Emergence of restless legs syndrome during opioid discontinuation.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The development of restless legs syndrome (RLS) has been rarely reported during and following opioid withdrawal. We aimed to determine the presence and severity of RLS symptoms during and after supervised opioid tapering. METHODS: Ninety-seven adults enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Pain Rehabilitation Center who underwent supervised prescription opioid tapering were prospectively recruited. RLS presence and severity was assessed with the Cambridge-Hopkins Questionnaire 13 and International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Severity Scale at admission, midpoint, and dismissal from the program as well as 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 3 months after completion. Frequency and severity of RLS symptoms were compared between admission and each time point. RESULTS: Average age of the cohort was 52.6 ± 13.3 years with a morphine milligram equivalent dose for the cohort of 45.6 ± 48.3 mg. Frequency of RLS symptoms increased from 28% at admission to peak frequency of 41% at 2 weeks following discharge from the Mayo Pain Rehabilitation Clinic (P = .01), returning to near baseline frequency 3 months after opioid discontinuation. International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Severity Scale increased from baseline and then remained relatively stable at each time point following admission. Thirty-five (36.1%) participants developed de novo symptoms of RLS during their opioid taper, with those being exposed to higher morphine milligram equivalent doses having higher risk of developing RLS. CONCLUSIONS: Moderately severe symptoms of RLS, as assessed by survey, occur commonly in individuals undergoing opioid tapering, particularly if exposed to higher doses. In many cases, symptoms appear to be self-limited, although a minority develop persistent symptoms. Our results may have implications for successful opioid tapering, but future confirmatory studies with structured clinician interview are needed to establish that these symptoms truly represent restless legs syndrome given the potential for RLS-mimicking symptoms in individuals with chronic pain syndromes. CITATION: McCarter SJ, Labott JR, Mazumder MK, et al. Emergence of restless legs syndrome during opioid discontinuation. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(4):741-748.

Young Adult Pain Rehabilitation: Interdisciplinary Development and Preliminary Outcomes of a Novel Treatment Program.

BACKGROUND: Young adults with chronic pain and symptoms experience disruptions to their social, emotional, physical, and vocational functioning. Interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs for pediatric and adult populations are not designed specifically to address the developmental needs of young adults. METHODS: This article describes the development of a novel intensive interdisciplinary outpatient rehabilitation program tailored to the unique needs of young adults with chronic pain and symptoms. Tailored content included vocational assessment and consultation, financial literacy education, and sexual health education. RESULTS: Outcome data demonstrate treatment gains, with reductions in pain interference, pain severity, pain catastrophizing, and depressive symptoms, as well as improvements in mental and physical quality of life, perceived performance, perceived satisfaction with performance, and objective measures of physical functioning. CONCLUSIONS: The article concludes with clinical recommendations for the management of chronic pain and symptoms in young adults, applicable across multiple treatment settings.

Mental Stress and Its Effects on Vascular Health.

Coronary artery disease continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality despite significant advances in risk stratification and management. This has prompted the search for alternative nonconventional risk factors that may provide novel therapeutic targets. Psychosocial stress, or mental stress, has emerged as an important risk factor implicated in a higher incidence of cardiovascular events, and although our understanding of this far ranging and interesting phenomenon has developed greatly over recent times, there is still much to be learned regarding how to measure mental stress and how it may impact physical health. With the current coronavirus disease 2019 global pandemic and its incumbent lockdowns and social distancing, understanding the potentially harmful biological effects of stress related to life-changing events and social isolation has become even more important. In the current review our multidisciplinary team discusses stress from a psychosocial perspective and aims to define psychological stress as rigorously as possible; discuss the pathophysiologic mechanisms by which stress may mediate cardiovascular disease, with a particular focus to its effects on vascular health; outline existing methods and approaches to quantify stress by means of a vascular biomarker; outline the mechanisms whereby psychosocial stressors may have their pathologic effects ultimately transduced to the vasculature through the neuroendocrine immunologic axis; highlight areas for improvement to refine existing approaches in clinical research when studying the consequences of psychological stress on cardiovascular health; and discuss evidence-based therapies directed at reducing the deleterious effects of mental stress including those that target endothelial dysfunction. To this end we searched PubMed and Google Scholar to identify studies evaluating the relationship between mental or psychosocial stress and cardiovascular disease with a particular focus on vascular health. Search terms included "myocardial ischemia," "coronary artery disease," "mental stress," "psychological stress," "mental∗ stress∗," "psychologic∗ stress∗," and "cardiovascular disease∗." The search was limited to studies published in English in peer-reviewed journals between 1990 and the present day. To identify potential studies not captured by our database search strategy, we also searched studies listed in the bibliography of relevant publications and reviews.

