Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Am Mosq Control Assoc ; 35(2): 91-96, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31442131

ABSTRACT

The introduction of Zika virus to the USA in 2015 engendered heightened interest in its known vectors. Aedes aegypti is the primary vector, with Ae. albopictus considered a potential secondary vector, together with several other possible marginal vectors. In Delaware, Ae. aegypti has been collected rarely, but no breeding populations were detected during past intensive statewide surveillance efforts. However, there is an abundance of Ae. albopictus statewide. Both species are container breeders and are peri-domestic-increasing the risk for virus transmission to humans. From July through September 2017, Delaware Mosquito Control conducted surveillance in 16 container-breeding hot spots to search for Ae. aegypti, and also ascertain the virus-positive pool rates of Ae. albopictus and Ae. triseriatus for West Nile virus (WNV) and Zika virus (ZIKV). The survey concluded that there were no known breeding populations of Ae. aegypti in Delaware, and no WNV- or ZIKV-positive pools were detected among pools of mosquitoes of the aforementioned species.


Subject(s)
Aedes/physiology , Aedes/virology , Animal Distribution , Ochlerotatus/physiology , Ochlerotatus/virology , West Nile virus/isolation & purification , Zika Virus/isolation & purification , Aedes/growth & development , Animals , Delaware , Female , Larva/physiology , Larva/virology , Male , Species Specificity
2.
J Am Mosq Control Assoc ; 26(3): 274-86, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21033054

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT. We performed a 2-year longitudinal study (2006-2007) of West Nile virus (WNV) infections in wild birds, mosquitoes, and sentinel chickens at 6 WNV-endemic sites in northern Delaware. We determined virus infection rates of Culex pipiens and other mosquito vectors as well as seroprevalence and antibody titers of amplifying hosts. Endemicity status varied widely among the 6 sites based on 3 criteria-mosquito infections, sentinel chicken seropositivity, and wild bird seropositivity. A highly endemic site would display at least 2 of the 3 criteria during each year of the study, while a site with just 1 positive criterion was considered to have low endemicity. Culex pipiens was the principal vector detected at 2 highly endemic sites in 2006 vs. 1 site in 2007. However, in 2006, we also found 2 other WNV-positive vector species as well as an unidentifiable Culex species at 1 highly endemic site, suggesting increased activity at the end of the 1st year of the study. Wild birds were early indicators of WNV at highly endemic sites in mid-July to early August of both 2006-2007. Mosquitoes were positive in mid- to late August, appearing concurrently with seroconverted sentinel chickens, with wild resident birds appearing approximately 4 wk prior to those indicators. Of birds tested with n > or = 9, Northern cardinals had the highest seropositivity rates (47%) followed by Carolina wrens (19%), house sparrows (13%), American robins (13%), tufted titmice (11%), and gray catbirds (9%). The overall seropositive rates in trapped birds increased from 5.0% in 2006 to 20.0% in 2007, while the geometric mean titers of all positive birds increased from 1:34 to 1:47 during the comparable periods. Based on these results, we suggest that an epiornitic in birds occurred in 2007, but that greatly reduced abundance of mosquito vectors caused by an extreme drought largely precluded human infection.


Subject(s)
Bird Diseases/epidemiology , Culicidae/virology , Disease Outbreaks/veterinary , West Nile Fever/veterinary , Animals , Animals, Wild , Birds , Chickens , Delaware/epidemiology , Sentinel Surveillance , West Nile Fever/epidemiology , West Nile Fever/transmission
3.
J Vector Ecol ; 32(2): 285-91, 2007 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18260519

ABSTRACT

West Nile virus surveillance was conducted at five sites in New Castle County, DE, and one site in Salem County, NJ, from June through September, 2004, using dry ice-baited Centers for Disease Control miniature light traps, infusion-baited gravid traps, and resting boxes. All trap types were simultaneously placed at each site every two weeks and run overnight. Collected mosquitoes were identified to species, pooled, and analyzed for virus using a real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction test. In total, 47,972 mosquitoes in 29 species or species groups were analyzed. Light traps collected 60,201 mosquitoes in 28 species or species groups. Gravid traps collected 3,195 mosquitoes in 19 species or species groups. Resting boxes collected 99 mosquitoes in nine species or species groups. In total, 1,500 mosquito pools were tested for WNV resulting in ten positive pools. All positive pools consisted of Culex pipiens, Culex restuans, or Culex salinarius. Seven positive pools were from gravid traps and three were from light traps despite testing almost 14 times as many pools from light traps. The overall infection rate from gravid traps was nearly 33 times greater than the infection rate from light traps, 2.29 and 0.07 infected mosquitoes per 1,000, respectively. The results demonstrate the advantage of using gravid traps for West Nile virus surveillance over light traps or resting boxes.


