ABSTRACT
Objectives: To assess the impact and utility of an intensive care unit (ICU) rotation during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the need for mandatory ICU rotations in training for all clinical specialties. Methods: A mixed methods study was conducted from January to September 2021 at the Aga Khan University Hospital, including resident doctors who rotated through COVID ICU between May and September 2020. An online survey was undertaken, followed by two focused group discussions (FGDs). Results: Fifty-nine complete responses out of a total of 86 were analyzed. Around 42.3% (n = 25) of doctors belonged to medicine/allied specialties and 57.6% (n = 34) had previous ICU experience. Both groups, with and without prior ICU experience, found the rotation equally challenging (82.3% (n = 28) versus 84% (n = 21), P = .776) and gained similar practical skills (35.3% (n = 12) versus 16% (n = 4), P = .072), however, those with experience gained significantly more knowledge (58.5% (n = 20) versus 32% (n = 8), P = .047). On opinion regarding mandatory ICU rotation, the majority agreed to have a mandatory rotation (82% (n = 28) versus 72% (n = 18), P = .421)) with an optimal duration of 1 to 2 months. The FGDs found that all residents encouraged the idea of mandatory training in ICU which must be tailored to their training specialty and suggested extending the duration beyond 1 week to ensure learning. Conclusions: COVID ICU rotation was a good avenue for learning and the idea of mandatory ICU training was supported. Mandating ICU rotation might theoretically enhance response to emergencies. More research is needed to understand for feasible incorporation of ICU training in the curriculum.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The analysis of adverse events, including morbidity and mortality (M&M), helps to identify subgroups of children at risk and to modify clinical practice. There are scant data available from low- and middle-income countries. Our aim was to estimate the proportion of pediatric patients with various severe adverse events in the perioperative period extending to 48 hours and to describe the clinical situations and causes of those events. METHODS: We reviewed the M&M database of the Department of Anesthesiology between 1992 and 2016. A data collection tool was developed, and the outcomes were standardized. Each case was reviewed independently and subsequently discussed between 2 reviewers to identify a major primary causative factor. RESULTS: The total number of pediatric cases during this period was 48,828. Seventy-six significant adverse events were identified in 39 patients (8 patients [95% confidence interval {CI}, 5.7-10.9] per 10,000). Thirteen patients had multisystem involvement, and hence the total number of events exceeded the number of patients. Respiratory events were the most common (33.5%). Thirteen patients had perioperative cardiac arrest within 48 hours of surgery (2.6 [95% CI, 1.3-4.3] per 10,000), 7 of these were infants (54%), 5 of whom had congenital heart disease (CHD). Eleven of these 39 patients died within 48 hours (2.0 [95% CI, 1.1-4.0] per 10,000).In 13 cases, anesthesia was assessed to be the predominant cause of morbidity (2.6 per 10,000), whereas in 26 cases, it contributed partially (5.32 per 10,000). There was only 1 death solely related to anesthesia (0.2 per 10,000), and this death occurred before the start of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse events were uncommon. Respiratory complications were the most frequent (33%). Infants, especially those with CHD, were identified as at a higher risk for perioperative cardiac arrest, but this association was not tested statistically. Twenty-eight percent of the patients who suffered events died within 48 hours. Increased access to anesthesia drugs and practice improvements resulted in a decline in perioperative cardiac arrests.