Mediators of change in depressed mood following pain rehabilitation among participants with mild, moderate, or severe depressive symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Prior research indicates that depression and chronic pain commonly co-exist and impact each other. Interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs (IPRPs) have been shown to lead to statistically and clinically significant improvements for patients who report both depressed mood and chronic pain, however there is a gap in the literature regarding the mechanisms by which these improvements occur. METHODS: This two-site, distinct sample study (Study 1: N = 303, 10-week, individual format, ACT-based program; Study 2: N = 406, 3-week, group format, CBT-based program) evaluated mediators of treatment improvement in depressive symptoms among adult IPRP participants who reported elevated depressive symptoms at program admission and examined treatment mechanisms for depressive symptoms. RESULTS: Self-reported pain self-efficacy and pain catastrophizing - particularly the helplessness domain - mediated the treatment-related change in depression among IPRP participants with elevated depressive symptoms across the two sites and samples. In one sample, full mediation was achieved while in the other sample, partial mediation was achieved. Participants in both samples showed improvement on all measures. LIMITATIONS: This study relied on self-report measures of depressive severity and not clinical diagnosis. Results may not generalize to other populations of patients with chronic pain. There was no control condition in either study. CONCLUSION: Increasing pain self-efficacy and decreasing a sense of helplessness are important treatment targets among IPRP participants who endorse symptoms of depression.

Outpatient Randomized Crossover Automated Insulin Delivery Versus Conventional Therapy with Induced Stress Challenges.

Background: Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems have not been evaluated in the context of psychological and pharmacological stress in type 1 diabetes. Our objective was to determine glycemic control and insulin use with Zone Model Predictive Control (zone-MPC) AID system enhanced for states of persistent hyperglycemia versus sensor-augmented pump (SAP) during outpatient use, including in-clinic induced stress. Materials and Methods: Randomized, crossover, 2-week trial of zone-MPC AID versus SAP in 14 adults with type 1 diabetes. In each arm, each participant was studied in-clinic with psychological stress induction (Trier Social Stress Test [TSST] and Socially Evaluated Cold Pressor Test [SECPT]), followed by pharmacological stress induction with oral hydrocortisone (total four sessions per participant). The main outcomes were 2-week continuous glucose monitor percent time in range (TIR) 70-180 mg/dL, and glucose and insulin outcomes during and overnight following stress induction. Results: During psychological stress, AID decreased glycemic variability percentage by 13.4% (P = 0.009). During pharmacological stress, including the following overnight, there were no differences in glucose outcomes and total insulin between AID and physician-assisted SAP. However, with AID total user-requested insulin was lower by 6.9 U (P = 0.01) for pharmacological stress. Stress induction was validated by changes in heart rate and salivary cortisol levels. During the 2-week AID use, TIR was 74.4% (vs. SAP 63.1%, P = 0.001) and overnight TIR was 78.3% (vs. SAP 63.1%, P = 0.004). There were no adverse events. Conclusions: Zone-MPC AID can reduce glycemic variability and the need for user-requested insulin during pharmacological stress and can improve overall glycemic outcomes. Clinical Trial Identifier NCT04142229.

