Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Vet Dermatol ; 34(6): 532-542, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37395162

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hymenoptera envenomation occurs frequently in people and dogs and can trigger anaphylaxis. Venom immunotherapy (VIT) is the only preventive treatment for Hymenoptera hypersensitivity and is indicated for people with severe adverse reactions to insect stings. Rush VIT is an accelerated VIT protocol in people. This has not been reported in dogs. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to evaluate the safety of modified rush VIT. ANIMALS: Twenty client-owned dogs with Hymenoptera hypersensitivity based on a history of adverse reactions to Hymenoptera envenomation and a positive intradermal test to honey bee and/or paper wasp venom. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dogs received incremental doses of venom via subcutaneous injection one day per week for three consecutive weeks until the maintenance dose was achieved. Vital signs were recorded every 30 min prior to venom administration. Adverse reactions were categorised as localised or grade I-IV systemic reactions. RESULTS: Nineteen of 20 dogs (95%) completed rush VIT. One dog experienced a grade III systemic adverse reaction and was withdrawn from the study. No adverse reactions occurred in 10 of 20 dogs (50%). Localised and grade I-II systemic reactions occurred in nine of 20 dogs (45%), including nausea (n = 5), injection site pruritus (n = 3) and diarrhoea and lethargy (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Modified rush VIT in dogs was well-tolerated and should be considered for dogs with Hymenoptera hypersensitivity. Larger studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of VIT in dogs for preventing hypersensitivity reactions to insect stings.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Bee Venoms , Desensitization, Immunologic , Dog Diseases , Hymenoptera , Hypersensitivity , Insect Bites and Stings , Humans , Dogs , Animals , Insect Bites and Stings/therapy , Insect Bites and Stings/veterinary , Bee Venoms/therapeutic use , Bee Venoms/adverse effects , Hypersensitivity/drug therapy , Hypersensitivity/veterinary , Anaphylaxis/chemically induced , Anaphylaxis/prevention & control , Anaphylaxis/veterinary , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Desensitization, Immunologic/veterinary , Immunotherapy/methods , Immunotherapy/veterinary , Dog Diseases/drug therapy
2.
Vet Dermatol ; 33(5): 435-439, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35644925

ABSTRACT

Toxoplasma gondii is a ubiquitous protozoan, for which felids are the definitive host. Immunocompromised individuals are susceptible to recrudescent toxoplasmosis. This case describes a 6-year-old, feline immunodeficiency virus-positive domestic short hair cat with feline atopic skin syndrome that developed fatal toxoplasmosis after treatment with oclacitinib for five months.


Toxoplasma gondii est un protozoaire ubiquitaire dont les félidés sont l'hôte définitif. Les personnes immunodéprimées sont sensibles à la toxoplasmose recrudescente. Ce cas décrit un chat domestique à poils courts de 6 ans, positif pour le virus de l'immunodéficience féline, atteint du syndrome atopique cutané félin, qui a développé une toxoplasmose mortelle après un traitement à l'oclacitinib pendant cinq mois.


Toxoplasma gondii es un protozoo ubicuo, cuyo huésped definitivo son los felinos. Las personas inmunocomprometidas son susceptibles a la toxoplasmosis recrudescente. Este caso describe un gato doméstico de pelo corto positivo para el virus de la inmunodeficiencia felina de 6 años de edad con síndrome de piel atópica felina, que desarrolló toxoplasmosis fatal después del tratamiento con oclacitinib durante cinco meses.


Toxoplasma gondii é um protozoário ubíquo para o qual os felídeos são o hospedeiro definitivo. Indivíduos imunocomprometidos são suscetíveis a toxoplasmose recrudescente. Este relato descreve um caso de um felino doméstico de pelo curto de seis anos de idade, positivo para o vírus da imunodeficiência felina, com síndrome atópica felina, que desenvolveu toxoplasmose fatal após tratamento com oclacitinib por cinco meses.


