Antibiotic adherence in dermatologic surgery: a Multicenter prospective cohort study.

Understanding patient non-adherence to prescribed antibiotics can inform clinical practices, patient counseling, and antibiotic efficacy study design in dermatology. The primary objective was to determine the rate of and reasons for antibiotic non-adherence in the dermatologic surgery setting. The secondary objective was to test the applicability of previously studied survey questions for antibiotic non-adherence screening in the dermatologic surgery setting. Five academic outpatient dermatologic surgery centers across the United States conducted one multicenter prospective cohort study. Dermatologic surgery patients ≥ 18 years of age who were prescribed an antibiotic were included as part of this study. 15.2% (42/276) of patients did not adhere to their antibiotic regimen after dermatologic surgery. Most common reasons for incomplete antibiotic courses included forgotten antibiotics (42.9%,18/42) and side effects (28.6%, 12/42). Previously evaluated questions to identify and predict non-adherence had modest performance in the dermatologic surgery setting (Area under the curve of 0.669 [95% CI (0.583-0.754)]). Antibiotic non-adherence after skin surgery is prevalent and commonly due to reasons that physicians can address with patients.

An Institutional Experience of a Tertiary Referral Center in Surgically Managing Patients With Gorlin Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The lifetime risk for basal carcinoma (BCC) is 90% in patients with Gorlin syndrome, also known as basal cell nevus syndrome. Compared with non-Gorlin patients, Gorlin patients often develop BCCs at a younger age and in greater numbers up to 500 BCCs in a lifetime. OBJECTIVE: To review the options available for Gorlin patients and highlight existing knowledge gaps where future studies are indicated to optimize the care of this unique population. METHODS: We review the current literature on managing patients with Gorlin syndrome from the lens of a dermatologic surgeon. RESULTS: Although Mohs surgery is still the gold standard for large and aggressive BCCs, other less-invasive approaches may be considered for smaller, more numerous lesions. As dermatologic surgeons, we must be open to the full spectrum of surgical and nonsurgical options to individualize treatment and optimize patients' quality of life. Without maintaining a balance between optimal cure rate and volume management, Gorlin patients become at risk for surgical burn out and loss to follow-up. CONCLUSION: Gorlin patients undergo numerous surgeries especially on the central face which can lead to disfigurement and reduce the quality of life. Identifying gaps in the current literature, continuing ongoing research, and eventually establishing appropriate guidelines that help to guide the formation of an individualized treatment plan is crucial in developing a balance between conservative and complex treatments for this population.

Anticipated Versus Unanticipated Incomplete Mohs Micrographic Surgery for Keratinocyte Carcinomas: Impact on Treatment Delays and Final Margin Status.

BACKGROUND: Mohs micrographic surgery may be discontinued with positive margins as an anticipated strategy for multidisciplinary care or as an unanticipated occurrence. Management of primary tumors has not been compared after anticipated versus unanticipated incomplete Mohs micrographic surgery (iMMS). OBJECTIVE: To compare rates and timing of adjuvant surgery after iMMS and final margin status when iMMS is anticipated versus unanticipated. Secondary outcomes were preoperative and intraoperative clinicopathologic factors associated with iMMS. METHODS: Cases of iMMS of keratinocyte carcinomas at a tertiary academic center between 2005 and 2022 were classified as anticipated (preoperative assembly of multidisciplinary teams) or unanticipated (ad hoc management of positive margins). Rate, timing, and final margin status of adjuvant surgery was compared between anticipated and unanticipated iMMS cohorts using χ2/Fisher exact test for categorical variables and t-test for continuous variables. RESULTS: Of 127 iMMS cases, 51.2% (65/127) were anticipated. Anticipated iMMS cases were more likely to undergo additional resection (98.5% vs 72.6%, p < .001), with fewer delays (3.9 vs 13.2 days, p < .001) and higher rates of final margin clearance (84.6% vs 59.7%, p < .001). CONCLUSION: When iMMS is anticipated as part of multidisciplinary care, patients are more likely to undergo additional resection, with fewer delays to next surgery and higher final margin clearance rates.

Patient Preferences for Pain Control After Mohs Micrographic Surgery: A Single-Center Discrete Choice Experiment.

Importance: Patient preferences for pain medications after Mohs micrographic surgery are important to understand and have not been fully studied. Objective: To evaluate patient preferences for pain management with only over-the-counter medications (OTCs) or OTCs plus opioids after Mohs micrographic surgery given varying levels of theoretical pain and opioid addiction risk. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective discrete choice experiment was conducted in a single academic medical center from August 2021 to April 2022 among patients undergoing Mohs surgery and their accompanying support persons (≥18 years). A prospective survey was administered to all participants using the Conjointly platform. Data were analyzed from May 2022 to February 2023. Main outcome and measure: The primary outcome was the pain level at which half of the respondents chose OTCs plus opioids equally to only OTCs for pain management. This pain threshold was determined for varying opioid addiction risk profiles (low, 0%; low-moderate, 2%; moderate-high, 6%; high, 12%) and measured via a discrete choice experiment and linear interpolation of associated parameters (pain levels and risk of addiction). Results: Of the 295 respondents (mean [SD] age, 64.6 [13.1] years; 174 [59%] were female; race and ethnicity were not considered) who completed the discrete choice experiment, 101 (34%) stated that they would never consider opioids for pain management regardless of the pain level experienced, and 147 (50%) expressed concern regarding possible opioid addiction. Across all scenarios, 224 respondents (76%) preferred only OTCs vs OTCs plus opioids after Mohs surgery for pain control. When the theoretical risk of addiction was low (0%), half of the respondents expressed a preference for OTCs plus opioids given pain levels of 6.5 on a 10-point scale (90% CI, 5.7-7.5). At higher opioid addiction risk profiles (2%, 6%, 12%), an equal preference for OTCs plus opioids and only OTCs was not achieved. In these scenarios, patients favored only OTCs despite experiencing high levels of pain. Conclusion and relevance: The findings of this prospective discrete choice experiment indicate that the perceived risk of opioid addiction affects the patient's choice of pain medications after Mohs surgery. It is important to engage patients undergoing Mohs surgery in shared decision-making discussions to determine the optimal pain control plan for each individual. These findings may encourage future research on the risks associated with long-term opioid use after Mohs surgery.

A retrospective case series of Mohs micrographic surgery and interdisciplinary management of female genital skin cancers: Local recurrence rates and patient-reported outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Conventional excision of female genital skin cancers has high rates of local recurrence and morbidity. Few publications describe local recurrence rates (LRRs) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for female genital skin cancers. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate LRRs, PROs, and interdisciplinary care after MMS for female genital skin cancers. METHODS: A retrospective case series was conducted of female genital skin cancers treated with MMS between 2006 and 2021 at an academic center. The primary outcome was local recurrence. Secondary outcomes were PROs and details of interdisciplinary care. RESULTS: Sixty skin cancers in 57 patients were treated with MMS. Common diagnoses included squamous cell cancer (n = 26), basal cell cancer (n = 12), and extramammary Paget disease (n = 11). Three local recurrences were detected with a mean follow-up of 61.1 months (median: 48.8 months). Thirty-one patients completed the PROs survey. Most patients were satisfied with MMS (71.0%, 22/31) and reported no urinary incontinence (93.5%, 29/31). Eight patients were sexually active at follow-up and 75.0% (6/8) experienced no sexual dysfunction. Most cases involved interdisciplinary collaboration 71.7% (43/60). LIMITATIONS: Limitations include the retrospective single-center design, heterogeneous cohort, and lack of preoperative function data. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating MMS into interdisciplinary teams may help achieve low LRRs and satisfactory function after genital skin cancer surgery.

Merkel Cell Carcinoma.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a neuroendocrine carcinoma that typically presents as a rapidly enlarging violaceous papulonodule on sun-damaged skin in elderly patients. MCC has high rates of local recurrence, metastasis, and poor survival. Treatment of the primary tumor involves surgical excision with possible adjuvant radiation therapy, whereas regional nodal disease is treated with some combination of lymph node dissection and radiation therapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as avelumab and pembrolizumab, are first-line agents for metastatic MCC. Monitoring for recurrence can be aided by Merkel cell polyomavirus oncoprotein antibody titers.

Cutaneous Oncology in the Immunosuppressed.

Patients with immunosuppressive conditions experience an increased frequency and severity of cutaneous malignancies. This article highlights management of keratinocyte carcinoma, melanoma, Merkel cell carcinoma, and Kaposi sarcoma in the setting of lymphoproliferative disorders, acquired immunodeficiencies, and organ transplantation. Advances in the safety of organ transplant recipient immunosuppression, early identification of risk factors, and new targeted therapies are improving skin cancer outcomes in immunocompromised populations.

One- and two-staged Pacman V-Y advancement flaps for defects of the head and neck: A review of 29 cases.

BACKGROUND: When traditional V-Y advancement flaps cannot span cutaneous defects, the modified Pacman™ V-Y advancement flap (Pacman™ VYAF) design increases its utility for challenging facial defects. OBJECTIVE: To describe the usage and surgical outcomes of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) defects repaired with the Pacman™ VYAF. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on MMS defects repaired with the Pacman™ VYAF in the division of dermatologic surgery at a large academic institution between January 01, 2013 and August 01, 2019. RESULTS: Twenty-nine instances of Pacman™ VYAF reconstructions were identified. Reconstruction of the cheek (22/29, 76%) was the most common, followed by the temple (4/29, 14%), and the post-auricular neck (3/29, 10%). Distal flap necrosis occurred more frequently in large Pacman™ VYAF repairs (6/29, 21% of cases), requiring surgical revision in 1 case. Surgical scars from the Pacman™ VYAF are rated favorably by dermatologic surgeons. CONCLUSION: The Pacman™ VYAF is a useful reconstruction option for surgical defects of the head and neck, and it is advantageous compared to traditional V-Y advancement flaps for defects with length greater than width.

A comparison of invasive squamous cell carcinoma greater than 1 year after treatment with 5-fluorouracil, imiquimod, or photodynamic therapy with aminolevulinic acid.

BACKGROUND: Studies comparing 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), imiquimod, and photodynamic therapy with aminolevulinic acid (PDT-ALA) have evaluated the efficacy of destroying actinic keratosis (AK). However, this end point may not directly translate to cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) prevention. No study to date has evaluated these field therapies for cSCC prevention in the long term, defined as greater than 1-year posttreatment. OBJECTIVE: Determine the time to surgically treat invasive cSCC development after treatment with 5-FU, imiquimod, or PDT-ALA beginning 1-year posttreatment. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart database from 2012 to 2019 RESULTS: The rate of cSCC development in patients treated with 5-FU showed no significant difference compared with imiquimod (0.99; 95% CI, 0.90-1.08). PDT-ALA was worse than 5-FU (1.27; 95% CI, 1.19-1.36) and imiquimod (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.17-1.43). Other known predictors of cSCC were consistent with previous literature. LIMITATIONS: The location of field therapy could not be determined with a claims database. CONCLUSIONS: 5-FU is not superior to imiquimod beginning 1 year posttreatment, despite previously demonstrated superior AK destruction efficacy, but was superior to PDT-ALA. Conflating AK destruction and cSCC prevention efficacy may not be appropriate. Future prospective studies should aim to use an end point of cSCC development.

Measuring Stakeholder Assessments of Postsurgical Facial Scars: A Retrospective Cohort Inter-rater Analysis of Patients, Physicians, and Medical Student Observers.

BACKGROUND: The relationship of postoperative facial scar assessments among patients, physicians, and societal onlookers is not clearly defined. OBJECTIVE: To identify differences in perceived scar outcomes by different stakeholders. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Retrospective cohort study at a single Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) center during which scars were assessed by: patients, physicians, and medical student observers not involved in patients' care using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (v.2). Eighty-one patients graded their scars at 2 visits: 1 to 2 weeks post-MMS and 3 months post-MMS. Deidentified patient photographs were taken at each visit and graded by 4 physicians and 12 observers. RESULTS: At week 1, there was a significant difference in overall opinion of scar appearance between patient and physicians (p = .001) and medical student observers and physicians (p < .001). Physicians graded scars more favorably. At 3 months, there remained a difference in scar evaluations between patient and physicians (p = .005), whereas medical student observers rated scars more similarly to physicians (p = .404). CONCLUSION: Postoperative scar perceptions differ among stakeholders. Physicians must be mindful of this disparity when counseling patients in the perioperative setting to align patient expectations with realistic scar outcomes.