Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 55
Filter
1.
Infect Dis Now ; 53(4): 104694, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36948248

ABSTRACT

In 2020 the French Society of Rhumatology (SFR) published an update of the 1990 recommendations for management of bacterial arthritis in adults. While we (French ID Society, SPILF) totally endorse this update, we wished to provide further information about specific antibiotic treatments. The present update focuses on antibiotics with good distribution in bone and joint. It is important to monitor their dosage, which should be maximized according to PK/PD parameters. Dosages proposed in this update are high, with the optimized mode of administration for intravenous betalactams (continuous or intermittent infusion). We give tools for the best dosage adaptation to conditions such as obesity or renal insufficiency. In case of enterobacter infection, with an antibiogram result "susceptible for high dosage", we recommend the requesting of specialized advice from an ID physician. More often than not, it is possible to prescribe antibiotics via the oral route as soon as blood cultures are sterile and clinical have symptoms shown improvement. Duration of antibiotic treatment is 6 weeks for Staphylococcus aureus, and 4 weeks for the other bacteria (except for Neisseria: 7 days).


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Infectious , Staphylococcal Infections , Humans , Adult , Child , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Arthritis, Infectious/diagnosis , Arthritis, Infectious/drug therapy , Administration, Oral , Administration, Intravenous
4.
Infect Dis Now ; 51(1): 39-49, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33576336

ABSTRACT

Over several decades, the economic situation and consideration of patient quality of life have been responsible for increased outpatient treatment. It is in this context that outpatient antimicrobial treatment (OPAT) has rapidly developed. The availability of elastomeric infusion pumps has permitted prolonged or continuous antibiotic administration by dint of a mechanical device necessitating neither gravity nor a source of electricity. In numerous situations, its utilization optimizes administration of time-dependent antibiotics while freeing the patient from the constraints associated with infusion by gravity, volumetric pump or electrical syringe pump and, more often than not, limiting the number of nurse interventions to one or two a day. That much said, the installation of these pumps, which is not systematically justified, entails markedly increased OPAT costs and is liable to expose the patient to a risk of therapeutic failure or adverse effects due to the instability of the molecules utilized in a non-controlled environment, instability that necessitates close monitoring of their use. More precisely, a prescriber must take into consideration the stability parameters of each molecule (infusion duration, concentration following dilution, nature of the diluent and pump temperature). The objective of this work is to evaluate the different means of utilization of elastomeric infusion pumps in intravenous antibiotic administration outside of hospital. Following a review of the literature, we will present a tool for optimized antibiotic prescription, in a town setting by means of an infusion device.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Home Infusion Therapy/standards , Infusion Pumps/standards , Infusions, Parenteral/standards , Administration, Intravenous , Ambulatory Care/standards , Anti-Bacterial Agents/economics , Elastomers , Home Infusion Therapy/economics , Humans , Infusion Pumps/economics , Infusions, Intravenous/economics , Infusions, Intravenous/standards , Infusions, Parenteral/economics , Outpatients , Quality of Life , Risk Factors
7.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 75(10): 2960-2968, 2020 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32737508

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Optimal dosing of antibiotics is critical in immunocompromised patients suspected to have an infection. Data on pharmacokinetics (PK) of meropenem in patients with haematological malignancies are scarce. OBJECTIVES: To optimize dosing regimens, we aimed to develop a PK population model for meropenem in this population. METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years, hospitalized in the haematology department of our 1500 bed university hospital for a malignant haematological disease and who had received at least one dose of meropenem were eligible. Meropenem was quantified by HPLC. PK were described using a non-linear mixed-effect model and external validation performed on a distinct database. Monte Carlo simulations estimated the PTA, depending on renal function, duration of infusion and MIC. Target for free trough concentration was set at >4× MIC. RESULTS: Overall, 88 patients (181 samples) were included, 66 patients (75%) were in aplasia and median Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) CLCR was 117 mL/min/1.73 m2 (range: 35-359). Initial meropenem dosing regimen ranged from 1 g q8h to 2 g q8h over 30 to 60 min. A one-compartment model with first-order elimination adequately described the data. Only MDRD CLCR was found to be significantly associated with CL. Only continuous infusion achieved a PTA of 100% whatever the MIC and MDRD CLCR. Short duration of infusion (<60 min) failed to reach an acceptable PTA, except for bacteria with MIC < 0.25 mg/L in patients with MDRD CLCR below 90 mL/min/1.73 m2. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with malignant haematological diseases, meropenem should be administered at high dose (6 g/day) and on continuous infusion to reach acceptable trough concentrations.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Hematologic Neoplasms , Adolescent , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Hematologic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Humans , Meropenem , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Monte Carlo Method , Thienamycins
8.
Med Mal Infect ; 50(7): 567-574, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32284220

