Intravenous immunoglobulin for patients with unexplained recurrent implantation failure: a 6-year single center retrospective review of clinical outcomes.

The effectiveness of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) for patients with unexplained recurrent implantation failure (uRIF) remains debated. We retrospectively analysed outcomes of uRIF patients treated with IVIg compared to a separate control uRIF cohort within our center (01/2014-12/2021). Primary outcomes included live birth, miscarriage, or transfer failure. We documented IVIg side effects and maternal/fetal outcomes. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess for association of IVIg exposure with outcomes and adjust for confounders. The study included 143 patients, with a 2:1 ratio of controls to patients receiving IVIg treatment. Patient characteristics were similar between groups. There was higher live birth rate (LBR) in patients receiving IVIg (32/49; 65.3%) compared to controls (32/94; 34%); p < 0.001). When stratifying patients into moderate and severe uRIF (respectively 3-4 and [Formula: see text] 5 previous good quality blastocyst transfer failures), only patients with severe uRIF benefited from IVIg (LBR (20/29 (69%) versus 5/25 (20%) for controls, p = 0.0004). In the logistic regression analysis, IVIg was associated with higher odds of live birth (OR 3.64; 95% CI 1.78-7.67; p = 0.0004). There were no serious adverse events with IVIg. IVIg can be considered in well selected patients with [Formula: see text] 5 previous unexplained, high quality blastocyst transfer failures. A randomized controlled trial is needed to confirm these findings.

The Role of Sex and Gender in Dermatology - From Pathogenesis to Clinical Implications.

BACKGROUND: Sex and gender have increasingly been recognized as significant risk factors for many diseases, including dermatological conditions. Historically, sex and gender have often been grouped together as a single risk factor in the scientific literature. However, both may have a distinct impact on disease incidence, prevalence, clinical presentation, severity, therapeutic response, and associated psychological distress. OBJECTIVES AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The mechanisms that underlie differences in skin diseases between males, females, men, and women remain largely unknown. The specific objectives of this review paper are:To highlight the biological differences between males and females (sex), as well as the sociocultural differences between men and women (gender) and how they impact the integumentary system.To perform a literature review to identify important sex- and gender-related epidemiological and clinical differences for various skin conditions belonging to a range of disease categories and to discuss possible biological and sociocultural factors that could explain the observed differences.To discuss dermatological skin conditions and gender-affirming treatments within the transgender community, a population of individuals who have a gender identity which is different than the gender identity they were assigned at birth. FUTURE IMPACT: With the rising number of individuals that identify as non-binary or transgender within our increasingly diverse communities, it is imperative to recognize gender identity, gender, and sex as distinct entities. By doing so, clinicians will be able to better risk-stratify their patients and select treatments that are most aligned with their values. To our knowledge, very few studies have separated sex and gender as two distinct risk factors within the dermatology literature. Our article also has the potential to help guide future prevention strategies that are patient-tailored rather than using a universal approach.

Intravenous immunoglobulin use in patients with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss.

PROBLEM: Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) affects up to 4% of couples attempting to conceive. RPL is unexplained in over 50% of cases and no effective treatments exist. Due to the immune system's pivotal role during implantation and pregnancy, immune-mediated RPL may be suspected and immunomodulatory treatments like intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) have been administered but remain controversial. The goal of our study was to evaluate our center's 6 year-outcomes and to develop a framework for IVIg use in RPL. METHOD OF THE STUDY: Retrospective, single-center cohort study. All patients having received IVIg for unexplained RPL at the McGill Reproductive Immunology Clinic (MRIC) from January 2014 to December 2020 were included if maternal age was <42 years, body mass index (BMI) < 35 kg/m2 , non-smoker and having had ≥3 consecutive RPL despite previous treatment with aspirin and progesterone. IVIg 0.6-0.8 g/kg was given prior to conception and monthly during pregnancy until 16-20 weeks' gestation. We compared IVIg treated patient's outcomes to a separate "natural history cohort". This cohort was composed of patients consulting at the McGill recurrent pregnancy loss clinic and the MRIC over a 2-year period (January 2020 to December 2021) with similar inclusion criteria as the treatment cohort but did not receive IVIg or other immunomodulatory treatments. The association of IVIg with outcomes (compared to no IVIg) was evaluated among the groups of patients with primary RPL and secondary RPL. The primary outcome was live birth rate (LBR), secondary outcomes included IVIg safety, obstetrical, and neonatal complications. RESULTS: Among 169 patients with unexplained RPL that were included in the study, 111 had primary RPL (38 exposed to IVIg and 83 controls) and 58 had secondary RPL (nine exposed to IVIG and 49 controls). Among patients with primary RPL (n = 111), the LBR was 64.3% (18/28) among patient exposed to IVIg compared to 43.4% (36/83) in controls (p = 0.079); regression analysis adjusting for BMI and number of previous miscarriages showed benefit favoring the use of IVIg (OR = 3.27, CI 95% (1.15-10.2), p = 0.03) when evaluating for live birth. In the subgroup of patients with ≥5 previous RPL and primary RPL (n = 31), IVIg was associated with higher LBR compared to control (10/15 (66.7%) vs. 3/16 (18.8%); p = 0.0113) but not the in the sub-group of patients with <5 miscarriages and primary RPL (8/13 (61.5%) vs. 33/67 (49.3%); p = 0.548). IVIG treatment did not improve LBR in patients with secondary RPL in our study (3/9 (33.3%) vs. 23/49 (47%); p = 0.495). There were no serious adverse events in the IVIg treatment group, obstetrical/neonatal complications were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: IVIg may be an effective treatment for patients with RPL if appropriately used in specific groups of patients. IVIg is a blood product and subject to shortages especially with unrestricted off-label use. We propose considering IVIg in well-selected patients with high order RPL who have failed standard medical therapy. Further mechanistic studies are needed to understand immune-mediated RPL and IVIg's mode of action. This will enable further refinement of treatment criteria and the development of standardized protocol for its use in RPL.