Subject(s)
Cat Diseases , Dermatitis, Atopic , Immunodeficiency Virus, Feline , Toxoplasma , Toxoplasmosis, Animal , Animals , Cat Diseases/drug therapy , Cats , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Dermatitis, Atopic/veterinary , Pyrimidines , Sulfonamides , Toxoplasmosis, Animal/drug therapy
3.
Vet Dermatol ; 25(5): 435-e67, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24898683

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous cytology is a valuable tool for diagnosis of canine superficial pyoderma. Current published reproducible techniques are semiquantitative. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of a quantitative method for skin surface cytology in dogs with superficial pyoderma. ANIMALS: Impression smears were collected from five normal dogs and 20 dogs with clinical and cytological evidence of superficial pyoderma. METHODS: Four investigators evaluated 10 oil immersion fields (OIF) on 25 slides, selecting fields with inflammatory cells, nuclear streaming and or keratinocytes under ×10 magnification. Investigators repeated blinded evaluations of all slides at least twice. For each OIF, polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs), intracellular (IC) cocci, extracellular (EC) cocci, IC rods, EC rods and yeast were quantified. Nuclear streaming was scored as present or absent. For each parameter, within-reader and between-reader agreements were expressed by the intraclass correlation (ICC) value (≤0.20 poor, 0.21-0.40 fair, 0.41-0.60 moderate, 0.61-0.80 good and 0.81-1.00 excellent) or kappa statistic (κ). RESULTS: Reproducible parameters included: PMNs (ICC = 0.58), nuclear streaming (ICC = 0.68), EC cocci (ICC = 0.64) and IC cocci (ICC = 0.32). When qualified as present or absent, within-reader κ for IC cocci was 0.71. The method demonstrated 93% sensitivity in identifying dogs with superficial pyoderma and 51% specificity in identifying normal dogs according to established criteria. However, if criteria for normal dogs were limited to the absence of PMNs and IC bacteria, sensitivity of 64% and specificity of 98% were demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: For several parameters, including PMNs, nuclear streaming, EC cocci and IC cocci, a reproducible, quantitative cytological technique was identified.


Subject(s)
Dog Diseases/diagnosis , Pyoderma/veterinary , Skin/cytology , Animals , Case-Control Studies , Cell Count/veterinary , Cytological Techniques/methods , Cytological Techniques/veterinary , Dog Diseases/microbiology , Dog Diseases/pathology , Dogs , Pyoderma/diagnosis , Pyoderma/microbiology , Pyoderma/pathology , Reproducibility of Results , Skin/microbiology , Skin/pathology
4.
Vet Dermatol ; 21(2): 175-83, 2010 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20230588

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to evaluate the level of bacterial contamination of otoscope cones in veterinary private practice, and to determine the most effective method of disinfection. Fifty small animal practices participated in this study, which included a detailed survey regarding otoscope cleaning, storage and usage and quantitative culture of the cleaned and stored otoscope cones. Using sterile technique, two cones from each of the 50 hospitals were swabbed and submitted for quantitative culture. Contamination was present in 29% of the samples and the following organisms were isolated: Flavobacterium brevis (10%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (6%), Pseudomonas alcaligenes (4%), Staphylococcus intermedius (4%), Corynebacterium spp. (2%), Bacillus spp. (1%), Enterococcus faecalis (1%) Malassezia spp. (1%). There was no statistically significant difference between storage type (dry versus stored in solution) and for the instrumentation used to clean the cones (brush, cotton-tipped applicator, both versus none). There was a statistically significant difference between the different cleaning solutions (P < 0.001) and between the storage solutions (P = 0.003). A single most effective cleaning solution was unable to be determined due to the large number of solutions utilized. Cetylcide G (Cetylite Industries, Inc., Pennsauken, NJ, USA) was the most effective of the three most commonly used storage solutions (Cetylcide G, Benz-all, and 2% Chlorhexidine gluconate) when used as directed (P < 0.001). The level of contamination had a positive association with the frequency of cone use and a negative association with the frequency of storage solution replacement.


Subject(s)
Disinfection/methods , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Hospitals, Animal/standards , Otoscopes/veterinary , Animals , Data Collection , Disinfectants , Otoscopes/microbiology , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...