Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
BJOG ; 127(11): 1338-1346, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32333820

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Laser therapy is now being proposed for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and urinary incontinence (UI). OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the available literature on laser therapy for POP and UI. SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed, Web Of Science and Embase were searched for relevant articles, using a three-concept (POP, UI, laser therapy) search engine composed as (concept 1 OR concept 2) AND concept 3. SELECTION CRITERIA: Only full-text clinical studies in English. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data on patient characteristics, laser setting, treatment outcome and adverse events were independently collected by two researchers. There was a lack of methodological uniformity so meta-analysis was not possible and the results are presented narratively. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-one studies recruiting 1530 adult women met the inclusion criteria. All studies showed significant improvement either on UI, POP or both; however the heterogeneity of laser settings, application and outcome measures was huge. Only one study was a randomised controlled trial, two studies were controlled cohort studies. All three were on UI and used standardised validated tools. The risk of bias in the randomised controlled trial was low on all seven domains; the controlled studies had a serious risk of bias. No major adverse events were reported, mild pain and burning sensation were the most commonly described adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: All studies on vaginal and/or urethral laser application for POP and UI report improvement, but the quality of studies needs to be improved. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: There is weak evidence that laser therapy is effective for urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse #LASER#UI#POP.


Subject(s)
Lasers, Gas/therapeutic use , Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Urinary Incontinence/surgery , Female , Humans , Lasers, Gas/adverse effects , Lasers, Solid-State/adverse effects , Research Design/standards , Treatment Outcome
2.
Physiotherapy ; 103(2): 222-230, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27908458

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate inter-rater reliability of a set of shoulder measurements including inclinometry [shoulder range of motion (ROM)], acromion-table distance and pectoralis minor muscle length (static scapular positioning), upward rotation with two inclinometers (scapular kinematics) and pain pressure thresholds (muscle tenderness) in middle-aged women. DESIGN: Observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty symptom-free middle-aged women (first cohort) were measured by two raters. All measurements with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) below 0.75 were retested after an additional training period in a second cohort of 30 symptom-free middle-aged women. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Inter-rater reliability of all variables was measured with the ICC (95% confidence interval) and standard error of measurement (SEM). RESULTS: Acromion-table distance (ICC=0.91, SEM 0.22 to 0.28% of body length), pectoralis minor muscle length (ICC=0.91, SEM 0.16% of body length), pain pressure thresholds (ICC=0.78 to 0.85, SEM 0.39 to 0.70kg) and abduction ROM (ICC=0.77, SEM 5°) showed good to excellent inter-rater reliability in the first cohort. After an additional training period, forward flexion ROM showed good inter-rater reliability (ICC=0.83, SEM 5°), scapular upward rotation in resting position showed moderate reliability (ICC=0.52, SEM 2°), and other scaption angles showed weak reliability (ICC=0.26 to 0.43, SEM 3 to 8°). CONCLUSIONS: In a battery of clinical tools to evaluate factors contributing to shoulder pain, static scapular positioning and pressure pain thresholds were found to have good to excellent inter-rater reliability in middle-aged women. Additional training is recommended for measurements with a gravity inclinometer.


Subject(s)
Acromion/anatomy & histology , Pectoralis Muscles/anatomy & histology , Physical Therapy Modalities/standards , Shoulder Joint/anatomy & histology , Adult , Biomechanical Phenomena , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Pain Threshold , Range of Motion, Articular , Reproducibility of Results
3.
Int J Impot Res ; 28(1): 9-13, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26538105