Pain Catastrophizing and Pain Self-Efficacy Mediate Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Program Outcomes at Posttreatment and Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: Decreasing pain catastrophizing and improving self-efficacy to self-manage chronic pain symptoms are important treatment targets in the context of interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation. Greater pain catastrophizing has been shown to be associated with greater impact of pain symptoms on functioning; conversely, greater pain self-efficacy has been associated with lower pain intensity and lower levels of disability. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation outcomes, as well as to evaluate the mediating effects of both pain catastrophizing and pain self-efficacy on outcome. METHODS: Participants were 315 patients with chronic pain between April 2017 and April 2018 who completed a 3-week interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program. Pain severity, pain interference, pain catastrophizing, pain self-efficacy, quality of life, depressive symptom questionnaires, and measures of physical performance were assessed before and after treatment. Follow-up questionnaires were returned by 163 participants. Effect size and reliable change analyses were conducted from pre- to posttreatment and from pretreatment to 6-month follow-up. Mediation analyses were conducted to determine the mediating effect of pain catastrophizing and pain self-efficacy on pain outcome. RESULTS: Significant improvements from pre- to posttreatment in pain outcomes were observed, and more than 80% evidenced a reliable change in at least one pain-relevant measure. Pain catastrophizing and pain self-efficacy mediated the relationship between changes in pain outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation is an effective treatment, and decreasing pain catastrophizing and increasing pain self-efficacy can influence maintenance of treatment gains.

Pain catastrophizing as a treatment process variable in cognitive behavioural therapy for adults with chronic pain.

BACKGROUND: Interdisciplinary cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for chronic pain is effective at improving function, mood and pain interference among individuals with disabling chronic pain. Traditionally, CBT assumes that cognitive change is an active therapeutic ingredient in the determination of treatment outcome. Pain catastrophizing, a cognitive response style that views the experience of pain as uncontrollable, permanent and destructive, has been identified as an important maladaptive cognition which contributes to difficulties with the management of chronic pain. Consequently, pain catastrophizing is commonly targeted in CBT for chronic pain. OBJECTIVES: To examine change trajectories in pain catastrophizing during treatment and assess the relevance of these trajectories to outcomes at posttreatment. METHODS: Participants included individuals with chronic pain (N = 463) who completed a 3-week program of interdisciplinary CBT. Pain catastrophizing was assessed weekly over the 3 weeks of treatment and latent growth curve modelling was used to identify trajectories of change. RESULTS: Findings indicated the presence of two classes of linear change, one with a significant negative slope in pain catastrophizing (i.e. improved class) and the other with a non-significant slope (i.e. unchanged class). Next, latent growth mixture modelling examined treatment outcome in relation to class membership. These results indicated that individuals in the 'improved' PCS class had significantly greater improvement in pain interference and mood, as well as physical and mental quality of life compared to the 'unchanged' class. CONCLUSIONS: Implications for our findings, in relation to the CBT model, are discussed.

Prevalence of Opioid-Induced Adrenal Insufficiency in Patients Taking Chronic Opioids.

CONTEXT: Chronic opioid use may lead to adrenal insufficiency because of central suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. However, the prevalence of opioid-induced adrenal insufficiency (OIAI) is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of OIAI and to identify predictors for the development of OIAI in patients taking opioids for chronic pain. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study, 2016-2018. SETTING: Referral center. PATIENTS: Adult patients taking chronic opioids admitted to the Pain Rehabilitation Center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Diagnosis of OIAI was considered if positive case detection (cortisol < 10 mcg/dL, ACTH < 15 pg/mL, and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate < 25 mcg/dL), and confirmed after endocrine evaluation. Daily morphine milligram equivalent (MME) was calculated. RESULTS: In 102 patients (median age, 53 years [range, 22-83], 67% women), median daily MME was 60 mg (3-840), and median opioid therapy duration was 60 months (3-360). Abnormal case detection testing was found in 11 (10.8%) patients, and diagnosis of OIAI was made in 9 (9%). Patients with OIAI were on a higher daily MME (median, 140 [20-392] mg vs 57 [3-840] mg, P = 0.1), and demonstrated a 4 times higher cumulative opioid exposure (median of 13,440 vs 3120 mg*months, P = 0.03). No patient taking  20 mg); however, specificity of MME cutoff >20 mg was only 19%. After opioid discontinuation, 6/7 patients recovered adrenal function. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of OIAI was 9%, with MME cumulative exposure being the only predictor for OIAI development. Patients on MME of 20 mg/day and above should be monitored for OIAI.

