Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 38(1): 276, 2023 Dec 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38040936

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the surgical management of sigmoid diverticular disease (SDD) before, during, and after the first containment rules (CR) for the first wave of COVID-19. METHODS: From the French Surgical Association multicenter series, this study included all patients operated on between January 2018 and September 2021. Three groups were compared: A (before CR period: 01/01/18-03/16/20), B (CR period: 03/17/20-05/03/20), and C (post CR period: 05/04/20-09/30/21). RESULTS: A total of 1965 patients (A n = 1517, B n = 52, C n = 396) were included. The A group had significantly more previous SDD compared to the two other groups (p = 0.007), especially complicated (p = 0.0004). The rate of peritonitis was significantly higher in the B (46.1%) and C (38.4%) groups compared to the A group (31.7%) (p = 0.034 and p = 0.014). As regards surgical treatment, Hartmann's procedure was more often performed in the B group (44.2%, vs A 25.5% and C 26.8%, p = 0.01). Mortality at 90 days was significantly higher in the B group (9.6%, vs A 4% and C 6.3%, p = 0.034). This difference was also significant between the A and B groups (p = 0.048), as well as between the A and C groups (p = 0.05). There was no significant difference between the three groups in terms of postoperative morbidity. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the management of SDD was impacted by COVID-19 at CR, but also after and until September 2021, both on the initial clinical presentation and on postoperative mortality.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diverticulitis, Colonic , Diverticulum , Humans , Anastomosis, Surgical/methods , Colon, Sigmoid/surgery , Colostomy/methods , Diverticulitis, Colonic/surgery , Diverticulitis, Colonic/complications , Diverticulum/complications , Postoperative Complications , Rectum/surgery , Retrospective Studies
2.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 22(1): 201, 2022 Apr 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35448953

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in France and by the time of the diagnosis, 15-25% of patients will suffer from synchronous liver metastases. Surgery associated to neoadjuvant treatment can cure these patients, but few studies focus only on rectal cancer. This study was meant to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent a simultaneous resection to those who underwent a staged resection (rectum first or liver first) in the University Hospital of Tours, France. METHODS: We assessed retrospectively a prospective maintained data base about the clinical, pathological and survival outcomes of patients who underwent a simultaneous or a staged resection in our center between 2010 and 2018. A propensity score matching was used, considering the initial characteristics of our groups. RESULTS: There were 70 patients (55/15 males, female respectively) with median age 60 (54-68) years. After matching 48 (69%) of them underwent a staged approach and 22 (31%) a simultaneous approach were compared. After PSM, there were 22 patients in each group. No differences were found in terms of morbidity (p = 0.210), overall survival (p = 0.517) and disease-free survival (p = 0.691) at 3 years after matching. There were significantly less recurrences in the simultaneous group (50% vs 81.8%, p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous resection of the rectal primary cancer and synchronous liver metastases is safe and feasible with no difference in terms of survival.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Liver Neoplasms , Rectal Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Hepatectomy/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Propensity Score , Prospective Studies , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
Transplant Proc ; 54(3): 731-733, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35282891

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although a short and nonredundant anastomosis is most often performed in liver transplantation, there is no strong evidence in the literature about the ideal arterial reconstruction. We describe here the "long-artery" technique that enables a wide side-to-end anastomosis and preserves arterial length. METHODS: We present the results between 2011 and 2019 of the "long-artery" technique performed in our center. Patients with a split liver transplantation or aortohepatic conduits were not included. This technique uses the whole arterial axis of the graft. A side-to-end anastomosis is performed between the common and/or proper hepatic artery of the recipient, and the celiac trunk with an aortic patch of the graft, while the gastroduodenal artery of the recipient is preserved. An omental flap is positioned under the graft artery to prevent kinking. RESULTS: Eight hundred thirty-two transplant patients were included in the analysis. Early hepatic artery thrombosis was diagnosed in 22 (2.6%) patients and occurred within the first 10 days after the procedure. A thrombectomy was performed in 7 patients, which was successful in 4 patients, and 18 patients were retransplanted. Seven patients (0.8%) developed a late hepatic artery thrombosis, including 2 patients who were retransplanted. CONCLUSIONS: The "long-artery" technique is a safe and efficient technique for arterial reconstruction in liver transplantation and does not seem to increase the rate of early hepatic artery thrombosis.


Subject(s)
Liver Transplantation , Thrombosis , Anastomosis, Surgical/methods , Celiac Artery/surgery , Hepatic Artery/surgery , Humans , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Liver Transplantation/methods , Thrombosis/surgery , Vascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Vascular Surgical Procedures/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...