Subject(s)
Culicidae/virology , Insect Vectors/virology , West Nile virus , Animals , Culicidae/classification , Delaware , Insect Vectors/classification , New Jersey , Population Surveillance
4.
J Am Mosq Control Assoc ; 22(2): 282-91, 2006 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17019774

ABSTRACT

We performed longitudinal surveys of mosquito larval abundance (mean mosquito larvae per dip) in 87 stormwater ponds and constructed wetland in Delaware from June to September 2004. We analyzed selected water quality factors, water depth, types of vegetation, degree of shade, and level of insect predation in relation to mosquito abundance. The 2004 season was atypical, with most ponds remaining wet for the entire summer. In terms of West Nile virus (WNV) vectors, wetlands predominantly produce Aedes vexans, culex pipiens pipiens, and Culex restuans. Retention ponds generally produced the same species as wetlands, except that Cx. p. pipiens was more abundant than Cx. restuans in retention ponds. Aedes vexans and Culex salinarius were the most abundant species to Conservation Restoration Enhancement Program ponds. Sand filters uniquely produced high numbers of Cx. restuans, Cx. p. pipiens, and Aedes japonicus japonicus, a newly invasive vector species. Site that alternately dried and flooded, mostly detention ponds, forebays of retention ponds, and some wetlands often produced Ae. vexans, an occasional WNV bridge vector species. Overall, seasonal distribution of vectors was bimodal, with peaks occurring during early and late summer. Ponds with shallow sides and heavy shade generally produced an abundance of mosquitoes, unless insect predators were abundant. Bright, sunny ponds with steep sides and little vegetation generally produced the fewest mosquitoes. The associations among mosquito species and selected vegetation types are discussed.


Subject(s)
Culicidae/virology , Insect Vectors/virology , West Nile virus , Aedes/virology , Animals , Anopheles/virology , Culex/virology , Culicidae/physiology , Delaware , Ecology , Fresh Water , Insect Vectors/physiology , Larva , Population Density , Seasons , Waste Disposal, Fluid
5.
J Am Mosq Control Assoc ; 21(2): 194-200, 2005 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16033122

ABSTRACT

Paucity of data on host-feeding patterns and behavior of 43 mosquito species that are reported as suspected West Nile virus (WN) vectors has limited full evaluation of their vectorial capacity. Recent studies addressing this issue need additional confirmation and should also be expanded to include collections of species or subpopulations attracted to humans. We used 4 types of collection methods to collect mosquitoes, including omnidirectional Fay-Prince traps, Centers for Disease Control-type light traps, gravid traps, and human-landing collections. Mosquitoes were collected during 2 full WN transmission seasons in 2001 and 2002, at 9 different sites across Delaware. We collected from various habitats, including salt marshes, brackish water areas, woodlands, a tire dump, a racetrack, and a mushroom farm. Blood-meal analyses were performed on parous mosquitoes by using a sandwich-type enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. We tested primarily for 5 common host species, including rabbits, dogs, deer, horses, and chickens. We obtained substantial host-feeding data from 8 mosquito species. The most mammalophilic species were Anopheles quadrimaculatus, Coquillettidia perturbans, and Aedes albopictus, whereas the most ornithophilic species was Culex pipiens. Aedes albopictus was the most anthropophilic species, whereas Ae. vexans and Cq. perturbans exhibited relatively low attraction to humans. Culex salinarius was the species with the most diverse host-feeding activity. Based on feeding behavior, Cx. pipiens and Cx. salinarius appear to be the most likely bridge vectors. Other species may have opportunities to be bridge vectors under special circumstances, as discussed in the paper.


Subject(s)
Culicidae/virology , Feeding Behavior , Insect Vectors/virology , West Nile virus/physiology , Aedes/virology , Animals , Animals, Wild/parasitology , Animals, Wild/virology , Anopheles/virology , Birds/parasitology , Birds/virology , Culex/virology , Delaware , Horses/parasitology , Horses/virology , Ochlerotatus/virology , West Nile Fever/transmission , West Nile Fever/virology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...