Treatment Effectiveness and Medication Use Reduction for Older Adults in Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of an interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program (IPRP) that incorporates medication tapering on improving pain-related and performance-based outcomes for older adults with chronic noncancer pain and determine the proportion who demonstrated reliable improvement in outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This 2-year retrospective clinical cohort study examined treatment outcomes of 134 older adult patients 65 years or older with chronic noncancer pain who completed a 3-week IPRP with physician-supervised medication tapering between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2017. Pain, pain catastrophizing, depressive symptoms, and quality of life were assessed at pretreatment, posttreatment, and follow-up. Physical performance and medication use were assessed pre- and posttreatment. Outcomes were examined using a series of repeated-measures analyses of variance, examining effect size and reliable change. RESULTS: Significant treatment effects (P<.001) with large effect sizes were observed for all self-report and physical performance outcome measures at posttreatment and 6-month follow-up (42.5% response rate). There were no significant differences in outcome based on opioid use status at admission. Reliable change analyses revealed that 76.9% (n=103 of 134) evidenced improvement in at least 1 pain-related outcome measure at posttreatment, and 87.7% (n=50 of 57), at follow-up. Patients also had significant reductions (P<.01) in medications at posttreatment (opioids, benzodiazepines, sedative-hypnotics, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, and anticonvulsants). CONCLUSION: Older adults with chronic noncancer pain demonstrated improved pain-related outcomes, physical performance, and decreased medication use following IPRP treatment. Results support the effectiveness of IPRPs in enhancing the physical and emotional functioning of older adults with chronic pain while also facilitating the reduction of medications that place them at risk for adverse events.

Examining the effectiveness of pain rehabilitation on chronic pain and post-traumatic symptoms.

Patients with co-morbid chronic pain and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) pose significant treatment challenges. This study evaluated the effectiveness of an interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program (IPRP) in improving pain and PTSD outcomes, as well as reducing medication use. In addition, the mediating effect of pain catastrophizing, which is theorized to underlie the pain and PTSD comorbidity, was examined. Participants included 83 completers of an IPRP with chronic pain and a provisional PTSD diagnosis. Significant improvements were found for pain outcomes, PTSD symptomatology, depressive symptoms, physical performance, and medication use (i.e., opioids and benzodiazepines). At discharge, 86.7% of participants reliably improved in at least one key measure of functioning and 50.6% demonstrated reliable improvement in PTSD symptomatology. Change in pain catastrophizing mediated improvements in pain interference and PTSD symptomatology. Results support the potential utility of an interdisciplinary pain treatment approach in the treatment of patients with comorbid pain and PTSD.

Integrated Behavioral Treatment for Veterans With Co-Morbid Chronic Pain and Hazardous Opioid Use: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.

