Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ) ; 19(75): 309-313, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36254415

ABSTRACT

Background Closed method of pneumoperitoneum using Veress needle is an established technique. Classical closed technique is popular. Simple technique is a modified closed technique. Objective To compare the classical and simple techniques of closed pneumoperitoneum. Method This study was conducted in the department of urology, Bir hospital from August 1st 2019 to March 30th 2021. Total 114 patients were randomized into simple and classical technique of creating closed pneumoperitoneum. Time taken for creation of pneumoperitoneum, complications and failure of creating pneumoperitoneum in each group noted and analyzed. Chi square test, Fischer exact test and student t test were used and p < 0.05 considered significant. Result Among 114 patients, 61 in simple and 53 in classical technique allocated. In simple technique, mean age was 42.98±18.21 years, BMI was 21.84±2.57 kg/m2 , mean time for pneumoperitoneum creation was 108.07±21.14 seconds. In classical technique, mean age was 40.15±17.58 years, BMI was 21.94±2.54 (kg/m2 ), mean time for pneumoperitoneum creation was 189.70±32.21 seconds. Mean time was less in simple technique than classical technique (p < 0.001). Complication rate observed was 6% in each technique (p=0.797) with cumulative rate of 10%. Omental injury was seen in 3.2% in simple technique and 5.6% in classical technique (p=0.662). Retroperitoneal insufflation was seen in 6.5% in simple technique and 5.6% in classical technique (p=0.842). No failed pneumoperitoneum was observed in both groups. Conclusion Simple technique is as effective, reproducible and safe method as classical technique of creating closed pneumoperitoneum.


Subject(s)
Insufflation , Laparoscopy , Pneumoperitoneum , Adult , Humans , Laparoscopy/methods , Middle Aged , Needles , Pneumoperitoneum/etiology , Pneumoperitoneum, Artificial/adverse effects , Pneumoperitoneum, Artificial/methods , Young Adult
2.
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc ; 52(195): 920-4, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26982667

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is elective surgical procedure for uncomplicated gallstone disease and gallbladder polyp. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of Dexamethasone and Pheniramine hydrogen maleate on reducing stress response and pain after surgery in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: After obtaining approval from the institutional ethics committee and written informed consent, 120 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were enrolled in the study from Sep 2103 to Aug 2014 at Department of Surgery, Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal. Patients were randomized to receive either 8mg/2ml of Dexamethasone + 45.5/2ml Pheniramine hydrogen maleate (treatment group, n= 60) or 5 ml of normal saline (control group, n=60) 90 minutes before skin incision. RESULTS: There was a reduction of total bilirubin, C-reactive protein (CRP) value and Visual Analogue Score (VAS) in treatment group as compared to control group (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Use of Dexamethasone and Pheniramine hydrogen maleate prior to surgical skin incision helps to reduce both postoperative pain and acute physiological stress.


Subject(s)
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , Cholecystolithiasis/surgery , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Pain, Postoperative , Pheniramine/administration & dosage , Polyps/surgery , Stress, Physiological/drug effects , Adult , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/adverse effects , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/methods , Cholecystolithiasis/diagnosis , Drug Monitoring , Female , Gallbladder/pathology , Gallbladder/surgery , Histamine H1 Antagonists/administration & dosage , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement/methods , Pain, Postoperative/diagnosis , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative/physiopathology , Polyps/diagnosis , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL