Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 111
Filter
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(10): e2337011, 2023 10 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37812418

ABSTRACT

Importance: Depression is a common mental health disorder in the US. Depressive symptoms have been associated with increased cardiovascular disease incidence and mortality, but studies have largely focused on narrow population subgroups. Objective: To examine the association between depressive symptoms and mortality in a large, diverse, nationally representative sample of US adults, and to examine how lifestyle factors mediate this association. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a prospective cohort study of a nationally representative sample of US adults using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005 to 2018 data linked with the National Death Index through 2019 for adults aged 20 years and older. Data were analyzed between March 1 and May 26, 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: All-cause, cardiovascular disease, and ischemic heart disease mortality. Depressive symptoms were defined by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores and were categorized as none or minimal, mild, and moderate to severe. Secondarily, we assessed degree of mediation by lifestyle factors. Results: A total of 23 694 participants were included (unweighted n = 11 862 male [weighted 49.8%]; mean [SE] age, 44.7 [0.24] years). Prevalences of mild and moderate to severe depression were 14.9% and 7.2%, respectively. For all-cause mortality, hazard ratios were 1.35 (95% CI, 1.07-1.72) for mild depressive symptoms vs none and 1.62 (95% CI, 1.24-2.12) for moderate to severe depressive symptoms vs none. The corresponding hazard ratios were 1.49 (95% CI, 1.11-2.00) and 1.79 (95% CI, 1.22-2.62) for cardiovascular disease mortality and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.58-1.60) and 2.21 (95% CI, 1.24-3.91) for ischemic heart disease mortality. The associations were largely consistent across subgroups. Approximately 11.0% to 16.1% of the associations between depression and mortality could be explained by lifestyle factors. Feeling tired or having little energy, poor appetite or overeating, and having little interest in doing things were independently associated with all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality but not with ischemic heart disease mortality. Conclusions and Relevance: In this prospective cohort study of a nationally representative sample of US adults, there was a graded positive association between depressive symptoms and mortality. Public health efforts to improve awareness and treatment of depression and associated risk factors could support a comprehensive, nationwide strategy to reduce the burden of depression.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Myocardial Ischemia , Adult , Humans , Male , Depression/psychology , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Nutrition Surveys , Myocardial Ischemia/epidemiology
2.
J Clin Lipidol ; 17(2): 225-235, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36878764

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Blood Cholesterol Guideline was published in 2013 (2013 Cholesterol Guideline) and the Multi-society Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol in 2018 (2018 Cholesterol Guideline). OBJECTIVE: To compare differences in population level estimates for statin recommendations and use between guidelines. METHODS: Using four 2-year cycles from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2011-2018), we analyzed data from 8,642 non-pregnant adults aged ≥20 years with complete information for blood cholesterol measurements and other cardiovascular risk factors used to define treatment recommendations in the 2013 or 2018 Cholesterol Guidelines. We compared the prevalence of statin recommendations and use between the guidelines, overall and among patient management groups. RESULTS: Under the 2013 Cholesterol Guideline, an estimated 77.8 million (33.6%) adults would be recommended statins, compared to 46.1 million (19.9%) recommended and 50.1 million (21.6%) considered for statins by the 2018 Cholesterol Guideline. Statin use among those recommended treatment was similar utilizing the 2018 Cholesterol Guideline (47.4%) compared to the 2013 Cholesterol Guideline (47.0%). Differences were observed across demographic and patient management groups. CONCLUSION: Compared to the 2013 Cholesterol Guideline, the prevalence of statin recommendations decreased utilizing the 2018 Cholesterol Guideline algorithm, though additional persons would be considered for treatment after risk factor assessment and patient-clinician discussion under the 2018 Cholesterol Guideline. Statin use was suboptimal (<50%) for those recommended treatment under either guideline. Optimizing patient-clinician risk discussions and shared decision making may be needed to improve treatment rates.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors , United States/epidemiology , Adult , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Nutrition Surveys , Cardiovascular Diseases/drug therapy , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Risk Factors , Cholesterol , American Heart Association
3.
Ann Intern Med ; 175(11): 1493-1500, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36191316

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Obesity increases the risk for metabolic and cardiovascular disease, and this risk occurs at lower body mass index (BMI) thresholds in Asian adults than in White adults. The degree to which obesity prevalence varies across heterogeneous Asian American subgroups is unclear because most obesity estimates combine all Asian Americans into a single group. OBJECTIVE: To quantify obesity prevalence in Asian American subgroups among U.S. adults using both standard BMI categorizations and categorizations tailored to Asian populations. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: United States, 2013 to 2020. PARTICIPANTS: The analytic sample included 2 882 158 adults aged 18 years or older in the U.S. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys (2013 to 2020). Participants self-identified as non-Hispanic White ([NHW] n = 2 547 965); non-Hispanic Black ([NHB] n = 263 136); or non-Hispanic Asian ([NHA] n = 71 057), comprising Asian Indian (n = 13 916), Chinese (n = 11 686), Filipino (n = 11 815), Japanese (n = 12 473), Korean (n = 3634), and Vietnamese (n = 2618) Americans. MEASUREMENTS: Obesity prevalence adjusted for age and sex calculated using both standard BMI thresholds (≥30 kg/m2) and BMI thresholds modified for Asian adults (≥27.5 kg/m2), based on self-reported height and weight. RESULTS: Adjusted obesity prevalence (by standard categorization) was 11.7% (95% CI, 11.2% to 12.2%) in NHA, 39.7% (CI, 39.4% to 40.1%) in NHB, and 29.4% (CI, 29.3% to 29.5%) in NHW participants; the prevalence was 16.8% (CI, 15.2% to 18.5%) in Filipino, 15.3% (CI, 13.2% to 17.5%) in Japanese, 11.2% (CI, 10.2% to 12.2%) in Asian Indian, 8.5% (CI, 6.8% to 10.5%) in Korean, 6.5% (CI, 5.5% to 7.5%) in Chinese, and 6.3% (CI, 5.1% to 7.8%) in Vietnamese Americans. The prevalence using modified criteria (BMI ≥27.5 kg/m2) was 22.4% (CI, 21.8% to 23.1%) in NHA participants overall and 28.7% (CI, 26.8% to 30.7%) in Filipino, 26.7% (CI, 24.1% to 29.5%) in Japanese, 22.4% (CI, 21.1% to 23.7%) in Asian Indian, 17.4% (CI, 15.2% to 19.8%) in Korean, 13.6% (CI, 11.7% to 15.9%) in Vietnamese, and 13.2% (CI, 12.0% to 14.5%) in Chinese Americans. LIMITATION: Body mass index estimates rely on self-reported data. CONCLUSION: Substantial heterogeneity in obesity prevalence exists among Asian American subgroups in the United States. Future studies and public health efforts should consider this heterogeneity. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.


Subject(s)
Asian , Obesity , Humans , Adult , United States/epidemiology , Prevalence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Obesity/epidemiology , Body Mass Index
4.
Am J Hypertens ; 35(11): 923-928, 2022 11 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36066190

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hypertension, defined as blood pressure (BP) ≥130/80 mm Hg or antihypertensive medication use, affects approximately half of US adults, and appropriately sized BP cuffs are important for accurate BP measurement and hypertension management. METHODS: This cross-sectional study analyzed 13,038 US adults (≥18 years) in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2015-March 2020 cycles. Recommended BP cuff sizes were categorized based on mid-arm circumference: small adult (≤26 cm), adult (>26 to ≤34 cm), large adult (>34 to ≤44 cm), and extra-large adult (>44 cm). Analyses were weighted and proportions were extrapolated to the US population. RESULTS: Among US adults (246 million), recommended cuff sizes were: 6% (16 million) small adult, 51% adult (125 million), 40% large adult (98 million), and 3% extra-large adult (8 million). Among adults with hypertension (116 million), large or extra-large cuffs were needed by over half (51%) overall, including 65% of those aged 18-34 years and 84% of those with obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2). By race/ethnicity, the proportion needing a large or extra-large cuff was 57% of non-Hispanic Black adults, 54% of Hispanic adults, 51% of non-Hispanic White adults, and 23% of non-Hispanic Asian adults. Approximately 40% of adults with hypertension in Medicare needed a large or extra-large cuff, compared to 54% for private insurance and 53% for Medicaid. CONCLUSIONS: Over half of US adults with hypertension need a large or extra-large BP cuff.


Subject(s)
Hypertension , Medicare , Adult , Aged , United States , Humans , Blood Pressure/physiology , Nutrition Surveys , Cross-Sectional Studies
5.
Obesity (Silver Spring) ; 30(9): 1887-1897, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35924441

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Ultraprocessed food (UPF) intake is associated with BMI, but effects on regional adipose depots or related to minimally processed food (MPF) intake are unknown. METHODS: Data included 12,297 adults in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2011 to 2016. This study analyzed associations between usual percentage of kilocalories from UPFs and MPFs and three adiposity indicators: supine sagittal abdominal diameter to height ratio (SADHtR, estimates visceral adiposity); waist circumference to height ratio (WHtR, estimates abdominal adiposity); and BMI, using linear and multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: Standardized ß coefficients per 10% increase in UPF intake were 0.0926, 0.0846, and 0.0791 for SADHtR, WHtR, and BMI, respectively (all p < 0.001; p > 0.26 for pairwise differences). For MPF intake, the ß coefficients were -0.0901, -0.0806, and -0.0688 (all p < 0.001; p > 0.18 pairwise). Adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) for adiposity tertile 3 versus tertile 1 (comparing UPF intake quartiles 2, 3, and 4 to quartile 1) were 1.33 (1.22-1.45), 1.67 (1.43-1.95), and 2.24 (1.76-2.86), respectively, for SADHtR; 1.31 (1.19-1.44), 1.62 (1.37-1.91), and 2.13 (1.63-2.78), respectively, for WHtR; and 1.27 (1.16-1.39), 1.53 (1.31-1.79), and 1.96 (1.53-2.51), respectively, for BMI. MPF intake showed inverse associations with similar trends in association strength. CONCLUSIONS: Among US adults, abdominal and visceral adiposity indictors were positively associated with UPFs and inversely associated with MPFs.


Subject(s)
Adiposity , Obesity , Adult , Body Mass Index , Eating , Humans , Nutrition Surveys , Obesity/complications , Obesity/epidemiology , Obesity, Abdominal/complications , Obesity, Abdominal/epidemiology , Waist Circumference
6.
Am J Hypertens ; 35(6): 514-525, 2022 06 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35380626

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Controlled blood pressure can prevent or reduce adverse health outcomes. Social and structural determinants may contribute to the disparity that despite equivalent proportions on antihypertensive medication, non-Hispanic Black (Black) adults have lower blood pressure control and more cardiovascular events than non-Hispanic White (White) adults. METHODS: Data from 2013 to 2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were pooled to assess control among Black and White adults by antihypertensive medication use and selected characteristics using the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Blood Pressure Guideline definition (systolic blood pressure <130 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure <80 mm Hg) among 4,739 adults. RESULTS: Among those treated with antihypertensive medication, an estimated 34.9% of Black and 45.0% of White adults had controlled blood pressure. Control was lower for Black and White adults among most subgroups of age, sex, education, insurance status, usual source of care, and poverty-income ratio. Black adults had higher use of diuretics (28.5%-Black adults vs. 23.5%-White adults) and calcium channel blockers (24.2%-Black adults vs. 14.7%-White adults) compared with White adults. Control among Black adults was lower than White adults across all medication classes including diuretics (36.1%-Black adults vs. 47.3%-White adults), calcium channel blockers (30.2%-Black adults vs. 40.1%-White adults), and number of medication classes used. CONCLUSIONS: Suboptimal blood pressure control rates and disparities warrant increased efforts to improve control, which could include addressing social and structural determinants along with emphasizing implementation of the 2017 ACC/AHA Blood Pressure Guideline into clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents , Hypertension , Adult , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Pressure , Calcium Channel Blockers/therapeutic use , Diuretics/therapeutic use , Humans , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/epidemiology , Nutrition Surveys , United States/epidemiology
8.
J Adolesc Health ; 70(2): 249-257, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34716093

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Studies of the association between ultraprocessed foods (UPF) and cardiovascular disease risk factors have been mainly focused on the adult population. This study examined the association between usual percentage of calories (%kcal) from UPF and the American Heart Association's seven cardiovascular health (CVH) metrics among U.S. adolescents aged 12-19 years. METHODS: We used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2018 (n = 5,565). The NOVA food system was used to classify UPF according to the extent and purpose of food processing. Each CVH metric was given a score of 0, 1, or 2 (poor, intermediate, or ideal health, respectively). Scores of six metrics were summed (excluding diet) to categorize CVH as low (0-7), moderate (8-10), or high (11-12). The National Cancer Institute's methods were used to estimate usual %kcal from UPF. Multivariable linear regression and multinomial logistic regression were used to evaluate the association between UPF and CVH. RESULTS: Among youth, 12.1% had low CVH, 56.3% moderate, and 31.6% high. The mean usual %kcal from UPF was 65.7%. Every 5% increase in calories from UPF was associated with .13 points lower CVH scores (p < .001). Comparing Q2, Q3, and Q4 to Q1 of UPF intake, the adjusted odds ratios for low versus high CVH were 1.43 (95% confidence interval 1.16-1.76), 1.86 (1.29-2.66), and 2.59 (1.49-4.55), respectively. The pattern of association was largely consistent across subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: U.S. adolescents consume about two thirds of daily calorie from UPF. There was a graded inverse association between %kcal from UPF and CVH score.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Energy Intake , Adolescent , Adult , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Child , Diet , Eating , Food Handling , Humans , Nutrition Surveys , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
9.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 70(42): 1478-1482, 2021 Oct 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34673747

