Association of a device-based remote management heart failure pathway with outcomes: TriageHF Plus real-world evaluation.

AIMS: Clinical pathways have been shown to improve outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). Although patients with HF often have a cardiac implantable electronic device, few studies have reported the utility of device-derived risk scores to augment and organize care. TriageHF Plus is a device-based HF clinical pathway (DHFP) that uses remote monitoring alerts to trigger structured telephone assessment for HF stability and optimization. We aimed to evaluate the impact of TriageHF Plus on hospitalizations and describe the associated workforce burden. METHODS AND RESULTS: TriageHF Plus was a multi-site, prospective study that compared outcomes for patients recruited between April 2019 and February 2021. All alert-triggered assessments were analysed to determine the appropriateness of the alert and the workload burden. A negative-binomial regression with inverse probability treatment weighting using a time-matched usual care cohort was applied to estimate the effect of TriageHF Plus on non-elective hospitalizations. A post hoc pre-COVID-19 sensitivity analysis was also performed. The TriageHF Plus cohort (n = 443) had a mean age of 68.8 ± 11.2 years, 77% male (usual care cohort: n = 315, mean age of 66.2 ± 14.5 years, 65% male). In the TriageHF Plus cohort, an acute medical issue was identified following an alert in 79/182 (43%) cases. Fifty assessments indicated acute HF, requiring clinical action in 44 cases. At 30 day follow-up, 39/66 (59%) of initially symptomatic patients reported improvement, and 20 (19%) initially asymptomatic patients had developed new symptoms. On average, each assessment took 10 min. The TriageHF Plus group had a 58% lower rate of hospitalizations across full follow-up [incidence relative ratio: 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.23-0.76, P = 0.004]. Across the pre-COVID-19 window, hospitalizations were 31% lower (0.69, 95% CI: 0.46-1.04, P = 0.077). CONCLUSIONS: These data represent the largest real-world evaluation of a DHFP based on multi-parametric risk stratification. The TriageHF Plus clinical pathway was associated with an improvement in HF symptoms and reduced all-cause hospitalizations.

Adaptive versus conventional cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with heart failure (AdaptResponse): a global, prospective, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Continuous automatic optimisation of cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT), stimulating only the left ventricle to fuse with intrinsic right bundle conduction (synchronised left ventricular stimulation), might offer better outcomes than conventional CRT in patients with heart failure, left bundle branch block, and normal atrioventricular conduction. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes of adaptive CRT versus conventional CRT in patients with heart failure with intact atrioventricular conduction and left bundle branch block. METHODS: This global, prospective, randomised controlled trial was done in 227 hospitals in 27 countries across Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with class 2-4 heart failure, an ejection fraction of 35% or less, left bundle branch block with QRS duration of 140 ms or more (male patients) or 130 ms or more (female patients), and a baseline PR interval 200 ms or less. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via block permutation to adaptive CRT (an algorithm providing synchronised left ventricular stimulation) or conventional biventricular CRT using a device programmer. All patients received device programming but were masked until procedures were completed. Site staff were not masked to group assignment. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death or intervention for heart failure decompensation and was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety events were collected and reported in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02205359, and is closed to accrual. FINDINGS: Between Aug 5, 2014, and Jan 31, 2019, of 3797 patients enrolled, 3617 (95·3%) were randomly assigned (1810 to adaptive CRT and 1807 to conventional CRT). The futility boundary was crossed at the third interim analysis on June 23, 2022, when the decision was made to stop the trial early. 1568 (43·4%) of 3617 patients were female and 2049 (56·6%) were male. Median follow-up was 59·0 months (IQR 45-72). A primary outcome event occurred in 430 of 1810 patients (Kaplan-Meier occurrence rate 23·5% [95% CI 21·3-25·5] at 60 months) in the adaptive CRT group and in 470 of 1807 patients (25·7% [23·5-27·8] at 60 months) in the conventional CRT group (hazard ratio 0·89, 95% CI 0·78-1·01; p=0·077). System-related adverse events were reported in 452 (25·0%) of 1810 patients in the adaptive CRT group and 440 (24·3%) of 1807 patients in the conventional CRT group. INTERPRETATION: Compared with conventional CRT, adaptive CRT did not significantly reduce the incidence of all-cause death or intervention for heart failure decompensation in the included population of patients with heart failure, left bundle branch block, and intact AV conduction. Death and heart failure decompensation rates were low with both CRT therapies, suggesting a greater response to CRT occurred in this population than in patients in previous trials. FUNDING: Medtronic.

Design of Mid-Q Response: A prospective, randomized trial of adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy in Asian patients.

Aims: The aim of the Mid-Q Response study is to test the hypothesis that adaptive preferential left ventricular-only pacing with the AdaptivCRT algorithm has superior clinical outcomes compared to conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure (HF) patients with moderately wide QRS duration (≥120 ms and <150 ms), left bundle branch block (LBBB), and normal atrioventricular (AV) conduction (PR interval ≤200 ms). Methods: This prospective, multi-center, randomized, controlled, clinical study is being conducted at approximately 60 centers in Asia. Following enrollment and baseline assessment, eligible patients are implanted with a CRT system equipped with the AdaptivCRT algorithm and are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to have AdaptivCRT ON (Adaptive Bi-V and LV pacing) or AdaptivCRT OFF (Nonadaptive CRT). A minimum of 220 randomized patients are required for analysis of the primary endpoint, clinical composite score (CCS) at 6 months post-implant. The secondary and ancillary endpoints are all-cause and cardiovascular death, hospitalizations for worsening HF, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), atrial fibrillation (AF), and cardiovascular adverse events at 6 or 12 months. Conclusion: The Mid-Q Response study is expected to provide additional evidence on the incremental benefit of the AdaptivCRT algorithm among Asian HF patients with normal AV conduction, moderately wide QRS, and LBBB undergoing CRT implant.

Identifying high risk patients post myocardial infarction with reduced left ventricular function using loop recorders INSPIRE-ELR clinical study.

AIMS: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) continues to be a devastating complication amongst survivors of myocardial infarction (MI). Mortality is high in the initial months after MI. The aims of the INSPIRE-ELR study were to assess the proportion of patients with significant arrhythmias early after MI and the association with mortality during 12 months of follow-up. METHODS: The study included 249 patients within 14 days after MI with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35% at discharge in 11 hospitals in India. Patients received a wearable external loop recorder (ELR) 5 ± 3 days after MI to monitor arrhythmias for 7 days. RESULTS: Patients were predominantly male (86%) with a mean age of 56 ± 12 years. In 82%, reperfusion had been done and all received standard of care cardiovascular medications at discharge. LVEF was 32.2 ± 3.9%, measured 5.1 ± 3.0 days after MI. Of the 233 patients who completed monitoring (7.1 ± 1.5 days), 81 (35%) experienced significant arrhythmias, including Ventricular Tachycardia/Fibrillation (VT/VF): 10 (4.3%); frequent Premature Ventricular Contractions (PVCs): 65 (28%); Atrial Fibrillation (AF): 8 (3.4%); chronic atrial flutter: 4 (1.7%); 2nd or 3rd degree Atrioventricular (AV) block: 4 (1.7%); and symptomatic bradycardia: 8 (3.4%). In total, 26 patients died. Mortality was higher in patients with clinically significant arrhythmia (at 12 months: 23.6% vs 4.8% with 19 vs 7 deaths, hazard ratio (HR) = 5.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.3 to 13.0, p < 0.0001). Excluding 7 deaths during ELR monitoring, HR = 4.5, p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: ELR applied in patients with acute MI and LV dysfunction at the time of discharge identifies patients with high mortality risk.

Performance evaluation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators with SmartShock technology in patients with inherited arrhythmogenic diseases.

