Detection of hepatitis C virus in an exhumed body identified the origin of a nosocomial transmission that caused multiple fatal diseases.

BACKGROUND: Medico-legal conflicts arise when it is difficult to prove the cause of nosocomial infections. AIM: To report an outbreak of patient-to-patient transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) through the repeated use of a multi-dose saline flask during the rinsing of central venous catheters. METHODS: Blood samples were taken from each patient for the comparative analysis of their HCV RNA strains. No samples were available for one patient who died before the investigation started. Despite the known lability of HCV RNA, the body was exhumed four months after burial and postmortem samples were collected. HCV RNA was extracted successfully from liver and spleen samples. Genotyping of all the HCV strains was performed by sequence analysis of the 5'NC untranslated region, the E1 core conserved region and the E1/E2 hypervariable region. FINDINGS: Forensic investigators retraced the route used by two ward nurses, when saline catheter flushes were given to 14 patients with each nurse administering to seven patients. The comparative phylogenetic analysis of all case strains identified the deceased patient as the source of contamination to five patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the value of sequence analysis as a tool for solving medico-legal conflicts. The High Court of Justice found that a health worker's re-use of a contaminated needle resulted in the nosocomial transmission of HCV.

Impact of different cadaveric donor age cut-offs on adult recipient survival after liver transplantation: a single-center analysis.

The increase in the number of patients awaiting liver transplantation (OLT) has forced the use of cadaveric donors (CD) with suboptimal characteristics. Of these, donor age is perhaps the most investigated parameter. Although excellent outcomes were observed for OLT using CD aged over 60 years, the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR) Group found an increased risk by using CD of more than 55 years. The Italian National Transplant Center has recently assumed that CD age more than 60 years is a potential risk factor for OLT. In this study, a single-center analysis was performed by stratifying CD by three age cut-offs (< or =55 or >55, < or =60 or >60, and < or =65 or >65 years) to evaluate effects on OLT outcome. Although no significant difference in 6-month and 1-year patient or graft survival occurred after stratification for each donor age cut-off, a better survival was observed with OLT performed using livers procured from CD >55 years. A significant increase in cold ischemia time (CIT) was observed among OLT performed with grafts procured from CD < or =55 and < or =65 years (P = .007), and there was an inverse correlation between overall CIT and donor age (R = -0.300; P = .0022). However, no impact on 1-year patient survival was observed by introducing CIT in univariate logistic regression models as well as donor age, recipient age, donor/recipient age ratio, donor/recipient sex mismatch, ELTR diagnostic categories, and UNOS status. The results of this study suggest the suitability of CD of more than 55 years for OLT and the need to further investigate the cut-off value for CIT-related risk.

Medicolegal aspects of donor safety evaluation.

Current Italian statutes concern the safety of organ donors. The law of April 1, 1999 (no. 91), established the fundamental principles for a new structure for organ transplants in Italy and, therefore, for the quality of transplanted organs. The Ministry of Health decree of February 8, 2002, defined organ conditions that preclude the utilization of an organ and identified conditions for suitability of non-optimal organs for some types of transplants or for some recipients. Guidelines from the National Transplant Center establish risk levels, criteria for absolute exclusion, and standard procedures for the evaluation of donor risk and organ suitability for transplant. This article also examines the levels of responsibility of various professionals involved in the harvesting-transplant process.

Preliminary results of an expert-opinion elicitation process to prioritize an informative system funded by Italian Ministry of Health for cadaveric donor management, organ allocation, and transplantation activity.

Expert-opinion elicitation (EOE) is a heuristic process for gathering evidence and data or answering questions on issues/problems of concern. The Delphi method (DM) is the most frequent technique used to obtain structured elicitation of expert opinions. It has been increasingly applied in medicine to produce guidelines and to evaluate the appropriateness of diagnostic procedures. In this study, a DM has been used as structured EOE process to assess the appropriateness and clinical priority of a data set-based informative system in the context of the Liguria-Trento Transplant Network (LTTN) Project, funded by Italian Ministry of Health. The original data set was obtained by using an interdisciplinary pool of regional experts (n = 60). This data set held 1506 items stratified in 21 categories at various surgical phases (preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative) and transplantation types (liver, kidney, and kidney/pancreas) in adult and pediatric recipients. Some categories included cadaveric donor management, organ allocation, and acute liver failure. In the second DM round, the data set was subjected to a panel of extraregional, independent experts (n = 9) to assess scores ranging from 1 to 9 on each item, based on increasing appropriateness/priority, according to RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. The overall agreement between experts was 95.88%, whereas disagreement and uncertainty were 0.13% and 3.98%, respectively. A major uncertainty occurred for the data set concerning the multiorgan cadaveric donor, for liver transplantation, and for kidney transplantation in adult recipients. The use of a structured EOE process may represent an effective strategy to define the appropriateness and prioritization criteria of a large data set in the field of solid organ transplantation.

