TP53 mutations and survival in patients with histologically defined Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype.

BACKGROUND: Mutations of the TP53 oncosuppressor gene are frequent events in patients with malignant tumors including IDH-wildtype GBM (GBM IDH wt). However, the effective impact of TP53 mutations on prognosis has been poorly evaluated. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study investigating the impact of TP53 mutations on patients with GBM IDH wt. Only patients with PS=0-1, treated with temozolomide concurrent with and adjuvant to radiotherapy, and younger than 70 years assessed with NGS were included in the analysis. RESULTS: 97 GBM IDH wt have been selected. The median follow-up was 34.5 months (95 %CI, 30.6 - NA). Overall, 20 patients (19.4 %) presented a TP53 mutation. There were no significant differences in terms of TERT mutation (75 % vs 79.2 %) between TP53 mutated and TP53 wild-type (wt) patients. We detected 6 TP53 mutations not previously described within GBM IDH wt patients. The overall survival (OS) did not significantly differ between TP53 mutated and wt patients (HR 0.69, 95 %CI 0.37-1.27, p = 0.24). Considering only patients with an OS longer than 36 months (n = 10), the presence of a TP53 mutation was significantly associated with prolonged survival (45.6 months vs Not Reached, p = 0.037). CONCLUSION: The presence of a TP53 mutation does not appear to be correlated with overall survival in this patient cohort. While there is an association with survival for patients with an OS of 36 months or longer, the number of patients is low and there is no available evidence correlating TP53 mutations to long-term survivors.

Novel insights toward diagnosis and treatment of glioneuronal and neuronal tumors in young adults.

Aim: Glioneuronal and neuronal tumors are rare primary central nervous system malignancies with heterogeneous features. Due to the rarity of these malignancies diagnosis and treatment remains a clinical challenge. Methods: Here we performed a narrative review aimed to investigate the principal issues concerning the diagnosis, pathology, and clinical management of glioneuronal tumors. Results: Diagnostic criteria have been recently overturned thanks to a better characterization on a histological and molecular biology level. The study of genomic alterations occurring within these tumors has allowed us to identify potential therapeutic targets including BRAF, FGFR, and PDGFRA. Conclusion: Techniques allowing molecular sequencing DNA methylation assessment of the disease are essential diagnostic tools. Targeting agents should be included in the therapeutic armamentarium after loco-regional treatment failure.

[Box: see text].

Olfactory neuroblastoma: diagnosis, management, and current treatment options.

Olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) is a rare neoplasm originating from the olfactory neuroepithelium representing 3-6% of tumors of the sinonasal tract. ONB require multi-disciplinary care. Historically, the gold standard surgical procedure for ONB has been open craniofacial resection. In the last years, endoscopic endonasal approaches have been largely introduced with lower complication rates, shorter hospital stay, and similar clinical outcome. Radiotherapy plays an important role in the management of ONB, however there are not generally accepted recommendations for its application. Although there is agreement that multimodal therapy is needed, the optimal use of chemotherapy is still unknown. The rarity of the disease, makes difficult to draw definitive conclusions about the role of systemic treatment in induction and concomitant setting.

CAR-T cells neurotoxicity from consolidated practice in hematological malignancies to fledgling experience in CNS tumors: fill the gap.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-T) therapy has marked a paradigm shift in the treatment of hematological malignancies and represent a promising growing field also in solid tumors. Neurotoxicity is a well-recognized common complication of CAR-T therapy and is at the forefront of concerns for CAR-based immunotherapy widespread adoption, as it necessitates a cautious approach. The non-specific targeting of the CAR-T cells against normal tissues (on-target off-tumor toxicities) can be life-threatening; likewise, immune-mediate neurological symptoms related to CAR-T cell induced inflammation in central nervous system (CNS) must be precociously identified and recognized and possibly distinguished from non-specific symptoms deriving from the tumor itself. The mechanisms leading to ICANS (Immune effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome) remain largely unknown, even if blood-brain barrier (BBB) impairment, increased levels of cytokines, as well as endothelial activation are supposed to be involved in neurotoxicity development. Glucocorticoids, anti-IL-6, anti-IL-1 agents and supportive care are frequently used to manage patients with neurotoxicity, but clear therapeutic indications, supported by high-quality evidence do not yet exist. Since CAR-T cells are under investigation in CNS tumors, including glioblastoma (GBM), understanding of the full neurotoxicity profile in brain tumors and expanding strategies aimed at limiting adverse events become imperative. Education of physicians for assessing individualized risk and providing optimal management of neurotoxicity is crucial to make CAR-T therapies safer and adoptable in clinical practice also in brain tumors.

DCVax-L Vaccination in Patients with Glioblastoma: Real Promise or Negative Trial? The Debate Is Open.

The lack of significant improvement in the prognosis of patients with GB over the last decades highlights the need for innovative treatments aimed at fighting this malignancy and increasing survival outcomes. The results of the phase III clinical trial of DCVax-L (autologous tumor lysate-loaded dendritic cell vaccination), which has been shown to increase both median survival and long-term survival in newly diagnosed and relapsed glioblastoma, have been enthusiastically received by the scientific community. However, this study deserves some reflections regarding methodological issues related to the primary endpoint change, the long accrual period, and the suboptimal validity of the external control population used as the comparison arm.

Tumor Microenvironment in Gliomas: A Treatment Hurdle or an Opportunity to Grab?

Gliomas are the most frequent central nervous system (CNS) primary tumors. The prognosis and clinical outcomes of these malignancies strongly diverge according to their molecular alterations and range from a few months to decades. The tumor-associated microenvironment involves all cells and connective tissues surrounding tumor cells. The composition of the microenvironment as well as the interactions with associated neoplastic mass, are both variables assuming an increasing interest in these last years. This is mainly because the microenvironment can mediate progression, invasion, dedifferentiation, resistance to treatment, and relapse of primary gliomas. In particular, the tumor microenvironment strongly diverges from isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutated and wild-type (wt) tumors. Indeed, IDH mutated gliomas often show a lower infiltration of immune cells with reduced angiogenesis as compared to IDH wt gliomas. On the other hand, IDH wt tumors exhibit a strong immune infiltration mediated by several cytokines and chemokines, including CCL2, CCL7, GDNF, CSF-1, GM-CSF, etc. The presence of several factors, including Sox2, Oct4, PD-L1, FAS-L, and TGF ß2, also mediate an immune switch toward a regulatory inhibited immune system. Other important interactions are described between IDH wt glioblastoma cells and astrocytes, neurons, and stem cells, while these interactions are less elucidated in IDH-mutated tumors. The possibility of targeting the microenvironment is an intriguing perspective in terms of therapeutic drug development. In this review, we summarized available evidence related to the glioma microenvironment, focusing on differences within different glioma subtypes and on possible therapeutic development.

Glioblastoma treatment slowly moves toward change: novel druggable targets and translational horizons in 2022.

INTRODUCTION: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumor in adults. GBM treatment options have been the same for the past 30 years and have only modestly extended survival, despite aggressive multimodal treatments. The progressively better knowledge of GBM biology and a comprehensive analysis of its genomic profile have elucidated GBM heterogeneity, contributing to a more effective molecular classification and to the development of innovative targeted therapeutic approaches. AREAS COVERED: This article reports all the noteworthy innovations for immunotherapy and targeted therapy, providing insights into the current advances in trial designs, including combination therapies with immuno-oncology agents and target combinations. EXPERT OPINION: GBM molecular heterogeneity and brain anatomical characteristics critically restrain drug effectiveness. Nevertheless, stimulating insights for future research and drug development come from innovative treatment strategies for GBM, such as multi-specific 'off-the-shelf' CAR-T therapy, oncolytic viral therapy and autologous dendritic cell vaccination. Disappointing results from targeted therapies-clinical trials are mainly due to complex interferences between signaling pathways and biological processes leading to drug resistance: hence, it is imperative in the future to develop combinatorial approaches and multimodal therapies.

How to treat histone 3 altered gliomas: molecular landscape and therapeutic developments.

INTRODUCTION: Diffuse midline gliomas (DMG) and diffuse hemispheric glioma (DHG) are both rare tumors characterized and recognized for specific alterations of histone 3 including H3K27 (DMG) and H3G34 (DHG). Despite these tumors arising from alterations of the same gene their clinical, radiological, and molecular behaviors strongly diverge, requiring a personalized therapeutic approach. AREAS COVERED: We performed a review on Medline/PudMed aiming to search papers relative to prospective trials, retrospective studies, case series, and case reports of interest in order to investigate current knowledge toward the main clinical and molecular characteristics, radiology, and diagnosis, loco-regional and systemic treatments of these tumors. Moreover, we also evaluated the novel treatments under investigation. EXPERT OPINION: Thanks to an increased knowledge of the genomic landscape of these rare tumors, there are novels promising therapeutic targets for these malignancies. However, the majority of available trials allowed enrollment only in DMG, while few studies are focused on or allow the inclusion of DHG patients.

The Biological and Clinical Role of the Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase Gene in Glioblastoma: A Potential Therapeutic Target?

Glioblastoma IDH-wildtype represents the most lethal and frequent primary tumor of the central nervous system. Thanks to important scientific efforts, we can now investigate its deep genomic assessment, elucidating mutated genes and altered biological mechanisms in addition to its clinical aggressiveness. The telomerase reverse transcriptase gene (TERT) is the most frequently altered gene in solid tumors, including brain tumors and GBM IDH-wildtype. In particular, it can be observed in approximately 80-90% of GBM IDH-wildtype cases. Its clonal distribution on almost all cancer cells makes this gene an optimal target. However, the research of effective TERT inhibitors is complicated by several biological and clinical obstacles which can be only partially surmounted. Very recently, novel immunological approaches leading to TERT inhibition have been investigated, offering the potential to develop an effective target for this altered protein. Here, we perform a narrative review investigating the biological role of TERT alterations on glioblastoma and the principal obstacles associated with TERT inhibitions in this population. Moreover, we discuss possible combination treatment strategies to overcome these limitations.

Beyond Imaging and Genetic Signature in Glioblastoma: Radiogenomic Holistic Approach in Neuro-Oncology.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a malignant brain tumor exhibiting rapid and infiltrative growth, with less than 10% of patients surviving over 5 years, despite aggressive and multimodal treatments. The poor prognosis and the lack of effective pharmacological treatments are imputable to a remarkable histological and molecular heterogeneity of GBM, which has led, to date, to the failure of precision oncology and targeted therapies. Identification of molecular biomarkers is a paradigm for comprehensive and tailored treatments; nevertheless, biopsy sampling has proved to be invasive and limited. Radiogenomics is an emerging translational field of research aiming to study the correlation between radiographic signature and underlying gene expression. Although a research field still under development, not yet incorporated into routine clinical practice, it promises to be a useful non-invasive tool for future personalized/adaptive neuro-oncology. This review provides an up-to-date summary of the recent advancements in the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiogenomics for the assessment of molecular markers of interest in GBM regarding prognosis and response to treatments, for monitoring recurrence, also providing insights into the potential efficacy of such an approach for survival prognostication. Despite a high sensitivity and specificity in almost all studies, accuracy, reproducibility and clinical value of radiomic features are the Achilles heel of this newborn tool. Looking into the future, investigators' efforts should be directed towards standardization and a disciplined approach to data collection, algorithms, and statistical analysis.

Adult Medulloblastoma: Updates on Current Management and Future Perspectives.

Medulloblastoma (MB) is a malignant embryonal tumor of the posterior fossa belonging to the family of primitive neuro-ectodermic tumors (PNET). MB generally occurs in pediatric age, but in 14-30% of cases, it affects the adults, mostly below the age of 40, with an incidence of 0.6 per million per year, representing about 0.4-1% of tumors of the nervous system in adults. Unlike pediatric MB, robust prospective trials are scarce for the post-puberal population, due to the low incidence of MB in adolescent and young adults. Thus, current MB treatments for older patients are largely extrapolated from the pediatric experience, but the transferability and applicability of these paradigms to adults remain an open question. Adult MB is distinct from MB in children from a molecular and clinical perspective. Here, we review the management of adult MB, reporting the recent published literature focusing on the effectiveness of upfront chemotherapy, the development of targeted therapies, and the potential role of a reduced dose of radiotherapy in treating this disease.