BACKGROUND: Patients with inherited arrhythmogenic diseases (IADs) are often prescribed preventative implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) to manage their increased sudden cardiac arrest risk. However, it has been suggested that ICDs in IAD patients may come with additional risk. We aimed to leverage the PainFree SmartShock Technology dataset to compare inappropriate therapies, appropriate therapies, mortality, and complications in patients with and without IAD. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included extracted, physician-adjudicated, arrhythmic episodes from ICD devices. The incidence of arrhythmic events was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Of the 1699 ICD patients, 77 patients (4.5%) had IAD. Incidence of inappropriate shock was similar in both patients with (3.2% at 24 months) and without (3.8% at 24 months) IAD (HR: 0.80, CI: 0.19-3.30, p = 0.76). In a multivariable analysis IAD was not significantly associated with reduced mortality (HR: 0.64, CI: 0.08-4.80, p = 0.66). The rates of complications were numerically lower in patients with IAD vs without (8.8% vs 9.6% at 24 months respectively), but not statistically significant (HR: 0.83, CI: 0.20-3.38, p = 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: IAD patients showed a very low annual rate of inappropriate therapy. This suggests that newer algorithms, such as the SST algorithm, are equally good at identifying and treating life-threatening arrhythmias in patients regardless of whether they have IAD.

Differences in clinical characteristics and reported quality of life of men and women undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.

AIMS: Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is known to be associated with a number of clinical characteristics, including QRS duration and morphology, gender, height, and the aetiology of heart failure (HF). We assessed the relation of gender and baseline characteristics with QRS duration and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. METHODS AND RESULTS: AdaptResponse is a global randomized trial. The trial enrolled CRT-indicated patients with New York Heart Association classes II-IV HF, left bundle branch block (QRS ≥ 140 ms in men, ≥130 ms in women), and baseline PR interval ≤200 ms. In total, 3620 patients were randomized, including 1569 women (43.3%) approaching the actual proportion of women in the HF population. Women were older and more often New York Heart Association class III or IV than men (55.6% vs. 48.7%), had less frequent ischaemic cardiomyopathy (21.2% vs. 39.5%), and had a 5.1 ms shorter QRS duration than men. Women were more often depressed (18.5% vs. 9.7%), had a significantly lower Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score, and had differences in medication prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS: AdaptResponse is the largest randomized CRT trial and enrolled more women than any other landmark CRT trial. Women differed from men with regard to baseline characteristics and quality of life. Whether these differences translate into clinical outcome differences will be examined further in the AdaptResponse trial.

Atrial fibrillation burden and subsequent heart failure events in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy devices.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) often coexist but little is known on how AF burden associates with subsequent episodes of HF. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to quantitatively assess the short- and long-term association of AF burden with subsequent episodes of HF events in patients with reduced ejection fraction. METHODS: Patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices with at least 90 days of device data were included in the study. Time-dependent Cox regression with a 7-day window was used to evaluate the association of short- and long-term AF burden with subsequent HF events. Each patient with HF was matched to two control patients without an HF event based on age, gender, year of implant and CRT defibrillation capability. RESULTS: In our cohort with 2:1 matching (N = 549), 183 patients developed HF events and 275 (50.1%) had AF over an average follow-up of 24 ± 11 months. A 1-hour increase in short-term AF burden was associated with a 3% increased risk of HF events (HR, 1.034; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.012-1.056; P = .01; HR for 24-hour = 2.23). In contrast, the association between long-term AF burden and subsequent HF events was not statistically significant (HR, 1.009; 95% CI, 0.992-1.026; P = .373). CONCLUSION: A 24-hour increase in AF burden is associated with a more than two-fold increased risk of HF events over the subsequent week while the long-term AF burden is not significantly associated with HF events.

SVT discrimination algorithms significantly reduce the rate of inappropriate therapy in the setting of modern-day delayed high-rate detection programming.

