Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 43
Filter
2.
Eur Radiol ; 30(4): 1997-2009, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31844958

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To implement detailed EU cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) quality criteria in the multicentre DISCHARGE trial (FP72007-2013, EC-GA 603266), we reviewed image quality and adherence to CCTA protocol and to the recommendations of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in a pilot study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From every clinical centre, imaging datasets of three patients per arm were assessed for adherence to the inclusion/exclusion criteria of the pilot study, predefined standards for the CCTA protocol and ICA recommendations, image quality and non-diagnostic (NDX) rate. These parameters were compared via multinomial regression and ANOVA. If a site did not reach the minimum quality level, additional datasets had to be sent before entering into the final accepted database (FADB). RESULTS: We analysed 226 cases (150 CCTA/76 ICA). The inclusion/exclusion criteria were not met by 6 of the 226 (2.7%) datasets. The predefined standard was not met by 13 of 76 ICA datasets (17.1%). This percentage decreased between the initial CCTA database and the FADB (multinomial regression, 53 of 70 vs 17 of 75 [76%] vs [23%]). The signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio of the FADB did not improve significantly (ANOVA, p = 0.20; p = 0.09). The CTA NDX rate was reduced, but not significantly (initial CCTA database 15 of 70 [21.4%]) and FADB 9 of 75 [12%]; p = 0.13). CONCLUSION: We were able to increase conformity to the inclusion/exclusion criteria and CCTA protocol, improve image quality and decrease the CCTA NDX rate by implementing EU CCTA quality criteria and ICA recommendations. KEY POINTS: • Failure to meet protocol adherence in cardiac CTA was high in the pilot study (77.6%). • Image quality varies between sites and can be improved by feedback given by the core lab. • Conformance with new EU cardiac CT quality criteria might render cardiac CTA findings more consistent and comparable.


Subject(s)
Computed Tomography Angiography/methods , Coronary Angiography/methods , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnosis , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Reproducibility of Results
3.
J Thorac Imaging ; 34(3): 179-186, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30870305

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical value of ultra-low-dose computed tomography (ULDCT) compared with chest x-ray radiography (CXR) for diagnosing chest pathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 200 patients referred for CXR by outpatient clinics or general practitioners were enrolled prospectively. They underwent CXR (posteroanterior and lateral) and ULDCT (120 kV, 3 mAs) on the same day. In-room time and effective dose were recorded for each examination. Studies were categorized whether they were diagnostic or not, relevant radiologic diagnostic findings were reported, and confidence for diagnosis was recorded by a Likert scale. Differences in diagnostic confidence and effect on management decision were compared. RESULTS: In-room time was <2 minutes for CXR and <3 minutes for ULDCT. Effective dose was 0.040 mSv for CXR and 0.071 mSv for ULDCT. CXR was considered diagnostic in 98% and ULDCT in 100%. The mean perceived confidence for diagnosis was 88±12% with CXR and 98±2% with ULDCT (P<0.0001), whereas discrepant findings between CXR and ULDCT were found in 101 of 200 patients. As compared with CXR, ULDCT had added value for management decisions in 40 of 200 patients. CONCLUSIONS: ULDCT provided added value to the radiologist by improved perceived confidence with a reduction in false-positive and false-negative CXR investigations that had management implications in 20% of patients. The effective dose of ULDCT will not be a limiting factor for introducing ULDCT of the chest on a broad scale in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Radiation Dosage , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Radiography, Thoracic/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Radiography
4.
Radiology ; 291(2): 340-348, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30888934

