Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Biosens Bioelectron ; 239: 115591, 2023 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37634421

ABSTRACT

Bottom-up neuroscience utilizes small, engineered biological neural networks to study neuronal activity in systems of reduced complexity. We present a platform that establishes up to six independent networks formed by primary rat neurons on planar complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) microelectrode arrays (MEAs). We introduce an approach that allows repetitive stimulation and recording of network activity at any of the over 700 electrodes underlying a network. We demonstrate that the continuous application of a repetitive super-threshold stimulus yields a reproducible network answer within a 15 ms post-stimulus window. This response can be tracked with high spatiotemporal resolution across the whole extent of the network. Moreover, we show that the location of the stimulation plays a significant role in the networks' early response to the stimulus. By applying a stimulation pattern to all network-underlying electrodes in sequence, the sensitivity of the whole network to the stimulus can be visualized. We demonstrate that microchannels reduce the voltage stimulation threshold and induce the strongest network response. By varying the stimulation amplitude and frequency we reveal discrete network transition points. Finally, we introduce vector fields to follow stimulation-induced spike propagation pathways within the network. Overall we show that our defined neural networks on CMOS MEAs enable us to elicit highly reproducible activity patterns that can be precisely modulated by stimulation amplitude, stimulation frequency and the site of stimulation.


Subject(s)
Biosensing Techniques , Animals , Rats , Microelectrodes , Neural Networks, Computer , Neurons , Oxides
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31921805

ABSTRACT

Sub-sensory electrical noise stimulation has been shown to improve motor performance in tasks that mainly rely on proprioceptive feedback. During the execution of movements such as reaching, proprioceptive feedback combines dynamically with visual feedback. It is still unclear whether boosting proprioceptive information in tasks where proprioception mixes with vision can influence motor performance. To better understand this point, we tested the effect of electrical noise stimulation applied superficially to the muscle spindles during four different experiments consisting of isometric reaching tasks under different visual feedback conditions. The first experiment (n = 40) consisted of a reach-and-hold task where subjects had to hold a cursor on a target for 30 s and had visual feedback removed 10 s into the task. Subjects performed 30 repetitions of this task with different stimulation levels, including no stimulation. We observed that trials in which the stimulation was present displayed smaller movement variability. Moreover, we observed a positive correlation between the level of stimulation and task performance. The other three experiments consisted of three versions of an isometric visuomotor adaptation task where subjects were asked to reach to random targets in <1.5 s (otherwise incurring in negative feedback) while overcoming a 45° clockwise rotation in the mapping between the force exerted and the movement of the cursor. The three experiments differed in the visual feedback presented to the subjects, with one group (n = 20) performing the experiment with full visual feedback, one (n = 10) with visual feedback restricted only to the beginning of the trajectory, and one (n = 10) without visual feedback of the trajectory. All subjects performed their experiment twice, with and without stimulation. We did not observe substantial effects of the stimulation when visual feedback was present (either completely or partially). We observed a limited effect of the stimulation in the absence of visual feedback consisting in a significant smaller number of negative-feedback trials and a significant smaller movement time in the first block of the adaptation phase. Our results suggest that sub-sensory stimulation can be beneficial when proprioception is the main feedback modality but mostly ineffective in tasks where visual feedback is actively employed.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...