BACKGROUND: Contemporary implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) programming involving delayed high-rate detection and use of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) discriminators has significantly reduced the rate of inappropriate shocks. The extent to which SVT algorithms alone reduce inappropriate therapies is poorly understood. METHODS AND RESULTS: PainFree SST enrolled 2770 patients with a single- or dual-chamber ICD or cardiac resynchronization defibrillator. Patients were followed for 22 ± 9 months with SVT discriminators on in 96% of patients. Sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias and SVT episodes were adjudicated by an independent physician committee. For this analysis, all episodes were subjected to postprocessing computer simulation with SVT discriminators off with and without delayed high-rate detection criteria (ventricular fibrillation zone only, 30/40 at 320 ms). There were 3282 adjudicated SVT episodes of which 115 resulted in an ICD shock and 113 received only ATP (2-year inappropriate shock and therapy rates of 3.1% and 4.1%). Therapy was appropriately withheld for the remaining 3054 SVT episodes. With both SVT discriminators and delayed high-rate detection simulated off, the 2-year inappropriate therapy rate would have been 22.9% (hazard ratio [HR] = 6.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.20-7.49). With SVT discriminators simulated off and delayed high-rate detection simulated on in all patients, the 2-year rate would have been 6.4% (HR = 1.63; CI: 1.44-1.85). CONCLUSIONS: The use of SVT discriminators has a significant role in reducing the rate of inappropriate ICD therapy even in the setting of delayed high-rate detection settings. Deactivating SVT discriminators would have resulted in an overall increase in the inappropriate ICD therapy rate by 63% and 524% with and without delayed high-rate detection programming, respectively.

Estimating the incidence of atrial fibrillation in single-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients.

BACKGROUND: Atrial arrhythmias are associated with major adverse cardiovascular events. Recent reports among implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients have demonstrated a high prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF), predominantly in dual-chamber recipients. AF incidence among patients with single-chamber systems (approximately 50% of all ICDs) is currently unknown. The objective was to estimate the prevalence of new-onset AF among single-chamber ICD patients by observing the rates of new atrial tachycardia (AT)/AF among a propensity scoring matched cohort of dual-chamber ICD patients from the PainFree SmartShock technology study, to better inform screening initiatives. METHODS: Among 2770 patients enrolled, 1862 single-chamber, dual-chamber, and cardiac resynchronization therapy subjects with no prior history of atrial tachyarrhythmias were included. Daily AT/AF burden was estimated using a propensity score weighted model against data from dual-chamber ICDs. RESULTS: Over 22 ± 9 months of follow-up, the estimated incidence of AT/AF-lasting at least 6 min, 6 h, and 24 h per day -in the single-chamber cohort was 22.0, 9.8, and 6.3%, whereas among dual-chamber patients, the prevalence was 26.6, 13.1, and 7.1%, respectively. Initiation of oral anticoagulation was estimated to occur in 9.8% of the propensity matched single-chamber cohort, which was higher than the actual observed rate of 6.0%. Stroke and transient ischemic attack occurred at low rates in all device subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Atrial arrhythmias occur frequently, and significant underutilization of anticoagulation is suggested in single-chamber ICD recipients. Routine screening for AF should be considered among single-chamber ICD recipients.

Comparison of ICD shock rates in Japanese and non-Japanese patients in the PainFree SST study.

BACKGROUND: The PainFree Smart Shock Technology (SST) study showed a low implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) inappropriate shock rate. However, the majority of patients were from Western countries with patient characteristics different from those in Japan. ICD shock rates using the novel SST algorithms in Japanese patients are still unknown. METHODS: All 2,770 patients in the PainFree SST study (Japan [JPN]: N = 181, other geographies [OJPN]: N = 2,589) were included in this analysis. RESULTS: Japanese patients had higher average left ventricular ejection fraction (P < 0.0001), higher prevalence of secondary prevention indications (P < 0.0001), nonischemic cardiomyopathy (P < 0.0001), and permanent atrial fibrillation (P < 0.0001). The appropriate shock rate at 12 months was not different between JPN and OJPN: 6.4% and 6.3%, respectively (P = 0.95). The inappropriate shock rate at 12 months was significantly higher in Japanese patients (2.9% vs 1.7%, P = 0.017). However, after propensity score matching to adjust for the difference in baseline characteristics, the difference in inappropriate shock rate was not statistically significant (P = 0.51). CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the appropriate shock rate between Japan and other geographies. The inappropriate shock rate in Japan was low, although it was slightly higher compared to other geographies due to baseline characteristics, including a higher prevalence of permanent AF. There was not a statistically significant difference after adjusting for baseline characteristics.

Benefits of left ventricular endocardial pacing comparing failed implants and prior non-responders to conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy: A subanalysis from the ALSYNC study.

OBJECTIVE: Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) is limited by a substantial proportion of non-responders. Left ventricular endocardial pacing (LVEP) may offer enhanced possibility to deliver CRT in patients with a failed attempt at implantation and to improve clinical status of CRT non-responders. METHODS: The ALternate Site Cardiac ResYNChronisation (ALSYNC) study was a prospective, multi-centre cohort study that included 118 CRT patients with a successfully implanted endocardial left ventricular (LV) lead, including 90 failed coronary sinus (CS) implants and 28 prior non-responders who had worsened or unchanged heart failure status after at least 6 months of optimal conventional CRT therapy. RESULTS: Patients were followed for 19 ±â€¯9 months. At baseline, prior non-responders were sicker as evidenced by a larger LV end-diastolic diameter (70 ±â€¯12 vs 65 ±â€¯9 mm, p = .03) and a trend towards larger LV end-systolic volume index (LVESVi, 95 ±â€¯51 vs 74 ±â€¯39 ml/m2, p = .07), and were more frequently anti-coagulated (96% vs 72%, p = .008) despite similar history of atrial fibrillation (54% vs 51%, p = .83). At 6 months, LVEP significantly improved LV ejection fraction (2.3 ±â€¯7.5 and 8.6 ±â€¯10.0%), New York Heart Association Class (0.4 ±â€¯0.9 and 0.7 ±â€¯0.8), LVESVi (9 ±â€¯16 and 18 ±â€¯43 ml/m2), and six-minute walk test (56 ±â€¯73 and 54 ±â€¯92 m) in prior non-responders and failed CS implants, relative to baseline (all p < .05), respectively. LVESVi reduction ≥15% was seen in 47% of the prior non-responder patients and 57% of failed CS patients. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that a sizable proportion of CRT non-responders can improve by LVEP, though to a lesser extent than failed CS implants. Clinical trial registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01277783.

Refining success of cardiac resynchronization therapy using a simple score predicting the amount of reverse ventricular remodelling: results from the Markers and Response to CRT (MARC) study.

Aims: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces morbidity and mortality in systolic heart failure patients with ventricular conduction delay. Variability of individual response to CRT warrants improved patient selection. The Markers and Response to CRT (MARC) study was designed to investigate markers related to response to CRT. Methods and results: We prospectively studied the ability of 11 clinical, 11 electrocardiographic, 4 echocardiographic, and 16 blood biomarkers to predict CRT response in 240 patients. Response was measured by the reduction of indexed left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESVi) at 6 months follow-up. Biomarkers were related to LVESVi change using log-linear regression on continuous scale. Covariates that were significant univariately were included in a multivariable model. The final model was utilized to compose a response score. Age was 67 ± 10 years, 63% were male, 46% had ischaemic aetiology, LV ejection fraction was 26 ± 8%, LVESVi was 75 ± 31 mL/m2, and QRS was 178 ± 23 ms. At 6 months LVESVi was reduced to 58 ± 31 mL/m2 (relative reduction of 22 ± 24%), 130 patients (61%) showed ≥ 15% LVESVi reduction. In univariate analysis 17 parameters were significantly associated with LVESVi change. In the final model age, QRSAREA (using vectorcardiography) and two echocardiographic markers (interventricular mechanical delay and apical rocking) remained significantly associated with the amount of reverse ventricular remodelling. This CAVIAR (CRT-Age-Vectorcardiographic QRSAREA -Interventricular Mechanical delay-Apical Rocking) response score also predicted clinical outcome assessed by heart failure hospitalizations and all-cause mortality. Conclusions: The CAVIAR response score predicts the amount of reverse remodelling after CRT and may be used to improve patient selection. Clinical Trials: NCT01519908.

Defibrillator shocks and their effect on objective and subjective patient outcomes: Results of the PainFree SST clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The effect of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shock on device-measured activity and patient-reported outcomes is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the acute and long-term effects of ICD shock on objective behavioral data (ie, device-based physical activity) and subjective patient-reported outcomes (eg, quality of life and shock anxiety). METHODS: The PainFree Smart Shock Technology (SST) clinical trial included 2770 patients with a single- or dual-chamber ICD or cardiac resynchronization therapy - defibrillator device who were followed for 22 ± 9 months. Participants completed measures of quality of life (EuroQol-5D [EQ-5D] questionnaire) and shock anxiety (Florida Shock Anxiety Scale) at baseline, biannual visits, and monthly for 6 months after an ICD shock. Daily physical activity data were obtained from a built-in device accelerometer. RESULTS: The average daily activity was 185.3 ± 119.4 min/d. Activity was significantly reduced after an ICD shock (P < .0001) and recovered to a normal level after ∼90 days. An ICD shock was also associated with decreased quality of life (EQ5-D health score) and increased EQ-5D anxiety scores, but it did not affect mobility, self-care, activity, or pain. Similarly, shock anxiety (Florida Shock Anxiety Scale) increased in shocked patients and remained significantly elevated at 24 months, regardless of appropriate or inappropriate shock delivery. CONCLUSION: ICD shocks have a long-lasting adverse effect on both objective, device-measured physical activity and subjective patient-reported outcomes of quality of life and shock anxiety. Successful management of patients with an ICD requires attention to clinically relevant behavioral and psychological outcomes to expedite recovery and return to activities of daily living.

Rationale and design of the AdaptResponse trial: a prospective randomized study of cardiac resynchronization therapy with preferential adaptive left ventricular-only pacing.

The AdaptResponse trial is designed to test the hypothesis that preferential adaptive left ventricular-only pacing with the AdaptivCRT® algorithm reduces the incidence of the combined endpoint of all-cause mortality and intervention for heart failure (HF) decompensation, compared with conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), among patients with a CRT indication, left bundle branch block (LBBB) and normal atrioventricular (AV) conduction. The AdaptResponse study is a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blinded, multicentre, clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02205359), conducted at up to 200 centres worldwide. Following enrolment and baseline assessment, eligible subjects will be implanted with a CRT system containing the AdaptivCRT algorithm, and randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either a treatment ('AdaptivCRT') or control ('Conventional CRT') group. The study is designed to observe a primary endpoint in 1100 patients ('event-driven') and approximately 3000 patients will be randomized. The primary endpoint is the composite of all-cause mortality and intervention for HF decompensation; secondary endpoints include all-cause mortality, intervention for HF decompensation, clinical composite score (CCS) at 6 months, atrial fibrillation, quality of life measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), health outcome measured by the EQ-5D instrument, all-cause readmission after a HF admission, and cost-effectiveness. The AdaptResponse clinical trial is powered to assess clinical endpoints and is expected to provide definitive evidence on the incremental utility of AdaptivCRT-enhanced CRT systems.

Mapping for Acute Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Stimulation Study (MAPS Study).