Impact of ischemia/reperfusion on transplanted livers procured from elderly cadaveric donors.

The increasing number of clinical indications for liver transplantation has forced physicians to use livers procured from elderly cadaveric donors to expand the graft pool. However, the degree of ischemia/reperfusion damage in elderly livers remains poorly investigated. In this study, the outcomes of livers procured from a group (I) of young donors (n=12; 38 +/- 12 years; range: 21-58) were compared with a group (II) from elderly donors (n=7; 68 +/- 7 years; range: 62-84) for changes in reduced glutathione, the main hepatic free radical scavenger. Reduced and oxidized glutathione were assayed by high performance liquid chromatography in liver biopsies performed just before cold ischemia and during early reperfusion. A significant decrease in reduced glutathione was observed at the time of reperfusion in both groups I (P=.0195) and II (P=.002). Before cold ischemia and during early reperfusion, no differences between young versus elderly donors were noted in the oxidized/reduced glutathione ratio, in conventional graft function markers or in liver-related hemostatic parameters. Comparable glutathione contents were measured at the time of early reperfusion in livers obtained from young and elderly cadaveric donors, suggesting that livers procured from elderly donors might be adequately protected against ischemia/reperfusion damage.

Intracranial insertion of a nasogastric tube in a case of homicidal head trauma.

A case of accidental intracranial penetration of a 29-cm-long portion of nasogastric tube (NGT) in a 27-year-old female victim of a severe homicidal skull and brain trauma is reported. Accidental penetration of the NGT occurred through a large fracture of the ethmoid lamina cribrosa. In addition to a systematic review of previously reported cases, circumstantial data, clinical aspects, and autopsy data have been analyzed to draw medicolegal considerations concerning the connection between death and insertion of an NGT, which may also contribute to the ascertaining of any possible professional responsibility of medical staff, in a case fraught with numerous legal complications.

Infant death in San Francisco 1989-1990.

This paper examines all of the unexplained and violent deaths of children less than one year of age in the City and County of San Francisco during the years 1989-1990. A total of 62 cases were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Among the cases we examined, 34 deaths were determined as SIDS, while seven were moded as accidents and two as homicides. The deaths were examined with respect to the following parameters: sex, race, age, height and weight, cause and manner of death, significant autopsy and microscopic findings; circumstances of death including place, the person discovering or reporting the death, the presence of siblings or previous child death in the family and previous illness in the same child. A particular stress is given to the definition and diagnosis of SIDS, according to the international literature, and to the criteria adopted to distinguish SIDS cases from accidents and homicides. A review of both the American and European literature shows that most articles do not include comparisons of data from both the autopsy and the scene. Additionally there is little standardization in the investigation and the extent of postmortem examinations performed. An international standardization of these methods appears necessary and the use of protocols to assure complete investigation and postmortem examination will allow more intensive evaluation of data. Here we give a brief presentation of the necropsy protocol for Sudden Unexpected Infant Death recently written and approved by the California Department of Health Services and used in the Chief Medical Examiner's Office in San Francisco.

[The organizational problems of the hospitals of the Nord Italia Transplant Program (NITp) engaged in the activities of organ retrieval for transplantation. The Collaborative Group of Resuscitation Anesthetists]. / Problemi organizzativi degli Ospedali del Nord Italia Transplant (NITp) impegnati nell'attività di reperimento di organi a scopo di trapianto. Il Gruppo Collaborativo degli Anestesisti Rianimatori.

If the quality of results of organ transplantation in NITp is highly satisfactory, the same cannot be said for the number of transplants performed, which only cover 20-25% of the requirement. To understand the causes of organ shortage, a study group of Anaesthesiologists and Transplant Coordinators from the North Italy Transplant Program (NITp) investigated, through a questionnaire addressed to the Heads of 103 Intensive Care Units (ICU) in 92 Hospitals in the NITp area, some of the organizational problems linked to donor identification and treatment and to organ retrieval. The questionnaire took into consideration the number of possible donors identified in 1990, those retrieved and the causes for non retrieving organs and examined a number of variables linked both to retrieval and to ICUs and Hospitals organization. The results show that potential donors were 461: 143 (31%) were used, 138 (30%) were lost due to family opposition to organ donation, 192 (20%) for clinical reasons and 88 (19%) for organizational reasons. The latter figure represents 5% of non retrieval in the most active ICUs and increases to 50% in the Hospitals that had procured no donors in 1990. The main obstacles for ICUs to procure organ donors are: convey the Medical-Legal Committee, carry out of complicated administrative procedures, availability of round the clock specialized equipment for neurological assessment (especially for ICU outside Neurosurgical and Neurological departments), inadequate number of medical and nursing staff, most of all at night, and finally the difficulty in the management of non-traumatic cerebrovascular patients.