ABSTRACT
Purpose To evaluate and compare the visual performance of a trifocal and a trifocal-toric intraocular lens (IOL) based on the same diffractive platform. Methods Prospective non-randomized comparative study enrolling 142 eyes of 77 patients (age 40-73 years) undergoing uneventful phacoemulsification lens surgery. Two groups were differentiated according to the implanted IOL: trifocal group, 98 eyes (50 patients) implanted with the trifocal diffractive IOL AT LISA tri 839MP (Carl Zeiss Meditec), and trifocal-toric group, 44 eyes (27 patients) implanted with the trifocal-toric diffractive IOL AT LISA trifocal-toric 939MP (Carl Zeiss Meditec). Visual and refractive changes were evaluated 3 months postoperatively. Results No significant differences between groups were found in postoperative refraction (p ≥ 0.144), monocular and binocular uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA; p = 0.519 and 0.398, respectively) and binocular uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA; p = 0.073). In contrast, significantly better monocular and binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA; p ≤ 0.002), as well as monocular UNVA (p = 0.005), were found in the trifocal group. A postoperative spherical equivalent within ± 1.00 D was found in 98â% and 100â% of eyes in the trifocal and trifocal-toric groups, respectively. Postoperative binocular UDVA, UIVA and UNVA of 20/30 or better were found in 100, 95 and 100â% of eyes, and in 96.3, 95.8 and 90.9â% of eyes in the trifocal and trifocal-toric groups, respectively. Conclusions The evaluated trifocal and trifocal-toric IOLs both provide a successful restoration of the visual function after cataract surgery, with good levels of refractive precision, as well as UIVA and UNVA.
Subject(s)
Lenses, Intraocular , Phacoemulsification , Humans , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Design , Pseudophakia , Refraction, OcularABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Evaluation of the visual and refractive results 3 months after implantation of a diffractive extended range of vision (ERV) intraocular lens (IOL) during cataract surgery. METHODS: In a prospective multicentre study, patients with a calculated postoperative corneal astigmatism of ≤ 1.5 D received a diffractive ERV IOL (TECNIS Symfony, model ZXR00, Abbott Medical Optics, USA) during cataract surgery. After 3 months, the monocular and binocular corrected and uncorrected far, intermediate and near visual acuity, as well as refraction, were evaluated. RESULTS: 18 patients (36 eyes) with a mean age of 63.34 ± 4.6 years underwent bilateral cataract surgery. After 3 months, the binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of logMAR was - 0.05 ± 0.11 and the corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of logMAR - 0.14 ± 0.05. Binocular uncorrected intermediate (UIVA) and near visual acuity (UNVA) were logMAR - 0.09 ± 0.02 and 0.19 ± 0.09, respectively. A target refraction of ± 0.75 D was reached by 89â% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Implantation of an extended range of vision intraocular lens offers an effective way for visual rehabilitation at far and intermediate distances. Near vision is still in a functional range.
Subject(s)
Cataract Extraction/rehabilitation , Lens Implantation, Intraocular , Lenses, Intraocular , Recovery of Function , Refractive Errors/diagnosis , Refractive Errors/rehabilitation , Adult , Cataract Extraction/adverse effects , Equipment Failure Analysis , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Germany , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Prosthesis Design , Refractive Errors/etiology , Treatment Outcome , Visual AcuityABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Evaluation of the clinical data 3 months after implantation of a new diffractive multifocal intraocular lens (MIOL) with a reduced near add power of + 2.75 D. METHODS: In a prospective study, patients who underwent cataract surgery or refractive lens exchange with implantation of an MIOL (Tecnis ZKB00, Abbott Medical Optics, Santa Ana, California, USA) were included. Three months postoperative corrected and uncorrected visual acuities at different distances were measured and evaluated. Those patients that underwent bilateral MIOL implantation additionally filled out a questionnaire 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Between October 2013 and August 2014, 115 eyes of 62 patients were implanted with the ZKB00 IOL. Mean postoperative refractions were - 0.27 ± 0.44 D for the spherical equivalent, respectively. Mean binocular CDVA was - 0.01 ± 0.3 logMAR with a mean binocular UDVA of 0.06 ± 0.08 logMAR. For near distance in 40 cm, an UNVA of 0.07 ± 0.10 logMAR three months postoperatively was measured. CONCLUSION: The ZKB00 IOL belongs to a group of novel MIOL with an increased intermediate visual performance. Our study shows good visual acuity at all distances, as well as a high rate of satisfaction and subjectively good image quality.
Subject(s)
Cataract Extraction/adverse effects , Cataract Extraction/rehabilitation , Lens Implantation, Intraocular , Lenses, Intraocular/classification , Refractive Errors/etiology , Refractive Errors/therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Equipment Failure Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Design , Refractive Errors/diagnosis , Treatment Outcome , Visual AcuityABSTRACT
Nowadays, further developments in the field of intraocular lenses offer a higher level of spectacle independence for our patients. As light gets scattered on different focal points a wider range of defocus is created. This greater defocus area makes it more difficult for us to determine the objective or subjective refraction. This contribution is concerned with the difficulties of measuring visual acuity in different intraocular lens designs and different measurement distances. Measuring refraction after implantation of a multifocal intraocular lens is a complex procedure and the experience of the examiner plays a crucial role. Retinoscopy, keratometry and the defocus curve are reliable methods for testing, while the auto refractometer, bichromatic testing and the cross-cylinder have limitations.