BACKGROUND: Central sleep apnea syndrome, correlated with the occurrence of heart failure, is characterized by periods of insufficient ventilation during sleep. This acute study in 15 patients aims to map the venous system and determine if diaphragmatic movement can be achieved by phrenic nerve stimulation at various locations within the venous system. METHODS: Subjects underwent a scheduled catheter ablation procedure. During the procedural waiting time, one multielectrode electrophysiology catheter was subsequently placed at the superior and inferior vena cava and the junctions of the left jugular and left brachiocephalic vein and right jugular and right brachiocephalic vein, for phrenic nerve stimulation (1-2 seconds ON/2-3 seconds OFF, 40 Hz, pulse width 210 µs). Diaphragmatic movement was assessed manually and by a breathing mask. During a follow-up assessment between 2 and 4 weeks postprocedure, occurrence of adverse events was assessed. RESULTS: In all patients diaphragmatic movement was induced at one or more locations using a median threshold of at least 2 V and maximally 7.5 V (i.e., e 3.3 mA, 14.2 mA). The lowest median current to obtain diaphragmatic stimulation without discomfort was found for the right brachiocephalic vein (4.7 mA). In 12/15 patients diaphragmatic movement could be induced without any discomfort, but in three patients hiccups occurred. CONCLUSION: Diaphragmatic stimulation from the brachiocephalic and caval veins is feasible. Potential side effects should be eliminated by adapting the stimulation pattern. This information could be used to design a catheter, combining cardiac pacing with enhancing diaphragm movement during a sleep apnea episode.

Fluid status telemedicine alerts for heart failure: a randomized controlled trial.

AIMS: Hospital admissions are frequently preceded by increased pulmonary congestion in heart failure (HF) patients. This study evaluated whether early automated fluid status alert notification via telemedicine improves outcome in HF patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients recently implanted with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) with or without cardiac resynchronization therapy were eligible if one of three conditions was met: prior HF hospitalization, recent diuretic treatment, or recent brain natriuretic peptide increase. Eligible patients were randomized (1:1) to have fluid status alerts automatically transmitted as inaudible text message alerts to the responsible physician or to receive standard care (no alerts). In the intervention arm, following a telemedicine alert, a protocol-specified algorithm with remote review of device data and telephone contact was prescribed to assess symptoms and initiate treatment. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death and cardiovascular hospitalization. We followed 1002 patients for an average of 1.9 years. The primary endpoint occurred in 227 patients (45.0%) in the intervention arm and 239 patients (48.1%) in the control arm [hazard ratio, HR, 0.87; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.72-1.04; P = 0.13]. There were 59 (11.7%) deaths in the intervention arm and 63 (12.7%) in the control arm (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.62-1.28; P = 0.52). Twenty-four per cent of alerts were not transmitted and 30% were followed by a medical intervention. CONCLUSION: Among ICD patients with advanced HF, fluid status telemedicine alerts did not significantly improve outcomes. Adherence to treatment protocols by physicians and patients might be challenge for further developments in the telemedicine field.

Extended detection time to reduce shocks is safe in secondary prevention patients: The secondary prevention substudy of PainFree SST.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF) detection has been shown to reduce implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapies and improve prognosis in primary prevention ICD patients. Data in secondary prevention patients are limited. OBJECTIVE: The PainFree SST secondary prevention study is the largest trial of secondary prevention patients randomized between standard and prolonged detection to assess the safety of this strategy in these patients. METHODS: A total of 705 secondary prevention patients implanted with an ICD in the PainFree SST trial were enrolled in this substudy; 353 patients were randomized to VF detection of 18/24 intervals and 352 patients to 30/40. All other VF parameters were standardized by protocol. RESULTS: The 1-year arrhythmic syncope-free rates in the standard and prolonged groups were 97.7% vs 96.9%, respectively, (P = .0034 for noninferiority). Freedom from all-cause syncope was 96% in both arms (P = .0013 for noninferiority). There was no difference in the time to first appropriate or inappropriate VF therapy. However, the rates of treated VF episodes were lower in the prolonged arm (1.48 per patient per year vs 0.44 per patient per year, P = .0001). A trend toward lower mortality in the prolonged group was not statistically different (5.6% 1 year, 12% 2 years vs 3.8% 1 year, 7.7% 2 years, adjusted hazard ratio = 0.60, P = .061). CONCLUSION: This large prospective randomized study shows that prolonged detection can safely be programmed in secondary prevention ICD patients with new or existing devices. This programming strategy decreases the rate of treated events and is not associated with an increased risk of syncope or mortality.