Tumor-Associated Microenvironment of Adult Gliomas: A Review.

The glioma-associated tumor microenvironment involves a multitude of different cells ranging from immune cells to endothelial, glial, and neuronal cells surrounding the primary tumor. The interactions between these cells and glioblastoma (GBM) have been deeply investigated while very little data are available on patients with lower-grade gliomas. In these tumors, it has been demonstrated that the composition of the microenvironment differs according to the isocitrate dehydrogenase status (mutated/wild type), the presence/absence of codeletion, and the expression of specific alterations including H3K27 and/or other gene mutations. In addition, mechanisms by which the tumor microenvironment sustains the growth and proliferation of glioma cells are still partially unknown. Nonetheless, a better knowledge of the tumor-associated microenvironment can be a key issue in the optic of novel therapeutic drug development.

Machine learning in neuro-oncology: toward novel development fields.

PURPOSE: Artificial Intelligence (AI) involves several and different techniques able to elaborate a large amount of data responding to a specific planned outcome. There are several possible applications of this technology in neuro-oncology. METHODS: We reviewed, according to PRISMA guidelines, available studies adopting AI in different fields of neuro-oncology including neuro-radiology, pathology, surgery, radiation therapy, and systemic treatments. RESULTS: Neuro-radiology presented the major number of studies assessing AI. However, this technology is being successfully tested also in other operative settings including surgery and radiation therapy. In this context, AI shows to significantly reduce resources and costs maintaining an elevated qualitative standard. Pathological diagnosis and development of novel systemic treatments are other two fields in which AI showed promising preliminary data. CONCLUSION: It is likely that AI will be quickly included in some aspects of daily clinical practice. Possible applications of these techniques are impressive and cover all aspects of neuro-oncology.

Hypermutation as a potential predictive biomarker of immunotherapy efficacy in high-grade gliomas: a broken dream?

A high tumor mutational burden and mismatch repair deficiency are observed in 'hypermutated' high-grade gliomas (HGGs); however, the molecular characterization of this distinct subtype and whether it predicts the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are largely unknown. Pembrolizumab is a valid therapeutic option for the treatment of hypermutated cancers of diverse origin, but only a few clinical trials have explored the activity of ICIs in hypermutated HGGs. HGGs appear to differ from other cancers, likely due to the prevalence of subclonal versus clonal neoantigens, which are unable to elicit an immune response with ICIs. The main aim of this review is to summarize the current knowledge on hypermutation in HGGs, focusing on the broken promises of tumor mutational burden and mismatch repair deficiency as potential biomarkers of response to ICIs.

An interesting question arising in neuro-oncology is whether a high mutational load (a condition termed 'hypermutation') can be as immunogenic in high-grade gliomas as in other solid tumors. The most recent literature has raised the question of whether hypermutated high-grade gliomas may be 'insensitive' to immunotherapy, especially in patients pretreated with temozolomide, which is the standard of care for glioma therapy. The purpose of this review is to summarize the available evidence on hypermutated gliomas and their sensitivity to immunotherapy agents.

Pharmacotherapeutic Treatment of Glioblastoma: Where Are We to Date?

The clinical management of glioblastoma (GBM) is still bereft of treatments able to significantly improve the poor prognosis of the disease. Despite the extreme clinical need for novel therapeutic drugs, only a small percentage of patients with GBM benefit from inclusion in a clinical trial. Moreover, often clinical studies do not lead to final interpretable conclusions. From the mistakes and negative results obtained in the last years, we are now able to plan a novel generation of clinical studies for patients with GBM, allowing the testing of multiple anticancer agents at the same time. This assumes critical importance, considering that, thanks to improved knowledge of altered molecular mechanisms related to the disease, we are now able to propose several potential effective compounds in patients with both newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM. Among the novel compounds assessed, the initially great enthusiasm toward trials employing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) was disappointing due to the negative results that emerged in three randomized phase III trials. However, novel biological insights into the disease suggest that immunotherapy can be a convincing and effective treatment in GBM even if ICIs failed to prolong the survival of these patients. In this regard, the most promising approach consists of engineered immune cells such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T, CAR M, and CAR NK alone or in combination with other treatments. In this review, we discuss several issues related to systemic treatments in GBM patients. First, we assess critical issues toward the planning of clinical trials and the strategies employed to overcome these obstacles. We then move on to the most relevant interventional studies carried out on patients with previously untreated (newly diagnosed) GBM and those with recurrent and pretreated disease. Finally, we investigate novel immunotherapeutic approaches with special emphasis on preclinical and clinical data related to the administration of engineered immune cells in GBM.

Glioblastoma Microenvironment: From an Inviolable Defense to a Therapeutic Chance.

Glioblastoma is an aggressive tumor and is associated with a dismal prognosis. The availability of few active treatments as well as the inexorable recurrence after surgery are important hallmarks of the disease. The biological behavior of glioblastoma tumor cells reveals a very complex pattern of genomic alterations and is partially responsible for the clinical aggressiveness of this tumor. It has been observed that glioblastoma cells can recruit, manipulate and use other cells including neurons, glial cells, immune cells, and endothelial/stromal cells. The final result of this process is a very tangled net of interactions promoting glioblastoma growth and progression. Nonetheless, recent data are suggesting that the microenvironment can also be a niche in which glioblastoma cells can differentiate into glial cells losing their tumoral phenotype. Here we summarize the known interactions between micro-environment and glioblastoma cells highlighting possible therapeutic implications.

Molecular Targeted Therapies: Time for a Paradigm Shift in Medulloblastoma Treatment?

Medulloblastoma is a rare malignancy of the posterior cranial fossa. Although until now considered a single disease, according to the current WHO classification, it is a heterogeneous tumor that comprises multiple molecularly defined subgroups, with distinct gene expression profiles, pathogenetic driver alterations, clinical behaviors and age at onset. Adult medulloblastoma, in particular, is considered a rarer "orphan" entity in neuro-oncology practice because while treatments have progressively evolved for the pediatric population, no practice-changing prospective, randomized clinical trials have been performed in adults. In this scenario, the toughest challenge is to transfer the advances in cancer genomics into new molecularly targeted therapeutics, to improve the prognosis of this neoplasm and the treatment-related toxicities. Herein, we focus on the recent advances in targeted therapy of medulloblastoma based on the new and deeper knowledge of disease biology.

Clinical and Molecular Features of Patients with Gliomas Harboring IDH1 Non-canonical Mutations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The canonical isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 R132 mutation (IDH1 R132) is the most frequent mutation among IDH-mutated gliomas. Non-canonical IDH1 mutations or IDH2 mutations are unusual and their clinical and biological role is still unclear. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the clinical role of IDH non-canonical mutations. RESULTS: Overall, we selected 13 of 3513 studies reporting data of 4007 patients with a diagnosis of grade 2 and grade 3 glioma including 3091 patients with a molecularly proven IDH1 or IDH2 mutation. Patients with non-canonical IDH1 mutations were younger and presented a higher DNA methylation level as compared to those with canonical IDH1 R132H alteration. The overall incidence of non-canonical IDH1 mutations was 7.9% (95% CI 5.4-10.7%) in patients with IDH-mutated gliomas. There was no statistical difference in terms of incidence between patients with grade 2 or grade 3 glioma. Patients with non-canonical IDH mutations had a lower rate of 1p19q codeletion (risk difference 31%, 95% CI 23-38%) and presented a significantly prolonged survival (pooled HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.28-0.81) as compared to those with IDH1 R132H mutation. CONCLUSION: Non-canonical IDH1 mutations occur in 7.9% of IDH-mutated gliomas and identify a specific subgroup of patients with an improved survival despite a lower rate of 1p19q codeletion. Data about the type of IDH mutation should be collected in clinical practice and within interventional trials as this could be a critical variable for improved stratification and selection of patients.