Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform ; 26(7): 2920-2928, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35316198

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In order to evaluate Parkinson disease patients' response to therapeutic interventions, sources of information are mainly patient reports and clinicians' assessment of motor functions. However, these sources can suffer from patient's subjectivity and from inter/intra rater's score variability. Our work aimed at determining the impact of wearable electronics and data analysis in objectifying the effectiveness of levodopa treatment. METHODS: Seven motor tasks performed by thirty-six patients were measured by wearable electronics and related data were analyzed. This was at the time of therapy initiation (T0), and repeated after six (T1) and 12 months (T2). Wearable electronics consisted of inertial measurement units each equipped with 3-axis accelerometer and 3-axis gyroscope, while data analysis of ANOVA and Pearson correlation algorithms, in addition to a support vector machine (SVM) classification. RESULTS: According to our findings, levodopa-based therapy alters the patient's conditions in general, ameliorating something (e.g., bradykinesia), leaving unchanged others (e.g., tremor), but with poor correlation to the levodopa dose. CONCLUSION: A technology-based approach can objectively assess levodopa-based therapy effectiveness. SIGNIFICANCE: Novel devices can improve the accuracy of the assessment of motor function, by integrating the clinical evaluation and patient reports.


Subject(s)
Parkinson Disease , Wearable Electronic Devices , Humans , Hypokinesia , Levodopa/therapeutic use , Parkinson Disease/diagnosis , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Tremor
2.
NPJ Parkinsons Dis ; 7(1): 82, 2021 Sep 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34535672

ABSTRACT

Early noninvasive reliable biomarkers are among the major unmet needs in Parkinson's disease (PD) to monitor therapy response and disease progression. Objective measures of motor performances could allow phenotyping of subtle, undetectable, early stage motor impairments of PD patients. This work aims at identifying prognostic biomarkers in newly diagnosed PD patients and quantifying therapy-response. Forty de novo PD patients underwent clinical and technology-based kinematic assessments performing motor tasks (MDS-UPDRS part III) to assess tremor, bradykinesia, gait, and postural stability (T0). A visit after 6 months (T1) and a clinical and kinematic assessment after 12 months (T2) where scheduled. A clinical follow-up was provided between 30 and 36 months after the diagnosis (T3). We performed an ANOVA for repeated measures to compare patients' kinematic features at baseline and at T2 to assess therapy response. Pearson correlation test was run between baseline kinematic features and UPDRS III score variation between T0 and T3, to select candidate kinematic prognostic biomarkers. A multiple linear regression model was created to predict the long-term motor outcome using T0 kinematic measures. All motor tasks significantly improved after the dopamine replacement therapy. A significant correlation was found between UPDRS scores variation and some baseline bradykinesia (toe tapping amplitude decrement, p = 0.009) and gait features (velocity of arms and legs, sit-to-stand time, p = 0.007; p = 0.009; p = 0.01, respectively). A linear regression model including four baseline kinematic features could significantly predict the motor outcome (p = 0.000214). Technology-based objective measures represent possible early and reproducible therapy-response and prognostic biomarkers.

3.
Front Hum Neurosci ; 15: 649533, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34434095

ABSTRACT

Healthy and pathological human walking are here interpreted, from a temporal point of view, by means of dynamics-on-graph concepts and generalized finite-length Fibonacci sequences. Such sequences, in their most general definition, concern two sets of eight specific time intervals for the newly defined composite gait cycle, which involves two specific couples of overlapping (left and right) gait cycles. The role of the golden ratio, whose occurrence has been experimentally found in the recent literature, is accordingly characterized, without resorting to complex tools from linear algebra. Gait recursivity, self-similarity, and asymmetry (including double support sub-phase consistency) are comprehensively captured. A new gait index, named Φ-bonacci gait number, and a new related experimental conjecture-concerning the position of the foot relative to the tibia-are concurrently proposed. Experimental results on healthy or pathological gaits support the theoretical derivations.

4.
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform ; 24(1): 120-130, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30843855

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The complex nature of Parkinson's disease (PD) makes difficult to rate its severity, mainly based on the visual inspection of motor impairments. Wearable sensors have been demonstrated to help overcoming such a difficulty, by providing objective measures of motor abnormalities. However, up to now, those sensors have been used on advanced PD patients with evident motor impairment. As a novelty, here we report the impact of wearable sensors in the evaluation of motor abnormalities in newly diagnosed, untreated, namely de novo, patients. METHODS: A network of wearable sensors was used to measure motor capabilities, in 30 de novo PD patients and 30 healthy subjects, while performing five motor tasks. Measurement data were used to determine motor features useful to highlight impairments and were compared with the corresponding clinical scores. Three classifiers were used to differentiate PD from healthy subjects. RESULTS: Motor features gathered from wearable sensors showed a high degree of significance in discriminating the early untreated de novo PD patients from the healthy subjects, with 95% accuracy. The rates of severity obtained from the measured features are partially in agreement with the clinical scores, with some highlighted, though justified, exceptions. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the feasibility of adopting wearable sensors in the detection of motor anomalies in early, untreated, PD patients. SIGNIFICANCE: This work demonstrates that subtle motor impairments, occurring in de novo patients, can be evidenced by means of wearable sensors, providing clinicians with instrumental tools as suitable supports for early diagnosis, and subsequent management.


