Effects of long-term oral testosterone undecanoate therapy on urinary symptoms: data from a 1-year, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial in aging men with symptomatic hypogonadism.

BACKGROUND: There has been a longstanding question as to whether testosterone therapy could precipitate or worsen urinary symptoms in aging men. We investigated the effects of 1-year oral testosterone undecanoate (TU) therapy on urinary symptoms in aging, hypogonadal men. METHODS: A total of 322 men ≥50 years with symptomatic testosterone deficiency participated in a 1-year, randomized, multicenter, double-blind trial. Patients received placebo or oral TU 80 mg/day, 160 mg/day, or 240 mg/day. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Compared with placebo, treatment with oral TU at doses of 80 mg/day and 160 mg/day resulted in no significant change in IPSS urinary symptoms or quality of life (QoL) scores. Treatment with oral TU 240 mg/day led to a statistically significant, but clinically insignificant, improvement in IPSS total score and a significant improvement in IPSS QoL score. None of the TU doses tested had a significant effect on PSA or PV. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term oral TU therapy had no deleterious effects on IPSS total score and did not change PV and PSA in aging, hypogonadal men. Oral TU therapy at a dose of 240 mg/day may even improve IPSS QoL score.

Effects of oral testosterone undecanoate therapy on bone mineral density and body composition in 322 aging men with symptomatic testosterone deficiency: a 1-year, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effects of oral testosterone undecanoate (TU) on bone mineral density (BMD), lean body mass (LBM) and body fat mass (BFM) in aging men with symptomatic testosterone deficiency (TD). METHODS: Three hundred twenty-two men ≥50 years with TD symptoms and calculated free testosterone <0.26 nmol/L participated in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients were randomized to placebo, oral TU 80 mg/d, oral TU 160 mg/d, or oral TU 240 mg/d, administered as divided doses with normal meals. BMD of the hip and lumbar spine were evaluated by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), and body composition (LBM and BFM) by whole body DEXA. RESULTS: Oral TU significantly increased BMD at Month 12 at the lumbar spine (240 mg/d), total hip (240 mg/d), and trochanter and intertrochanter (160 and 240 mg/d) compared with placebo. Oral TU significantly increased LBM at Months 6 and 12 for all oral TU groups compared with placebo. BFM significantly decreased at Month 6 (all oral TU groups) and Month 12 (160 mg/d) compared with placebo. The effects on BMD and body composition showed a clear dose response. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with oral TU led to improvement in BMD, LBM and BFM in aging men with symptomatic TD.

Oral testosterone replacement in symptomatic late-onset hypogonadism: effects on rating scales and general safety in a randomized, placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of oral testosterone undecanoate (TU) on symptoms associated with late-onset hypogonadism (LOH). Design Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled. METHODS: The study was performed in 14 study centers in seven European countries. Men > or =50 years (n=322) with symptoms of hypogonadism and testosterone deficiency (calculated free testosterone <0.26 nmol/l) were randomized and treated for 12 months with placebo or oral TU 80, 160 or 240 mg/day. Primary outcome was the total score on the Aging Males' Symptoms (AMS) rating scale after six months of treatment. RESULTS: Treatment of mild-to-moderate LOH symptoms in subjects with borderline hypogonadism with oral TU resulted in an improved total AMS score at month 6, but differences between groups were not statistically significant. There was greater improvement in subjects <60 years when compared with subjects > or =60 years (P=0.001), but baseline testosterone level had no influence on treatment response. The AMS sexual symptoms domain improved with oral TU 160 mg/day at months 6 (P=0.008) and 12 (P=0.012) compared with placebo, but not with 80 and 240 mg/day. Treatment was well-tolerated and there were no between-group differences in adverse events or drop-out rates. CONCLUSIONS: In one of the largest placebo-controlled studies of testosterone therapy in LOH, oral TU did not improve total AMS score in subjects with mild-to-moderate symptoms compared with placebo, except the sexual symptom sub-domain where a modest improvement was reported with oral TU 160 mg/day.

The effect of food composition on serum testosterone levels after oral administration of Andriol Testocaps.

OBJECTIVE: Andriol Testocaps is a new oral formulation of testosterone undecanoate (TU) for treatment of hypogonadism. As TU is taken up by the intestinal lymphatic system, both the presence and the composition of food influence the absorption. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of food composition on the pharmacokinetics of oral TU. DESIGN: An open-label, single-centre, four-way crossover study. With a washout period of 6-7 days, 80 mg TU was administered in the morning 5 min after consuming each of four different meals in a randomized order (A: 230 kcal, 0.6 g lipid; B: 220 kcal, 5 g lipid; C: 474 kcal, 19 g lipid; D: 837 kcal, 44 g lipid). PATIENTS: Twenty-four postmenopausal volunteers. MEASUREMENTS: Serial blood samples were collected until 24 h after dosing to determine testosterone and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) by gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC-MS). RESULTS: The bioavailability of testosterone after a low-calorie meal containing 0.6 g lipid or 5 g lipid was relatively low, the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(0-tlast)) for testosterone being 30.7 and 43.5 nmol h/l, respectively. The bioavailability of testosterone after a meal containing 19 g lipid was considerably higher (AUC(0-tlast) = 146 nmol h/l), whereas increasing the lipid content to 44 g lipid did not further increase the bioavailability of testosterone (AUC(0-tlast) = 154 nmol h/l). CONCLUSION: Approximately 19 g of lipid per meal efficiently increases absorption of testosterone from oral TU. Therefore, coadministration with a normal rather than a fatty meal is sufficient to increase serum testosterone levels when using oral TU.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of three different intramuscular doses of nandrolone decanoate: analysis of serum and urine samples in healthy men.

The pharmacokinetics of nandrolone in serum and urine were investigated in healthy young men after a single im injection of 50 mg (n = 20), 100 mg (n = 17), or 150 mg (n = 17) nandrolone decanoate. Blood samples were collected before treatment and for up to 32 d after dosing. In addition, in the 50- and 150-mg groups, 24-h urine samples were collected before treatment and on d 1, 7, and 33 after treatment; in the 150-mg group, additional samples were collected after 3 and 6 months. Serum concentrations and the area under the curve of nandrolone increased proportionally with the dose administered. The peak serum concentration ranged from 2.14 ng/ml in the 50-mg group to 4.26 ng/ml in the 100-mg group and 5.16 ng/ml in the 150-mg group. The peak serum concentration was reached after 30 h (50 and 100 mg) and 72 h (150 mg), whereas the terminal half-life was 7-12 d. In urine, pretreatment concentrations of 19-norandrosterone (19-NA) and/or 19-noretiocholanolone (19-NE) were detected in five of 37 subjects (14%). In the 50-mg group, 19-NA and/or 19-NE could be detected at least until 33 d after injection in 16 of 17 subjects (94%). In the 150-mg group, who were presumed to have not previously used nandrolone, nandrolone metabolites could be detected for up to 6 months in eight of 12 subjects (67%) for 19-NE and in 10 of 12 subjects (83%) for 19-NA.