ABSTRACT
Purpose of review: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) and myositis are two different entities that may coexist as an overlap syndrome. Immunological biomarkers such as anti-PM/Scl or anti-Ku reinforce the syndrome. This review is focused on the treatment of different and characteristic manifestations of this syndrome. Recent findings: Among the different phenotypes of muscle involvement in patients with SSc, the fibrotic pattern and the sporadic inclusion body myositis must be identified early to avoid a futile immunosuppressive treatment. Other forms such as dermatomyositis, non-specific myositis and immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy need to receive conventional immunosuppressive therapy considering that high dose of glucocorticoids may induce a scleroderma renal crisis in patients with SSc. Physicians must be aware of the existence of a "double trouble" association of hereditary myopathy with an autoimmune phenomenon. Several autoantibodies, mainly anti-PM/Scl and anti-Ku may help to define specific phenotypes with characteristic clinical manifestations that need a more specific therapy. Vasculopathy is one of the underlying mechanisms that link SSc and myositis. Recent advances in this topic are reviewed. Summary: Current treatment of SSc associated myopathy must be tailored to specific organs involved. Identifying the specific clinical, pathological, and immunological phenotypes may help to take the correct therapeutic decisions.
ABSTRACT
Purpose of the Review: Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are a heterogeneous group of autoimmune disorders. The presence of different autoantibodies allows clinicians to define distinct phenotypes. Antibodies against the melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 gene, also called anti-MDA5 antibodies, are associated with a characteristic phenotype, the clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis with rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease. This review aims to analyze the different pharmacological options for the treatment of rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease in patients with anti-MDA5 antibodies. Recent Findings: Evidence-based therapeutic recommendations suggest that the best initial approach to treat these patients is an early combination of immunosuppressive drugs including either glucocorticoids and calcineurin inhibitors or a triple therapy adding intravenous cyclophosphamide. Tofacitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, could be useful according to recent reports. High ferritin plasma levels, generalized worsening of pulmonary infiltrates, and ground-glass opacities should be considered predictive factors of a bad outcome. In this scenario, clinicians should consider rescue therapies such as therapeutic plasma exchange, polymyxin-B hemoperfusion, veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or even lung transplantation. Summary: Combined immunosuppressive treatment should be considered the first-line therapy for patients with anti-MDA5 rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease. Aggressive rescue therapies may be useful in refractory patients.
