Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Transfusion ; 58(5): 1245-1253, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29492976

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Until now, markers of hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection have not been studied in blood donors throughout Poland, and no acute case of HEV infection has been closely documented or confirmed by HEV RNA detection. The prevalence of HEV infection markers, including HEV RNA in Polish blood donors and virus genotypes was investigated. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In total, 12,664 individual donations from 22 Polish blood transfusion centers were tested for HEV RNA by transcription-mediated amplification. In addition, 3079 first-time donors sampled throughout Poland also were screened for antibodies to HEV. HEV RNA and immunoglobulin M-positive donations were confirmed using real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting, respectively. RESULTS: Ten donors were identified as RNA initial reactive (one of 1266 donors), and six (one of 2109) were identified as repeat reactive and confirmed by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction or seroconversion. Sequence analysis identified HEV Genotype 3c in one donor and Genotype 3i in two others. On average, 43.5% of donors were immunoglobulin G-positive. Immunoglobulin G seroprevalence ranged from 22.7% to 60.8% in group ages 18 to 27 years and 48 to 57 years, respectively and differed between administrative regions from 28.9% in Podlasie to 61.3% in Wielkopolska. Thirty-nine of the donors were immunoglobulin M-positive, and seven donors were IgM positive only (0.2%). Of 37 immunoglobulin M-reactive samples tested by Western blot, 24 (64.9%) were confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicate a high level of HEV endemicity throughout Poland compared with other countries. There is an urgent need to consider the protection of recipients of blood components against transfusion-transmitted HEV infection.


Subject(s)
Blood Donors , Endemic Diseases , Hepatitis E virus/genetics , Hepatitis E/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Biomarkers/blood , Female , Genotype , Humans , Male , Mass Screening , Middle Aged , Poland , RNA, Viral/blood , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Transfusion Reaction/epidemiology , Young Adult
2.
Transfusion ; 53(10 Pt 2): 2512-24, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23590145

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The second triplex transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) assay version (Ultrio Plus, Novartis Diagnostics) uses an additional reagent enhancing the disruption of hepatitis B virus (HBV) particles and release of DNA for the target capture probe. This study compares the performance of this new assay version with the previous one (Ultrio). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: For analytical sensitivity assessment the World Health Organization HBV, hepatitis C virus (HCV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) international standards and various genotype dilution panels were used. Individual donations (IDs) from 9980 first-time donors were screened simultaneously by serology and both TMA assay versions. RESULTS: The 50 and 95% limits of detection (LODs) for HBV using Ultrio Plus were 0.8 (0.6-1.0) and 4.6 (3.2-7.2) IU/mL, respectively, 2.4 (1.4-4.8)-fold more sensitive than Ultrio. The TMA assay versions had comparable LODs for HIV-1 and HCV. The improvement factors on analytical sensitivity panels of HBV Genotypes A to G ranged from 1.3 to 7.3 and 50% LODs (95% confidence interval) reduced from 12.5 (10-15) to 3.8 (3.2-4.4) copies/mL. One Ultrio Plus HBV Genotype D yield sample missed by the Ultrio assay in the donor screening study was detected with ninefold higher sensitivity. The specificities of ID nucleic acid test (ID-NAT) and serologic testing in a similar repeat test algorithm were 100 and 99.41%, respectively. CONCLUSION: More efficient target capture chemistry in the new TMA assay version significantly improved sensitivity and diminished variability in detecting HBV strains of various genotypes. We recommend a triplicate ID-NAT repeat test strategy to eliminate discriminatory tests on false-non-repeat-reactive (anti-HBc-nonreactive) donations.


Subject(s)
Blood Donors , HIV-1/isolation & purification , Hepacivirus/isolation & purification , Hepatitis B virus/isolation & purification , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques , Blood Donors/statistics & numerical data , DNA, Viral/genetics , DNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Genotype , HIV-1/genetics , Hepacivirus/genetics , Hepatitis B virus/genetics , Humans , Limit of Detection , Mass Screening/methods , Mass Screening/standards , RNA, Viral/blood , RNA, Viral/genetics , Serologic Tests/methods , Serologic Tests/standards , Transcription, Genetic , World Health Organization
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...