ALternate Site Cardiac ResYNChronization (ALSYNC): a prospective and multicentre study of left ventricular endocardial pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

AIMS: The ALternate Site Cardiac ResYNChronization (ALSYNC) study evaluated the feasibility and safety of left ventricular endocardial pacing (LVEP) using a market-released pacing lead implanted via a single pectoral access by a novel atrial transseptal lead delivery system. METHODS AND RESULTS: ALSYNC was a prospective clinical investigation with a minimum of 12-month follow-up in 18 centres of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)-indicated patients, who had failed or were unsuitable for conventional CRT. The ALSYNC system comprises the investigational lead delivery system and LVEP lead. Patients required warfarin therapy post-implant. The primary study objective was safety at 6-month follow-up, which was defined as freedom from complications related to the lead delivery system, implant procedure, or the lead ≥70%. The ALSYNC study enrolled 138 patients. The LVEP lead implant success rate was 89.4%. Freedom from complications meeting the definition of primary endpoint was 82.2% at 6 months (95% CI 75.6-88.8%). In the study, 14 transient ischaemic attacks (9 patients, 6.8%), 5 non-disabling strokes (5 patients, 3.8%), and 23 deaths (17.4%) were observed. No death was from a primary endpoint complication. At 6 months, the New York Heart Association class improved in 59% of patients, and 55% had LV end-systolic volume reduction of 15% or greater. Those patients enrolled after CRT non-response showed similar improvement with LVEP. CONCLUSIONS: The ALSYNC study demonstrates clinical feasibility, and provides an early indication of possible benefit and risk of LVEP. CLINICAL TRIAL: NCT01277783.

Low inappropriate shock rates in patients with single- and dual/triple-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillators using a novel suite of detection algorithms: PainFree SST trial primary results.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have been well demonstrated in many clinical trials, and ICD shocks for ventricular tachyarrhythmias save lives. However, inappropriate and unnecessary shock delivery remains a significant clinical issue with considerable consequences for patients and the healthcare system. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the PainFree SmartShock Technology (SST) study was to investigate new-generation ICDs to reduce inappropriate and unnecessary shocks through novel discrimination algorithms with modern programming strategies. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter clinical trial enrolled 2790 patients with approved indication for ICD implantation (79% male, mean age 65 years; 69% primary prevention indication, 27% single-chamber ICD, 33% replacement or upgrade). Patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months, and mean follow-up was 22 months. The primary end-point of the study was the percentage of patients remaining free of inappropriate shocks at 1 year postimplant, analyzed separately for dual/triple-chamber ICDs (N = 2019) and single-chamber ICDs (N = 751). RESULTS: The inappropriate shock rate at 1 year was 1.5% for patients with dual/triple-chamber ICDs and 2.5% for patients with single-chamber devices. Two years postimplant, the inappropriate shock rate was 2.8% for patients with dual-/triple chamber ICDs and 3.7% for those with single-chamber ICDs. The most common cause of an inappropriate shock in both groups was atrial fibrillation or flutter. CONCLUSION: In a large patient cohort receiving ICDs for primary or secondary prevention, the adoption of novel enhanced detection algorithms in conjunction with routine implementation of modern programming strategies led to a very low inappropriate shock rate.