Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Eplasty ; 23: e62, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38045100

ABSTRACT

Background: There is no clear consensus in the literature regarding clinical indications for vascularized nerve grafts. Most studies indicate that vascularized nerve grafting, rather than non-vascularized nerve grafting, is indicated for nerve gaps of greater than 7 cm. Vascularized nerve grafts are superior to non-vascularized nerve grafts because they possess an independent blood supply. However, not all nerve injuries can be repaired via vascularized nerve grafts. Methods: A 32-year-old female received a fascial free flap and vascularized sural nerve graft after having multiple reresections of a recurrent thigh liposarcoma. Results: A 25-cm segment of the sural nerve was isolated alongside the lesser saphenous vein and intervening fascia. The free fascial flap was subsequently reversed and placed into the thigh. Vascular anastomoses were created, and the sural nerve was anastomosed to the peroneal nerve. A small portion of muscle from the thigh was wrapped around tibial nerve fascicles of the sciatic nerve to create a regenerative nerve interface. Conclusions: Benefits of vascularized sural nerve graft compared with other vascularized nerve grafts include negligible sensory loss at the donor site and a nerve graft that can be designed on itself due to its vast length. Additionally, vascularized sural nerve grafts provided a better rate of axonal regeneration, rate of electromyographic return, and motor and sensory outcome compared with non-vascularized sural nerve grafts.

3.
Ann Plast Surg ; 90(5): 462-470, 2023 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37146311

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Despite inspiring improvements in postamputation pain and prosthetic control, targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) continues to be underused. With some consistency for recommended nerve transfers developing in the literature, it is necessary to systematize these techniques and simplify their incorporation into routine amputation and neuroma care. This systematic review explores the coaptations reported in the literature to date. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed to collect all reports describing nerve transfers in the upper extremity. The preference was directed toward original studies presenting surgical techniques and coaptations used in TMR. All target muscle options were presented for each nerve transfer in the upper extremity. RESULTS: Twenty-one original studies describing TMR nerve transfers throughout the upper extremity met inclusion criteria. A comprehensive list of transfers reported for major peripheral nerves at each upper extremity amputation level was included in tables. Ideal nerve transfers were suggested based on convenience and frequency with which certain coaptations were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Increasingly frequent studies are published with convincing outcomes with TMR and numerous options for nerve transfers and target muscles. It is prudent to appraise these options to provide patients with optimal outcomes. Certain muscles are more consistently targeted and can serve as a baseline plan for the reconstructive surgeon interested in incorporating these techniques.


Subject(s)
Nerve Transfer , Humans , Nerve Transfer/methods , Muscle, Skeletal/surgery , Amputation, Surgical , Neurosurgical Procedures , Upper Extremity/surgery
4.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open ; 11(3): e4894, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36923716

ABSTRACT

Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) outcome studies reveal the benefit amputees experience and the potential functional improvement by optimizing neurocutaneous signaling for myoelectric prosthesis control. However, there are still many settings where these techniques are not offered to patients requiring lower extremity amputations or neuroma reconstruction. With growing consistency in the literature, it is helpful to systematize the nerve transfers described for lower extremity TMR and to simplify its integration into reconstructive care. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed and contained the following inclusion criteria: original cases of primary or secondary lower extremity amputation defects or nerve-related pain that underwent TMR with clearly described target muscles for each nerve transfer. Studies were excluded if the cases had been previously described or contained incomplete data. The primary outcomes were nerves transferred and muscles targeted. Target muscle options were presented in tables specific to anatomic region, and cross-sectional schematics were created for intraoperative assistance. Results: Seventeen studies presenting original cases with clearly described nerve transfers and target muscles in the lower extremity were included in the review. Target muscle selection for all nerve transfers at the transfemoral and transtibial levels were presented in separate tables. Conclusions: Reports of early experience at multiple institutions identify trends in the selection of certain target muscles for nerve transfers in transfemoral and transtibial TMR. Familiarity with these common target muscles and nerve transfers can simplify intraoperative decision-making and enhance integration of lower extremity TMR in amputation care and in the treatment of nerve-related pain.

5.
Urol Case Rep ; 45: 102212, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36117734

ABSTRACT

We present a case of extensive Condyloma acuminata lesions involving significant area of the penile and genital skin. He underwent a complete excision of the lesions. Reconstruction of the penile skin was performed using full-thickness skin graft. The patient recovered well with no graft contracture or disfigurement.

6.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 30(18): 879-887, 2022 09 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36001887

ABSTRACT

Acute compartment syndrome is a surgical emergency in the extremities resulting from increased compartmental pressure, requiring immediate fasciotomy to resolve muscular compromise. As the mainstay treatment, fasciotomies involve substantial skin incisions and are thus prone to complications such as skin necrosis, wound infection, and permanent disability. Multidisciplinary care instituted at the time of fasciotomy can facilitate timely closure and minimize the complication profile. Several approaches are available to enhance outcomes of fasciotomy wounds, and a comprehensive knowledge of these options affords the treating surgeon greater flexibility and confidence in optimal management. Common techniques include early primary closure, gradual approximation, skin grafting, and negative pressure therapy. There is currently no consensus on the best method of closure. The purpose of this study was to review fasciotomy wound management from the time of initial release to final closure. Highlights include preparation for closing these wounds; the various techniques for fasciotomy closure, including adjunct options; evaluation of timing and staging; and injury-specific features, such as fracture management, limited subcutaneous tissues, and hand fasciotomies. Combining the perspectives of orthopaedic and plastic surgery, this review evaluates the benefits of multiple closure methods and highlights the importance of planning closure at the time of release.


Subject(s)
Compartment Syndromes , Fasciotomy , Compartment Syndromes/etiology , Compartment Syndromes/surgery , Extremities/surgery , Fasciotomy/adverse effects , Humans , Skin Transplantation/adverse effects , Skin Transplantation/methods , Suture Techniques
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL