PERSIAN trial (NCT05717660): an ongoing randomized trial testing androgen deprivation therapy, apalutamide and stereotactic body radiotherapy. An alternative "triplet" for oligometastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer patients.

Earlier treatment intensification with systemic potent androgen receptor inhibition has been shown to improve clinical outcomes in metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer. Nonetheless, oligometastatic patients may benefit from local treatment approaches such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Aiming to explore the benefit of SBRT in this scenario, we designed this trial to specifically test the hypothesis that SBRT will improve clinical outcomes in select population affected by metachronous oligometastatic HSPC treated with androgen deprivation therapy + apalutamide. Enrolled patients will be randomized to receive the standard systemic treatment alone or in combination with SBRT on all metastatic sites of disease. Here we report the protocol design and an overview of the ongoing trials testing different integration strategies between RT and systemic therapies.

Pattern of recurrence after stereotactic body radiotherapy for para-aortic oligo-recurrent prostate cancer, a multicentric analysis.

BACKGROUND: M1a disease represents an intermediate status between loco-regional relapse and bone metastatic disease. Metastasis directed therapy (MDT), through stereotactic body RT (SBRT) may be offered to patients, aiming to exclusively treat sites of macroscopic relapse and avoiding wide prophylactic treatment volumes. This appears as a viable treatment, especially after the rise of PSMA tailored treatment approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data about patients treated in two different institutions were retrieved from a prospectively collected dataset. All included patients were affected by oligo-recurrent M1a disease after definitive RT or radical prostatectomy, defined as ≤ 3 nodal lesions situated above aortic bifurcation and below renal arteries. Both castration resistant PCa (CRPC) and castration sensitive (CSPC) PCa patients were included. All imaging methods were allowed to detect recurrence (CT scan, Choline or PSMA PET/CT).All sites of recurrences were treated with SBRT. RESULTS: Median PFS was 10 months (95% CI 8-17). Twelve patients died, with a median OS of 114 months (95% CI 85-114). Out of the 83 recurrences, 2 (2.4%), 11 (13.25%), 36 (43.37%) and 15 (18%) patients had respectively prostate bed only, pelvic nodal, para-aortic or distant relapse. Furthermore, 19 (22.9%) patients experienced a biochemical only relapse with negative imaging at re-staging. DISCUSSION: MDT conferred a remarkable PFS outcome in a mixed cohort of CSPC and CRPC patients with m1a disease, with an optimal safety profile. Prospective trials are needed in order to compare MDT and ENRT for these patients, allowing to select the best treatment option.

Three Months' PSA and Toxicity from a Prospective Trial Investigating STereotactic sAlvage Radiotherapy for Macroscopic Prostate Bed Recurrence after Prostatectomy-STARR (NCT05455736).

Biochemical recurrences after radical prostatectomy (RP) can be managed with curative purpose through salvage radiation therapy (SRT). RT dose escalation, such as stereotactic RT (SSRT), may improve relapse-free survival in this setting. STARR trial (NCT05455736) is a prospective multicenter study including patients affected by macroscopic recurrence within the prostate bed after RP treated with SSRT. Recurrence was detected with a Choline or PSMA CT-PET. In the current analysis, the early biochemical response (BR) rate and toxicity profile after three months of follow-up were assessed. Twenty-five patients were enrolled, and data about BR and toxicity at three months after treatment were available for 19 cases. Overall, BR was detected after three months in 58% of cases. Four G1-G2 adverse events were recorded; no G ≥ 3 adverse events were detected. SSRT appears feasible and safe, with more than half of patients experiencing BR and an encouraging toxicity profile. The STARR trial is one of the few prospective studies aimed at implementing this promising treatment strategy in this scenario.

Study protocol and preliminary results from a mono-centric cohort within a trial testing stereotactic body radiotherapy and abiraterone (ARTO-NCT03449719).

BACKGROUND: ARTO trial was designed to evaluate the difference in terms of outcomes between patients affected by oligo metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with Abiraterone acetate and randomized to receive or not SBRT on all sites of disease. Here, we present a preliminary analysis conducted on patients enrolled at promoting institution. OBJECTIVE: To present a preliminary overview about population features, clinical outcomes, adverse events, quality of life and explorative translational research. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: ARTO (NCT03449719) is a phase II trial including patients affected by oligo mCRPC, randomized to receive standard of care (GnRH agonist or antagonist plus abiraterone acetate 1000 mg and oral prednisone 10 mg daily) with or without SBRT on all metastatic sites of disease. All subjects have < 3 bone or nodal metastases. All patients are treated in I line mCRPC setting, no previous lines of treatment for mCRPC are allowed. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Data about a mono-centric cohort of 42 patients enrolled are presented in the current analysis, with focus on baseline population features, PSA drop at 3 months, biochemical response, and quality of life outcomes. Descriptive statistics regarding translational research are also presented. RESULTS AND LIMITATION: Significant difference in terms of PSA drop at three months was not detected (p = 0.68). Biochemical response (PSA reduction > 50%) was reported in 73.7 versus 76.5% of patients in control vs SBRT arm, respectively (p = 0.84). All patients are alive. Progression occurred in 1 versus 0 patients in the control versus SBRT arm, respectively. After 3 months, an average decrease of 13 points in terms of Global Health Score was reported for the overall population. However, complete recovery was noticed at 6 months. Circulating tumor cells detection rate was 40%. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT + Abiraterone treatment was safe and well tolerated, non-significant trend in terms of PSA drop and biochemical response at 3 months was detected in SBRT arm. Interestingly, CTCs detection in this selected cohort of oligo-mCRPC was lower if compared to historical data of unselected mCRPC patients.

Dose-escalated pelvic radiotherapy for prostate cancer in definitive or postoperative setting.

PURPOSE: Given the absence of standardized planning approach for clinically node-positive (cN1) prostate cancer (PCa), we collected data about the use of prophylactic pelvic irradiation and nodal boost. The aim of the present series is to retrospectively assess clinical outcomes after this approach to compare different multimodal treatment strategies in this scenario. METHODS: Data from clinical records of patients affected by cN1 PCa and treated in six different Italian institutes with prophylactic pelvic irradiation and boost on pathologic pelvic lymph nodes detected with CT, MRI or choline PET/CT were retrospectively reviewed and collected. Clinical outcomes in terms of overall survival (OS) and biochemical relapse-free survival (b-RFS) were explored. The correlation between outcomes and baseline features (International Society of Urological Pathology-ISUP pattern, total dose to positive pelvic nodes ≤ / > 60 Gy, sequential or simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) administration and definitive vs postoperative treatment) was explored. RESULTS: ISUP pattern < 2 was a significant predictor of improved b-RFS (HR = 0.3, 95% CI 0.1220-0.7647, P = 0.0113), while total dose < 60 Gy to positive pelvic nodes was associated with worse b-RFS (HR = 3.59, 95% CI 1.3245-9.741, P = 0.01). Conversely, treatment setting (postoperative vs definitive) and treatment delivery technique (SIB vs sequential boost) were not associated with significant differences in terms of b-RFS (HR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.338-2.169, P = 0.743, and HR = 2.39, 95% CI 0.93-6.111, P = 0.067, respectively). CONCLUSION: Results from the current analysis are in keeping with data from literature showing that pelvic irradiation and boost on positive nodes are effective approaches. Upfront surgical approach was not associated with better clinical outcomes.