ABSTRACT

Hypertension, which can be brought on by excess sodium intake, affects nearly one half of U.S. adults and is a major risk factor for heart disease, the leading cause of death in the United States (1). In 2019, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) established the Chronic Disease Risk Reduction (CDRR) intake, a chronic-disease-specific recommendation for dietary sodium of 2,300 mg/day. Reducing daily sodium to CDRR intake is expected to reduce chronic disease risk among healthy persons, primarily by lowering blood pressure (2). Although the 2019 sodium CDRR intake is equivalent in number to the 2005 Tolerable Upper Limit (UL) released by NASEM (then known as the Institute of Medicine), the UL was intended to provide guidance on safe intake levels, not to serve as an intake goal (2). To describe excess sodium intake in the context of the CDRR intake goal, this report analyzed National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from 2003 to 2016 to yield temporal trends in usual sodium intake >2,300 mg/day and in mean sodium intake, unadjusted and adjusted for total energy intake, among U.S. adults aged ≥19 years. The percentage of U.S. adults with sodium intake above CDRR intake was 87.0% during 2003-2004 and 86.7% during 2015-2016. Among U.S. adults overall, no significant linear trend was noted from 2003 to 2016 in unadjusted or energy intake-adjusted mean sodium intake. Small, significant declines were observed in mean usual sodium intake among some groups (adults aged 19-50 years, non-Hispanic White adults, adults experiencing obesity, and adults without hypertension). However, after energy adjustment, only adults aged ≥71 years and Mexican American adults demonstrated significant change in usual sodium intake. Many U.S. adults might be at risk for chronic disease associated with sodium intake above CDRR intake, and efforts to lower sodium intake could improve population cardiovascular health. The results of this report support enhanced efforts to reduce population sodium intake and cardiovascular disease risk, including the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) recently released guidance for the reduction of sodium in the commercially processed, packaged, and prepared food supply.


Subject(s)
Diet/trends , Sodium, Dietary/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Time Factors , United States
10.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 18: E15, 2021 02 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33600303

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Little information is available about racial/ethnic and geographic variations in long-term survival among older patients (≥65) after acute ischemic stroke (AIS). METHODS: We examined data on 1,019,267 Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries aged 66 or older, hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of AIS from 2008 through 2012. Survival was defined as the time from the date of AIS to date of death, or an end of follow-up date of December 31, 2017. We used Cox proportional hazard models to estimate 5-year survival after AIS, adjusted for age, sex, race and Hispanic ethnicity, poverty level, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and state. RESULTS: Among 1,019,267 Medicare FFS beneficiaries hospitalized with AIS from 2008 through 2012, we documented 701,718 deaths (68.8%) during a median of 4 years of follow-up with 4.08 million person-years. The overall adjusted 5-year survival was 44%. Non-Hispanic Black men had the lowest 5-year survival, and 5-year survival varied significantly by state, from the highest at 49.1% (North Dakota) to the lowest at 40.5% (Hawaii). The ranges between the highest and lowest 5-year survival rates across states also varied significantly by racial/ethnic groups, with percentage point differences of 9.6 among non-Hispanic White, 11.3 among non-Hispanic Black, 17.7 among Hispanic, and 28.5 among other racial/ethnic beneficiaries. CONCLUSION: We identified significant racial/ethnic and geographic variations in 5-year survival rates after AIS among 2008-2012 Medicare FFS beneficiaries. Further study is needed to understand the reasons for these variations and develop prevention strategies to improve survival and racial disparities in survival after AIS.


Subject(s)
Brain Ischemia , Ischemic Stroke , Stroke , Aged , Ethnicity , Female , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Male , Medicare , United States/epidemiology
11.
J Immigr Minor Health ; 23(1): 26-34, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32451693

ABSTRACT

Asian Americans are one of the fastest growing races in the US. The objectives of this report were to assess self-reported hypertension prevalence and treatment among Asian Americans. Merging 2013, 2015, and 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data, we estimated self-reported hypertension and antihypertensive medication use among non-Hispanic Asian Americans (NHA) and compared estimates between NHA and non-Hispanic whites (NHW), and by NHA subgroup (Asian Indian, Chinese, Filipino, Japanese, Korean, and Vietnamese/other). The prevalence of hypertension was 20.8% and 33.5%, respectively, for NHAs and NHWs (p < 0.001). Among those with hypertension, the prevalence of antihypertensive medication use was 71.6% and 78.2%, respectively, for NHAs and NHWs (p < 0.001). Among NHA subgroups, a wide range of hypertension prevalence and medication use was found. Overall NHA had a lower reported prevalence of hypertension and use of antihypertensive medication than NHW. Certain NHA subgroups had a burden comparable to high-risk disparate populations.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents , Hypertension , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Asian , Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System , Humans , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/epidemiology , Prevalence , Self Report
12.
Int J Stroke ; 16(7): 855-862, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33308104

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recent studies reported increasing trends in hospitalization of stroke patients aged 35-64 years. AIM: To examine changes in risk factor profiles among patients aged 35-64 years hospitalized with acute ischemic stroke between 2006 and 2017 in the United States. METHODS: We used data from the National Inpatient Sample of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project from 2006 through 2017. Principal ICD-9-CM/ICD-10-CM codes were used to identify acute ischemic stroke hospitalizations, and secondary codes were used to identify the presence of four major stroke risk factors: hypertension, diabetes, lipid disorders, and tobacco use. We used the relative percent change to assess the changes in the prevalence of risk profile between 2006-2007 and 2016-2017 and linear regression models to obtain the p values for the overall trends across six time periods. RESULTS: Approximately 1.5 million acute ischemic stroke hospitalizations occurred during 2006-2017. The prevalence of having all four risk factors increased from 4.1% in 2006-2007 to 9.1% in 2016-2017 (relative percent change 122.0%, p < 0.001 for trend), prevalence of any three risk factors increased from 24.5% to 33.8% (relative percent change 38.0%, p < 0.001). Prevalence of only two risk factors decreased from 36.1% to 32.7% (p < 0.001), only one risk factor decreased from 25.2% to 18.1% (p < 0.001), and absence of risk factors decreased from 10.1% to 6.2% (p < 0.001). The most prevalent triad of risk factors was hypertension, diabetes, and lipid disorders (14.3% in 2006-2007 and 19.8% in 2016-2017), and the most common dyad risk factors was hypertension and lipid disorders (12.6% in 2006-2007 and 11.9% in 2016-2017). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of hospitalized acute ischemic stroke patients aged 35-64 years with all four or any three of four major stroke risk factors increased by 122% and 38%, while those with only one risk factor or no risk factor has declined by 28% and 39%, respectively, from 2006 to 2017. Younger adults are increasingly at higher risk for stroke from preventable and treatable risk factors. This growing public health problem will require clinicians, healthcare systems, and public health efforts to implement more effective prevention strategies among this population.


Subject(s)
Brain Ischemia , Ischemic Stroke , Stroke , Adult , Brain Ischemia/complications , Brain Ischemia/epidemiology , Hospitalization , Humans , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Stroke/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology
13.
Am J Clin Nutr ; 113(2): 428-436, 2021 02 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33021623

