The impact of body mass index on the progression-free survival of CDK 4/6 inhibitors in metastatic breast cancer patients.

Aim: Endocrine therapy (ET) plus cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors is a standard treatment for hormone receptor (HR) positive HER-2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of body mass index (BMI) on progression-free survival (PFS) in patients receiving ET plus CDK 4/6 inhibitors.Materials & methods: Patients with metastatic HR-positive breast cancer receiving CDK 4/6 inhibitors were included in the study. A total of 116 patients were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into three groups according to BMI level: normal weight (group 1) 18.5-24.9 kg/m2, overweight (group 2) 25-29.9 kg/m2 and obese (group 3): ≥30 kg/m2. Median follow-up was 10.83 months. Comparisons of PFS and BMI categories were performed by Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank test.Results: PFS was 9.3 (5.3-13.4) months in normal weight patients and 11.1 (9.7-12.56) months in obese patients and was not reached in overweight patients. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.02).Conclusion: Low BMI has been shown to have a negative prognostic effect on survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer and overweight patients had a longer PFS.

[Box: see text].

Clinicopathologic Features and Efficacy of Induction Chemotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Real-World Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) accounts for 0.01% of all carcinomas, and 70% of patients have locally advanced disease with a poor prognosis. The mainstay therapy is chemoradiotherapy (CRT), and concurrent administration of platinum-based agents and irradiation provides high local control rates. However, induction (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy (ICT) prior to CRT is recommended for large tumors with a high tumor burden at the category 1 level. For ICT, platinum-based doublet or triplet combination regimens are recommended. Selected patients with a high tumor burden at the time of diagnosis who did not receive ICT before CRT were given adjuvant (consolidation) therapy after CRT. This multicenter study aimed to share our experience in treatment of NPC and evaluate the factors associated with survival. METHODS: The study included patients diagnosed with NPC who were followed and treated between 2008 and 2022. Hundred and forty-two patients from 6 centers were evaluated. The factors associated with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. RESULTS: The median age of our patients was 51 years (IQR: 16-81 years), and the male:female ratio was 2.5:1. A majority of patients (71%) had stage 3-4 disease. They had locally advanced disease, and 48 patients (34%) received ICT. Twenty patients (14%) received adjuvant therapy. The median follow-up was 41 months (range, 2.7-175.1 months). The median DFS in NPC was 92.6 months (range, 71.9-113.3 months), with a 40th month DFS of 70.9%. The median OS was 113 months (range, 91-135 months), with a 40th month OS of 84.7%. Median DFS was 95.3 months (range, 64.2-126.4 months) in patients who received ICT before CRT, which was longer than in the CRT-only group (p = 0.6). DFS at the 40th month was 75.1% in patients treated with ICT compared to 65.1% in the CRT-only group. Median OS was 117 months (range, 92-142 months) in patients receiving ICT, which was longer than in the CRT-only group (p = 0.4). OS at the 40th month was 86.7% in patients receiving ICT but 83.6% in the CRT-only group. CONCLUSIONS: Both the objective response rate and survival were longer in patients who radiologically responded to CRT following ICT. Nonresponse to ICT is a negative predictive indicator. The role of ICT in locally advanced NPC is increasing.

Real-world treatment outcomes from nationwide Onco-colon Turkey registry in RAS wild-type patients treated with biologics second-line mCRC.

BACKGROUNDS AND OBJECTIVES: Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality both globally and in our country. In Turkey, we conducted a multicenter investigation into the effectiveness of second-line treatments and real-life data for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (NCT04757311). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, records from 28 centers were collected, and histopathological, molecular, and clinical characteristics were documented. Patients were categorized into groups based on their second-line biological treatments: anti-EGFR (Group A and Group B, panitumumab and cetuximab) and anti-VEGF (Group C, bevacizumab and aflibercept). They were then compared within these groups. RESULTS: A total of 588 patients with documented RAS wild-type status were evaluated. The median OS was 15.7, 14.3 and 14.7 months in Group A, Group B and Group C, respectively (p = 0.764). The median PFS of the patients in second-line setting that received panitumumab, cetuximab and bevacizumab/aflibercept were 7.8, 6.6 and 7.4 months, respectively (p = 0.848). CONCLUSION: According to the results of our real-life data study, there is no significant difference in efficiency between the combination of biological agent and chemotherapy used in the second-line treatments.

The XRCC1 and TP53 gene polymorphisms are associated with advanced-stage disease and early distant metastasis at diagnosis in non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: Studies on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) suggest that DNA repair capacity may have prognostic implications for disease recurrence and survival. However, there is no study investigating the relationship between SNPs and the risk of metastasis at the time of initial diagnosis in patients with NSCLC. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the potential predictive value of SNPs in detecting the risk of metastasis at the time of initial diagnosis and poor prognosis in patients with NSCLC. Material and Methods: In this prospective cohort study, we evaluated 275 patients with NSCLC. Analysis of SNPs from peripheral blood cells was performed by a polymerase chain reaction. Excision repair cross-complementing group 1 (ERCC1)- Asn118Asn, excision repair cross-complementing group 2 (ERCC2)-Lys751Gln, X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1)-Arg399Gln, and tumor protein 53 (TP53)-Arg72Pro polymorphisms were evaluated in conjunction with the development of metastasis. Results: The ERCC1 normal genotype, ERCC2 heterozygote genotype, XRCC1 normal genotype, and TP53 normal genotype were associated with a higher stage and more advanced-stage disease at the time of initial diagnosis (P = 0.027, 0.005, <0.001, and 0.006, respectively). Also, XRCC1 normal genotype and TP53 normal genotype were associated with the risk of metastasis at the time of initial diagnosis (P = <0.001 and 0.002, respectively). Moreover, the XRCC1 normal genotype was associated with the risk of brain metastasis at the time of initial diagnosis (P = 0.031). Conclusions: We showed that SNPs are related to a higher stage and more advanced-stage disease at the time of initial diagnosis in patients with NSCLC, and XRCC1 and TP53 gene polymorphisms are associated with the risk of metastasis. These results may contribute to the identification of high-risk groups and may help to earlier diagnosis and treatment in patients with NSCLC.

The Prognostic Role of Mismatch Repair Status and CDX-2 Expression with Inflammatory Markers and Pathological Risk Factors in Stage II and III Colon Cancer: Multicenter Real-Life Data.

OBJECTIVE: Colorectal cancer is common worldwide, and adjuvant treatment's benefit is still controversial. We designed this study to determine the role of MSI and CDX-2 status determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) combined with the inflammatory markers and pathological parameters in predicting disease recurrence in stage II and III colon cancer. METHODS: A total of 226 stage II/III colon cancer patients with a median age of 59 years who underwent initial surgery were included in this retrospective study. The pathologic assessment of MSI and CDX-2 was performed twice by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and two different pathologists. No staining/weak staining below 10% of the tumor was accepted as CDX-2 negative, and any MSI clones with weak staining below 10% were accepted as MSI-H. The laboratory parameters were noted at the initial diagnosis. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-one and 105 patients were diagnosed with stage III and II colon cancer. 58.0% of patients were male, 46 (20.4%) of tumor tissue were MSS, and 17 (7.5%) were CDX-2 negative. One hundred twenty-nine tumors were localized in the right colon. Disease recurrence was significantly correlated with tumor localization, CDX-2 status, stage at diagnosis, and preoperatively median CRP and CEA levels. DFS rates for MSS patients with CDX-2 negative and positive were 36.7% and 98.1%, respectively [p < 0.001]. There was no significant correlation between MSI status and CDX-2 status. MSI status, the presence of adjuvant treatment, and systemic inflammatory markers were not significant prognostic factors for DFS. CDX-2 status [HR:0.08, CI 95% 0.03-0.17, p < 0.001 HR: 1.7, CI 95% 1.1-3.0, p = 0.03], disease stage [HR:2.6, CI 95% 1.43-4.74], and preoperatively CEA levels [HR:4.1 CI 95% 2.18-785, p < 0.001 were independent significant prognostic factors for DFS. CONCLUSION: CDX-2 loss was an independent prognostic factor for DFS and disease recurrence in early-stage colon cancer. MSS patients with CDX-2 loss had significantly worse survival outcomes, and this might be the reason for deciding on adjuvant chemotherapy.

The effect of concomitant proton pump inhibitor use on survival outcomes of Nivolumab-treated renal cell carcinoma patients: a multicenter study.

AIM: We aimed to evaluate the effect of concomitant proton pump inhibitors (PPI) use with nivolumab on survival outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in second-line setting. METHODS: The study was designed as a multicenter and retrospective involving patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving second-line nivolumab therapy. One hundred and nine patients with mRCC were divided into two groups based on whether they use PPI concomitantly with nivolumab: concomitant PPI users and non-users. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between the groups with and without concurrent PPIs. RESULTS: Of 109 patients in our study, 59 were not using PPI concomitantly with nivolumab and 50 were using PPI concomitantly. The median PFS was 6.37 (5.2-7.5) months in the concomitant PPI group and 9.7 (4.5-15) months in the non-users (p = 0.03). The median OS was 14.6 (7.1-22.1) months in patients on PPI concurrently with nivolumab and 29.9 (17.1-42.7) months in the non-users (p = 0.01). Accordingly, PPI use for PFS (Non-use vs. Use = HR: 0.44, 95%Cl 0.28-0.96, p = 0.014) and PPI use for OS (Non-use vs. Use = HR: 0.68, 95%Cl 0.22-0.88, p = 0.01) were found to be as independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant use of PPIs is associated with worse survival outcomes in patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab. Clinicians should carefully consider the concomitant use of PPIs in such patients.

The effect of concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors with CDK 4/6 inhibitors on survival in metastatic breast cancer.

AIM: To evaluate the difference of progression free survival between the patients using concomitant proton pump inhibitors and non-users in the patients using CDK 4/6 inhibitors with HR + and HER2 negative mBC. METHODS: We included 86 patients with HR + and HER 2 negative mBC treated with CDK 4/6 inhibitors in this study. Patients were divided into two categories according to their status of PPI use. The primary end points was progression free survival (PFS). We compared PPI users and non-users. RESULTS: Forty-five (52.3%) patients used a PPI concomitantly with a CDK 4/6 inhibitor, and 41 (47.7%) did not. The median duration of follow-up was 10.68 (1.94-27.56) months. Of the patients, 50 (58.1%) palbociclib and 36 (41.9%) received ribociclib. The median progression free survival (mPFS) was 10.9 months (95% CI: 7.5-14.27) in the group with concomitant PPI use with a CDK 4/6 inhibitor, whereas the median progression free survival could not be reached in the group without concomitant PPI use (p = 0.04). In addition, concomitant PPI use with palbociclib was associated with a shorter PFS; there was no significant difference between the concomitant PPI users and non-users in terms of PFS in the patients using ribociclib. CONCLUSION: Palbociclib and ribociclib are weak base drugs so their bioavailability is pH-dependent. PPIs can affect their solubility and their concentration in the plasma. Therefore, we must avoid concomitant use of PPIs and CDK 4/6 inhibitors. If we need to use concomitant PPI and CDK 4/6 inhibitors, we should prefer ribociclib than palbociclib.

Real-life analysis of treatment approaches and the role of inflammatory markers on survival in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Advanced-stage biliary tract cancers (BTC) are rare malignancies with poor prognosis. There are few prospective trials, but several retrospective studies regarding treatment options. In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of systemic inflammatory parameters (SIP) and other possible independent factors that may affect survival and treatment approaches and to determine the benefit of later-line treatments in these patients. METHODS: A total of 284 patients, initially diagnosed with advanced stage or progressed after curative treatment of BTC, from different oncology centers in Turkey were included in this retrospective study. The prognostic significance of clinicopathological factors, SIPs and treatment options was analyzed. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 13 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.1 months (95% CI:5.51-6.82), and the median overall survival (OS) time was 16.8 months (95% CI: 13.9-19.6). Treatment choice (p < .001 HR:0.70 CI95% 0.55-0.9), performance status (p < .001 HR:2.74 CI 95% 2.12-3.54) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (p = .02 HR:1.38 CI 95% 1.03-1.84) were independent prognostic factors for PFS. For OS, the independent prognostic indicators were determined as The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) (p < .001 HR:1.78 CI 95% 1.5-2.3), Systemic Immune-inflammation Index (SII) (p < .001 HR:0.51 CI95% 0.36-0.73) and stage at diagnosis (p = .002 HR:1.79 CI 95% 1.24-2.59). Furthermore, second and third line treatments significantly prolonged OS in advanced BTC (p < .001 HR:0.55 CI 95% 0.38-0.79; p = .007 HR:0.51 CI95% 0.31-0.83, respectively). CONCLUSION: SII and NLR are useful prognostic factors and may be helpful in making treatment decisions. Additionally, second and later-line treatments in advanced BTC have a significant impact on survival under real-life conditions.

Efficacy and safety profile of COVID-19 vaccine in cancer patients: a prospective, multicenter cohort study.

Aim: To compare the seropositivity rate of cancer patients with noncancer controls after inactive SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and evaluate the factors affecting seropositivity. Method: Spike IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were measured in blood samples of 776 cancer patients and 715 noncancer volunteers. An IgG level ≥50 AU/ml is accepted as seropositive. Results: The seropositivity rate was 85.2% in the patient group and 97.5% in the control group. The seropositivity rate and antibody levels were significantly lower in the patient group (p < 0.001). Age and chemotherapy were associated with lower seropositivity in cancer patients (p < 0.001). Conclusion: This study highlighted the efficacy and safety of the inactivated vaccine in cancer patients. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT04771559 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Cancer patients are at high risk for infection with SARS-CoV-2 and of developing the associated disease, COVID-19, which therefore puts them in the priority group for vaccination. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of inactive SARSCoV-2 vaccination, an inactivated virus vaccine, in cancer patients. The immune response rate, defined as seropositivity, was 85.2% in the cancer patient group and 97.5% in the control group. The levels of antibodies, which are blood markers of immune response to the vaccine, were also significantly lower in the patient group, especially in those older than 60 years and receiving chemotherapy. These results highlight the importance of determining the effective vaccine type and dose in cancer patients to protect them from COVID-19 without disrupting their cancer treatment.

Cisplatin plus paclitaxel and bevacizumab versus carboplatin plus paclitaxel and bevacizumab for the first-line treatment of metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Cisplatin-paclitaxel and bevacizumab is a frequently used treatment regimen for metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer, and carboplatin-paclitaxel and bevacizumab are also among the recommended regimens. In this study we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of these two regimens for the treatment of metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer. METHODS: Patients with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer treated with cisplatin-paclitaxel and bevacizumab or carboplatin-paclitaxel and bevacizumab were retrospectively evaluated in this study. The clinical and demographic characteristics of patients in each group were evaluated. Median overall survival, progression-free survival, and response rates between the two groups were compared. RESULTS: A total of 250 patients were included. Overall, the numbers of patients with recurrent disease and metastatic disease were 159 and 91, respectively. The most common histologic subtype was squamous cell carcinoma (83.2%). The median duration of follow-up was 13.6 (range 0.5-86) months. The median progression-free survival was 10.5 (95% CI 9.0 to 11.8) months in the cisplatin-paclitaxel and bevacizumab group (group 1), and 10.8 (95% CI 8.6 to 13.0) months in the carboplatin-paclitaxel and bevacizumab group (group 2) (HR 1.20; 95% CI 0.88 to 1.63; p=0.25). The median overall survival was 19.1 (95% CI 13.0 to 25.1) months in group 1 and 18.3 (95% CI 15.3 to 21.3) months in group 2 (HR 1.28; 95% CI 0.91 to 1.80; p=0.15). CONCLUSIONS: There is no survival difference between cisplatin or carboplatin combined with paclitaxel and bevacizumab in metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer.

Cetuximab-induced rash is associated with overall survival in patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck.

PURPOSE: In this study, we looked for whether treatment-induced rash predicts treatment efficacy in patients with recurrent/metastatic HNSCC treated with Cetuximab and chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients who were treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and cetuximab for the first line treatment of recurrent/metastatic HNSCC were recruited. Presence of rash, hypomagnesemia, hypopotassemia, anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia during treatment and treatment response, date of progression, date of last visit and death were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 138 patients' data were available for analysis. Any grade of rash was detected in 57 (44.5%) of the patients. The incidence of rash was significantly higher in patients with objective response than in patients with disease progression (%56.8 vs %14.3, p < 0.001). Progression free survival was 7.06 months (4.98-9.15) in patients treated with cetuximab and chemotherapy as first line treatment. In the multivariate analysis; rash was significantly correlated with longer PFS (HR 2.136; 95% CI 1.067-4.278; p = 0.032). Progression free survival was 9.65 months in patients who experienced rash, and 6.02 months in patients without rash, (p = 0.019, log-rank test). Overall survival was 11.24 months (9.65-12.82). In multivariate analysis, the survival of patients with rash was significantly longer than patients without rash (HR 1.954; 95% CI 1.162-3.285; p = 0.012). Overall survival was 15.08 months in patients who experienced rash, and 8.61 months in patients without rash (p = 0.05, log-rank test). CONCLUSION: Cetuximab-induced rash is associated with better ORR and longer PFS and OS in patients with recurrent/metastatic HNSCC treated with Cetuximab and platinum-based chemotherapy.

Efficacy of trastuzumab and potential risk factors on survival in patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastric cancer.

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of trastuzumab and potential risk factors on survival in patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastric cancer. Methods: We retrospectively included 138 patients who were given trastuzumab-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment and analyzed the relationship between clinical response rates and maintenance treatment status and survival outcomes. Results: In the whole group, the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 10.2 and 16 months, respectively. Clinical response was obtained in 79% of patients. The median overall survival was 16.9 months in follow-up group and 19.0 months in the maintenance group in patients with clinical response. Continuation of maintenance trastuzumab created a significant survival advantage (p = 0.021). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 2 (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.02), grade 3 (HR: 1.78) and more than four metastatic lesions (HR: 1.67) were determined as risk factors for death. Conclusion: We recommend the continuation of maintenance trastuzumab in patients with clinical response, but those with identified risk factors may not benefit from treatment because life expectancy may be low.

Gastric cancer has a poor prognosis despite available treatments. Inclusive studies are still needed with real-life data. Our research retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of trastuzumab and potential risk factors on survival in patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastric cancer who received trastuzumab-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy. In total, 138 patients were included in this study. Clinical response to trastuzumab-based chemotherapy was obtained in 79% of the patients. We also divided the patients who had a clinical response into two groups according to whether they received maintenance therapy. In the present study, trastuzumab administration had compatible survival outcomes with recent studies. Continuation of trastuzumab maintenance treatment provided a survival advantage in patients with clinical response. We suppose that maintenance trastuzumab may be recommended in patients with clinical responses to the first-line treatment. Furthermore, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 2, grade 3 and having more than four metastatic lesions were determined as risk factors for death. Therefore, although we recommend maintenance of trastuzumab in patients with clinical response, those with identified risk factors may not benefit from treatment.

Can 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT-derived prostate-specific membrane antigen expression parameters predict prostate-specific antigen response to enzalutamide treatment?