Impact of COVID-19 on workload burden of a complex radiotherapy facility.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: COVID-19 constitutes a worldwide threat, prompting Italian Government to implement specific measures on March 8, 2020, to protect patients and health workers from disease transmission. The impact of preventive measures on daily activity of a radiotherapy facility may hamper the ability to fulfill normal workload burden. Thus, we assessed the number of delivered treatments in a specific observation period after the adoption of preventive measures (since March 11 to April 24, 2020) and compared it with the corresponding period of the year 2019. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overall number of delivered fractions was related to actual time of platform daily activity and reported as a ratio between number of delivered fractions and activity hours (Fr/Hrs). Fr/Hrs were calculated and compared for two different periods of time, March 11-April 24, 2019 (Fr/Hrs1), and March 11-April 24, 2020 (Fr/Hrs2). RESULTS: Fr/Hrs1 and Fr/Hrs2 were 2.66 and 2.54 for year 2019 and 2020, respectively, for a Fr/Hrsratio of 1.07 (95% CI 1.03-1.12, p = 0.0005). Fr/Hrs1 was significantly higher than Fr/Hrs2 for SliR and PreciseR, with Fr/Hrsratio of 1.92 (95% CI 1.66-2.23, p < 0.0001) and 1.11 (95% CI 1.03-1.2, p = 0.003), respectively. No significant difference was reported for SynergyR and CyberknifeR with Fr/Hrsratio of 0.99 (95% CI 0.91-1.08, p = 0.8) and 0.9 (95% CI 0.77-1.06, p = 0.2), respectively. Fr/Hrs1 was significantly lower than Fr/Hrs2 for TomotherapyR, with Fr/Hrsratio of 0.88 (95% CI 0.8-0.96, p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Preventive measures did not influence workload burden performed. Automation in treatment delivery seems to compensate effectively for health workers number reduction.

Re-irradiation for oligoprogression under Nivolumab in recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A case report.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent a recently introduced class of agents active in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). For a subgroup of patients with recurrent or metastatic disease, long-term benefit can be achieved: maintaining a sustained response to immunotherapy is therefore a critical factor for its efficacy at an individual level. In analogy to targeted agents, a limited pattern of progression, or "oligoprogression", can occur. For locally recurrent HNSCC, the potential biologic interplay between the efficacy of ICIs and the design of radiation fields chosen for primary treatment is currently unknown. Here, we report on a patient who presented two subsequent oligoprogressions successfully treated with re-irradiation without interrupting Nivolumab. Both oligoprogressive lesions developed in previously unirradiated areas. We hypothesize the existence of a synergistic effect with optimal spatial cooperation between ICIs and re-irradiation for oligoprogressive disease under immunotherapy.

Thermal Ablation versus SBRT in liver tumours: pros and cons.

Non-surgical locally ablative treatments for primary liver cancer and liver metastases represent an effective therapeutic choice when surgery cannot be performed or is not indicated. Thermal ablative employing electric currents or electromagnetic fields have historically played an important role in this setting. Radiotherapy, in the last decades, due to a series of important technological development, has become an attractive option for the treatment of liver tumours, especially with the introduction of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy. Published literature so far evidenced both for radiotherapy and thermal ablative techniques a benefit in terms of local control and other oncological outcomes; however, no direct prospective comparison between the two techniques have been published so far. The aim of this review is to summarize the technical and clinical implications of these treatment modalities and to identify criteria to allocate patients to one or another option in consideration of the expected efficacy. The main features and critical aspects of both thermoablative techniques and external beam radiation will also be covered in the present paper.

Artificial Intelligence in radiotherapy: state of the art and future directions.

Recent advances in computing capability allowed the development of sophisticated predictive models to assess complex relationships within observational data, described as Artificial Intelligence. Medicine is one of the several fields of application and Radiation oncology could benefit from these approaches, particularly in patients' medical records, imaging, baseline pathology, planning or instrumental data. Artificial Intelligence systems could simplify many steps of the complex workflow of radiotherapy such as segmentation, planning or delivery. However, Artificial Intelligence could be considered as a "black box" in which human operator may only understand input and output predictions and its application to the clinical practice remains a challenge. The low transparency of the overall system is questionable from manifold points of view (ethical included). Given the complexity of this issue, we collected the basic definitions to help the clinician to understand current literature, and overviewed experiences regarding implementation of AI within radiotherapy clinical workflow, aiming to describe this field from the clinician perspective.

