Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 19(3): e0295588, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38478510

ABSTRACT

While experiencing homelessness with a pet can present unique challenges, it can also provide physical health, mental health, and social benefits. A Photovoice project with adolescents and adults experiencing homelessness with a pet was conducted in Seattle, Washington, USA in 2018-2019 to explore the experience of homelessness with a pet, the impact of the human-animal bond on the health of each, and to drive policy changes to help support people experiencing homelessness (PEH) with pets. Twenty-five people spanning a range of age groups, genders, and living situations were recruited primarily through homeless-services providers, 19 of whom completed the study and created over 900 images. One-on-one semi-structured interviews were conducted with each participant to review printed photos. A key theme emerging from the interviews and photos was the importance and strength of the human-animal bond, providing mental and physical health benefits, and motivation for daily activities or making/maintaining positive changes. Challenges related to homelessness with a pet included barriers to access services, housing, and employment. Participants provided policy recommendations to improve support for PEH with pets. Multiple public exhibitions of images from all participants were held, reaching service providers, policy makers, and the general public. Visitor feedback included statements of positive change in attitudes towards PEH with pets among housed individuals. Collectively, the images, stories and themes deepen our understanding of homelessness with pets, leading to increased empathy and potential for policies that benefit the health of PEH and their pets.


Subject(s)
Ill-Housed Persons , Adult , Adolescent , Humans , Male , Female , Social Problems , Housing , Employment , Motivation
2.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 100(2): 357-364, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30628564

ABSTRACT

Gastrointestinal parasites have diverse life cycles that can involve people, animals, and the environment (e.g., water and soil), demonstrating the utility of One Health frameworks in characterizing infection risk. Kosumpee Forest Park (Thailand) is home to a dense population of long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) that frequently interact with tourists and local residents. Our study investigated the presence of zoonotic parasites, and barriers to healthy coexistence by conducting stool analysis on macaques (N = 102) and people (N = 115), and by examining risk factors for infection with a household questionnaire (N = 95). Overall, 44% of macaques and 12% of people were infected with one or more gastrointestinal helminths, including Strongyloides spp., Ascaris spp., and Trichuris sp. An adults-only generalized linear mixed model identified three factors significantly associated with human infection: household size, occupational exposure, and contact with macaque feces at home. Participants identified both advantages and disadvantages to living in close contact with macaques, suggesting that interventions to improve human and animal health in Kosumpee Forest Park would be welcome.


Subject(s)
Helminthiasis, Animal/epidemiology , Helminthiasis/epidemiology , Intestinal Diseases, Parasitic/veterinary , Macaca fascicularis/parasitology , Monkey Diseases/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Animals , Ascaris/classification , Ascaris/isolation & purification , Child , Child, Preschool , Family Characteristics , Feces/parasitology , Female , Helminthiasis/parasitology , Helminthiasis/transmission , Helminthiasis, Animal/parasitology , Helminthiasis, Animal/transmission , Humans , Intestinal Diseases, Parasitic/epidemiology , Intestinal Diseases, Parasitic/parasitology , Intestinal Diseases, Parasitic/transmission , Male , Middle Aged , Monkey Diseases/parasitology , Monkey Diseases/transmission , Parks, Recreational , Strongyloides/classification , Strongyloides/isolation & purification , Surveys and Questionnaires , Thailand/epidemiology , Trichuris/classification , Trichuris/isolation & purification
3.
FEMS Microbiol Lett ; 365(15)2018 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29912375

ABSTRACT

Dairy farming involves frequent contact among animals, workers and farm environments. To explore the Staphylococcus spp. diversity that occurs on dairy farms, a pilot study sampled dairy workers, cows and the farm environments from five farms, two organic and three conventional farms, in Washington State. Samples were taken from the nares and hands of consenting workers (n = 24), udders and nares of selected cows (n = 25) and representative environmental surfaces (n = 96) from each farm. To increase diversity of the Staphylococcus spp. characterized, five distinct colonies were selected from each sample for identification with 16S analysis. A total of 198 staphylococci were characterized representing 19 different Staphylococcus spp. The diversity of species ranged from 9-15 Staphylococcus spp./farm with no difference between conventional and organic farms. S. haemolyticus [n = 60 isolates] was the most common species and was isolated from all farms and from cows, humans and environmental samples. Whole genome sequencing of selected S. haemolyticus found no genetically related isolates among human, animal and environmental samples within the same farm. S. epidermidis, S. saprophyticus, S. sciuri and S. xylosus were also found in ≥1 farms from human, animal and environmental samples.


Subject(s)
Cattle/microbiology , Hand/microbiology , Nose/microbiology , Staphylococcus/isolation & purification , Animals , Biodiversity , Environmental Microbiology , Farmers/statistics & numerical data , Farms , Female , Humans , Male , Phylogeny , Pilot Projects , Staphylococcus/classification , Staphylococcus/genetics , Washington , Whole Genome Sequencing
4.
Ecohealth ; 14(1): 20-28, 2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28176028

ABSTRACT

Most emerging infectious diseases are zoonotic in origin, with wildlife a frequent source of zoonotic disease events. Although individuals with extensive wildlife contact may be at the greatest risk of contracting novel infectious agents, the occupational risk of those working closely with wildlife has not been well studied. This study assessed the occupational exposures among wildlife health professionals working in multiple countries worldwide. An occupational risk survey of past and present exposures was developed and administered online in a confidential manner to wildlife workers recruited through an ongoing international wildlife pathogen surveillance project. Surveys were completed by 71 participants in 14 countries. Significant lifetime exposures reported included bites from bats and rodents and touching dead animals. Completion of training in occupational safety was reported by 75% of respondents. While gloves were used for most tasks, use of N95 respirators and other personal protective equipment varied by task. Eighty percent of workers reported rabies vaccination. Some respondents indicated interest in enhanced occupational health services targeting their unique needs. Wildlife workers represent an occupational population at risk of zoonotic infection and injury. Enhanced occupational health services targeting wildlife workers could reduce the risk and sequelae of zoonotic exposure and infection.


Subject(s)
Animals, Wild , Occupational Exposure , Zoonoses/prevention & control , Animals , Bites and Stings , Humans , Occupational Health , Occupations , Personal Protective Equipment/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vaccination
5.
PLoS One ; 12(2): e0171017, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28152044

ABSTRACT

The gut microbiome community structure and development are associated with several health outcomes in young children. To determine the household influences of gut microbiome structure, we assessed microbial sharing within households in western Kenya by sequencing 16S rRNA libraries of fecal samples from children and cattle, cloacal swabs from chickens, and swabs of household surfaces. Among the 156 households studied, children within the same household significantly shared their gut microbiome with each other, although we did not find significant sharing of gut microbiome across host species or household surfaces. Higher gut microbiome diversity among children was associated with lower wealth status and involvement in livestock feeding chores. Although more research is necessary to identify further drivers of microbiota development, these results suggest that the household should be considered as a unit. Livestock activities, health and microbiome perturbations among an individual child may have implications for other children in the household.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Livestock/microbiology , Animals , Biodiversity , Cattle/microbiology , Chickens/microbiology , Child, Preschool , Family Characteristics , Feces/microbiology , Female , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/genetics , Humans , Kenya , Male , Poultry/microbiology , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S , Rural Population
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...