18F-Fluorocholine PET/CT of Incidental Male Breast Cancer.

Breast cancer is approximately 100 times less common among men. Estrogen-related receptor α was detected in human prostate cancer tissue, and androgen receptors are expressed in both normal and malignant breast tissue. Thus, prostate cancer hormonal therapy may increase breast cancer risk. A 67-year-old man with prostate cancer history presented with rising prostate-specific antigen level. F-Fluorocholine PET/CT showed intense uptake in his right breast and moderate uptake in right axillary lymph node. Complementary F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated more intense tracer uptakes in both the right breast and axillary lymph node. Breast histological findings were invasive ductal cancer, with axillary lymph node invasion.

Harmonization of the Volume of Interest Delineation among All Eleven Radiotherapy Centers in the North of France.

BACKGROUND: Inter-observer delineation variation has been detailed for many years in almost every tumor location. Inadequate delineation can impair the chance of cure and/or increase toxicity. The aim of our original work was to prospectively improve the homogeneity of delineation among all of the senior radiation oncologists in the Nord-Pas de Calais region, irrespective of the conditions of practice. METHODS: All 11 centers were involved. The first studied cancer was prostate cancer. Three clinical cases were studied: a low-risk prostate cancer case (case 1), a high-risk prostate cancer case (pelvic nodes, case 2) and a case of post-operative biochemical elevated PSA (case 3). All of the involved physicians delineated characteristically the clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk. The volumes were compared using validated indexes: the volume ratio (VR), common and additional volumes (CV and AV), volume overlap (VO) and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). A second delineation of the same three cases was performed after discussion of the slice results and the choice of shared guidelines to evaluate homogenization. A comparative analysis of the indexes before and after discussion was conducted using the Wilcoxon test for paired samples. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. RESULTS: The indexes were not improved in case 1, for which the inter-observer agreement was considered good after the first comparison (DSC = 0.83 ± 0.06). In case 2, the second comparison showed homogenization of the CTV delineation with a significant improvement in CV (81.4 ± 11.7 vs. 88.6 ± 10.26, respectively, p = 0.048), VO (0.41 ± 0.09 vs. 0.47 ± 0.07, respectively; p = 0.009) and DSC (0.58 ± 0.09 vs. 0.63 ± 0.07, respectively; p = 0.0098). In case 3, VR and AV were significantly improved: VR: 1.71(± 0.6) vs. 1.34(± 0.46), respectively, p = 0.0034; AV: 46.58(± 14.50) vs. 38.08(± 15.10), respectively, p = 0.0024. DSC was not improved, but it was already superior to 0.6 in the first comparison. CONCLUSION: Our prospective work showed that a collaborative discussion about clinical cases and the choice of shared guidelines within an established framework improved the homogeneity of CTV delineation among the senior radiation oncologists in our region.

Surgical resection and radiotherapy for primary retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-five patients were consecutively treated for primary retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma with surgery in combination with radiation therapy in the same institution. The median follow-up time was 53 months (7-108). RESULTS: Seventeen (38%) patients had clear microscopic margins (R0 resection), 26 patients (58%) had gross complete surgical excision (R1 resection) and two patients (4%) had a macroscopic residual disease (R2 resection). External radiotherapy doses ranged from 40.8 to 59.4 Gy (mean and median: 49 Gy). Seventeen patients underwent intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT). Moreover, 11 patients received chemotherapy. The overall 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival for all 45 patients were 93, 85 and 60%, respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year locoregional relapse-free rate for the whole group was 91, 70 and 40%, respectively. In univariate analysis, quality of surgery was the only variable to show a significant effect for overall survival (P=0.0386) and for local control (P=0.0059). Tumor size and tumor grade had no statistically significant effect. For the patients receiving IORT+external beam radiation therapy, no difference was observed for survival or locoregional control. The most frequent acute side effects treatment complications were radiation-induced nausea or vomiting (42%) and moderate enteritis (30%). Significant late morbidity was observed for two patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the feasibility of external postoperative radiotherapy with an acceptable level of toxicity. However, the high rate of local relapses (especially in field of radiation) does not demonstrate the usefulness of radiotherapy at the level of dose used and further preferably randomized studies should be planned.