ABSTRACT

Background Patient preference is pivotal for widespread adoption of tests in clinical practice. Patient preferences for invasive versus other noninvasive tests for coronary artery disease are not known. Purpose To compare patient acceptance and preferences for noninvasive and invasive cardiac imaging in North and South America, Asia, and Europe. Materials and Methods This was a prospective 16-center trial in 381 study participants undergoing coronary CT angiography with stress perfusion, SPECT, and invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Patient preferences were collected by using a previously validated questionnaire translated into eight languages. Responses were converted to ordinal scales and were modeled with generalized linear mixed models. Results In patients in whom at least one test was associated with pain, CT and SPECT showed reduced median pain levels, reported on 0-100 visual analog scales, from 20 for ICA (interquartile range [IQR], 4-50) to 6 for CT (IQR, 0-27.5) and 5 for SPECT (IQR, 0-25) (P < .001). Patients from Asia reported significantly more pain than patients from other continents for ICA (median, 25; IQR, 10-50; P = .01), CT (median, 10; IQR, 0-30; P = .02), and SPECT (median, 7; IQR, 0-28; P = .03). Satisfaction with preparation differed by continent and test (P = .01), with patients from Asia reporting generally lower ratings. Patients from North America had greater percentages of "very high" or "high" satisfaction than patients from other continents for ICA (96% vs 82%, respectively; P < .001) and SPECT (95% vs 79%, respectively; P = .04) but not for CT (89% vs 86%, respectively; P = .70). Among all patients, CT was preferred by 54% of patients, compared with 18% for SPECT and 28% for ICA (P < .001). Conclusion For cardiac imaging, patients generally favored CT angiography with stress perfusion, while study participants from Asia generally reported lowest satisfaction. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Woodard and Nguyen in this issue.


Subject(s)
Computed Tomography Angiography , Coronary Angiography , Patient Preference/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Computed Tomography Angiography/adverse effects , Computed Tomography Angiography/methods , Computed Tomography Angiography/psychology , Coronary Angiography/adverse effects , Coronary Angiography/methods , Coronary Angiography/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain, Procedural , Prospective Studies
5.
Phys Med ; 57: 47-57, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30738531

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To design a 3D printed anthropomorphic lung vessel phantom for CT image quality assessment and to evaluate the phantom image and dose characteristics. METHODS: An in-house algorithm generated a vessel tree model, based on human lungs anatomy, which was 3D printed using a multi jet modeling printer (0.25 mm ≤ vessel diameters ≤ 8.25 mm) and inserted in an elliptical holder (thorax surrogate). The phantom was scanned (Toshiba Aquilion Genesis CT) and compared in terms of attenuation (Hounsfield units, HU) and dose characteristics with studies of five patients (normal BMI) and a commercial torso phantom, performed with the same thorax protocol. The pixel value distribution in the lung area was assessed with histograms. To investigate the adjustment of tube current modulation, tube load and CTDI were compared. RESULTS: The histogram peaks for respectively vessels and surrounding tissue were at 105 HU and -985 HU (3D printed phantom), at -25 HU and -1000 HU (torso phantom) and at 25 HU and -875 HU (average patient). The contrast between vessels and surrounding was -1090 HU (3D printed), -975 HU (torso phantom), and -900 HU (average patient). The measured HU values (soft tissue and vertebra) were (32 ±â€¯15) HU and (210 ±â€¯71) HU (average patient); (4 ±â€¯4) HU, (390 ±â€¯39) HU (torso phantom) and (119 ±â€¯5) HU, (951 ±â€¯31) HU (3D printed phantom and holder). CTDIvol was (1.9 ±â€¯4.7 mGy) for patients, 1.9 mGy for the torso phantom and 2.1 mGy for the 3D printed lung phantom. CONCLUSIONS: An anthropomorphic 3D printed lung phantom was developed and its CT image and dose characteristics evaluated. The phantom has the potential to provide clinically relevant and reproducible measures of CT image quality.


Subject(s)
Lung/diagnostic imaging , Phantoms, Imaging , Printing, Three-Dimensional , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/instrumentation , Humans , Quality Control , Radiation Dosage
6.
Br J Radiol ; 90(1079): 20160519, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28830200

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of three generations of CT reconstruction techniques using structural similarity (SSIM) as a measure of image quality for CT scans of a chest phantom with 3D printed lung vessels. METHODS: CT images of the chest phantom were acquired at seven dose levels by changing the tube current while other acquisition parameters were kept constant. Three CT reconstruction techniques were applied on each acquisition. The first technique was filtered backprojection (FBP), the second technique was FBP with iterative filtering (adaptive iteration dose reduction in 3 dimensions (AIDR 3D)) and the third technique was model-based iterative reconstruction (Forward projected model-based Iterative Reconstruction SoluTion (FIRST)). Image quality of the CT data was quantified in terms of SSIM. The SSIM index was used for image quality comparison between the dose levels and different reconstruction techniques. The SSIM index gives a value between 0 and 1, with 0 as the lowest image quality and 1 as an excellent image quality. RESULTS: The lowest SSIM index was observed for FBP at all dose levels. The reconstruction technique with the highest SSIM depends on the dose level. For tube currents higher than 80 mA, AIDR 3D showed the highest SSIM index, and for tube currents lower or equal to 80 mA FIRST showed the highest SSIM index. CONCLUSION: SSIM index is a robust quantity and is correlated to the image quality as perceived by the humans. Advanced CT reconstruction techniques provide better image quality in all conditions compared to FBP. Advances in knowledge: SSIM is a robust measure to compare CT image quality for advanced reconstruction techniques relative to a reference. The 3D print technology is an useful method for the development of dedicated phantoms for CT image quality evaluation.


Subject(s)
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Lung/blood supply , Phantoms, Imaging/standards , Printing, Three-Dimensional , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Models, Anatomic , Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , Radiographic Image Enhancement/standards , Signal-To-Noise Ratio , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/standards
7.
Phys Med Biol ; 62(15): 6304-6321, 2017 Jul 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28590940

ABSTRACT

This study aims to develop and test software for assessing and reporting doses for standard patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) examinations in a 320 detector-row cone-beam scanner. The software, called SimDoseCT, is based on the Monte Carlo (MC) simulation code, which was developed to calculate organ doses and effective doses in ICRP anthropomorphic adult reference computational phantoms for acquisitions with the Aquilion ONE CT scanner (Toshiba). MC simulation was validated by comparing CTDI measurements within standard CT dose phantoms with results from simulation under the same conditions. SimDoseCT consists of a graphical user interface connected to a MySQL database, which contains the look-up-tables that were generated with MC simulations for volumetric acquisitions at different scan positions along the phantom using any tube voltage, bow tie filter, focal spot and nine different beam widths. Two different methods were developed to estimate organ doses and effective doses from acquisitions using other available beam widths in the scanner. A correction factor was used to estimate doses in helical acquisitions. Hence, the user can select any available protocol in the Aquilion ONE scanner for a standard adult male or female and obtain the dose results through the software interface. Agreement within 9% between CTDI measurements and simulations allowed the validation of the MC program. Additionally, the algorithm for dose reporting in SimDoseCT was validated by comparing dose results from this tool with those obtained from MC simulations for three volumetric acquisitions (head, thorax and abdomen). The comparison was repeated using eight different collimations and also for another collimation in a helical abdomen examination. The results showed differences of 0.1 mSv or less for absolute dose in most organs and also in the effective dose calculation. The software provides a suitable tool for dose assessment in standard adult patients undergoing CT examinations in a 320 detector-row cone-beam scanner.


Subject(s)
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/instrumentation , Monte Carlo Method , Phantoms, Imaging , Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Adult , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/methods , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Male , Radiation Dosage , Software
8.
Sci Data ; 4: 170047, 2017 04 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28398352

ABSTRACT

The cranial diversity of sharks reflects disparate biomechanical adaptations to feeding. In order to be able to investigate and better understand the ecomorphology of extant shark feeding systems, we created a x-ray computed tomography (CT) library of shark cranial anatomy with three-dimensional (3D) lower jaw reconstructions. This is used to examine and quantify lower jaw disparity in extant shark species in a separate study. The library is divided in a dataset comprised of medical CT scans of 122 sharks (Selachimorpha, Chondrichthyes) representing 73 extant species, including digitized morphology of entire shark specimens. This CT dataset and additional data provided by other researchers was used to reconstruct a second dataset containing 3D models of the left lower jaw for 153 individuals representing 94 extant shark species. These datasets form an extensive anatomical record of shark skeletal anatomy, necessary for comparative morphological, biomechanical, ecological and phylogenetic studies.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Biological , Jaw , Sharks/anatomy & histology , Animals , Biological Evolution , Feeding Behavior , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
9.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 206(1): 129-35, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26700344

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the patient dose from perfusion CT examinations of the brain, lung tumors, and the liver on a cone-beam 320-MDCT scanner using a Monte Carlo simulation and the recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Monte Carlo simulation based on the Electron Gamma Shower Version 4 package code was used to calculate organ doses and the effective dose in the reference computational phantoms for an adult man and adult woman as published by the ICRP. Three perfusion CT acquisition protocols--brain, lung tumor, and liver perfusion--were evaluated. Additionally, dose assessments were performed for the skin and for the eye lens. Conversion factors were obtained to estimate effective doses and organ doses from the volume CT dose index and dose-length product. RESULTS: The sex-averaged effective doses were approximately 4 mSv for perfusion CT of the brain and were between 23 and 26 mSv for the perfusion CT body protocols. The eye lens dose from the brain perfusion CT examination was approximately 153 mGy. The sex-averaged peak entrance skin dose (ESD) was 255 mGy for the brain perfusion CT studies, 157 mGy for the lung tumor perfusion CT studies, and 172 mGy for the liver perfusion CT studies. CONCLUSION: The perfusion CT protocols for imaging the brain, lung tumors, and the liver performed on a 320-MDCT scanner yielded patient doses that are safely below the threshold doses for deterministic effects. The eye lens dose, peak ESD, and effective doses can be estimated for other clinical perfusion CT examinations from the conversion factors that were derived in this study.


Subject(s)
Brain/diagnostic imaging , Liver/diagnostic imaging , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Monte Carlo Method , Radiation Dosage , Radiometry/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Phantoms, Imaging
10.
Phys Med ; 31(8): 1029-1034, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26439859

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To estimate organ dose and effective dose for patients for cardiac CT as applied in an international multicenter study (CORE320) with a 320-Detector row CT scanner using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations and voxelized phantoms. The effect of positioning of the arms, off-centering the patient and heart rate on patient dose was analyzed. METHODS: A MC code was tailored to simulate the geometry and characteristics of the CT scanner. The phantoms representing the adult reference male and female were implemented according to ICRP 110. Effective dose and organ doses were obtained for CT acquisition protocols for calcium scoring, coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion. RESULTS: For low heart rate, the normalized effective dose (E) for cardiac CT was higher for female (5.6 mSv/100 mAs) compared to male (2.2 mSv/100 mAs) due to the contribution of female breast tissue. Averaged E for female and male was 11.3 mSv for the comprehensive cardiac protocol consisting of calcium scoring (1.9 mSv); coronary angiography including rest cardiac perfusion (5.1 mSv) and stress cardiac perfusion (4.3 mSv). These values almost doubled at higher heart rates (20.1 mSv). Excluding the arms increased effective dose by 6-8%, centering the patient showed no significant effect. The k-factor (0.028 mSv/mGy.cm) derived from this study leads to effective doses up to 2-3 times higher than the values obtained using now outdated methodologies. CONCLUSION: MC modeling of cardiac CT examinations on realistic voxelized phantoms allowed us to assess patient doses accurately and we derived k-factors that are well above those published previously.


Subject(s)
Heart/diagnostic imaging , Monte Carlo Method , Radiation Dosage , Rest , Stress, Physiological , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/instrumentation , Arm , Female , Heart/physiology , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Male , Patient Positioning , Phantoms, Imaging
11.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 205(3): 572-7, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26295643

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to survey the radiation dose used in CT urography (CTU) in routine clinical practice, both before and after implementation of a scanning protocol that uses iterative reconstruction (Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D [AIDR 3D]). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively surveyed dose reports from consecutive CTU examinations performed in 2011 with the use of 64- and 320-MDCT scanners that were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and from CTU examinations performed from May 2012 through November 2013 that were reconstructed with the use of AIDR 3D. Findings from these dose reports were then correlated with such patient characteristics as weight and body mass index (BMI; weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters). Only dose reports from single-bolus three-phase CTU examinations were included in the study. The volume CT dose index, dose-length product (DLP), and effective dose were surveyed both per examination and per phase by use of published effective dose DLP conversion factors. Image quality was evaluated subjectively for a subset of patients. RESULTS: The two study cohorts included 82 patients (median patient weight, 75.0 kg; median BMI, 25.3) who underwent CTU with FBP and 85 patients (median patient weight, 78.0 kg; median BMI, 24.5) who underwent CTU with AIDR 3D. The median total DLP and median effective dose were 924 mGy · cm and 13.0 mSv, respectively, in the CTU with the FBP cohort and 433 mGy · cm and 6.1 mSv, respectively, in the CTU with the AIDR 3D cohort. The median DLP in the unenhanced, nephrogenic, and excretory phases was 218, 300, and 441 mGy · cm, respectively, in patients undergoing CTU with FBP and 114, 121, and 190 mGy · cm, respectively, in patients undergoing CTU with AIDR 3D. Image quality was diagnostic in both groups, with relatively fewer artifacts noted on scans obtained using CTU with AIDR 3D. CONCLUSION: Our study presents detailed dose data from three-phase CTU examinations performed both before and after implementation of iterative reconstruction. Implementation of a CTU protocol using iterative reconstruction resulted in a mean effective dose of 6.1 mSv with preservation of clinical diagnostic image quality.


