Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Audiol ; 33(2): 369-378, 2024 Jun 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38416788

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Many factors create barriers for early hearing detection and intervention (EHDI), especially those related to unfavorable social determinants of health (SDOH). The primary aim of this study was to evaluate diagnostic timing of infants at risk for congenital hearing loss in consideration of known barriers. Understanding the specific barriers to early diagnosis can inform interventions to improve timeliness of diagnosis and subsequent habilitation. METHOD: A retrospective chart review was completed for infants referred for diagnostic audiologic testing at a tertiary urban-setting Children's Hospital from 2018 to 2021. After exclusion criteria were applied, 1,488 infants were included in the analysis. Various factors were recorded from electronic medical records including those specific to SDOH. Time to diagnosis was derived and compared across five factors of interest that have previously been shown to impact diagnostic timeline, including (a) insurance type, (b) race/ethnicity, (c) presence of middle ear dysfunction at first auditory brainstem response (ABR), (d) proximity to diagnostic center, and (e) diagnostic timing before and during/after the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: Across the study time period, 77% of infants referred for diagnostic testing had confirmed diagnosis by the EHDI benchmark of 3 months. Analysis of time to diagnosis across factors of interest revealed no clinically significant differences for insurance type, race/ethnicity, proximity to diagnostic center, or timing in reference to the COVID-19 pandemic. Presence of middle ear dysfunction on first ABR was found to significantly protract final diagnostic timing. CONCLUSIONS: Although some known barriers for EHDI can be universal, other factors may have a differential impact on an infant's timeline to diagnosis based on their specific location, which can interact differently with additional known barriers. Understanding local challenges will serve to better guide programs in implementing facilitators that will address their specific needs for improved outcomes.


Subject(s)
Child Health Services , Healthcare Disparities , Hearing Loss , Child Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Hearing Tests/statistics & numerical data , Hearing Loss/congenital , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Humans , Male , Female , Infant, Newborn
2.
J Perinatol ; 41(2): 310-314, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32893264

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine when infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) have the first hearing screen performed, and thus inform targeted testing for cytomegalovirus (CMV)-related hearing loss. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of electronic health records of infants admitted to a Level 4 outborn NICU and had a first hearing screen performed from 8/2016-8/2018. RESULT: Among 1498 infants, 546 (36%) had a first hearing screen performed at age >21 days when a positive CMV PCR test cannot distinguish congenital from postnatal CMV acquisition. While most infants tested at >21 days of age were <34 weeks' gestational age (71%), 18% (n = 100) and 11% (n = 59) were ≥34 and ≥37 weeks' gestation, respectively. CONCLUSION: Targeted CMV testing for failed hearing screen in the NICU is problematic as 36% of infants did not have a hearing screen performed before 21 days of age, supporting the need for CMV screening at NICU admission.


Subject(s)
Cytomegalovirus Infections , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Cytomegalovirus Infections/diagnosis , Hearing , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Neonatal Screening , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL