ABSTRACT
Controversy exists as to the optimal observational time (OT) after outpatient percutaneous kidney biopsy. Further, there is some uncertainty about the benefit of smaller (18-gauge) vs. larger (16-gauge) biopsy needles. At our institution, we have been lowering the OT after outpatient kidney biopsies. Initially in 2015, we were monitoring for 6 hours and gradually began to decrease the OT over time. From 2020, we have adopted an OT of less than 4 hours. During this time period (in 2018), we also began using a smaller gauge needle (18 gauge). We reviewed all outpatient kidney biopsies performed by the nephrology division at our institution since 2015. There were 137 biopsies reviewed. 63 had OT of 4 - 6 hours, and 74 had OT < 4 hours. There was a total of 4 significant complications (2.9%). Two complications, symptomatic retroperitoneal bleeds, were detected in less than 3 hours. The other 2 complications were seen at 9 hours (clot retention) and 72 hours (retroperitoneal bleed after anticoagulation restarted). 63% of the biopsies were done using 18-gauge needles with 1 complication in this group vs. 3 in the 16-gauge group. All cases had adequate tissue for interpretation based on the ability to make a kidney diagnosis. The number of glomeruli obtained in the 18-gauge group was 29 ± 13 glomeruli, and in the 16-gauge group was 25 ± 10, which did not differ between groups. In summary, in an outpatient population, all significant post-biopsy complications were evident either within the first 3 hours or after 9 hours, and this suggests the feasibility of using shorter than standard OT in outpatient kidney biopsies. Furthermore, an 18-gauge needle may lower the risk of complications and obtain adequate tissue.
ABSTRACT
Background: Vascular closure devices have replaced mechanical compression for closure of femoral access sites after endovascular procedures. Case: We present an 87-year-old male with symptomatic infrarenal aortic aneurysm measuring 4.8 cm presenting for elective endovascular repair of the aortic aneurysm. A Perclose ProGlide Suture-Mediated Closure was used for closure. The closure was complicated by a separation of the ProGlide device resulting in the migration of the footplate to the descending aorta. Correction required snare retrieval via radial access, and the patient recovered without complications. Discussion: We highlight an important complication of the Perclose ProGlide Suture-Mediated Closure device that is rare but important to know when performing endovascular closures with this device.