OBJECTIVE: In patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPCa), enzalutamide is administered when docetaxel treatment fails. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the relationship between prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and metabolic parameters obtained from 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT before treatment in this patient group. METHODS: From February 2018 to May 2020, 34 patients with mCRPCa were enrolled in this study. The association between PSA response (at least 50% decrease compared to the pretreatment value) and quantitative prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression parameters such as SUVmax, SUVmean, PSMA-TV (PSMA receptor-expressing tumor volume) and TL-PSMA (total lesion PSMA receptor expression) were evaluated. RESULTS: Mean SUVmax, SUVmean, PSMA receptor-expressing tumor volume (PSMA-TV) and total lesion PSMA receptor expression (TL-PSMA) values were 33.66 ± 20.42; 8.82 ± 5.03; 319.85 ± 615.12 cm3; and 2894.76 ± 5195.13, respectively. In the posttreatment 12th week, 22 patients (64.7%) had PSA response, while 12 patients (35.3%) were nonresponders. In patients with PSA response, PSMA-TV values were significantly lower than nonresponders (78.37 ± 80.99 cm3 vs. 451.58 ± 734.61 cm3; P = 0.028). But there was no significant difference between responders and nonresponders in terms of age, ISUP grade, SUVmax, SUVmean, TL-PSMA, pretreatment PSA values, presence of local recurrence or metastases at any site. CONCLUSION: PSMA-TV values on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging before starting enzalutamide treatment following docetaxel failure can predict PSA response in patients with mCRPCa.

Clinical and Pathological Characteristics of Patients with High-Risk Breast Cancer Based on BRCA Mutation Profiles: A Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the differences in clinicopathological features of Turkish patients with high-risk breast cancer based on the mutation status of two breast cancer susceptibility genes (BRCA1/2) . MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study enrolled patients with invasive breast cancer who have been evaluated for BRCA1/2 mutations due to the presence of high-risk factors admitted to two tertiary referral centers in Turkey. Clinical and histopathological features were analyzed in BRCA1 mutation carriers, BRCA2 mutation carriers, and non-carriers. RESULTS: A total of 302 patients with a mean age of 44.2±9.9 (22-82) years were included. BRCA1/2 mutation was found in 75 (24%) patients, of whom 41 (13.6%) were BRCA1 mutation carriers and 37 (12.3%) were BRCA2 mutation carriers. Moreover, 104 (34.4%) and 4 (1.3%) patients had family history of breast and ovarian carcinoma, respectively. The rates of triple negativity (56.1%), histologic grade 3 (65.9%), and lymphovascular invasion (78%) were significantly higher in BRCA1 mutation carriers than in non-carriers and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Furthermore, 87% of triple-negative BRCA1 mutation carriers had histologic grade 3 tumors compared with 38.9% in non-triple-negative BRCA1 mutation carriers, and the difference was significant. CONCLUSION: Findings of this study showed that BRCA1-related breast cancers represent a distinct group with unique pathological features, which are usually associated with a poor prognosis.

The conversion of RAS status in metastatic colorectal cancer patients after first-line biological agent treatment.

AIM: The aim was to investigate the RAS discordance between initial and recurrent metastasectomy specimens in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with chemotherapy (CT) plus biological agents in a first-line setting. METHODS: Patients who had been treated with CT plus bevacizumab or cetuximab or panitumumab followed by R0 resection for potentially resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases were scanned. Among these, patients who developed resectable new metastases after a disease-free interval longer than 6 months were included in the study. We compared the RAS mutation status between the first biopsy and the second metastasectomy specimen. RESULTS: A total of 82 mCRC patients treated with CT plus biological agents in a first-line setting were included in the study. The first biopsy assessment showed wild-type RAS tumours in 39 (47.6%) patients and mutant RAS tumours in 43 (52.4%) patients. The mean time for new operable liver metastasis after R0 resection was 15.5 months. In the second metastasectomy specimens, the numbers of wild-type and mutant RAS tumours were 30 (36.6%) and 52 (63.4%), respectively. The comparison with the first biopsy specimens showed RAS status conversions in 17 (20.7%) patients. Univariate comparison between patients with and without RAS status conversion revealed that grade, pathological T stage, wild-type RAS tumour and longer biological agent use time in the first-line treatment were significant factors for RAS conversion. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that re-biopsy is needed for an optimal second-line treatment decision in mCRC patients regardless of backbone biological agent, especially in patients with wild-type RAS mCRC.