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Higher intake of ultraprocessed foods (UPFs) might be associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to examine the association between usual percentage of calories (%kcal) from UPFs and the American Heart Association's "Life's Simple 7" cardiovascular health (CVH) metrics in US adults. METHODS: We analyzed data from 11,246 adults aged ≥20 y from the NHANES 2011-2016 (a cross-sectional, nationally representative survey). UPF designation was assigned on the basis of the NOVA classification system, according to the extent and purpose of food processing. Each CVH metric was given a score of 0, 1, or 2 representing poor, intermediate, or ideal health, respectively. Scores of the 6 metrics (excluding diet) were summed, and CVH was categorized as inadequate (0-4), average (5-8), or optimum (9-12). We used the National Cancer Institute's methods to estimate the usual %kcal from UPFs, and multivariable linear and multinomial logistic regression to assess the association between UPFs and CVH, adjusted for age, sex, race and Hispanic origin, education, and poverty. RESULTS: The weighted prevalence of inadequate, average, and optimum CVH was 8.0%, 51.7%, and 40.3%, respectively. The mean usual %kcal from UPFs was 55.4%, and midpoint of quartiles of intake ranged from 40.4% (quartile 1) to 70.5% (quartile 4). Every 5% increase in calories from UPFs was associated with 0.14 points lower CVH score (P < 0.001). The adjusted ORs for inadequate CVH were 1.40 (95% CI: 1.23, 1.60), 1.82 (1.45, 2.29), and 2.57 (1.79, 3.70), respectively, comparing quartiles 2, 3, and 4 with quartile 1 of UPF intake. The pattern of association was largely consistent across subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Usual %kcal from UPFs represented more than half of total calorie intake in US adults. A graded inverse association between %kcal from UPFs and CVH was observed.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Feeding Behavior , Food Handling , Adult , Aged , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Status , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nutrition Surveys , United States , Young Adult
14.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 69(44): 1617-1621, 2020 Nov 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33151923

ABSTRACT

Stroke is the fifth leading cause of death in the United States (1). In 2017, on average, a stroke-related death occurred every 3 minutes and 35 seconds in the United States, and stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability (1). To prevent mortality or long-term disability, strokes require rapid recognition and early medical intervention (2,3). Common stroke signs and symptoms include sudden numbness or weakness of the face, arm, or leg, especially on one side; sudden confusion or trouble speaking; sudden trouble seeing in one or both eyes; sudden trouble walking, dizziness, or loss of balance; and a sudden severe headache with no known cause. Recommended action at the first sign of a suspected stroke is to quickly request emergency services (i.e., calling 9-1-1) (2). Public education campaigns have emphasized recognizing stroke signs and symptoms and the importance of calling 9-1-1, and stroke knowledge increased 14.7 percentage points from 2009 to 2014 (4). However, disparities in stroke awareness have been reported (4,5). Knowledge of the five signs and symptoms of stroke and the immediate need to call emergency medical services (9-1-1), collectively referred to as "recommended stroke knowledge," was assessed among 26,076 adults aged ≥20 years as part of the 2017 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). The prevalence of recommended stroke knowledge among U.S. adults was 67.5%. Stroke knowledge differed significantly by race and Hispanic origin (p<0.001). The prevalence of recommended stroke knowledge was highest among non-Hispanic White adults (71.3%), followed by non-Hispanic Black adults (64.0%) and Hispanic adults (57.8%). Stroke knowledge also differed significantly by sex, age, education, and urbanicity. After multivariable adjustment, these differences remained significant. Increasing awareness of the signs and symptoms of stroke continues to be a national priority. Estimates from this report can inform public health strategies for increasing awareness of stroke signs and symptoms.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Stroke/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Emergency Medical Dispatch , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
15.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 69(32): 1064-1069, 2020 Aug 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32790654

ABSTRACT

Most U.S. adults consume too much sodium and not enough potassium (1,2). For apparently healthy U.S. adults aged ≥19 years, guidelines recommend reducing sodium intake that exceeds 2,300 mg/day and consuming at least 3,400 mg/day of potassium for males and at least 2,600 mg/day for females* (1). Reducing population-level sodium intake can reduce blood pressure and prevent cardiovascular diseases, the leading causes of death in the United States (1,3). Adequate potassium intake might offset the hypertensive effects of excessive sodium intake (1). Data from the 2015-2016 What We Eat in America (WWEIA) dietary interview component of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)† were analyzed to identify top food categories contributing to sodium and potassium intake for U.S. residents aged ≥1 year. During 2015-2016, 40% of sodium consumed came from the top 10 food categories, which included prepared foods with sodium added (e.g., deli meat sandwiches and pizza). Approximately 43% of potassium consumed was from 10 food categories, which included foods naturally low in sodium (e.g., unflavored milk, fruit, vegetables) and prepared foods. These results can inform efforts to encourage consumption of foods naturally low in sodium, which might have the dual benefit of reducing sodium intake and increasing potassium intake, contributing to cardiovascular disease prevention.


Subject(s)
Food/classification , Potassium, Dietary/analysis , Sodium, Dietary/analysis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Potassium, Dietary/administration & dosage , Risk Assessment , Sodium, Dietary/administration & dosage , Sodium, Dietary/adverse effects , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
16.
Am J Hypertens ; 33(11): 1021-1029, 2020 11 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32701144

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends the use of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) as part of screening and diagnosis of hypertension. The optimal ABPM device for population-based surveys is unknown. METHODS: We compared the proportion of valid blood pressure (BP) readings, mean awake and asleep BP readings, differences between awake ABPM readings and initial standardized BP readings, and sleep experience among three ABPM devices. We randomized a convenience sample of 365 adults to 1 of 3 ABPM devices: Welch Allyn Mobil-O-Graph (WA), Sun Tech Classic Oscar2 (STO) and Spacelabs 90227 (SL). Participants completed sleep quality questionnaires on the nights before and during ABPM testing. RESULTS: The proportions of valid BP readings were not different among the 3 devices (P > 0.45). Mean awake and asleep systolic BP were significantly higher for STO device (WA vs. STO vs. SL: 126.65, 138.09, 127.44 mm Hg; 114.34, 120.34, 113.13 mm Hg; P < 0.0001 for both). The difference between the initial average standardized mercury systolic BP readings and the ABPM mean awake systolic BP was larger for STO device (WA vs. STO. vs. SL: -5.26, -16.24, -5.36 mm Hg; P < 0.0001); diastolic BP mean differences were ~ -6 mm Hg for all 3 devices (P = 0.6). Approximately 55% of participants reported that the devices interfered with sleep; however, there were no sleep differences across the devices (P > 0.4 for all). CONCLUSION: Most of the participants met the threshold of 70% valid readings over 24 hours. Sleep disturbance was common but did not interfere with completion of measurement in most of the participants.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory/instrumentation , Hypertension , Sleep Hygiene , Sphygmomanometers , Blood Pressure/physiology , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory/methods , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory/statistics & numerical data , Circadian Rhythm , Female , Humans , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertension/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Reproducibility of Results , Sphygmomanometers/classification , Sphygmomanometers/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires
17.
J Acad Nutr Diet ; 120(7): 1133-1141.e3, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32335042

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lowering excess sodium in packaged foods is part of a public health strategy to reduce cardiovascular disease risk. Sales of foods with labeled sodium claims increased during the past decade. Yet, it is unclear whether sugars or fats were added during the reformulation of foods that might counter the benefits of sodium reduction. OBJECTIVE: It was hypothesized that the nutrient content of packaged foods with lower sodium label claims (ie, sodium-modified) would differ from their regular (ie, unmodified) counterparts. DESIGN: This cross-sectional study compared label data of 153 sodium-modified foods and 141 regular, matched counterparts within four food categories: soups, processed meats, vegetables, and savory snacks. Foods were identified by searching manufacturer websites of the top-10 brands in each category. Sodium, calories, total carbohydrate, sugar, protein, total fat, saturated fat, and potassium (when reported) were compared by labeled serving and per 100 g food. RESULTS: The average amount in milligrams of sodium per serving in regular foods ranged from 162 mg for savory snacks to 782 mg for soups. Compared with regular foods, the matched lower sodium foods had significantly less sodium per serving (-95 to -387 mg) and per 100 g (-184 to -462 mg) (P<0.01 for all comparisons), except for soups per 100 g (P = 0.166), and were similar to their regular counterparts in calories, total carbohydrate, sugar, protein, total fat, and saturated fat (P>0.05 for all comparisons). Of the soups that reported potassium on the label, potassium was 244 mg/serving (P=0.004) and 139 mg/100 g (P=0.002) higher among matched lower sodium soups. CONCLUSIONS: The similarity in macronutrient contents on the labels for sodium-modified foods and their regular counterparts suggests that reformulation did not include the addition of significant amounts of sugars, fats, or other macronutrients among major food brands in the selected categories. Potassium content and additional food categories deserve further investigation.


Subject(s)
Food Analysis , Food Labeling , Food Packaging , Nutrients/analysis , Sodium, Dietary/analysis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dietary Carbohydrates/analysis , Dietary Fats/analysis , Dietary Proteins/analysis , Energy Intake , Humans , Meat Products/analysis , Snacks , United States , Vegetables/chemistry
18.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 29(5): 703-712, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31393215