Efficacy of a Clinical Decision Rule to Enable Direct Oral Challenge in Patients With Low-Risk Penicillin Allergy: The PALACE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Fewer than 5% of patients labeled with a penicillin allergy are truly allergic. The standard of care to remove the penicillin allergy label in adults is specialized testing involving prick and intradermal skin testing followed by an oral challenge with penicillin. Skin testing is resource intensive, limits practice to specialist-trained physicians, and restricts the global population who could undergo penicillin allergy delabeling. Objective: To determine whether a direct oral penicillin challenge is noninferior to the standard of care of penicillin skin testing followed by an oral challenge in patients with a low-risk penicillin allergy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This parallel, 2-arm, noninferiority, open-label, multicenter, international randomized clinical trial occurred in 6 specialized centers, 3 in North America (US and Canada) and 3 in Australia, from June 18, 2021, to December 2, 2022. Eligible adults had a PEN-FAST score lower than 3. PEN-FAST is a prospectively derived and internationally validated clinical decision rule that enables point-of-care risk assessment for adults reporting penicillin allergies. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to either direct oral challenge with penicillin (intervention arm) or a standard-of-care arm of penicillin skin testing followed by oral challenge with penicillin (control arm). Main Outcome and Measure: The primary outcome was a physician-verified positive immune-mediated oral penicillin challenge within 1 hour postintervention in the intention-to-treat population. Noninferiority was achieved if a 1-sided 95% CI of the risk difference (RD) did not exceed 5 percentage points (pp). Results: A total of 382 adults were randomized, with 377 patients (median [IQR] age, 51 [35-65] years; 247 [65.5%] female) included in the analysis: 187 in the intervention group and 190 in the control group. Most patients had a PEN-FAST score of 0 or 1. The primary outcome occurred in 1 patient (0.5%) in the intervention group and 1 patient (0.5%) in the control group, with an RD of 0.0084 pp (90% CI, -1.22 to 1.24 pp). The 1-sided 95% CI was below the noninferiority margin of 5 pp. In the 5 days following the oral penicillin challenge, 9 immune-mediated adverse events were recorded in the intervention group and 10 in the control group (RD, -0.45 pp; 95% CI, -4.87 to 3.96 pp). No serious adverse events occurred. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, direct oral penicillin challenge in patients with a low-risk penicillin allergy was noninferior compared with standard-of-care skin testing followed by oral challenge. In patients with a low-risk history, direct oral penicillin challenge is a safe procedure to facilitate the removal of a penicillin allergy label. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04454229.

Intravenous Immunoglobulin: Mechanism of Action in Autoimmune and Inflammatory Conditions.

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is the mainstay of therapy for humoral immune deficiencies and numerous inflammatory disorders. Although the use of IVIG may be supplanted by several targeted therapies to cytokines, the ability of polyclonal normal IgG to act as an effector molecule as well as a regulatory molecule is a clear example of the polyfunctionality of IVIG. This article will address the mechanism of action of IVIG in a number of important conditions that are otherwise resistant to treatment. In this commentary, we will highlight mechanistic studies that shed light on the action of IVIG. This will be approached by identifying effects that are both common and disease-specific, targeting actions that have been demonstrated on cells and processes that represent both innate and adaptive immune responses.

Delayed hypersensitivity reaction to cosmetic filler following two COVID-19 vaccinations and infection.

BACKGROUND: With ongoing COVID-19 vaccination schedules and the popularity of cosmetic fillers, it is important to examine and record associated adverse reactions to a more general audience of health care professionals. Case reports exist in subspecialty journals outlining reactions after SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination. This is one of the first cases published in Canada, and it highlights priorities and challenges faced by physicians in assessing and managing patients presenting with adverse reactions post vaccination. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of a 43 -year-old women with delayed type 4 hypersensitivity reaction to hyaluronic acid cosmetic filler triggered by COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. We outline the clinical presentation, diagnosis, complications, and treatment of a late inflammatory reaction to hyaluronic acid filler and highlight the treatment priorities for clinicians faced with similar presentations. CONCLUSION: The differential diagnosis of delayed onset nodules formation post filler injection is broad and includes redistribution of fillers, inflammatory reaction to biofilm, and delayed hypersensitivity reaction. As result, in order to make the right diagnosis, administer the appropriate treatment and achieve great cosmetic results, we highly recommend seeking expert opinion from dermatologist, plastic surgeon and allergist immunologist in a timely manner.

Immunomodulation for unexplained recurrent implantation failure: where are we now?

In brief: Immune dysfunction may contribute to or cause recurrent implantation failure. This article summarizes normal and pathologic immune responses at implantation and critically appraises currently used immunomodulatory therapies. Abstract: Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) may be defined as the absence of pregnancy despite the transfer of ≥3 good-quality blastocysts and is unexplained in up to 50% of cases. There are currently no effective treatments for patients with unexplained RIF. Since the maternal immune system is intricately involved in mediating endometrial receptivity and embryo implantation, both insufficient and excessive endometrial inflammatory responses during the window of implantation are proposed to lead to implantation failure. Recent strategies to improve conception rates in RIF patients have focused on modulating maternal immune responses at implantation, through either promoting or suppressing inflammation. Unfortunately, there are no validated, readily available diagnostic tests to confirm immune-mediated RIF. As such, immune therapies are often started empirically without robust evidence as to their efficacy. Like other chronic diseases, patient selection for immunomodulatory therapy is crucial, and personalized medicine for RIF patients is emerging. As the literature on the subject is heterogenous and rapidly evolving, we aim to summarize the potential efficacy, mechanisms of actions and side effects of select therapies for the practicing clinician.

Comparison of Complement Pathway Activation in Autoimmune Glomerulonephritis.

Introduction: Studies on complement activation have implicated a combination of the classical pathway (CP), lectin pathway (LP), and alternative pathway (AP) in triggering the terminal pathway (TP) for each common autoimmune glomerulonephritis (GN). Evaluating different pathways simultaneously may help identify whether one is preferentially activated and, consequently, which is best to target for each disease. Methods: We followed 112 patients with focal segmental glomerular sclerosis (FSGS), membranous nephropathy (MN), IgA nephropathy (IgAN), lupus nephritis (LN), and antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody-associated vasculitis (AAV) for a median duration of 22 (12-52) months. At the time of greatest clinical activity, we simultaneously evaluated urinary C3a (C3 convertase activity), C5a and sC5b-9 (TP), MASP-1 and MASP-2 (LP), C1q (CP), C4a (CP/LP), and Ba and Bb (AP). We evaluated the relation between activation fragments of the AP and CP/LP with the TP. Results: Urinary complement biomarkers for each pathway were associated with the severity of proteinuria. Fragments of the TP were higher among patients with FSGS and MN compared with patients with IgAN, LN, and AAV. For the AP, urinary Ba level was lower in those with IgAN and LN compared with those with FSGS. For the CP/LP, urinary C4a, MASP-1, and MASP-2 levels were similar between diseases whereas urinary C1q levels were lower in those with LN. For each GN, independent associations existed between the activation markers of the AP and CP/LP with the degree of TP activation, except for the AP in AAV, although perhaps underpowered. Conclusion: The AP and CP/LP contribute individually to the TP activation in autoimmune GN, and both seem to be valid potential therapeutic targets.

Successful Milk Oral Immunotherapy Promotes Generation of Casein-Specific CD137+ FOXP3+ Regulatory T Cells Detectable in Peripheral Blood.