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to determine whether patients with persistent erectile dysfunction (ED), minimum 12 months after radical prostatectomy (RP), experienced a better recovery of erectile function (EF) with pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) compared with patients without this intervention. Second, we aimed to investigate the effect of PFMT on climacturia. All patients, who underwent RP, with persistent ED of minimum 1 year post operation were eligible. The treatment group started PFMT immediately at 12 months post operation and the control group started at 15 months after RP. All patients received PFMT during 3 months. The sample size needed to detect with 80% power a 6 points-difference regarding the EF-domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), was at least 12 subjects per group. Patients were evaluated using the IIEF and questioned regarding climacturia. Differences between groups at 15 months were evaluated with Mann-Whitney U-test and Fisher's exact test. As a result, the treatment group had a significantly better EF than the control group at 15 months after surgery (P=0.025). Other subdomains of the IIEF remained constant for both groups. The effect of PFMT was maintained during follow-up. At 15 months, a significantly higher percentage of patients in the treatment group showed an improvement regarding climacturia (P=0.004).


Subject(s)
Erectile Dysfunction , Exercise Therapy/methods , Pelvic Floor/physiopathology , Postoperative Complications , Prostatectomy , Urinary Incontinence , Erectile Dysfunction/diagnosis , Erectile Dysfunction/etiology , Erectile Dysfunction/physiopathology , Erectile Dysfunction/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/physiopathology , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Recovery of Function , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Urinary Incontinence/diagnosis , Urinary Incontinence/etiology , Urinary Incontinence/physiopathology , Urinary Incontinence/therapy
6.
Int Angiol ; 29(5): 401-7, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20924341

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of this paper was to examine the reliability and validity of a new measurement device that counters the disadvantages of the traditional method of arm circumference measurements. METHODS: We measured the arm on the non-operated side of breast cancer patients. Sixty-four patients were measured twice by the same assessor and 48 patients were measured twice by two different assessors. The arm circumferences were measured at the olecranon and each 4 cm proximal and distal of the olecranon. The measurements were performed with a self-developed device consisting of a stainless steel bar on which a tapeline was fixed at every 4 cm distance. The arm volume was calculated from the circumference measurements with the frustrum formula and was also measured directly with the water displacement method. RESULTS: For the circumference measurements, intrarater and interrater ICCs ranged between 0.942 and 0.998. ICCs for the calculated arm volume were also very high. No systematic changes between the first to the second assessment could be found. The standard error of measurement for the circumference measurements as well as for the calculated arm volume was low (between 0.8% and 2.0%). An increase of 1.0 cm or more of the arm circumference at any measurement side and of 55 ml or more of the calculated arm volume was clinically significant. CONCLUSION: Arm circumferences and also the calculated arm volume can be measured quickly and accurately with a simple and inexpensive device.


Subject(s)
Anthropometry/instrumentation , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Lymphedema/diagnosis , Upper Extremity/pathology , Belgium , Breast Neoplasms/complications , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Lymphedema/etiology , Lymphedema/pathology , Observer Variation , Organ Size , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results
7.
J Urol ; 181(6): 2641-6, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19375099

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We sought to predict the duration of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy based on potential risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 104 patients after radical retropubic prostatectomy at University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven. To evaluate incontinence a 24-hour pad test, a 1-hour pad test, a visual analog scale and a questionnaire were used. Patients were considered continent when they stopped wearing incontinence pads, when 24 and 1-hour pad tests showed less than 2 gm urine loss, and when patients considered themselves continent. On univariate and multivariate analyses we examined the influence of different risk factors on the duration of incontinence. RESULTS: The amount of urine loss the first day after catheter withdrawal was the only predictor of the duration of urinary incontinence on univariate and multivariate analyses. Patient age was significant but only on univariate analysis. The duration of incontinence after prostatectomy was estimated. The average time needed to regain continence was 8, 16, 29, 29 and 70 days in men who lost 2 to 50, 51 to 100, 101 to 200, 201 to 500 and more than 500 gm urine, respectively, on day 1. CONCLUSIONS: The amount of urine loss on day 1 after catheter withdrawal is the most important predictive factor in terms of regaining urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. An estimation table can provide realistic information to the patient regarding the duration of urinary incontinence.


Subject(s)
Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Urinary Catheterization , Urinary Incontinence/etiology , Aged , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Urine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...