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: One-stage replacement arthroplasty for treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) results in similar cure rate than two-stage (around 85-92%), but antibiotic therapy duration is not well established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a short six-week antibiotic course in periprosthetic joint infections after onstage exchange. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective, observational study conducted at Orthopaedic Department of Cochin Hospital, Paris, between 1st January 2010 and 31 December 2015. Patients with a microbiologically proven PJI, treated with one-stage replacement and 6 weeks (+/1week) of antimicrobial therapy were included. Pearson's-χ2 and Wilcoxon tests were used to compare categorical and continuous variables. RESULTS: Fifty patients with periprosthetic joint infections (42 hip, 8 knee PJI) treated with one-stage replacement arthroplasty were included. Median age was 69.3 years (IQR 24.5-97.4). Infections occurred after a mean of 36 months (IQR 1-216). Bone biopsy cultures were positive for Staphylococcus spp. in 29 patients (58%), Cutibacterium acnes in 19 (38%), Gram-negative bacilli in 6 (12%). Polymicrobial infections occurred in 12 (24%). Intravenous antibiotics were administered for a median of 11 days (IQR 4-45) and 46 patients (92%) were switched to an oral therapy. Medium follow-up was of 32 months (IQR 12-101). Overall remission rate was 90%. CONCLUSIONS: A six-week course of antibiotics in knee and hip PJIs treated with one-stage RA has a satisfactory remission rate in this open study.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Bacterial Infections/surgery , Prosthesis-Related Infections/drug therapy , Prosthesis-Related Infections/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bacterial Infections/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prosthesis-Related Infections/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
9.
Med Mal Infect ; 50(4): 323-331, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31326299

ABSTRACT

Antibiotic prescription in chronic kidney disease patients poses a twofold problem. The appropriate use of antibacterial agents is essential to ensure efficacy and to prevent the emergence of resistance, and dosages should be adapted to the renal function to prevent adverse effects. SiteGPR is a French website for health professionals to help with prescriptions to chronic kidney disease patients. A working group of infectious disease specialists and nephrology pharmacists reviewed the indications, dosing regimens, administration modalities, and dose adjustments of antibiotics marketed in France for patients with renal failure. Data available on the SiteGPR website and detailed in the present article aims to provide an evidence-based update of infectious disease recommendations to health professionals managing patients with chronic kidney disease.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Infectious Disease Medicine/methods , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/metabolism , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Biotransformation , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Monitoring , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Kidney/drug effects , Kidney/metabolism , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prescription Drugs
11.
Med Mal Infect ; 49(6): 456-462, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31351803

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the practices of French infection specialists related to antibiotic therapy duration between 2016 and 2018. METHODS: We conducted two identical surveys (in 2016 and 2018) targeting hospital-based infection specialists (medical physicians, pharmacists) who gave at least weekly advice on antibiotic prescriptions. The questionnaire included 15 clinical vignettes. Part A asked about the durations of antibiotic therapies they would usually advise to prescribers, and part B asked about the shortest duration they would be willing to advise for the same clinical situations. RESULTS: We included 325 specialists (165 in 2016 and 160 in 2018), mostly infectious disease specialists (82.4%, 268/325), members of antibiotic stewardship teams in 72% (234/325) of cases. Shorter antibiotic treatments (as compared with the literature) were advised to prescribers in more than half of the vignettes by 71% (105/147) of respondents in 2018, versus 46% (69/150) in 2016 (P<0.001). Guidelines used by participants displayed fixed durations for 77% (123/160) of cases in 2018 versus 21% (35/165) in 2016. Almost all respondents (89%, 131/160) declared they were aware of the 2017 SPILF's proposal. CONCLUSION: The release of guidelines promoting shorter durations of antibiotic therapy seems to have had a favourable impact on practices of specialists giving advice on antibiotic prescriptions.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Antimicrobial Stewardship/standards , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Infectious Disease Medicine/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Societies, Medical/standards , Adult , Antimicrobial Stewardship/methods , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Infections/drug therapy , Infections/epidemiology , Infectious Disease Medicine/organization & administration , Male , Middle Aged , Online Systems , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Societies, Medical/organization & administration , Surveys and Questionnaires
12.
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med ; 38(5): 549-562, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30836191

ABSTRACT

Infection is a risk for any intervention. In surgery, for example, pathogenic bacteria are found in more than 90% of operative wounds during closure. This exists whatever the surgical technique and whatever the environment (the laminar flow does not entirely eliminate this risk). These bacteria are few in number but can proliferate. They find in the operative wound a favourable environment (haematoma, ischaemia, modification of oxido-reduction potential...) and the intervention induces anomalies of the immune defences. In the case of the installation of foreign material, the risk is increased. The objective of antibiotic prophylaxis (ABP) is to prevent bacterial growth in order to reduce the risk of infection at the site of the intervention. The preoperative consultation represents a privileged moment to decide on the prescription of a ABP. It is possible to define the type of intervention planned, the associated risk of infection (and therefore the necessity or not of ABP), the time of prescription before surgery and any allergic antecedents which may modify the choice of the selected antibiotic molecule.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Surgical Procedures, Operative , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/standards , France , Humans , Societies, Medical , Surgical Procedures, Operative/adverse effects , Surgical Procedures, Operative/methods , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology , Time Factors
13.
Med Mal Infect ; 49(3): 187-193, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30420165

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the documentation of the 72-hour antibiotic therapy reassessment in medical records. METHODS: One-day prevalence evaluation of curative antibiotic therapies≥72hours. The documentation of the reassessment was defined according to three criteria: (1) "clear" documentation (clinical or microbiological comment associated with a comment on the need to adjust the antibiotic therapy or on the lack of need); (2) "tacit" documentation (only based on a clinical or microbiological comment); (3) no documentation. RESULTS: We assessed 114 antibiotic therapies in 26 hospital departments. A clear reassessment at 72hours was observed in only 45 (39%) records and 31 (27%) records had no reassessment. The planned duration of treatment was written in 63 (55%) records. At 72hours, among the 71 antibiotic therapies with a microbiological documentation, 69 (97%) were active and 44 (62%) had a narrow spectrum. Among the 48 antibiotic therapies with a broad spectrum on day 1, only 21 (44%) benefited from a de-escalation at 72hours. A clearly recorded reassessment at 72hours was associated with de-escalation (P=0.025) and the prescription of a planned duration of treatment was associated with antibiotic therapy compliance with local or national guidelines (P=0.018). CONCLUSION: Although reassessment was observed in 73% of records, it was correctly recorded at 72hours in only 39% of cases. The documentation of the reassessment and the prescription of a planned duration were associated with a better quality of antibiotic prescription (de-escalation, compliance with guidelines) and are relevant indicators for monitoring the proper use of antibiotics.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Documentation , Drug Monitoring/methods , Medical Records , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Antimicrobial Stewardship/methods , Antimicrobial Stewardship/organization & administration , Antimicrobial Stewardship/standards , Cross-Sectional Studies , Documentation/standards , Documentation/statistics & numerical data , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Monitoring/standards , Drug Monitoring/statistics & numerical data , France/epidemiology , Hospitals/standards , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Medical Records/standards , Medical Records/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , Program Evaluation , Risk Assessment , Time Factors
19.
Med Mal Infect ; 47(2): 92-141, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28279491

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Reducing antibiotic consumption has now become a major public health priority. Reducing treatment duration is one of the means to achieve this objective. Guidelines on the therapeutic management of the most frequent infections recommend ranges of treatment duration in the ratio of one to two. The Recommendation Group of the French Infectious Diseases Society (SPILF) was asked to collect literature data to then recommend the shortest treatment durations possible for various infections. METHODS: Analysis of the literature focused on guidelines published in French and English, supported by a systematic search on PubMed. Articles dating from one year before the guidelines publication to August 31, 2015 were searched on the website. RESULTS: The shortest treatment durations based on the relevant clinical data were suggested for upper and lower respiratory tract infections, central venous catheter-related and uncomplicated primary bacteremia, infective endocarditis, bacterial meningitis, intra-abdominal, urinary tract, upper reproductive tract, bone and joint, skin and soft tissue infections, and febrile neutropenia. Details of analyzed articles were shown in tables. CONCLUSION: This work stresses the need for new well-conducted studies evaluating treatment durations for some common infections. Following the above-mentioned work focusing on existing literature data, the Recommendation Group of the SPILF suggests specific study proposals.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Time Factors
20.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 36(7): 1083-1090, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28070748

ABSTRACT

In 2011, the French Agency for Safety of Health Products issued guidelines underlining the principles of proper aminoglycosides' use. The aim of the survey was to evaluate adherence to these guidelines two years after their issue. Characteristics of patients receiving aminoglycosides were recorded by voluntary facilities during a 3-month survey in 2013-2014. The modalities of aminoglycosides treatment were analysed by comparison with the French guidelines. A total of 3,323 patients were included by 176 facilities. Patients were mainly hospitalized in medical wards (33.0%), and treated for urinary-tract infections (24.7%). Compliance regarding the clinical indication and the daily aminoglycosides dose was observed in 65.2% and 62.9% of the cases, respectively. A 30-min once-daily IV administration was recorded in 62.5% of the cases. Aminoglycosides treatment duration was appropriate (≤5 days) for 93.6% of the patients. When considering the four criteria together, 23.2% of the patients had a treatment regimen aligned with the guidelines. Requests for measurements of peak and trough AG serum concentrations matched the guidelines in 24.9% and 67.4% of the cases, respectively. Two years after guidelines issue, aminoglycosides use remains unsatisfactory in French health-care facilities. Efforts should be made for guidelines promotion, especially regarding the issue of underdosing.


Subject(s)
Aminoglycosides/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Guideline Adherence , Aged , Female , France , Hospitals , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...