Opioid prescription in the treatment of chronic pain is frequent and carries a risk of increased morbidity and mortality in a clinically significant number of patients, particularly those who are using opioids in a hazardous manner. Few treatment options are available that target both pain-related interference and hazardous opioid use among patients with chronic pain. In military Veterans, this issue is of particular importance as numerous reports indicate continued high rates of opioid prescription for chronic pain, as well as significant opioid-related problems. The overall aim of the present study was to determine the feasibility of an integrated psychosocial treatment in Veterans with chronic pain, who also have evidence of hazardous opioid use. To examine this aim, a random design was used to assess the feasibility and initial efficacy of integrating 2 empirically supported interventions: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for chronic pain and Mindfulness Based Relapse Prevention for opioid misuse. Half of participants were randomized to the integrated treatment group and all participants received usual care through a Veteran's Administration co-occurring disorders medical clinic to treat chronic pain and opioid misuse. In total, 37 participants were randomized and included in intent-to-treat analyses and 32 individuals were included in per protocol analyses with 6-month follow-up serving as the primary study endpoint. Feasibility indicators included recruitment, retention, and treatment completion rates. Recruitment fell short of targeted enrollment, although retention and completion were excellent. Primary outcome measures were opioid misuse, pain interference, and pain behavior. Simultaneous multiple regression analyses controlled for pain duration, baseline opioid dose, and baseline value for outcome measures. Results of both the intent-to-treat and per protocol indicated a significant effect in favor of the integrated intervention for opioid misuse, pain interference, and pain behavior. Results support the feasibility of providing an integrated treatment for both opioid risk and pain interference. PERSPECTIVE: Opioid misuse occurs in some opioid-prescribed individuals with chronic pain. Few treatment options exist that target both pain interference and opioid misuse. This study examined feasibility and initial efficacy of an integrated behavioral treatment for Veterans. Feasibility was supported, except recruitment. Efficacy was supported compared to usual care.

The Mediating Effect of Pain Catastrophizing on PTSD Symptoms and Pain Outcome.

OBJECTIVE: Coprevalence of chronic pain and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) negatively impacts the course of both disorders. Patients diagnosed with both conditions report greater pain, affective distress, and disability when compared with those with either chronic pain or PTSD alone. While the prevalence and complexity of the comorbidity is widely acknowledged, there is a dearth of research examining potential mechanism variables that might account for the relationship between chronic pain and PTSD. The current study utilizes a series of mediation analyses to examine if pain catastrophizing mediates the relationship between PTSD symptomatology and chronic pain outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 203 treatment-seeking participants admitted to a 3-week interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program completed a battery of psychometrically validated measures of pain severity, pain interference, pain catastrophizing, depressive symptoms, and PTSD symptoms at program admission. RESULTS: A series of multiple parallel mediation analyses revealed that pain catastrophizing fully mediated the relationships between PTSD symptoms and pain outcome (ie, pain severity and pain interference) above and beyond the influence of depressive symptoms. DISCUSSION: Results suggest that pain catastrophizing may represent an important cognitive mechanism through which PTSD symptoms influence the experience of chronic pain. Psychosocial treatment approaches that directly target tendency to catastrophize in response to pain may hold the potential to have salutary effects on both chronic pain and PTSD.

Longitudinal Treatment Outcomes for an Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Program: Comparisons of Subjective and Objective Outcomes on the Basis of Opioid Use Status.

Chronic pain is a major public health concern, and widespread use of prescription opioids for chronic pain has contributed to the escalating problem of opioid use disorder. Interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs (IPRPs) can be highly effective in discontinuing opioids in patients with chronic pain while also improving functional status. This study sought to examine self-report and performance-based functional outcomes of 2 cohorts of patients enrolled in a 3-week IPRP: patients engaged in interdisciplinary pain treatment and physician-supervised opioid taper versus nonopioid users engaged in interdisciplinary treatment. Immediate and long-term treatment outcomes were assessed using a series of 2 (group: opioid use, no opioid use) × 2 (period: pretreatment, post-treatment) and 2 (group: opioid use, no opioid use) × 2 (period: pretreatment, 6 months post-treatment) mixed model analyses of variance. Group × Period interactions were nonsignificant whereas period effects were significant for all outcomes in directions indicating improvement (Ps < .001) at discharge from the program and at 6 months, irrespective of opioid use status. Results support the assertion that IPRPs lead to significant improvements in subjective as well as objective indices of function, irrespective of opioid use status. Implications for our findings are discussed. PERSPECTIVE: This article provides support for the effectiveness of interdisciplinary, rehabilitative models of care in improving physical and emotional functioning of patients with chronic pain while simultaneously discontinuing opioid use. The reach of this work is substantial, because opioid dependency and chronic pain are public health problems in the United States.

