Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Einstein (Sao Paulo) ; 20: eAO6880, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35730806

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare the number of surgeries, mortality rate, length of hospital stay, and costs of transurethral resection of the prostate and open prostatectomy for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia, between 2008 and 2018, in the Public Health System in São Paulo, Brazil. METHODS: Ecological and retrospective study using data from the informatics department of the Brazilian Public Health System database. Procedure codes were "open prostatectomy" and "transurethral resection of the prostate." The outcomes analyzed were compared between transurethral resection of the prostate and open prostatectomy according to the hospital surgical volume and presence or absence of a residency program. RESULTS: A total of 18,874 surgeries were analyzed (77% transurethral resection of the prostate) and overall mortality was not statistically different between procedures. Intermediate and high-volume centers had shorter length of hospital stay than low-volume centers for transurethral resection of the prostate (3.28, 3.02, and 6.58 days, respectively, p=0.01 and p=0.004). Length of hospital stay was also shorter for open prostatectomy in high-volume compared to low-volume centers (4.86 versus 10.76 days, p=0.036). Intrahospital mortality was inversely associated with surgical volume for transurethral resection of the prostate. Centers with residency program had shorter length of hospital stay considering open prostatectomy and less mortality regarding transurethral resection of the prostate. Open prostatectomy was 64% more expensive than transurethral resection of the prostate. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest the importance of investing in specialized centers, which could be potential referral centers for surgical cases.


Subject(s)
Laser Therapy , Prostatic Hyperplasia , Transurethral Resection of Prostate , Brazil/epidemiology , Humans , Laser Therapy/methods , Male , Prostatectomy , Prostatic Hyperplasia/surgery , Public Health , Retrospective Studies , Transurethral Resection of Prostate/methods , Treatment Outcome
2.
Einstein (Säo Paulo) ; 20: eAO6880, 2022. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1384777

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective To describe and compare the number of surgeries, mortality rate, length of hospital stay, and costs of transurethral resection of the prostate and open prostatectomy for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia, between 2008 and 2018, in the Public Health System in São Paulo, Brazil. Methods Ecological and retrospective study using data from the informatics department of the Brazilian Public Health System database. Procedure codes were "open prostatectomy" and "transurethral resection of the prostate." The outcomes analyzed were compared between transurethral resection of the prostate and open prostatectomy according to the hospital surgical volume and presence or absence of a residency program. Results A total of 18,874 surgeries were analyzed (77% transurethral resection of the prostate) and overall mortality was not statistically different between procedures. Intermediate and high-volume centers had shorter length of hospital stay than low-volume centers for transurethral resection of the prostate (3.28, 3.02, and 6.58 days, respectively, p=0.01 and p=0.004). Length of hospital stay was also shorter for open prostatectomy in high-volume compared to low-volume centers (4.86 versus 10.76 days, p=0.036). Intrahospital mortality was inversely associated with surgical volume for transurethral resection of the prostate. Centers with residency program had shorter length of hospital stay considering open prostatectomy and less mortality regarding transurethral resection of the prostate. Open prostatectomy was 64% more expensive than transurethral resection of the prostate. Conclusion The findings suggest the importance of investing in specialized centers, which could be potential referral centers for surgical cases.

3.
World J Urol ; 38(7): 1663-1684, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31595314

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate safety and efficacy of different endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) techniques, by comparing laser (L-EEP) and non-laser (NL-EEP) procedures; and EEP versus other endoscopic non-enucleation (ENE) surgeries for benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed for randomized clinical trials (RCT) that compared different endoscopic treatments for BPE, between 1982 and 2018. Two analyses were performed: (1) EEP versus ENE; and (2) L-EEP versus NL-EEP. Efficacy was assessed using perioperative data (removed tissue volume, operation time (OT), catheterization time, length of hospital stay); and functional outcomes [IPSS, IIEF-5, maximum flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual volume (PVR), quality of life (QoL)]. Safety was assessed through complications (Hb and sodium decrease, transfusion rate). Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan® 5.3. RESULTS: Out of 35 RCTs (4066 patients), 31 (3909 patients) evaluated EEP versus ENE, and 4 (327 patients) evaluated L-EEP versus NL-EEP. EEP presented greater Qmax. Also, EEP presented less catheterization time, length of hospital stay, Hb decrease, transfusion rate. OT and bladder injury were greater with EEP. There were no significant differences between other items. L-EEP removed more tissue volume, with a smaller drop in serum Hb. There were no significant differences in other perioperative data, functional outcomes, complications. CONCLUSIONS: EEP and ENE are effective and safe for treating BPE. Perioperative data favors EEP. Statistical differences, with questionable clinical significance in functional outcomes and complication rates were encountered. L-EEP provides greater tissue removal and smaller Hb decrease then NL-EEP, with similar functional profiles.


Subject(s)
Endoscopy , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatic Hyperplasia/surgery , Endoscopy/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome
6.
ABCD (São Paulo, Impr.) ; 11(2): 42-7, abr.-jun. 1996. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-201043

ABSTRACT

O diabetes mellitus constitui afecçäo de elevada prevalência, morbidade e mortalidade em todo o mundo. O diabetes mellitus representa atualmente a terceira doença mais comum e a oitava causa de morte nos Estados Unidos. Esta doença acomete cerca de 5 por cento da populaçäo geral naquele pais e aproximadamente 15 por cento destes pacientes representam diabetes insulino-depedente (diabetes mellitus tipo 1, forma juvenil da doença), numeros estes semelhantes no Brasil...


Subject(s)
Humans , Kidney Transplantation , Diabetes Mellitus/complications , Pancreas Transplantation/methods , Surgical Procedures, Operative , Immunosuppression Therapy/methods
7.
Mednews ; 4(9): 23-6, out. 1986.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-47448

ABSTRACT

Os autores apresentam um caso de paciente com feocromocitoma, interna no hospital com diagnóstico de síndrome hipertensiva e tumor de supra-renal, abordando aspectos dos exames laboratoriais e de imagem, do preparo operatório e do tratamento cirúrgico. Uma discusäo atual é apresentada sobre estes aspectos, ressaltando a importância do plano cirúrgico em tumor grande como o do presente caso; além de um resumo sobre os critérios atuais de determinaçäo de malignidade do feocromocitoma e seu prognóstico a longo prazo


Subject(s)
Adult , Humans , Female , Adrenal Gland Neoplasms , Pheochromocytoma , Preoperative Care , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Urography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...