ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIM: In this retrospective study, we compared breast cancer patients treated with and without mistletoe lectin I (ML-I) in addition to standard breast cancer treatment in order to determine a possible effect of this complementary treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 18,528 patients with invasive breast cancer. Data on additional ML-I treatments were reported for 164 patients. We developed a "similar case" method with a distance measure retrieved from the beta variable in Cox regression to compare these patients, after stage adjustment, with their non-ML-1 treated counterparts in order to answer three hypotheses concerning overall survival, recurrence free survival and life quality. RESULTS: Raw data analysis of an additional ML-I treatment yielded a worse outcome (p=0.02) for patients with ML treatment, possibly due to a bias inherent in the ML-I-treated patients. Using the "similar case" method (a case-based reasoning approach) we could not confirm this harm for patients using ML-I. Analysis of life quality data did not demonstrate reliable differences between patients treated with ML-I treatment and those without proven ML-I treatment. CONCLUSION: Based on a "similar case" model we did not observe any differences in the overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and quality of life data between breast cancer patients with standard treatment and those who in addition to standard treatment received ML-I treatment.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ribosome Inactivating Proteins, Type 2/therapeutic use , Toxins, Biological/therapeutic use , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Disease-Free Survival , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The well-characterized tubular-type of breast tumors is classified as low-risk breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report on the results of a retrospective analysis on clinical and biological features of 248 tubular breast tumors including follow-up and treatment data from two German series of 21,065 breast cancer cases. The majority of tumors were stage I or stage II, ER- and PR-positive and c-erbB2-negative with a 5-year survival-rate of 96.3%. 51.3% of patients received hormonal treatment, 75.5% had post-operative radiotherapy and 11.8% were treated with a chemotherapeutical regimen. CONCLUSION: Our retrospective analysis showed no treatment benefit for either anti-hormonal or chemotherapeutical regimens. Post-operative radiotherapy, however, improved the survival rate of patients with tubular carcinoma (log-rank=5, p=0.025). Our data suggest that post-operative radiotherapy is an important treatment to prolong survival for patients suffering from tubular breast cancer.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Sensitivity of breast tumors to anticancer drugs depends upon dynamic interactions between epithelial tumor cells and their microenvironment including stromal cells and extracellular matrix. To study drug-sensitivity within different compartments of an individual tumor ex vivo, culture models directly established from fresh tumor tissues are absolutely essential. METHODS: We prepared 0.2 mm thick tissue slices from freshly excised tumor samples and cultivated them individually in the presence or absence of taxol for 4 days. To visualize viability, cell death, and expression of surface molecules in different compartments of non-fixed primary breast cancer tissues we established a method based on confocal imaging using mitochondria- and DNA-selective dyes and fluorescent-conjugated antibodies. Proliferation and apoptosis was assessed by immunohistochemistry in sections from paraffin-embedded slices. Overall viability was also analyzed in homogenized tissue slices by a combined ATP/DNA quantification assay. RESULTS: We obtained a mean of 49 tissue slices from 22 breast cancer specimens allowing a wide range of experiments in each individual tumor. In our culture system, cells remained viable and proliferated for at least 4 days within their tissue environment. Viability of tissue slices decreased significantly in the presence of taxol in a dose-dependent manner. A three-color fluorescence viability assay enabled a rapid and authentic estimation of cell viability in the different tumor compartments within non-fixed tissue slices. CONCLUSION: We describe a tissue culture method combined with a novel read out system for both tissue cultivation and rapid assessment of drug efficacy together with the simultaneous identification of different cell types within non-fixed breast cancer tissues. This method has potential significance for studying tumor responses to anticancer drugs in the complex environment of a primary cancer tissue.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/pathology , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/pharmacology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor/methods , Paclitaxel/pharmacology , Adenosine Triphosphate/analysis , Apoptosis/drug effects , Cell Division/drug effects , Cell Survival , DNA, Neoplasm/analysis , Female , Humans , Microscopy, Confocal , Microscopy, Fluorescence , Tumor Cells, Cultured/chemistry , Tumor Cells, Cultured/drug effectsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: c-erbB2 (also known as HER-2/neu) and topoisomerase IIalpha are frequently overexpressed in breast cancer. The aim of the study was to analyze retrospectively whether the expression of c-erbB2 and topoisomerase IIalpha protein influences the long-term outcome of patients with primary breast cancer. METHODS: In this study c-erbB2 and topoisomerase IIalpha protein were evaluated by immunohistochemistry in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue from 225 samples of primary breast cancer, obtained between 1986 and 1998. The prognostic value of these markers was analyzed. RESULTS: Of 225 primary breast tumor samples, 78 (34.7%) showed overexpression of either c-erbB2 (9.8%) or topoisomerase IIalpha protein (24.9%), whereas in 21 tumors (9.3%) both proteins were found to be overexpressed. Patients lacking both c-erbB2 and topoisomerase IIalpha overexpression had the best long-term survival. Overexpression of either c-erbB2 or topoisomerase IIalpha was associated with shortened survival, whereas patients overexpressing both c-erbB2 and topoisomerase IIalpha showed the worst disease outcome (P < 0.0001). Treatment with anthracyclines was not capable of reversing the negative prognostic impact of topoisomerase IIalpha or c-erbB2 overexpression. CONCLUSION: The results of this exploratory study suggest that protein expression of c-erbB2 and topoisomerase IIalpha in primary breast cancer tissues are independent prognostic factors and are not exclusively predictive factors for anthracycline response in patients with primary breast cancer.