Subject(s)
Radiation Dosage , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Urography , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
12.
Otol Neurotol ; 36(4): 592-9, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25420084

ABSTRACT

HYPOTHESIS: Image quality of low-dose multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) after cochlear implantation is comparable to that of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). BACKGROUND: CBCT has been described as a low-dose alternative with superior image quality to MSCT for postoperative cochlear implant (CI) imaging, but to our knowledge, no dose-matched comparisons of image quality have been published. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five human cochleae were implanted with CI electrodes and scanned on two CBCT and two MSCT systems. Four independent observers rated aspects of image quality on a five-point scale. CBCT scans were compared to clinical and dose-matched MSCT scans. Declining-dose MSCT protocols were compared to the clinical protocol. CT phantoms were used to determine effective dose and resolution for each acquisition protocol. RESULTS: Effective dose of the CBCT protocols was 6 to 16% of the clinical MSCT dose. Visibility of cochlear inner and outer walls and overall image quality were positively correlated with radiation dose on MSCT and image quality was better with clinical MSCT than with CBCT protocols. In other comparisons, differences between systems were found, but a distinction between CBCT and MSCT could not be made. CONCLUSION: CBCT and dose-matched MSCT are both suitable for postoperative CI imaging. Selecting a CT system and radiation dose depends on which cochlear structures need to be visualized.


Subject(s)
Cochlea/diagnostic imaging , Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/methods , Temporal Bone/diagnostic imaging , Cadaver , Humans , Phantoms, Imaging , Postoperative Period , Radiation Dosage , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
13.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 204(1): W27-36, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25539270

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively study estimated radiation doses for subjects included in the main analysis of the Combined Non-invasive Coronary Angiography and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using 320 Detector Computed Tomography (CORE320) study ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00934037), a clinical trial comparing combined CT angiography (CTA) and perfusion CT with the reference standard catheter angiography plus myocardial perfusion SPECT. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Prospectively acquired data on 381 CORE320 subjects were analyzed in four groups of testing related to radiation exposure. Radiation dose estimates were compared between modalities for combined CTA and perfusion CT with respect to covariates known to influence radiation exposure and for the main clinical outcomes defined by the trial. The final analysis assessed variations in radiation dose with respect to several factors inherent to the trial. RESULTS. The mean radiation dose estimate for the combined CTA and perfusion CT protocol (8.63 mSv) was significantly (p < 0.0001 for both) less than the average dose delivered from SPECT (10.48 mSv) and the average dose from diagnostic catheter angiography (11.63 mSv). There was no significant difference in estimated CTA-perfusion CT radiation dose for subjects who had false-positive or false-negative results in the CORE320 main analyses in a comparison with subjects for whom the CTA-perfusion CT findings were in accordance with the reference standard SPECT plus catheter angiographic findings. CONCLUSION. Radiation dose estimates from CORE320 support clinical implementation of a combined CT protocol for assessing coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion.


Subject(s)
Absorption, Radiation , Coronary Angiography/statistics & numerical data , Coronary Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Radiation Dosage , Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon/statistics & numerical data , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data , Whole-Body Counting/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Female , Humans , Internationality , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
14.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 201(6): 1291-7, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24261369