Background: Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is an emerging treatment for cow's milk protein (CMP) allergy in children. The mechanisms driving tolerance following OIT are not well understood. Regulatory T cells (TREG) cells are key inhibitors of allergic responses and promoters of allergen-specific tolerance. In an exploratory study, we sought to detect induction of allergen-specific TREG in a cohort of subjects undergoing OIT. Methods: Pediatric patients with a history of allergic reaction to cow's milk and a positive Skin Pick Test (SPT) and/or CMP-specific IgE >0.35 kU, as well as a positive oral challenge to CMP underwent OIT with escalating doses of milk and were followed for up to 6 months. At specific milestones during the dose escalation and maintenance phases, casein-specific CD4+ T cells were expanded from patient blood by culturing unfractionated PBMCs with casein in vitro. The CD4+ T cell phenotypes were quantified by flow cytometry. Results: Our culture system induced activated casein-specific FOXP3+Helios+ TREG cells and FOXP3- TEFF cells, discriminated by expression of CD137 (4-1BB) and CD154 (CD40L) respectively. The frequency of casein-specific TREG cells increased significantly with escalating doses of milk during OIT while casein-specific TEFF cell frequencies remained constant. Moreover, expanded casein-specific TREG cells expressed higher levels of FOXP3 compared to polyclonal TREG cells, suggesting a more robust TREG phenotype. The induction of casein-specific TREG cells increased with successful CMP desensitization and correlated with increased frequencies of casein-specific Th1 cells among OIT subjects. The level of casein-specific TREG cells negatively correlated with the time required to reach the maintenance phase of desensitization. Conclusions: Overall, effective CMP-OIT successfully promoted the expansion of casein-specific, functionally-stable FOXP3+ TREG cells while mitigating Th2 responses in children receiving OIT. Our exploratory study proposes that an in vitro TREG response to casein may correlate with the time to reach maintenance in CMP-OIT.

Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in a Cohort of Patients Exposed to Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors throughout Pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) are increasingly used in pregnancy but are frequently withheld in the second or third trimesters. We evaluated the maternal and fetal outcomes of women who continued their TNFi throughout pregnancy compared to women who interrupted TNFi during pregnancy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of women seen in clinic with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), or ankylosing spondylitis, who were exposed to TNFi during pregnancy. We separated pregnancies into 2 groups based on the level of TNFi exposure and compared outcomes. RESULTS: In Group 1 (TNFi exposure in first trimester only), 11 women had 14 pregnancies and 12 live births. There were 2 first-trimester losses (2/14, 14%), one in the setting of active RA. Five pregnancies (5/14, 35.7%) were complicated by a disease flare. Eight patients (8/12, 66%) flared postpartum. In Group 2 (TNFi exposure throughout pregnancy), 29 women had 32 pregnancies and 34 live births. Three (3/28, 10.7%) adverse pregnancy outcomes were reported in 2 patients. One patient had a twin pregnancy and delivered at 33 weeks after developing preterm premature rupture of membranes at 32 weeks in the setting of a JIA flare. Her second pregnancy was complicated by active JIA before and throughout gestation, and hemolysis, elevated liver enzyme levels, and low platelet levels (HELLP) syndrome at 39 weeks. Another patient with comorbid antiphospholipid syndrome underwent a cesarean birth at 36 weeks for suspicion of HELLP syndrome. Six (6/32, 18.7%) postpartum flares occurred. CONCLUSION: Women who discontinued their TNFi during pregnancy had a higher risk of peri- or postpartum flare compared to those who continued their TNFi throughout pregnancy.

Brief Report: Causes of Stillbirths in Women With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: There are few precise or recent estimates of the risk or causes of stillbirths in women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Thus, we undertook the present study to examine causes of stillbirths in mothers with SLE versus those without SLE. METHODS: The Offspring of SLE Mothers Registry (OSLER) is a large population-based cohort, identified through Quebec's health care databases (1989-2009), including all women who had ≥1 hospitalization for delivery after SLE diagnosis, and a randomly selected control group of women matched for age and year of delivery. We identified stillbirths and ascertained the cause of death as indicated on death certificates. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate the risk of stillbirth in women with SLE versus controls. RESULTS: In our cohort, 509 women with SLE had 729 births, including 9 stillbirths, while 5,829 matched controls had 8,541 births, including 47 stillbirths. We observed more stillbirths in mothers with SLE than in controls (1.24% versus 0.55%, difference 0.69% [95% CI 0.03, 1.88]). Women with SLE had an increased risk of stillbirth compared to controls (adjusted OR 2.13 [95% CI 1.02, 4.45]). We also observed a trend toward more stillbirths due to placenta-mediated pregnancy complications in mothers with SLE than in controls (44% [95% CI 14, 79] versus 15% [95% CI 6, 28]). CONCLUSION: Compared to women from the general population, women with SLE have an increased risk of stillbirth. Stillbirths in women with SLE might be more often caused by placenta-mediated pregnancy complications compared to stillbirths in mothers without SLE.