ABSTRACT

Background: Understanding and addressing cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk has implications for maternal and child health outcomes. Heart age, the modeled age of an individual's cardiovascular system based on risk level, and excess heart age, the difference between a person's heart age and chronological age, are alternative simplified ways to communicate CVD risk. Among women with a recent live birth, we predicted heart age, calculated prevalence of excess heart age (≥5 years), and examined factors associated with excess heart age. Materials and Methods: Data were analyzed in 2017 from 2009 to 2014 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS). To calculate heart age we used maternal age, prepregnancy body mass index, systolic blood pressure, smoking status, and diabetic status. Weighted prevalence and prevalence ratios compared the likelihood of excess heart age across racial/ethnic groups by selected factors. Results: Prevalence of excess heart age was higher in non-Hispanic black women (11.8%) than non-Hispanic white women (7.3%, prevalence ratio [PR], 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.62, 1.49-1.76) and Hispanic women (4.9%, PR, 95% CI: 2.39, 2.10-2.72). Prevalence of excess heart age was highest among women who were without health insurance, obese or overweight, engaged in physical activity less than thrice per week, or were smokers in the prepregnancy period. Among women with less than high school education, non-Hispanic black women had a higher prevalence of excess heart age than Hispanic women (PR, 95% CI: 4.01, 3.15-5.10). Conclusions: Excess heart age may be an important tool for decreasing disparities and encouraging CVD risk reduction among certain groups of women.


Subject(s)
Black People/statistics & numerical data , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Health Status Disparities , Heart/physiopathology , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , White People/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Female , Health Behavior , Humans , Live Birth , Population Surveillance , Prevalence , Risk Assessment , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States , Young Adult
19.
AIDS ; 33(12): 1935-1942, 2019 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31274539

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality among persons living with HIV (PLWH). We used individual cardiovascular risk factor profiles to estimate heart age for PLWH in medical care in the United States. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analyses of HIV Outpatient Study (HOPS) data METHODS:: Included in this analysis were participants aged 30-74 years, without prior CVD, with at least two HOPS clinic visits during 2010-2017, at least 1-year of follow-up, and available covariate data. We calculated age and race/ethnicity-adjusted heart age and excess heart age (chronological age - heart age), using a Framingham risk score-based model. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 2467 men and 619 women (mean chronologic age 49.3 and 49.1 years, and 23.6% and 54.6% Non-Hispanic/Latino black, respectively). Adjusted excess heart age was 11.5 years (95% confidence interval, 11.1-12.0) among men and 13.1 years (12.0-14.1) among women. Excess heart age was seen among all age groups beginning with persons aged 30-39 years [men, 7.8 (6.9-8.8); women, 7.7 (4.9-10.4)], with the highest excess heart age among participants aged 50-59 years [men, 13.7 years (13.0-14.4); women, 16.4 years (14.8-18.0)]. More than 50% of participants had an excess heart age of at least 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: Excess heart age is common among PLWH, begins in early adulthood, and impacts both women and men. Among PLWH, CVD risk factors should be addressed early and proactively. Routine use of the heart age calculator may help optimize CVD risk stratification and facilitate interventions for aging PLWH.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/pathology , HIV Infections/complications , Myocardium/pathology , Outpatients , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Ethnicity , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Assessment , United States/epidemiology
20.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 16: E78, 2019 06 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31228234

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Early recognition of stroke symptoms and recognizing the importance of calling 9-1-1 improves the timeliness of appropriate emergency care, resulting in improved health outcomes. The objective of this study was to assess changes in awareness of stroke symptoms and calling 9-1-1 from 2009 to 2014. METHODS: We analyzed data among 27,211 adults from 2009 and 35,862 adults from 2014 using the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). The NHIS included 5 questions in both 2009 and 2014 about stroke signs and symptoms and one about the first action to take when someone is having a stroke. We estimated the prevalence of awareness of each symptom, all 5 symptoms, the importance of calling 9-1-1, and knowledge of all 5 symptoms plus the importance of calling 9-1-1 (indicating recommended stroke knowledge). We assessed changes from 2009 to 2014 in the prevalence of awareness. Data analyses were conducted in 2016. RESULTS: In 2014, awareness of stroke symptoms ranged from 76.1% (sudden severe headache) to 93.7% (numbness of face, arm, leg, side); 68.3% of respondents recognized all 5 symptoms, and 66.2% were aware of all recommended stroke knowledge. After adjusting for sex, age, educational attainment, and race/ethnicity, logistic regression results showed a significant absolute increase of 14.7 percentage points in recommended stroke knowledge from 2009 (51.5%) to 2014 (66.2%). Among US adults, recommended stroke knowledge increased from 2009 to 2014. CONCLUSION: Stroke awareness among US adults has improved but remains suboptimal.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Dispatch , Stroke/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Asian People , Female , Health Education , Health Promotion , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Public Health , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...