ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: E-cigarettes have become the main alternative to traditional cigarettes. An increasing number of explosive accidents with e-cigarettes have been described over the past years. Through our experience of sixteen consecutive cases, we wanted to acquire a better understanding of the origins and to specify the principles of management for these particular new burns. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted to review all cases of burns related to e-cigarettes referred to our burn center from April 2014 through May 2019. Several key data were collected in relation to the patients, the circumstances and characteristics of the burns, their treatment and follow-up. RESULTS: In the past five years, sixteen patients were burned by e-cigarette explosions. They were all males with an average age of 41 years. They all had second or third degree burn injuries. The average burned area was 5% TBSA. The areas that were burned were the hands, buttocks, thorax, thighs and genital areas, and were always related to clothes pocket location. Eight patients described an increase in pain after cooling, suggesting significant contamination of the burn by lithium-ion deposits. Six required surgical management with excision and split-thickness skin graft. The others healed spontaneously in several weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Burns by e-cigarette lithium batteries explosion have a double mechanism (thermal and chemical). Carrying cigarettes in a pocket close to the body is a significant risk factor to which the male population is particularly exposed. Early debridement is recommended when possible while initial cooling does not seem helpful and is sometimes painful.
Subject(s)
Blast Injuries/etiology , Burns, Chemical/etiology , Burns/etiology , Electric Power Supplies/adverse effects , Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems , Explosions , Adult , Blast Injuries/therapy , Burns/surgery , Burns, Chemical/surgery , Hospitals, University , Humans , Male , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Risk Factors , Skin TransplantationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the use of artificial dermal and perforator flap after radical surgery of severe axillary and perineal hidradenitis suppurativa disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The data on postoperative outcomes, scar assessment (POSAS) and quality of life (DLQI, SF-36) were collected during consultation or by phone call. Forty-seven patients were included in our study between January 2015 and September 2017, including 27 patients in the artificial dermal group and 20 patients in the perforator flap group. RESULTS: The quality of life assessment by the SF-36 questionnaire showed a significant increase in quality of life in both groups (P<0.05), higher in the perforating flap group (P<0.001). The DLQI questionnaire showed a decrease in the impact of MV on quality of life in both groups, which was greater in the perforator flap group (P<0.05). The scarring assessment by the POSAS patient and observer questionnaire showed a better overall opinion in the perforator flap group (P<0.001). In the perforator flap group, the total hospital stay and healing time was shorter (P<0.001) and the return to work was faster (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The artificial dermis and the perforator flaps are very useful coverage solutions after radical surgery of hidradenitis suppurativa. The use of perforator flaps, however, seems more interesting while simplifying the post-operative course.
