Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Minerva Anestesiol ; 88(6): 516-523, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35199974

ABSTRACT

To date, there is still partial data on the effects of COVID-19 on pregnant women. The constant collection of information results in a continuous updating of the knowledge about the best management of pregnant patients affected by COVID-19. This work aimed to summarize the state of the art on prevention and management of SARS-CoV-2 infection in obstetric patients. This was enabled by a comprehensive literature search for the most recent and relevant publications on the subject, including guidelines and recommendations. Management of these women by a multidisciplinary team is of crucial importance, given the extreme clinical complexity of this condition. Every health worker involved must put in place all possible procedures to protect themselves from contagion. Neuraxial anesthesia should be favored in the management of labor and caesarean section over other modalities, unless there are contraindications based on the patient's status. There is still no standardized drug treatment in pregnant women with COVID-19 due to their exclusion from studies conducted to evaluate pharmacological therapies. Nevertheless, various drugs have been used to treat this disease in pregnancy, although the data at our disposal are still few. As regards mRNA vaccines, it seems that their immunogenicity, safety and tolerability in pregnant women are comparable to those of non-pregnant women of the same age. More studies are certainly needed in infected pregnant women to establish treatment and prevention protocols for this special category of patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Cesarean Section , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/therapy , SARS-CoV-2
2.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 24(3): 458-60, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20608807

ABSTRACT

Two groups of women have been retrospectively compared: 155 women who received analgesia and 1355 women who delivered without analgesia. The duration of the first stage, second stage, and total duration of labor was longer in epidural group, however epidural analgesia was not demonstrated as an independent risk factor for a prolonged labor. The variable most influencing the total duration of labor and the duration of the first stage was nulliparity; the variables most influencing the duration of the second stage were the older age, a reduced body mass index, a high newborn weight and nulliparity.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Epidural , Delivery, Obstetric , Labor, Obstetric , Adolescent , Adult , Analgesia, Epidural/adverse effects , Analgesia, Epidural/methods , Analgesia, Epidural/statistics & numerical data , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Analgesics/adverse effects , Analgesics/pharmacology , Case-Control Studies , Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Delivery, Obstetric/rehabilitation , Delivery, Obstetric/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Labor, Obstetric/drug effects , Labor, Obstetric/physiology , Middle Aged , Obstetric Labor Complications/epidemiology , Obstetric Labor Complications/etiology , Pregnancy , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL