Optimal Management of Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Management of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (ACAS), including carotid endarterectomy (CEA), carotid artery stenting (CAS), and best medical treatment (BMT), remains inconsistent in current practice. Early studies reported a benefit of CEA vs. BMT; however, the current risk-benefit profile of invasive therapy lacks consensus. By evaluating the effects of modern BMT vs. invasive intervention on patient outcomes, this study aimed to influence the future management of ACAS. METHODS: A systematic review and series of network meta-analyses were performed assessing peri-operative (within 30 days) and long term (30 days - 5 years) stroke and mortality risk between ACAS interventions. Total stroke, major, minor, ipsilateral, and contralateral stroke subtypes were assessed independently. Traditional (pre-2000) and modern (post-2000) BMT were compared to assess clinical improvements in medical therapy over the previous two decades. Risks of myocardial infarction (MI) and cranial nerve injury (CNI) were also assessed. RESULTS: Seventeen reports of 14 310 patients with > 50% ACAS were included. CEA reduced the odds of a peri-operative stroke event occurring vs. CAS (odds ratio [OR] 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1 - 2.2 [0 - 20 fewer/1 000]). CEA and CAS reduced the long term odds of minor strokes (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.21 - 0.59 [20 fewer/1 000]) and ipsilateral strokes (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.19 - 0.39 [30 fewer/1 000]) vs. all BMT. CEA reduced the odds of major strokes and combined stroke and mortality vs. traditional BMT; however, no difference was found between CEA and modern BMT. CAS reduced the odds of peri-operative MI (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0. 26 - 0.91) and CNI (OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01 - 0.42) vs. CEA. CONCLUSION: Modern BMT demonstrates similar reductions in major stroke, combined stroke, and mortality to CEA. The overall risk reductions are low and data were unavailable to assess subgroups which may benefit from intervention. However, BMT carries the potential to reduce the requirement for surgical intervention in patients with ACAS.

Outcomes of Saphenous Vein Intervention in the Management of Superficial Venous Incompetence: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the most effective modality of intervention to treat saphenous vein insufficiency. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Endovenous therapies have instigated a paradigm shift in the management of superficial venous incompetence. When compared with open surgery, endovenous interventions (foam sclerotherapy, radiofrequency ablation, endovenous laser ablation (EVLA), mechanochemical ablation, and CAE closure) potentially offer reduced morbidity with similar procedural efficacy. METHODS: A systematic review and series of network meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials were performed assessing risks of procedural failure (within 6-weeks) and recurrence (6-weeks to 5-years), defined by ultrasound, between the different modalities of intervention for superficial venous incompetence. Treatment comparisons addressing risks of common adverse events, venous clinical severity score, and pain were also performed. RESULTS: A systematic search identified 51 articles, describing 36 randomized controlled trials, incorporating 7576 limbs. Outcome data on 10 modalities of intervention were analyzed up to 5-year follow-up. CAE resulted in the lowest risk of procedural failure within 6-weeks. Foam sclerotherapy had the highest risk of recurrence while high ligation with stripping (HLS) and Conservatrice Hemodynamique de l'Insuffisance Veineuse en Ambulatoire were ranked best to reduce long-term recurrence. No intervention increased risks of venous thromboembolism and there was minimal difference in morbidity between treatments. All interventions improved venous clinical severity score (range -1.02 to -4.95), however, radiofrequency ablation demonstrated the greatest improvement, followed by EVLA and HLS between 2 to 5-years. EVLA was associated with the highest risk of pain, while mechanochemical ablation offered the least. CONCLUSIONS: Although CAE offered the lowest risk of initial procedural failure, HLS resulted in lower rates of long-term recurrence without considerably increasing morbidity when compared with other endovenous options.