Predicting return of lung function after a pulmonary exacerbation using the cystic fibrosis respiratory symptom diary-chronic respiratory infection symptom scale.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary exacerbations (PExs) in people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF) are associated with increased healthcare costs, decreased quality of life and the risk for permanent decline in lung function. Symptom burden, the continuous physiological and emotional symptoms on an individual related to their disease, may be a useful tool for monitoring PwCF during a PEx, and identifying individuals at high risk for permanent decline in lung function. The purpose of this study was to investigate if the degree of symptom burden severity, measured by the Cystic Fibrosis Respiratory Symptom Diary (CFRSD)- Chronic Respiratory Infection Symptom Scale (CRISS), at the onset of a PEx can predict failure to return to baseline lung function by the end of treatment. METHODS: A secondary analysis of a longitudinal, observational study (N = 56) was conducted. Data was collected at four time points: year-prior-to-enrollment annual appointment, termed "baseline", day 1 of PEx diagnosis, termed "Visit 1", day 10-21 of PEx diagnosis, termed "Visit 2" and two-weeks post-hospitalization, termed "Visit 3". A linear regression model was performed to analyze the research question. RESULTS: A regression model predicted that recovery of lung function decreased by 0.2 points for every increase in CRISS points, indicating that participants with a CRISS score greater than 48.3 were at 14% greater risk of not recovering to baseline lung function by Visit 2, than people with lower scores. CONCLUSION: Monitoring CRISS scores in PwCF is an efficient, reliable, non-invasive way to determine a person's status at the beginning of a PEx. The results presented in this paper support the usefulness of studying symptoms in the context of PEx in PwCF.

Symptom phenotyping in people with cystic fibrosis during acute pulmonary exacerbations using machine-learning K-means clustering analysis.

INTRODUCTION: People with cystic fibrosis (PwCF) experience frequent symptoms associated with chronic lung disease. A complication of CF is a pulmonary exacerbation (PEx), which is often preceded by an increase in symptoms and a decline in lung function. A symptom cluster is when two or more symptoms co-occur and are related; symptom clusters have contributed meaningful knowledge in other diseases. The purpose of this study is to discover symptom clustering patterns in PwCF during a PEx to illuminate symptom phenotypes and assess differences in recovery from PExs. METHODS: This study was a secondary, longitudinal analysis (N = 72). Participants at least 10 years of age and being treated with intravenous antibiotics for a CF PEx were enrolled in the United States. Symptoms were collected on treatment days 1-21 using the CF Respiratory Symptom Diary (CFRSD)-Chronic Respiratory Symptom Score (CRISS). K-means clustering was computed on day 1 symptom data to detect clustering patterns. Linear regression and multi-level growth models were performed. RESULTS: Symptoms significantly clustered based on severity: low symptom (LS)-phenotype (n = 42), high symptom (HS)-phenotype (n = 30). HS-phenotype had worse symptoms and CRISS scores (p< 0.01) than LS-phenotype. HS-phenotype was associated with spending 5 more nights in the hospital annually (p< 0.01) than LS-phenotype. HS-phenotype had worse symptoms over 21 days than LS-phenotype (p< 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Symptoms significantly cluster on day 1 of a CF-PEx. PwCF with HS-phenotype spend more nights in the hospital and are less likely to experience the same resolution in symptoms by the end of PEx treatment than LS-phenotype.

A longitudinal analysis of respiratory symptoms in people with cystic fibrosis with advanced lung disease on and off ETI.

People with CF (PwCF), particularly those with advanced lung disease (ALD), experience frequent respiratory symptoms. A major CF breakthrough was the approval of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) in 2019, which has been shown to improve symptoms and lung function in the CF population, and decrease pulmonary exacerbations. The purpose of this study was to analyze longitudinal changes in respiratory symptoms over 24 months in ETI-treated and untreated PwCF with ALD Symptoms were measured among CF adults with ppFEV1 < 40% (N = 48, 24 ETI-treated, 24 untreated) using the CFRSD-CRISS and the CFQ-R [respiratory]. Two multilevel growth models assessed the rate of change in symptoms overall and within the ETI-treated and untreated groups. PwCF on ETI had significantly lower symptom severity over 24 months than those not on ETI as measured by the CRISS and CFQ-R. The ETI-treated group maintained an -11.7 and +19.3 point difference(p<0.01) in CRISS and CFQ-R scores over the study compared to the non-ETI group, achieving minimal clinically important differences on average between groups on both instruments. No change in the symptom burden trajectory between groups was observed (p = 0.58). Even with ALD, ETI-treated PwCF have a lower respiratory burden than those not on ETI. This may be confounded by survivorship bias in the non-ETI group. Of note, in this ALD cohort, neither instrument demonstrated ceiling effects. Our results suggest that, while ETI has significantly improved the lived experience, PwCF with ALD are still plagued by respiratory symptoms.

Predicting return of lung function after a pulmonary exacerbation using the cystic fibrosis respiratory symptom diary-chronic respiratory infection symptom scale.

Background: Pulmonary exacerbations (PExs) in people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF) are associated with increased healthcare costs, decreased quality of life and the risk for permanent decline in lung function. Symptom burden, the continuous physiological and emotional symptoms on an individual related to their disease, may be a useful tool for monitoring PwCF during a PEx, and identifying individuals at high risk for permanent decline in lung function. The purpose of this study was to investigate if the degree of symptom burden severity, measured by the Cystic Fibrosis Respiratory Symptom Diary (CFRSD)- Chronic Respiratory Infection Symptom Scale (CRISS), at the onset of a PEx can predict failure to return to baseline lung function by the end of treatment. Methods: A secondary analysis of a longitudinal, observational study (N = 56) was conducted. Data was collected at four time points: year-prior-to-enrollment annual appointment, termed "baseline", day 1 of PEx diagnosis, termed "Visit 1", day 10-21 of PEx diagnosis, termed "Visit 2" and two-weeks post-hospitalization, termed "Visit 3". A linear regression model was performed to analyze the research question. Results: A regression model predicted that recovery of lung function decreased by 0.2 points for every increase in CRISS points, indicating that participants with a CRISS score greater than 48.3 were at 14% greater risk of not recovering to baseline lung function by Visit 2, than people with lower scores. Conclusion: Monitoring CRISS scores in PwCF is an efficient, reliable, non-invasive way to determine a person's status at the beginning of a PEx. The results presented in this paper support the usefulness of studying symptoms in the context of PEx in PwCF.

Patient perspectives on elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor after lung transplant.

Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators, including elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI), significantly improve outcomes and quality of life for people with cystic fibrosis (CF). However, little is known about how lung transplant recipients (LTRs) perceive the use of ETI. We conducted a survey to assess perspectives on ETI among LTRs with CF at our lung transplant program. Of 81 CF LTRs, 46 participants (58 %) responded. The majority of respondents (88 %) were aware of ETI. Over 80 % considered treating non-lung symptoms of CF to be very important. Concerns regarding ETI included potential drug interactions with transplant medications (77 %), side effects (53 %), cost of medication (49 %), and lack of clinical trial data for LTRs (43 %). Half reported they would only consider taking ETI if their CF or transplant doctor recommended it. The findings suggest that CF LTRs seek informational support and shared decision-making about ETI from their clinicians.