Subject(s)
Machine Learning , Parkinson Disease , Wearable Electronic Devices , Accelerometry/instrumentation , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Physiologic/instrumentation , Movement/physiology , Parkinson Disease/classification , Parkinson Disease/diagnosis , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation
5.
J Parkinsons Dis ; 10(1): 113-122, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31594252

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Technology-based objective measures (TOMs) recently gained relevance to support clinicians in the assessment of motor function in Parkinson's disease (PD), although limited data are available in the early phases. OBJECTIVE: To assess motor performances of a population of newly diagnosed, drug free PD patients using wearable inertial sensors and to compare them to healthy controls (HC) and differentiate different PD subtypes [tremor dominant (TD), postural instability gait disability (PIGD), and mixed phenotype (MP)]. METHODS: We enrolled 65 subjects, 36 newly diagnosed, drug-free PD patients and 29 HCs. PD patients were clinically defined as tremor dominant, postural instability-gait difficulties or mixed phenotype. All 65 subjects performed seven MDS-UPDRS III motor tasks wearing inertial sensors: rest tremor, postural tremor, rapid alternating hand movement, foot tapping, heel-to-toe tapping, Timed-Up-and-Go test (TUG) and pull test. The most relevant motor tasks were found combining ReliefF ranking and Kruskal- Wallis feature-selection methods. We used these features, linked to the relevant motor tasks, to highlight differences between PD from HC, by means of Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier. Furthermore, we adopted SVM to support the relevance of each motor task on the classification accuracy, excluding one task at time. RESULTS: Motion analysis distinguished PD from HC with an accuracy as high as 97%, based on SVM performed with measured features from tremor and bradykinesia items, pull test and TUG. Heel-to-toe test was the most relevant, followed by TUG and Pull Test. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, we demonstrate that the SVM algorithm successfully distinguishes de novo drug-free PD patients from HC. Surprisingly, pull test and TUG tests provided relevant features for obtaining high SVM classification accuracy, differing from the report of the experienced examiner. The use of TOMs may improve diagnostic accuracy for these patients.


Subject(s)
Gait Disorders, Neurologic/diagnosis , Hypokinesia/diagnosis , Parkinson Disease/diagnosis , Postural Balance , Support Vector Machine , Tremor/diagnosis , Wearable Electronic Devices , Aged , Female , Gait Disorders, Neurologic/etiology , Humans , Hypokinesia/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Parkinson Disease/complications , Phenotype , Pilot Projects , Postural Balance/physiology , Tremor/etiology
6.
Sensors (Basel) ; 19(24)2019 Dec 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31835822

ABSTRACT

Currently, clinical evaluation represents the primary outcome measure in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, clinical evaluation may underscore some subtle motor impairments, hidden from the visual inspection of examiners. Technology-based objective measures are more frequently utilized to assess motor performance and objectively measure motor dysfunction. Gait and balance impairments, frequent complications in later disease stages, are poorly responsive to classic dopamine-replacement therapy. Although recent findings suggest that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can have a role in improving motor skills, there is scarce evidence for this, especially considering the difficulty to objectively assess motor function. Therefore, we used wearable electronics to measure motor abilities, and further evaluated the gait and balance features of 10 PD patients, before and (three days and one month) after the tDCS. To assess patients' abilities, we adopted six motor tasks, obtaining 72 meaningful motor features. According to the obtained results, wearable electronics demonstrated to be a valuable tool to measure the treatment response. Meanwhile the improvements from tDCS on gait and balance abilities of PD patients demonstrated to be generally partial and selective.


Subject(s)
Gait/physiology , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Postural Balance/physiology , Wearable Electronic Devices , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Gait/radiation effects , Humans , Male , Motor Activity/physiology , Motor Activity/radiation effects , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Parkinson Disease/rehabilitation , Postural Balance/radiation effects , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods
7.
J Biomech ; 83: 243-252, 2019 01 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30554812

ABSTRACT

Developmental coordination disorder (DCD) and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are neuro-developmental disorders, starting in childhood, which can affect the planning of movements and the coordination. We investigated how and in which measure a system based on wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) can provide an objective support to the diagnosis of motor impairments in school-aged children. The IMUs measured linear and rotational movements of 37 schoolchildren, 7-10yo, 17 patients and 20 control subjects, during the execution of motor exercises, performed under medical and psychiatric supervision, to assess different aspects of the motor coordination. The measured motor parameters showed a high degree of significance in discriminating the ADHD/DCD patients from the healthy subjects, pointing out which motor tasks are worth focusing on. So, medical doctors have a novel key lecture to state a diagnosis, gaining in objectivity with respect to the standard procedures which mainly involve subjective human judgment. Differently to other works, we propose a novel approach in terms of number of used IMUs and of performed motor tasks. Moreover, we demonstrate the meaningful parameters to be considered as more discriminant in supporting the medical diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Motor Skills Disorders/diagnosis , Schools , Wearable Electronic Devices , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/physiopathology , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/psychology , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Motor Skills , Motor Skills Disorders/physiopathology , Motor Skills Disorders/psychology , Movement
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...