The Effect of Body Mass Index on Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Platinum-Based Therapy.

To investigate the effect of body mass index(BMI) on treatment outcomes and side-effect profile in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy(ChT) in the first-line setting. This was a retrospective analysis of 233 NSCLC patients who were treated and followed up from 2008 through 2018. NSCLC patients who had metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis and were treated with platinum-based ChT in the first-line setting were included. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the BMI as follows; BMI < 25 kg/m2 and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2. This retrospective analysis enrolled 233 patients, 35 (15.0%) of whom were female. The BMI in 132 patients (56.2%) was < 25 kg/m2. The median age was 58 years (range, 21-90). Median progression-free survival(PFS) was 7 mo, in the patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 compared to 5.0 mo, in those with BMI < 25 kg/m2 (p = 0.032), with corresponding median overall survival(OS) durations of 12 vs. 9 mo, (p = 0.003). In multivariate analysis, ECOG PS 2, grade III histology, and brain or bone metastasis negatively affected OS, whereas BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 positively affected OS. A high BMI prior to therapy in patients with NSCLC treated with platinum-based ChT in the first-line setting was associated with more favorable PFS and OS.

The effect of body mass index on location of recurrence and survival in early-stage colorectal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity has become one of the major public health problems in many countries. Controversial results were reported in publications on the relationship between obesity and mortality in patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) and that receive curative treatment. In this study, we evaluated the effects of body mass index (BMI) on the location of recurrence and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with early-stage CRC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients that were followed up and treated in the Department of Medical Oncology between 1999 and 2016 were retrospectively included in the study. Patients with operated Stage I, II, and III CRC were included in the study. Patients were divided into three groups based on their BMI (kg/m2) of below 25, between 25 and 30, and above 30. RESULTS: A total of 950 patients, of which 527 (55.5%) were male and 423 (44.5%) were female, were included in the study. The median age of the patients was 56 years. Of the patients, 408 (42.4%) had BMI of <25, 370 (38.9%) had BMI between 25 and 30, and 172 (18.2%) had BMI of ≥30. Local recurrence rate was significantly higher in the group with BMI ≥30 compared to the other groups (P <0.01). When compared with DFS, there was a statistically significant difference between groups with BMI of <25 and ≥30 (P = 0.02) and that difference was more evidently observed in Stage III (P = 0.02). There was no statistically significant difference of overall survival in the BMI groups (P = 0.87). In multivariate analysis, the BMI ≥30 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.49, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-2.17), rectal tumor (HR, 1.70, 95% CI, 1.15-2.51), Stage III (HR, 3.91, 95% CI, 1.86-8.25), number of positive lymph nodes (HR, 1.05, 95% CI, 1.03-1.07), and R1 resection (HR, 3.47, 95% CI, 1.71-7.05) were identified as independent risk factors negatively affecting DFS. CONCLUSION: In this study, we observed that the high BMI increased the risk of recurrence, especially in Stage III CRC patients, and that the recurrence frequently occurred locally.

Factors affecting survival in operated pancreatic cancer: Does tumor localization have a significant effect on treatment outcomes?

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the factors affecting survival in operated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and the possible prognostic effect of primary tumor localization on treatment outcomes. METHODS: In this study, 98 patients with curatively-operated PDAC, who were followed up and treated for the years 2008 through 2018, were enrolled. Metastatic and locally advanced stages and patients under 18 years of age were excluded from this study. Patients were divided into two groups based on the primary tumor localization as *head or *body/tail. RESULTS: Sixty-seven (68.3%) patients were male and 31 (31.7%) were female, with a median age of 62 years (range, 35-82 years). The numbers of patients with a primary tumor located in *head vs.*body/tail were 74 (75.4%) vs. 24 (24.6%), respectively. Patients with a primary tumor located in *head vs.*body/tail; median disease-free survival was 16.0 months vs. 13 months (p=0.972), respectively, with corresponding median overall survival was 25 months vs. 33 months (p=0.698). The level of carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA) at diagnosis (Hazard ratio[HR], 1.09 95%CI, 1.01-1.18), stage III disease (HR, 2.09 95%CI, 1.16-4.35), and receiving adjuvant treatment (HR, 0.20 95%CI, 0.09-4.34) were the independent predictors of survival. CONCLUSION: Our study revealed that high levels of CEA at diagnosis and stage III disease adversely affected the survival in non-metastatic PDAC patients, while receiving adjuvant therapy had a positive effect on survival. The findings suggest that primary tumor localization did not affect survival in operated PC patients. The results on this issue are still inconsistent and under debate in the literature.

Assessment of pretreatment albumin-bilirubin grade in pancreatic cancer patients with liver metastasis.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the effect of pretreatment albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score on treatment outcomes in pancreatic cancer (PC) patients with liver metastasis at the time of diagnosis treated with chemotherapy (CT) in the first-line setting. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 273 PC patients ≥18 years of age who had liver metastasis at the time of diagnosis and received CT in the first-line. ALBI score was calculated through the following formula; [(log10 bilirubin (µmol/L)×0.66)+[albumin(g/l)×-0.0852]. Patients were stratified into 3 categories based on the ALBI score as follows; grade I:ALBI ≤-2.60, grade II:-2.60-1.39. RESULTS: A total of 273 patients, [180 (65.9%) men and 93 (34.1%) women], were evaluated. The median age was 60 years. ALBI grade was I in 45 (16.4%) patients, II in 156 (57.1%) patients, and III in 72 (26.5%) patients. Based on the ALBI grade, median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 9 months in grade I patients, 6 months in grade II patients, and 4 months in grade III patients (p=0.002), with median overall survival (mOS) durations of 12 months vs. 8 months vs. 5 months, respectively (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that ALBI grade II (HR,1.543) or III (HR,2.260) negatively affected survival. CONCLUSION: A higher pretreatment ALBI grade is related to worse OS and PFS in PC patients with liver metastasis treated with a first-line CT, and therefore it can help predict the treatment outcomes in these patients.

The prognostic significance of the 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in early-stage nonsmall cell lung cancer.

CONTEXT: The prognostic criteria for early-stage nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) wait to be explored. AIM: In this study, our aim was to evaluate the prognostic significance of the positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) value of the primary tumor in patients with a diagnosis of early-stage NSCLC who received surgical treatment. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a multicenter retrospective design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who had been diagnosed with early-stage NSCLC and who underwent surgery for the condition were included in this study. The preoperative fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT results of the patients were retrospectively accessed from their medical files. The disease-free survival (DFS) rates of patients who had SUVmax values above and below the determined cutoff value were compared. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: SPSS version 22 and Kaplan-Meier method were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 92 patients were included in the study. The median age of the patients was 60 years (range: 36-79). The determined cutoff SUVmax value of the primary tumor was 13.6. A comparison of the DFS rates of the patients with an SUVmax value above and below 13.6 revealed a significant difference in patients with Stage I (22.9 months vs. 50.3 months; P = 0.02) and Stage II (28 months vs. 40.4 months; P = 0.04), Stage I + II (43.5 months vs. 26.1 months; P = 0,02), and Stage IIIA (14.7 months vs. 13.6 months; P = 0.92) NSCLC. CONCLUSIONS: We found that in early-stage NSCLC patients, the SUVmax value of the primary mass in 18F FDG PET/CT was a prognostic indicator for the DFS rates.