A rare case of non-small cell lung cancer choroidal metastasis responding to ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Choroidal localization from non-small cell lung cancer is rare and when it occurs may cause visual alterations. Targeted therapy against actionable gene mutations represents the standard of care in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. We report the case of a 53-year-old woman affected by metastatic anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer who received ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors, from January 2017. The patient had a complete response of choroidal metastasis after therapy with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors. She recovered a complete visus and actually she still continue therapy with alectinib. The patient had a complete recovery of visus in addiction to a long response on treatment.

Efficacy and Tolerability of CyberKnife Stereotactic Robotic Radiotherapy for Primary or Secondary Orbital Lesions: A Single-Center Retrospective Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Orbital lesions are rare, but are likely to become symptomatic and can impact on patients' quality of life. Local control is often difficult to obtain, because of proximity to critical structures. CyberKnife stereotactic robotic radiotherapy could represent a viable treatment option. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on patients treated for intraorbital lesions from solid malignancies were retrospectively collected. All patients underwent treatment with CyberKnife system. We analyzed local control, response rate, symptoms control, progression-free survival and overall survival, acute and late toxicity. RESULTS: From January 2012 to May 2017, 20 treatments on 19 patients were performed, with dose ranging from 24 to 35 Gy in 1 to 5 fractions, prescribed at an average isodose line of 79.5% (range: 78-81). After a mean follow-up of 14.26 months (range: 0-58), overall response rate was 75%, with 2 and 4 patients presenting a partial and complete response, respectively. Mean time to best measured response was 15.16 months (range: 2-58). Thirteen patients were alive, with a local control rate of 79%. Mean time to local progression was 5 months (range: 3-7). Three patients reported improvement in symptoms after treatment. Mean planning target volume dose coverage was 97.2% (range: 93.5-99.7). Mean maximum dose (D max) to eye globe, optic nerve, optic chiasm, and lens was 2380.8 cGy (range: 290-3921), 1982.82 cGy (range: 777.3-2897.8), 713.14 cGy (range: 219.5-2273), and 867.9 cGy (range: 38-3118.5). Four patients presented acute toxicity. CONCLUSION: This current retrospective series demonstrated that CyberKnife robotic stereotactic radiotherapy is a feasible and tolerable approach for intraorbital lesions.

External accelerated partial breast irradiation for ductal carcinoma in situ: long-term follow-up from a phase 3 randomized trial.

INTRODUCTION: For a long time, accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) effectiveness for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has been debated, due to conflicting published results. Recent encouraging data from phase 3 trials reopened new perspectives for this radiation approach. The aim of the present study was to analyze the long-term efficacy and safety results of the series of patients with DCIS enrolled in the APBI arm of the APBI-IMRT-Florence phase 3 trial (NCT02104895). METHODS: Patients were treated in a phase 3 randomized trial comparing whole breast irradiation (50 Gy in 25 fractions to the whole breast, plus 10 Gy in 5 fractions to the tumor bed) to APBI (30 Gy in 5 nonconsecutive fractions) using the intensity-modulated radiotherapy technique. RESULTS: Overall, 22 patients were treated in the APBI arm. Median age was 62 years (mean 59; range 42-75 years). At a median follow-up of 9.2 years (mean 8.8; range 3.8-12.1 years), no contralateral invasive/DCIS occurrence, distant metastasis, or breast cancer-related death were recorded. The 5- and 10-year local recurrence, distant metastasis-free survival, and breast cancer-specific survival were 100%. The 10-year overall survival rate was 90.9%. No late toxicity at 5 and 10 years was recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Waiting for pending studies and mature follow-up, we confirmed the efficacy and safety of APBI for low-risk DCIS.

A matched cohort study of radio-chemotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in soft tissue sarcoma patients.

PURPOSE: Adjuvant radiotherapy is the standard postoperative treatment after conservative surgery in high risk soft tissue sarcoma. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy is still debated. Therefore, a matched cohort analysis was performed in high risk soft tissue patients to analyse differences in terms of clinical outcome and toxicity between patients treated with concomitant radio-chemotherapy (RTCT) and radiotherapy (RT) alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For each patient in RT group was selected a patient in the RTCT group matching for age, T stage and grading. Acute and late toxicity were recorded, overall survival, recurrence free survival and distant metastases free survival were analysed and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Ninety patients were selected, half of patients underwent radio-chemotherapy and half received radiotherapy alone. During the treatment Grade 3 dermatitis was recorded in 15 (16.7%) patients, 6 (6.7%) patients associated chemotherapy and during follow up 12 (13.3%) patients developed grade 2 late fibrosis, 3 (3.3%) joint stiffness and 1 (1.1%) patient experienced a bone fracture. There were no differences in the rate of acute and late toxicity between RTCT and RT alone group. Nineteen (21.1%) patients developed local recurrence, overall 5-year local relapse free survival was 83%. There were no differences between the two groups. 29 patients developed distant metastases, 14 (15.6%) patients in the RTCT group and 15 (16.7%) patients in the RT group. The 5-year distant metastases free survival was 67%. Age > 65 years was the only independent factor affecting distant recurrence (HR = 5.7, 95% CI 2.7-11.9; p = 0.001). At the time of analysis 15 (16.7%) patients were dead, 6 (6.7%) patients in the RTCT group and 9 (10%) patients in the RT group. 5-years overall survival was: 88%. At multivariate analysis age > 65 years was an independent prognostic factor of overall survival (HR = 3.7, 95% CI 1.2-12.1, p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Prospective randomized studies with large size population and with subgroup analysis for histological subtypes are necessary to clarify the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma patients. Tailored treatment has to be considered in elderly soft tissue patients to guarantee a better outcome in this high risk and fragile population.

Influence of age and subtype in outcome of operable liposarcoma.

AIM: Liposarcoma (LPS) is rare tumor deriving from adipocytes. LPS is classified into histological subtypes: well-differentiated (WDLPS), dedifferentiated (DDLPS), myxoid (MLPS) and pleomorphic (PLPS). A tailored approach taking into account the specificity of disease subtype and age at presentation could be helpful in delineating therapeutic management of liposarcoma. In this paper, we report a retrospective series of a single-institution cohort of patients with LPS, undergoing surgery and radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether clinical characteristics, tumor- and treatment-related features affect clinical outcome in patients treated with curative intent for non-metastatic liposarcoma. METHODS: Data of patients with locally advanced, non-metastatic liposarcoma treated between 1990 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Data about patient, tumor and treatment features were collected. Two patients subgroups were identified according to age (cutoff: age < 65 years or > 65 years). Statistical analysis was performed to assess correlation between the above-cited variables and local recurrence-free survival (DFS-LR), distant metastasis-free survival, overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS); moreover, differences in clinical outcome between the two age groups were identified. RESULTS: Data of 186 patients were collected. At diagnosis, 27.4% of patients were 65 years or older. At a median follow-up of 8.6 years (range 0.1-27.3 years), Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis showed that LR, DM, OS and DSS were 75.5%, 76.6%, 48.1% and 72.1%, respectively. KM analysis showed that age > 65, DDLPS and lower limb localization were related to LR (p = 0.001, p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0001, respectively). Association between LR, age and DDLPS persisted both at univariate (p = 0.003 and p = 0.0001, respectively) and multivariate Cox regression (CR) analysis (p = 0.024 and p = 0.002). Age, tumor depth and grading influenced distant recurrence, both at KM (p = 0.023, p = 0.026 and p = 0.016) and univariate CR (p = 0.026, p = 0.042 and p = 0.012). Age and grading were confirmed at multivariate analysis (p = 0.009 and p = 0.017). Patients with WDLPS and wide excision had significantly better OS (p = 0.001 and p = 0.03, respectively), while histological G3 and age > 65 were related with worse OS (p = 0.008 and p = 0.0001, respectively). Age, DDLPS and grade were related to OS at univariate (p = 0.0001, p = 0.0001 and p = 0.03, respectively) and multivariate CR analysis (p = 0.031, p = 0.0001 and p = 0.001, respectively). However, analyzing the specific causes of death, female died less often for tumor-related causes, with a DSS of 91.0% compared to 57.4% of male counterpart (p = 0.005). At Kaplan-Meier analysis, postoperative radiotherapy resulted in a statistically significant better disease-specific survival than postoperative radiotherapy (82.9% vs. 46.2%, p = 0.045). High grade correlated with poorer disease-specific survival (59.3%) than intermediate and low grade (73.4% and 91.6%, respectively) (p = 0.008). Association between DSS, sex and grade persisted both at univariate (p = 0.008 and p = 0.022, respectively) and multivariate Cox regression (CR) analysis (p = 0.014 and p = 0.038). Histotype-driven schedules of treatment should be developed to take into account biological heterogeneity of this disease. Further studies are needed to stratify patients subgroup and develop tailored treatment strategies (i.e., altered fractionations and different chemotherapy regimens in aggressive subtypes), in particular more prospective trials are needed to develop treatment guidelines in elderly STS, taking into account the frailty and the peculiarity of this subgroup.

