Influence of ethanol consumption and food intake on serum concentrations of endogenous steroids.

Steroid biosynthesis and biotransformation are based on a cascade of enzymatic processes being highly sensitive to various external influences. Amongst those, ethanol was shown to affect testosterone metabolism. For doping analyses, athlete steroid profiles comprise seven urinary steroid metabolites, of which relevant ratios are significantly increased following ethanol consumption. This effect is presumably based on the lack of hepatic NAD+-coenzyme as a consequence of ethanol oxidation. Only recently, testosterone (T) and androstenedione (A4) blood profiles have been introduced as additional approach for doping control. However, a potential influence of ethanol intake on testosterone biosynthesis and thus on blood steroid profiles has not been investigated so far. Therefore, steroid concentrations from 10 males and 10 females receiving an ethanol infusion up to a breath alcohol concentration of 0.5 mg/L which was hold as a plateau for two hours were conducted. Blood samples were drawn every 15 min for steroid quantification. An ethanol-dependent T/A4 increase up to 385% resulting from A4 suppression was observed in 14 volunteers. In addition, we observed sporadic A4 increases coinciding with cortisol and ACTH pulses pointing to a meal-induced adrenal stimulation. While testosterone levels in males showed diurnal variation solely, testosterone levels in some females were found to be susceptible to ethanol- and ACTH-dependent perturbations, which is thought to be due to its predominant adrenal synthesis in females. In conclusion, the results of the present study emphasize the importance of blood sampling at a sufficient time interval from food and ethanol intake. This is of interest if T and A4 are used for diagnostics in doping control.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of atomoxetine in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder: a naturalistic study.

The selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor atomoxetine is potentially among the first-line pharmacotherapy options for ADHD. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) with the quantification and interpretation of atomoxetine serum concentrations is used to determine an individual dose followed by an optimal effectiveness and minimal side effects. The aim of this retrospective pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis was to derive age-appropriate recommendations for the implementation of TDM to improve the efficacy and tolerability of atomoxetine in children and adolescents. Using the analytical method of high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection, 94 serum concentrations of 74 patients between 6 and 21 years of age were determined. Therapeutic effectiveness and side effects were evaluated according to the categories "low", "moderate", and "significant". As part of TDM, a time interval with maximum concentrations of 1-3 h after the administration of atomoxetine was determined for blood sampling. In this time interval, a significant correlation between the weight-normalized dose and the serum concentrations was found. The efficacy as well as the tolerability proved to be mainly moderate or significant. A preliminary therapeutic reference range was between 100 and 400 ng/ml. Naturalistic studies have limitations. Therefore, and due to a limited study population, the results have to be regarded as preliminary observations that must be confirmed in further studies. The preliminary therapeutic reference range for children and adolescents proved to be narrower than the reference range for adult patients. However, due to good efficacy and tolerability an exact reference range remained difficult to determine.

Interindividual and Intraindividual Variation of Methylphenidate Concentrations in Serum and Saliva of Patients With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring is becoming increasingly important in psychiatric therapy, especially in children. However, for several reasons, it cannot yet be implemented as a daily routine in clinical or outpatient settings. To evaluate new, noninvasive procedures, blood and saliva (oral fluid) samples were collected from patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) who were also being administered methylphenidate (MPH). The study's main purposes were to correlate MPH concentrations in serum and saliva between subjects and to analyze intraindividual variation of serum concentration. METHODS: Thirty-six patients with ADHD (27 children and 9 adults) on MPH medication were included for drug analysis. MPH and its major metabolite ritalinic acid were quantified using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry measurements. The following correlations were investigated: (1) between drug concentrations in serum and saliva, and (2) between pH value and saliva to serum concentration ratio. Furthermore, the mean intraindividual MPH-concentration fluctuation in saliva under constant frame conditions was analyzed. RESULTS: After quantification, MPH concentrations were approximately 5 times higher in the saliva than in the serum, whereas the concentrations of ritalinic acid were much lower in saliva. We found significant correlations between concentrations of MPH in serum and saliva (r = 0.51, P < 0.05). Saliva MPH measures, compared with serum, were pH-dependent (r = -0.56, P < 0.01). Daily coefficient of variance of saliva concentration in children taking constant medication was 27.3% (11%-42%), whereas the coefficient of variance for the ratio of saliva to serum was 122% (2%-2060%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that the interindividual variation in saliva to serum concentrations is rather high, whereas the intraindividual variation is fairly low, as already shown in the literature for repeated citalopram serum measurements. Saliva may well serve as an alternative matrix for therapeutic drug monitoring of MPH in patients with ADHD, especially for follow-up examinations. Future research should focus on analyzing the relationship between drug levels in saliva and clinical effects as well as on understanding the mechanisms that generate saliva drug concentrations. These are essential steps before potential clinical use.

Molecular recognition of N-acetylneuraminic acid by acyclic pyridinium- and quinolinium-based receptors in aqueous media: recognition through combination of cationic and neutral recognition sites.

Compounds 5b-8b and 10b, and 11b, containing a triethylbenzene scaffold substituted with both neutral and cationic recognition sites, were shown to be effective receptors for N-acetylneuraminic acid (NeuAc), the most common occurring sialic acid, in highly competitive solvents. These compounds were established to be more powerful receptors for NeuAc than the symmetrical pyridinium- and quinolinium-based compounds 9b and 12b in aqueous media. As in natural protein-sialic acid complexes, the combination of neutral/charge-reinforced hydrogen bonds, ion pairs, CH-π, and van der Waals interactions seems to be responsible for the effective binding of this naturally widespread anionic carbohydrate in aqueous media.

8-Hydroxyquinoline as a building block for artificial receptors: binding preferences in the recognition of glycopyranosides.

8-Hydroxyquinoline-based receptors 1-3, containing a trisubstituted triethylbenzene core, were prepared and their binding properties towards glycosides were evaluated. (1)H NMR and fluorescence titrations as well as binding studies in two-phase systems, such as dissolution of solid carbohydrates in apolar media and phase transfer of sugars from aqueous into organic solvents, revealed ß- vs.α-anomer binding preferences in the recognition of glycosides. Compared to the previously described three-armed aminopyridine-based receptor, compounds 1 and 2 showed significantly increased affinity to ß-galactoside. Receptor 2, incorporating two 8-hydroxyquinoline units, was shown to be the most effective receptor for ß-galactoside. Compound 3, bearing one 8-hydroxyquinoline group, was found to be a highly effective receptor for ß-glucoside and shown to be a more powerful receptor than the quinoline-based compound 4, indicating an important role of the quinoline hydroxy group in the complex formation.