to bias. New technologies, including electronic and video hand hygiene monitoring systems, have the potential to provide continuous and objective monitoring of hand hygiene, regular feedback, and for some systems, real-time reminders. We propose a systematic review of the evidence supporting the effectiveness of these systems. The primary objective is to determine whether hand hygiene monitoring systems yield sustainable improvements in hand hygiene compliance when compared to usual care. METHODS/DESIGN: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and other relevant databases will be searched for randomized control studies and quasi-experimental studies evaluating a video or electronic hand hygiene monitoring system. A standard data collection form will be used to abstract relevant information from included studies. Bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Group Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. Studies will be reviewed independently by two reviewers, with disputes resolved by a third reviewer. The primary outcome is directly observed hand hygiene compliance. Secondary outcomes include healthcare-associated infection incidence and improvements in hand hygiene compliance as measured by alternative metrics. Results will be qualitatively summarized with comparisons made between study quality, the measured outcome, and study-specific factors that may be expected to affect outcome (for example, study duration, frequency of feedback, use of real-time reminders). Meta-analysis will be performed if there is more than one study of similar systems with comparable outcome definitions. DISCUSSION: Electronic and video monitoring systems have the potential to improve hand hygiene compliance and prevent healthcare-associated infection, but are expensive, difficult to install and maintain, and may not be accepted by all healthcare workers. This review will assess the current evidence of effectiveness of these systems before their widespread adoption. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42013004519.


Subject(s)
Electronics/methods , Guideline Adherence , Hand Hygiene/standards , Research Design , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Electronics/instrumentation , Feedback , Humans , Infectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-Patient/prevention & control , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Reminder Systems , Video Recording
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...