Enhancement of Soft Tissue Sarcoma Cell Radiosensitivity by Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase-1 Inhibitors.

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are aggressive tumors with a poor prognosis. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)-1 inhibitors (PARPi) enhance the cytotoxic effects of radiation. In this study, we evaluated the effect of PARPi on survival and DNA damage of irradiated STS cells. For clonogenic assays, STS cell lines were irradiated with or without olaparib, iniparib or veliparib pretreatment. The effect of PARP inhibition on γ-H2AX and Rad51 foci formation, on PARP-1, phospho-ERK and cleaved caspase-3 protein expression and on cell cycle progression was evaluated on irradiated rhabdomyosarcoma cells pretreated with olaparib. The results from this work showed that PARPi induced significant radiosensitization in STS cells. Rhabdomyosarcoma cells showed the highest increase in radiosensitivity, with a radiosensitization enhancement ratio at 50% survival (ER50) of 3.41 with veliparib. All PARPi exerted a synergistic effect when combined with radiation. Fibrosarcoma cells showed an ER50 of 2.29 with olaparib. Leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma cells showed their highest ER50 with veliparib (1.71 and 1.84, respectively). In rhabdomyosarcoma, olaparib enhanced the formation of radiation-induced γ-H2AX/Rad51 foci and PARP-1 cleavage, induced slightly increased expression of cleaved caspase-3 and reduced phospho-ERK expression. Moreover, the combination of olaparib and radiation resulted in a significantly enhanced cell cycle arrest in the G2/M phase compared to the two treatments alone. In conclusion, we have shown that PARPi are potent radiosensitizers of human STS cells. These results support the pursuit of further investigations into the effects of PARPi combined with radiation on STS.

Systemic therapies and cognitive impairment for breast cancer: an overview of the current literature.

Both endocrine and chemotherapy can be utilized for breast cancer patients' management, in multiple setting (i.e., primary systemic therapy, adjuvant, metastatic treatment). Health-related quality of life in breast cancer survivors can be significantly influenced by cognitive impairment, which has been related in several previously reported experiences to systemic therapies administration. However, although the growing body of literature, the impact of both chemo- and endocrine therapy on cognitive function is currently unclear, due to many confounding factors (i.e., multiple therapies, duration of therapy, comorbidity, age). The aim of the present review is to present an overview of the current literature concerning the possible influence of endocrine and systemic therapy on breast cancer patients' cognitive impairment.