Unique Contributions of Acceptance and Catastrophizing on Chronic Pain Adaptation.

PURPOSE: Pain catastrophizing and acceptance represent distinct but interrelated constructs that influence adaptation to chronic pain. Clinical and laboratory research suggest that higher levels of catastrophizing and lower levels of acceptance predict worse functioning; however, findings have been mixed regarding which specific outcomes are associated with each construct. The current study evaluates these constructs in relation to pain, affect, and functioning in a treatment-seeking clinical sample. METHOD: Participants included 249 adult patients who were admitted to an interdisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation program and completed measures of pain and related psychological and physical functioning. RESULTS: Hierarchical multiple regression analyses indicated that pain catastrophizing and acceptance both significantly, but differentially, predicted depressive symptoms and pain-related negative affect. Only pain catastrophizing was a unique predictor of perceived pain severity, whereas acceptance uniquely predicted pain interference and performance in everyday living activities. There were no significant interactions between acceptance and catastrophizing, suggesting no moderation effects. CONCLUSION: Findings from the current study indicate a pattern of results similar to prior studies in which greater levels of catastrophic thinking is associated with higher perceived pain intensity whereas greater levels of acceptance relate to better functioning in activities despite chronic pain. However, in the current study, both acceptance and catastrophizing were associated with negative affect. These relationships were significant beyond the effects of clinical and demographic variables. These results support the role of pain acceptance as an important contribution to chronic pain-related outcomes alongside the well-established role of pain catastrophizing. Results are limited by reliance on self-report data, cross-sectional design, and low racial/ethnic diversity.

The Mediating Effects of the Different Dimensions of Pain Catastrophizing on Outcomes in an Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Program.

OBJECTIVE: Although reducing pain catastrophizing has been shown to contribute to functional improvement in patients receiving interdisciplinary pain care, little is known about how changes in the different dimensions of pain catastrophizing uniquely contribute to improvement in outcome. The study examined the unique relationship between changes in the 3 distinct factors of pain catastrophizing-helplessness, rumination, and magnification-and changes in pain outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this nonrandomized study, 641 patients who completed treatment in a 3-week interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program between the years 2013 and 2014 completed a battery of psychometrically validated measures of pain catastrophizing, pain severity, pain interference, mental and physical health-related quality of life, and depressive symptoms at pretreatment and posttreatment. RESULTS: A series of within groups (repeated measures) mediation analyses were conducted. Change in the helplessness, rumination, and magnification subscales were entered as multiple mediators in the model. Analyses revealed that change in helplessness partially mediated improvement in all outcome variables beyond the influence of change in other variables in the model, whereas change in rumination partially mediated improvement in pain severity, interference, and depressive symptoms. Change in magnification had the least impact on outcome, partially mediating improvements in only mental health quality of life. DISCUSSION: Results suggest that changes in the 3 dimensions of pain catastrophizing differentially mediate improvement in pain outcome. Treatment approaches that specifically target helplessness and rumination may be particularly useful in improving the outcomes of patients with refractory pain conditions enrolled in interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program.

Patients' perceptions of a chronic pain rehabilitation program: changing the conversation.

Objective Research supports the effectiveness of comprehensive approaches to chronic pain treatment, including behavioral management and physical reconditioning. However, less is known about patients' perceptions of this treatment approach. The current study evaluated patient perceptions and treatment outcomes utilizing both qualitative and quantitative data collection. Methods A total of 498 adult patients (≥18 years of age; Mage = 49.1) completed an intensive outpatient interdisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation program, completed survey measures at admission and discharge, and were asked open-ended questions about their treatment experience at discharge. Results Patients reported significant decreases in pain severity, t(488) = 23.08, p < .001, and pain-related interference, t(488) = 24.28, p < .001, at discharge. Patients endorsed self-management strategies, particularly relaxation skills (85%), moderation and/or modification (47%), and exercise, stretching and/or physical therapy (39%) as the most important aspects of treatment. Conclusions Patients perceive behavioral skills to manage pain and physical reconditioning to be important components of a successful pain rehabilitation program. These findings can inform conversations with both physicians and patients about the importance of biopsychosocial approaches to pain management. Key limitations include a lack of racial/ethnic diversity, use of anonymous data that cannot be linked directly to patient outcomes, and reliance on self-report data.

Rumination, Magnification, and Helplessness: How do Different Aspects of Pain Catastrophizing Relate to Pain Severity and Functioning?

OBJECTIVES: Although there is a large body of research on the relationship between pain catastrophizing and functioning among individuals with chronic pain, little is known about the potential differential impact of specific aspects of pain catastrophizing. The current study evaluates the relationship between the Rumination, Helplessness, and Magnification subscales of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale and pain-related outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 844 patients who were admitted to a chronic pain rehabilitation program completed survey measures of pain, catastrophizing, quality of life (QOL), and depression. RESULTS: A series of analyses were conducted entering the 3 subscales simultaneously in a predictive model after pain intensity and demographic variables (ie, age, sex, pain duration, current opioid use). The Helplessness subscale accounted for unique variance in the prediction of pain severity, pain-related interference, mental and physical health-related QOL, and depressed mood. Magnification was significantly related to physical and mental health-related QOL and depressed mood. The Rumination subscale was not uniquely associated with any of the outcome measures beyond that which was accounted for by pain severity, magnification, or helplessness. DISCUSSION: Pain catastrophizing is a multifaceted construct, and different domains of catastrophizing are uniquely related to pain-related outcomes. This study represents the first to evaluate the functioning of these subscales in a large, diagnostically heterogeneous sample of chronic pain patients.

Hearing new voices: registered nurses and health technicians experience caring for chronic pain patients in primary care clinics.

Recent national estimates from the U.S. reveal that as many as one-third of all Americans experience chronic pain resulting in high prevalence rates of visits to primary care clinics (PCC). Indeed, chronic pain appears to be an emerging global health problem. Research has largely ignored the perspective of PCC staff other than physicians in providing care for patients with chronic pain. We wanted to gain insights from the experiences of Registered Nurses (RNs) and Health Technicians (HTs) who care for this patient population. Krippendorff's method for content analysis was used to analyze comments written in an open-ended survey from fifty-seven primary care clinic staff (RNs-N=27 and HTs-N=30) respondents. This represented an overall response rate of 75%. Five themes emerged related to the experience of RNs and HTs caring for patients with chronic pain: 1) Primacy of Medications and Accompanying Clinical Quandaries; 2) System Barriers; 3) Dealing with Failure; 4) Primacy of Patient Centered Care; and 5) Importance of Team Based Care. This study demonstrates that nursing staff provide patient-centered care, recognize the importance of their role within an interdisciplinary team and can offer valuable insight about the care of patients with chronic pain. This study provides insight into strategies that can mitigate barriers to chronic pain management while sustaining those aspects that RNs and HTs view as essential for improving patient care for this vulnerable population in PCCs.

Development and application of an electronic health record information extraction tool to assess quality of pain management in primary care.

Chronic pain is one of the most common presenting problems in primary care. Standards and guidelines have been developed for managing chronic pain, but it is unclear whether primary care providers routinely engage in guideline-concordant care. The purpose of this study is to develop a tool for extracting information about the quality of pain care in the primary care setting. Quality indicators were developed through review of the literature, input from an interdisciplinary panel of pain experts, and pilot testing. A comprehensive coding manual was developed, and inter-rater reliability was established. The final tool consists of 12 dichotomously scored indicators assessing quality and documentation of pain care in three domains: assessment, treatment, and reassessment. Presence of indicators varied widely. The tool is reliable and can be utilized to gather valuable information about pain management in the primary care setting.