Impact of contemporary regimens on the outcomes and toxicity of primary CNS lymphoma: a single-center retrospective analysis of 73 patients.

INTRODUCTION: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare disease with a dismal prognosis compared to its systemic large B-cell lymphoma counterpart. Real world data are limited, when considering a uniform backbone treatment. METHODS: A retrospective study of all adult patients treated sequentially with a high-dose methotrexate (HD MTX)-based regimen in a single tertiary medical center between 2003 and 2019. RESULTS: The 2015-2019 period differed from its predecessor in that most patients were treated with an HD MTX-based polychemotherapy regimen as opposed to HD MTX monotherapy (81% vs. 13%, P < .001), rituximab was given as standard of care (100% vs. 56%, P < .01), and most induction-responsive patients received consolidation treatment (70% vs. 18%, P = .01). The median progression-free and overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort (n = 73, mean age 64 years) was 9.9 and 29.8 months, respectively. Patients diagnosed between 2015 and 2019 had superior OS (P = .03) compared to those treated earlier. An interim partial response (PR) state, documented after two cycles of chemotherapy, was associated with increased incidence of progression, with only 33% of those patients achieving end-of-induction complete response. Twenty-three percent of patients developed thrombotic events and 44% developed grade 3-4 infections. HD MTX-based polychemotherapy induction was associated with both increase in thrombotic and infection incidence. CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary HD MTX-based combination therapies suggestively improved the outcomes for PCNSL, but at a cost of increased incidence of toxicity. Patients who achieve an interim PR status are at a high risk for treatment failure.

Reduced-dose ICE chemotherapy ± rituximab is a safe and effective salvage therapy for fit elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

The risk of developing non-Hodgkin lymphoma increases with age, yet elderly patients are under-represented in clinical trials. Here, we evaluate a combination regimen including ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide with or without rituximab (ICE ± R) in 32 fit elderly patients (median age 75.6 years) with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. ICE ± R was generally administered in reduced doses and was well tolerated. The overall response rate (ORR) was 53.1% with a complete response (CR) rate of 40.6%. The median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.9 and 17.0 months, respectively. Patients who responded to ICE ± R achieved median PFS of 47.2 months and OS of 78.9 months. Patients ineligible for autologous transplantation who responded to ICE ± R were treated with additional cycles, and achieved a median PFS of 18.9 months and OS of 21.7 months. Previous response to first-line therapy was the strongest predictor of response, PFS and OS to second-line treatment.

High response rate for treatment with gemtuzumab ozogamicin and cytarabine in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia and favorable and intermediate-I cytogenetic risk.

UNLABELLED: Recent studies have reevaluated whether gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) improves the outcome of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in elderly patients. Over 5 years, we treated 16 elderly patients with AML with GO and cytarabine. A high response rate, prolonged survival, and low toxicity were observed in the favorable and intermediate-I genetic groups of AML. Our study raises the issue about the optimal protocol for these patients. BACKGROUND: The benefit of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) in combination with chemotherapy as frontline therapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is still debated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of low-dose GO with cytarabine in elderly patients with newly diagnosed AML. Over the past 5 years, we have treated 16 elderly patients with AML (64-82 years) with GO (3 mg/m(2)) followed by continuous infusion of cytarabine (100 mg/m(2)) for 7 days. RESULTS: Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 68.8% of patients; however, this was true only in patients in the favorable or intermediate-I cytogenetic risk groups. Of the 12 patients with AML in the favorable and intermediate-I genetic groups, 11 (91.7%) achieved CR. By comparison, of all 4 patients in the intermediate-II or adverse genetic groups, none of the patients achieved CR (P = .003). The median disease-free survival and overall survival (OS) was 10.9 and 18.8 months, respectively, for patients who achieved CR. The estimated median survival was 15 months in the favorable and intermediate-I cytogenetic groups and only 4.4 months in the intermediate-II and unfavorable risk groups (P = .008). The toxicity profile was also manageable in patients with AML who were mainly older than 70 years with good performance status (PS). The 8-week mortality rate was 6.25%, which is relatively low in this high-risk group of patients. These data are in line with results from 2 randomized trials suggesting that the addition of low-dose GO should be further investigated to reevaluate its role in selected elderly patients with AML and raises the issue of the optimal protocol.