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate image quality with filtered back projection (FBP) and adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Phantom acquisitions were performed at six dose levels to assess spatial resolution, noise, and low-contrast detectability (LCD). Spatial resolution was assessed with the modulation transfer function at high and low contrast levels. Noise power spectrum and SD of attenuation were assessed. LCD was calculated with a mathematic model observer applied to phantom CT images. The subjective image quality of clinical CT scans was assessed by five radiologists. RESULTS: Compared with FBP, AIDR 3D resulted in substantial noise reduction at all frequencies with a similar shape of the noise power spectrum. Spatial resolution was similar for AIDR 3D and FBP. LCD improved with AIDR 3D, which was associated with a potential average dose reduction of 36% (range, 9-86%). The observer study showed that overall image quality improved and artifacts decreased with AIDR 3D. CONCLUSION: AIDR 3D performs better than FBP with regard to noise and LCD, resulting in better image quality, and performs similarly with respect to spatial resolution. The evaluation of image quality of clinical CT scans was consistent with the objective assessment of image quality with a phantom. The amount of dose reduction should be investigated for each clinical indication in studies with larger numbers of patients.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Radiation Dosage , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Humans , Phantoms, Imaging , Quality Control , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
15.
Case Rep Pediatr ; 2013: 426923, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23424699

ABSTRACT

We present 3 patients with 4 causes of mediastinal fluid collection after congenital cardiac surgery in this extended case report. Volumetric computed tomography played an essential role in diagnosing causes and extent, relevant to subsequent management. Recent advances in volumetric computed tomography allow fast and accurate imaging of cardiovascular and extravascular structures in children with acceptable radiation dose, providing a powerful imaging tool for the evaluation of complications after congenital cardiac surgery.

16.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging ; 29(2): 453-61, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23001159

ABSTRACT

To evaluate the effect of radiation dose reduction on image quality and diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography. Coronary CT angiography studies of 40 patients with (n = 20) and without (n = 20) significant (≥50 %) stenosis were included (26 male, 14 female, 57 ± 11 years). In addition to the original clinical reconstruction (100 % dose), simulated images were created that correspond to 50, 25 and 12.5 % of the original dose. Image quality and diagnostic performance in identifying significant stenosis were determined. Receiver-operator-characteristics analysis was used to assess diagnostic accuracy at different dose levels. The identification of patients with significant stenosis decreased consistently at doses of 50, 25 and 12.5 of the regular clinical acquisition (100 %). The effect was relatively weak at 50 % dose, and was strong at dose levels of 25 and 12.5 %. At lower doses a steady increase was observed for false negative findings. The number of coronary artery segments that were rated as diagnostic decreased gradually with dose, this was most prominent for smaller segments. The area-under-the-curve (AUC) was 0.90 (p = 0.4) at 50 % dose; accuracy decreased significantly with 25 % (AUC 0.70) and 12.5 % dose (AUC 0.60) (p < 0.0001), with underestimation of patients having significant stenosis. The clinical acquisition protocol for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis with CT angiography represents a good balance between image quality and patient dose. A potential for a modest (<50 %) reduction of tube current might exist. However, more substantial reduction of tube current will reduce diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography substantially.


Subject(s)
Coronary Angiography/methods , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Radiation Dosage , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Aged , Area Under Curve , False Negative Reactions , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Predictive Value of Tests , ROC Curve , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index
17.
Insights Imaging ; 3(3): 197-200, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22696082

ABSTRACT

Some years ago it was decided that a European curriculum should be developed for medical physicists professionally engaged in the support of clinical diagnostic imaging departments. With this in mind, EFOMP (European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics) in association with ESR (European Society of Radiology) nominated an expert working group. This curriculum is now to hand. The curriculum is intended to promote best patient care in radiology departments through the harmonization of education and training of medical physicists to a high standard in diagnostic radiology. It is recommended that a medical physicist working in a radiology department should have an advanced level of professional expertise in X-ray imaging, and additionally, depending on local availability, should acquire knowledge and competencies in overseeing ultrasound imaging, nuclear medicine, and MRI technology. By demonstrating training to a standardized curriculum, medical physicists throughout Europe will enhance their mobility, while maintaining local high standards of medical physics expertise. This document also provides the basis for improved implementation of articles in the European medical exposure directives related to the medical physics expert. The curriculum is divided into three main sections: The first deals with general competencies in the principles of medical physics. The second section describes specific knowledge and skills required for a medical physicist (medical physics expert) to operate clinically in a department of diagnostic radiology. The final section outlines research skills that are also considered to be necessary and appropriate competencies in a career as medical physicist.

18.
Med Phys ; 39(2): 1125-32, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22320823

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To develop, implement, and compare two metal artifact reduction methods for CT. METHODS: Two methods for metal artifact reduction were developed. The first is based on applying corrections in a Radon transformation of the CT images. The second method is based on a forward projection of the CT images and applying corrections in the scanner's original raw data. The first method is generic since it does not depend on the scanner specifications. For the second method, detailed information on the design of the CT scanner and the raw data of the study is required. Clinical implementation and evaluation were performed using pre- and post-operative CT scans of four patients with shoulder prosthesis. For comparison of these methods, the authors developed a quantitative technique that compares improvement in image quality for the two metal artifact reduction techniques with the image quality of the uncorrected images. RESULTS: Metal artifact reduction using either of the two methods yields a decrease of noise and artifacts in CT scans of patients with shoulder prostheses. Artifacts that appeared as bright and dark streaks were reduced or eliminated and as a result image quality improved. Quantitative assessment of clinical images showed improved image quality for both techniques of metal artifact reduction, but the method based on correction in original raw data performed better in all comparisons. CONCLUSION: Both methods are effective for metal artifact reduction, but better performance was observed for the method that is based on correcting the original raw data. The used evaluation technique provides an objective way of evaluating the metal artifacts in clinical CT images.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Artifacts , Metals , Prostheses and Implants , Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Shoulder/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Shoulder/surgery
19.
Phys Med ; 28(4): 319-26, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22061446

ABSTRACT

Aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of a tube current modulation (TCM) system ((SURE)Exposure 3D). On a 64 detector-row CT scanner (Aquilion 64, Toshiba), performance of fixed tube current, longitudinal TCM, and volumetric TCM acquisitions were assessed. A homogeneous cone-shaped phantom and an anthropomorphic phantom were used. Tube current and noise profiles were quantitatively analysed by box and whisker plots when phantom size, acquisition, and reconstruction parameters were varied. At similar median noise, fixed tube current scanning showed a noise range of 16.8-38.3 HU, while longitudinal TCM showed a range of 19.4-31.4 HU and volumetric TCM showed an even lower range of 20.7-28.7 HU. When acquisitions resulting in similar image quality (noise) were compared, the use of volumetric compared to longitudinal TCM resulted in a variable radiation dose reduction up to 6.6%. In conclusion, (SURE)Exposure 3D resulted in more uniform image quality at a lower dose. Volumetric TCM shows improved results over longitudinal TCM.


Subject(s)
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Humans , Phantoms, Imaging
20.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 196(5): 1126-32, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21512080

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the exposure of patients to radiation for the cardiac CT acquisition protocol of the multicenter Coronary Artery Evaluation Using 64-Row Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography (CORE 64) trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An algorithm for patient dose assessment with Monte Carlo dosimetry was developed for the Aquilion 64-MDCT scanner. During the CORE 64 study, different acquisition protocols were used depending on patient size and sex; therefore, six patient models were constructed representing three men and three women in the categories of small, normal size, and obese. Organ dose and effective dose resulting from the cardiac CT protocol were assessed for these six patient models. RESULTS: The average effective dose for coronary CT angiography (CTA) calculated according to Report 103 of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) is 19 mSv (range, 16-26 mSv). The average effective dose for the whole cardiac CT protocol including CT scanograms, bolus tracking, and calcium scoring is slightly higher-22 mSv (range, 18-30 mSv). An average conversion factor for the calculation of effective dose from dose-length product of 0.030 mSv/mGy · cm was derived for coronary CTA. CONCLUSION: The current methods of assessing patient dose are not well suited for cardiac CT acquisitions, and published effective dose values tend to underestimate effective dose. The effective dose of cardiac CT is approximately 25% higher when assessed according to the preferred ICRP Report 103 compared with ICRP Report 60. Underestimation of effective dose by 43% or 53% occurs in coronary CTA according to ICRP Report 103 when a conversion factor (E / DLP, where E is effective dose and DLP is dose-length product) for general chest CT of 0.017 or 0.014 mSv/mGy · cm, respectively, is used instead of 0.030 mSv/mGy · cm.


Subject(s)
Coronary Angiography , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Radiation Dosage , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Adult , Algorithms , Body Size , Female , Humans , Male , Models, Biological , Monte Carlo Method , Sex Factors , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...