Non-recurrent Laryngeal Nerve During Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Thyroidectomy: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Complete and precise knowledge of the neck anatomy and its eventual anomalies is crucial while performing a safe thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Embryo-genetic malformations of the IV branchial arch can lead to an uncommon anatomical alteration known as non-recurrent inferior laryngeal nerve. Its prevalence varies between 0.7% for the dextral branch and 0.04% for the sinistral. In these cases, the inferior laryngeal nerve branches originate directly from the cervical vagus nerve, entering the larynx without hooking, on the right side around the subclavian artery or on the left around the aortic arch. The presence of a non-recurrent laryngeal nerve is challenging, due to the increased risks of iatrogenic damage to the nerve, which results in hoarseness, dysphagia, glottal obstruction, vocal cords palsy, and serious airway impairment. We present the case of a 58-year-old woman. The patient was admitted to our department for a nodule classified as Bethesda IV in the right thyroid lobe. Through the use of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM), surgeons detected intraoperatively a non-recurrent laryngeal nerve. A subsequent computed tomography scan confirmed an anomalous right subclavian artery branching from the left aortic arch, the Lusoria Artery. Anatomical variants represent pitfalls in this case and an accurate knowledge of the neck region is imperative while performing thyroid surgery. Devices such as IONM are useful for detecting abnormalities that may lead to iatrogenic damages.

Meckel's Diverticulum Causing Ileal Volvulus and Peritonitis after a Recent Appendectomy: A Case Report and Literature Review-We Should Likely Resect an Incidental MD.

Meckel's diverticulum (MD) is the most common congenital anomaly of the gastrointestinal tract with a 1-3% prevalence in the general population. The surgical management of symptomatic MD is well described in the literature, but there is still no consensus on the indication for prophylactic resection of incidental asymptomatic MD. To address this issue, we extensively reviewed the current literature and report our experience with laparoscopic management of an unusual case of MD causing ileal volvulus and acute peritonitis two weeks after a laparoscopic appendectomy for acute gangrenous appendicitis performed in another hospital. A 50-year-old man presented to the emergency department with acute and severe abdominal pain, vomiting, and constipation. He had undergone a laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis two weeks before in another hospital. The patient was apyretic, distressed, and seeking an antalgic position. The abdomen was mildly distended and tender, and the Blumberg sign was mildly positive in the central quadrants. The clinical picture deteriorated with fever, peritonismus, and leukocytosis. A CT scan showed an ileo-ileal adhesion near the ileocolic junction and dilatation of the upstream loops with the air-fluid levels. Through an urgent laparoscopy, a necrotic mass, the MD, was wedge-resected, and the surrounding ileal volvulus derotated. The postoperative course was uneventful. There is no definitive consensus on the appropriate management of incidental asymptomatic MD, although several studies have attempted to identify guiding criteria. Features of the MD, the patient's risk factors, clinical presentation, and surgical approach need to be considered to establish definitive guidelines for the management of incidental asymptomatic MD. In the absence of definitive guidelines, personal expertise and judgement are the main resources for the surgeon approaching an incidental asymptomatic MD.

Laparoscopic vs Open Treatment for Gastric and Non-Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: a Two-Center Experience.

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 109 patients who underwent curative laparoscopic or open resection for different types of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Only primary GIST patients who did not receive preoperative chemotherapy or oral imatinib treatment were included in the analysis. We divided the patients into 2 groups according to the surgical approach:a laparoscopic group (LAP) and a laparotomic group (OPEN). Our aim was to confirm the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic surgery for GISTs that differed in size and location, and to assess its long-term oncologic outcome in terms of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Furthermore, we performed a surgical short-term outcome analysis. The two groups did not differ with respect to age at operation, gender, BMI or comorbidities. Even the NIH and AFIP risk classifications were not significantly different between the two groups. Furthermore, in our analysis, there was no significant difference in mean tumor size or location between the two groups. Wedge resection was the most frequently performed procedure. The conversion rate was 7.8%. The operative time was 194.75 (60- 350) min for the open group and 181.70 (57-480) min for the laparoscopic group. Our data clearly indicated that the long-term oncologic outcome and DFS of laparoscopic resection were not inferior to those of traditional open operations and laparoscopic resection was still feasible in cases with large tumors: the median size of the tumor was 4.5 cm (3-25) and the tumor was larger than 4.5 cm in 47.7% of the cases in the LAP group. With regard to short-term outcomes, our study demonstrated that the LAP group had fewer complications, faster gastrointestinal recovery, reduced use of analgesic drugs and shorter postoperative hospital stay (each p<0.05). In conclusion, our experience confirms that GISTs are very uncommon cancers for which the prognosis is closely related to size, localization and class of risk. In light of our clinical data, laparoscopic resection for gastric and non-gastric GISTs is a safe, feasible and oncologically correct procedure. The most important advantage of this technique is that it ensures a better postoperative outcome compared with open surgery, without worsening the prognosis.

Peyronie's disease development and management in diabetic men.

BACKGROUND: Peyronie's disease (PD) is a fibrosing disorder of the penis resulting in plaque formation and penile deformity that negatively affect sexual and psychosocial function of patients. A multifactorial etiology of PD is assumed with diabetes mellitus (DM) being a potential risk factor. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this narrative review was to investigate diabetes role in PD pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A non-systematic narrative review of original articles, meta-analyses, and randomized trials was conducted, including articles in the pre-clinical setting to support relevant findings. RESULTS: Diabetes is one of the most common comorbidity observed in PD patients, with a prevalence of about 11% and a strong association with erectile dysfunction (ED). DM is associated with both a higher risk of developing PD and has also an impact on the outcomes of PD's treatments. DISCUSSION: Evidence from literature underlines that metabolic alterations typical of DM are pivotal factors in the development of PD and resistance to its medical treatment. CONCLUSION: The role of DM in development of PD is still debated, while its role in PD development is not completely clear, there is a clear impact of DM on PD treatment outcomes.